National Fire Danger Rating System. NFDRS Basics Indicator of worst case fire danger Five danger classes –Low, moderate, high, very high, extreme Describes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wildland Fire Behavior
Advertisements

Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Los Padres National Forest
Forestry Understanding the Role of Fire in Forest Management.
BUSHFIRES IN AUSTRALIA
Eastern Great Basin May, June, July/August Monthly/Seasonal Outlook Shelby Law EGBCC Predictive Services Meteorologist.
Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Ressources naturelles Canada Service canadien des forêts Spatial Fire Management System Peter Englefield.
Evaluating landscape flammability through simulation modeling Marc Parisien 1, Victor Kafka 2, Bernie Todd 1, Kelvin Hirsch 1, and Suzanne Lavoie 1 1 Canadian.
Introduction to Wildland Fire Behavior
I’m so confused Sticks and Stones What’s burning? I smell smoke What the heck?
Introducing a Fire Danger Rating System for South Africa
Examining fire spread patterns across a managed forest-land mosaic in northern Wisconsin, USA using a modeling approach Jacob LaCroix, Daolan Zheng, Soung-Ryoul.
Interagency Prescribed Fire Training/ Fire Ecology and Management, University of Florida Ignition Techniques (adapted from FL DOF)
Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Wendy Gandy Resource Specialist Texas Forest Service.
Wildland Fire Decision Support Tools Managing Long Duration Wildfires Workshop Salt Lake City, UT April 30 – May 1, 2008 Missoula, MT May 6-7, 2008 Wildland.
Unit 8.
S-190 Introduction to Wildland Fire Behavior
Firefighter Refresher: Fuel Types and Suppression Tactics.
FIRE BEHAVIOR IN THE WILDLAND/URBAN INTERFACE An instructional presentation to accompany the video series from the National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire.
Roads, 2006 Firedanger Applications of NCEP's Downscaled** CFS Forecasts In the mid 90’s, USFS researchers (Fujioka) asked if we could develop routine.
Wildland Fire Today and in the Coming Decades: What Might We Expect? Scott Stephens ESPM - Division of Forest Science University of California, Berkeley.
Wildfires in Pennsylvania any unwanted fire that burns fields, grass, brush or forests. Wildfire is defined as… 2.
Raster models in GIS What is GIS modelingWhat is GIS modeling Why GIS modeling Why GIS modeling Raster models Raster models Binary models Binary models.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Calculating Daily Fire Danger Adjective Ratings for New York State Forest Rangers.
1 Spatially Explicit Burn Probability across A Landscape in Extreme Fire Weather Year Wenbin Cui, David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto.
Teacher Information! Necessary materials: PowerPoint Guide
Fire and Fire Safety Fires can be very useful in the outdoors if they are used right. Fires can be very useful in the outdoors if they are used right.
Unit 10 Fuel Moisture.
Eastern Great Basin July – October, 2014 Fire Potential Outlook Shelby Law EGBCC Predictive Services Meteorologist.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Day Outlook: Near Normal temperature for Central Arizona. Below Normal precipitation probability for Central/Northen.
FIRE BEHAVIOR. Surface fire: Ground: Crown: Three types of fire behavior Fuels at or near the surface Subsurface organic fuels (duff, organic soils) Tree.
Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Forest Fire Simulation - Principles, Models and Application
1 Fire Weather Science Fire Weather System Project EcoConnect-Fire Implementation, June 2013 April 2011.
S-190 Introduction to Wildland Fire Behavior. Why we feel fire behavior training is critical.
Geospatial Decision Support Tools: A Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC) Perspective Kim Kelly Northwest Wildland Fire Coordination Center & BIA.
20 Wildland and Ground Fires. 2 The Wildland Fire Triangle 20.
Determining and Distributing Real-Time Strategic-Scale Fire Danger Assessments Chris Woodall and Greg Liknes USDA North Central Research Station, Forest.
Basic Wildland Fire Management
Fire and Fuels 8/31/2010. OXYGEN HEAT FUEL THE FIRE TRIANGLE FIRE.
SCENERIO Hour fire weather forecast for: Monday, April 20 th, 2009 Dry weather will continue to hold over the area today Fire activity will remain.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Outlook for June is for Above Normal temperature and Normal precipitation probability.
Aspen stands: Fuel or Fuelbreak at a Landscape Scale?
Fire Danger MODIS direct broadcast data for enhanced forecasting and real-time environmental decision making.
Winter / Conifer Browning & Associated Potential Fire Hazard in Northwestern Ontario, 2012 Prepared by AFFES May 17, 2012.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK 6-10 Day Outlook: Below Normal temperature for Northern Arizona. Above Normal precipitation probability for Arizona.
Fire Behavior and Prescribed Fire. Heat Fuel Oxygen Fire Triangle.
8-1 MFIRS 8 Wildland Fire Module. 8-2 Optional Wildland Fire Module The State Fire Marshal will accept this data… Currently this module does not replace.
Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Fairbanks-North Star Borough CWPP Risk Assessment Update And Plan Evaluation.
Introduction to Fire Ecology. Consider the statement: “Fire is bad” – What do you think? Why? – Can you think of examples of when fire is good and bad?
2015 PNF P RECIPITATION. PNF W EATHER S TATION P RECIPITATION Crown King January - June Historic Normal: 8.21” Crown King January - June Year to.
“Burn Baby Burn!”.  Evidence of forest fires dates back 350 million years ago  It is a natural phenomenon  Initially, lightning was the sole cause.
T EMPERATURE /P RECIPITATION O UTLOOK Day Outlook: Below Normal temperature for Arizona. Normal precipitation probability for Central Arizona.
Wildland and Ground Fires
Cold Front Indicators Lines of cumulus clouds approaching from the west or northwest Large clouds of dust can precede the arrival of a.
Wildfires in Florida David T. Butry US Forest Service Marcia L. Gumpertz North Carolina State University Marc G. Genton Texas A&M University Funding provided.
Part 3: Bushfires SENIOR SCIENCE DISASTERS. IDENTIFY SOME OF THE CONDITIONS THAT CAN COMBINE TO TRIGGER A BUSHFIRE INCLUDING DRY WEATHER, HIGH TEMPERATURES.
Unit 2 – Fire Behavior. Unit 2 Objectives Define a fire triangle Affects of fire by: 1. Fuel volume 2. Fuel size 3. Fuel arrangement 4. Topography Define.
Forestry Science I Unit 4: Wildfires Lesson 2: Fire Behavior Prepared by Chad Bass December 5, 2001 To accompany Georgia Agriculture Education Curriculum.
Prescribed Fire in the Forest Ecosystem FORS 5610 / 7610 Location: Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center For more information: Dr. Pete Bettinger.
Ignition Techniques (adapted from FL DOF)
Large Fire Simulator (FSIM)
Fires in Nature.
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Fire Danger Signage at The Woods
Basic Fire Behavior Walt Thomson
Basic Fire Control Training
Presentation transcript:

National Fire Danger Rating System

NFDRS Basics Indicator of worst case fire danger Five danger classes –Low, moderate, high, very high, extreme Describes fire danger for large areas –10-10,000 acres –24 hour time period Used by fire suppression agencies to: –Plan staffing levels and preparedness –Determine management action (dispatch) –Set public use restrictions (campfires, spark-producing equip.)

NFDRS Calculations Local weather + Fuel moisture  Regional predictions –3 indices Burning Index (BI) Occurrence Index (OI) Fire Load Index (FLI) –3 fire behavior components Spread Component (SC) Ignition Component (IC) Energy Release Component (ERC) Software –FireFamilyPlus gives SC, ERC for public users –National Computer Center processes fire weather station info –Custom agency programs

NFDRS System

Fuel Model Equivalents A = 1, Western annual grassland C = 2, Open pine with grass B = 4, Mature brush H = 8, Short needle closed canopy normal dead U = 9, Western long needle pine G = 10, Short needle closed canopy heavy dead All 20 NFDRS fuel models can be cross- referenced with the 13 Anderson fuel models

NFDRS System

Spread Component (SC) Definition: –forward rate of spread at the head of the fire Units = feet/minute –Ex. If SC = 31, forward rate of spread is 31 feet/minute SC calculated using: –wind speed –slope –fine fuel moisture (including live herbaceous plants) –live woody fuel moisture (foliage and twigs)

Energy Release Component (ERC) Definition: – the potential available energy per square foot of flaming fire at the head of the fire. Similar to “intensity” Units = BTUs per square foot. Unlike SC, the ERC calculations require moisture inputs for the entire fuel complex. –1, 10, 100, 1000 hr and live fuel.

NFDRS System

Burning Index (BI) Definition: - 10 times the predicted flame length -Refers to the potential amount of effort needed to contain a single fire. Units = feet Calculated using a modified version of Byram's flame length equation –based on the Spread Component (SC) and the available energy (ERC)

Relationship between SC, ERC and BI

NFDRS System Ignition Component (IC)

Definition: = probability that a spreading fire will result if a firebrand (or other ignition source) comes into contact with fine fuels. IC ranges from 0 (cool, damp conditions) to 100 (dry, windy days). –If IC = 60, approximately 60% of all fire brands that come into contact with fuels will require suppression action. Live fuels reduce the efficiency of ignition, so the IC is adjusted based on the percentage of fine live fuel (herbaceous material).

NFDRS System Ignition Component (IC) Staffing Level and Adjective Class

Staffing Levels Determined using percentiles of a selected NFDRS component or index. –USFS uses the 90 th, 97th percentiles of ERC –BLM uses the 80 th, 95th percentiles of the BI. Percentiles are determined from statistical analysis of historical NFDRS components and indexes using frequency distribution tables and graphs.

Fire Danger Adjective Classes Low (L), Moderate (M), High (H), Very High (V), Extreme (E) Staffing Level Fire Danger Adjective 1LLLMM 2LMMMH 3MMHHV 4MHVVE 5HVVEE Ignition Component

Websites

Other Definitions Occurrence Index –Degree to which an area will be exposed to man-caused (MCOI) and lightning-caused (LCOI) ignition sources. –Scale of –Ex. OI = 100, expect 10 fires/million acres Fire Load Index –number relating the total amount of effort required to contain all probable fires within the rating area during a specified period of time. –The difficulty of containing a single fire (Burning Index) multiplied by the probable number of fires projected by the Occurrence Index (OI).

Adjective Class Definitions Low (L) = Fuels do not ignite readily from small firebrands although a more intense heat source, such as lightning, may start fires in duff or punky wood. Fires in open cured grasslands may bum freely a few hours after rain, but woods fires spread slowly by creeping or smoldering, and burn in irregular fingers. Moderate (M) = Fires can start from most accidental causes, but with the exception of lightning fires in some areas, the number of starts is generally low. Fires in open cured grasslands will burn briskly and spread rapidly on windy days. High (H) = All fine dead fuels ignite readily and fires start easily from most causes. Unattended brush and campfires are likely to escape. Very High (VH) = Fires start easily from all causes and, immediately after ignition, spread rapidly and increase quickly in intensity. Spot fires are a constant danger. Extreme (E) = Fires start quickly, spread furiously, and burn intensely. Direct attack is rarely possible and may be dangerous except immediately after ignition.