1 New Budget Model Spring 2007 Update. Spring 2007 2 Guiding Principles The institution’s values as expressed in the academic plan should inform and drive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Advertisements

Operating Budget Overview Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009 Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009.
TUITION & FEE PROPOSAL (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas Board of Regents (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas.
1 State University System Tuition and Fees. 2 Florida Tuition Within proviso in the General Appropriations Act and law, each board of trustees shall set.
M ARCH PASSHE Budget Status SRU Comparative Budgets 1 FY Fund Sources Tuition$58,951 State Appropriation$35,946 ARRA$3,099 Other$2,279 Auxiliaries.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
Darrel Covell, Assistant Director, Finance & Human Resources Jim Grady, Associate Director, Emeritus Responsibility Center Management at the University.
UW-Platteville Financial Overview October/November 2013 Robert Cramer - Vice Chancellor Cathy Riedl-Farrey - Director, Financial Services 1.
Overview of Ad-hoc Budget Review Committee Recommendations Dick Dietrich, Chair, Senate Fiscal Committee Prepared from multiple sources with appreciation.
Overall the recurring budget increase is $9.8 million. In addition, the budget has $9.5 million of carry forward funds. This budget reflects no tuition.
Performance Based Funding Formula. SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2.
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Presentation to UTSA Staff Council June 26, 2008 Janet Parker, Associate.
Financial Overview and Budget Recommendations David Cummins Vice President for Finance and Administration/CFO Mike Sherman Senior Vice President and Provost;
Budget 101: Athens Campus Budget Orientation
1 Overview of NACUBO Cost of College Model January 7, 2004 Presented by: Nancy D. Suttenfield Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration.
Tuition & Aid Advisory Board A Discussion of UCB Priorities and Funding Strategies September 27, 2004.
1 The FY 2006 Budget Request and Future Impacts Strategic Planning Study Session January 20, 2005.
Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.
David Proulx, Assistant Vice President for Financial Planning and Budgeting Budget Office Website:
1 Budget Model Update #2 Resources Implementation Team.
1 Budget Model Update Resources Implementation Team.
Financial Issues in Higher Education Dr. David F. Finney.
University Budget Models Session Chair: Marsha Weinraub Breakout Session 1, Madero A COGDOP Annual Meeting San Antonio, TX February 20, 2015.
UAccess Symposium April Agenda General overview of RCM Overview of the model and UA budget composition 2.
1 The Ohio State University Budgeting Basics Presented by: John Kuhar, Financial Planning & Analysis Henry Zheng, Office of Academic Affairs.
A & S SRI Presentation Spring 2015 Thomas Nenon. A&S SRI Basic Facts The implementation of the SRI at the University of Memphis will not involve any automatic.
Understanding Subsidy Budget Planning Council
Academic Budget Presentation March 4, FY05 University Budget Unit Description NonExempt BudgetExempt Budget Total Budget President's Units 2,121,8942%
May 15, 2009 Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Fiscal Forum 1.
Campus Budget Update October 12, Tuition Proposed Tuition Rates: + 2.5% Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Undergraduate Resident $ $
UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 Legislative Appropriations.
Responsibility Centered Management (RCM) Case Study: Engineering and Technology By H. Öner Yurtseven Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis.
Campus Budget Update December 7, State Appropriations Operating Recommendations: 6.1% ($1,623,145) Performance Incentives.
Sheri Austin Assistant Vice President, University Budgets Office of the Chief Financial Officer Academic Administrators Seminar Series October 2011.
2008 Budget Forum 2008 BUDGET FORUM Larry A. Nielsen Provost Executive Vice Chancellor Charles D. Leffler Vice Chancellor Finance & Business Terri Lomax.
A Glance Back  We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from:  Declining state appropriations  Pressure.
The board of each community college district shall within or before the first quarter of each fiscal year, adopt an annual budget which it deems necessary.
General Budget Orientation and Discussion Mr. Gavin Leach, Vice President for Finance and Administration.
April, 2005 Texas Public University Cost Study. April, 2005 Charge To develop a defensible and acceptable “Instruction and Operations Formula” Matrix.
Function Codes in the General Ledger University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Quick Guide to Divisional Budget Planning Tool – Undergraduate (DBPT-UG)
College Update Fall 2013 Sarah A. Rajala Dean James & Katherine Melsa Professor of Engineering.
Consistent distribution of revenues and costs Distribute revenues to units Units pay for all the costs associated with their programs Eliminate the “General.
Costs of Central Services 1 T HE P AST : T RYING TO LOOK THROUGH DEEPLY TINTED GLASS U NIVERSITY F INANCIAL M ODEL Personnel Costs Endowment Income Actual.
Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614)
UW-Platteville Financial Overview November 2012 Robert Cramer - Vice Chancellor Cathy Riedl-Farrey - Director, Financial Services 1.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY Budget and Budget Process.
THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | ELLER COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT RCM BUDGETING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA OCTOBER 5, 2015.
WACTC 2014 Allocation and Accountability Recommendations - Briefing SBCTC October 2014.
Budget Summary Town Hall Report September 22 & 23, 2009.
January Cal Poly Budget Presentation UPBAC January 2009.
1 U NIVERSITY F INANCIAL M ODEL UPDATE A UGUST 27, 2014.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Florida International University G-51 April 9, 2010.
Winter Symposium January 20, Why are we here today? To discuss ways that we can take control of our future and make the outcomes we desire more.
Responsibility Centered Management APAC Presentation August 26, 2013 Jim Florian, AVP Provost Office.
INCENTIVE FUNDING UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Created on 2/17/2016.
© 2015 Boise State University1 Boise State University Bronco Budget 2.0 Committee Ken Kline AVP, Budget and Planning.
December Town Hall Tuition Planning Presentation FY17- FY20 December 3, 2015.
UAccess Symposium March Who am I? What do I do? Native of Maryland BS, James Madison University MBA, Eller College of Management, University of.
Budget Overview 2016 New Department Chairs Workshop
FY18 Budget Planning Council Orientation
Fiscal Management.
CALS Faculty Senate Financial Review – April 2017
Breakfast for Progress
at the University of Virginia
Responsibility Centered Management (RCM): A New Budget Model
Central Washington University
Presentation transcript:

1 New Budget Model Spring 2007 Update

Spring Guiding Principles The institution’s values as expressed in the academic plan should inform and drive budgetary decisions. The institution’s values as expressed in the academic plan should inform and drive budgetary decisions. While the new budget model will link resources with revenue generating activity and total costs, it is simply a tool for the allocation of limited resources in a way that serves and supports the academic mission of the University. While the new budget model will link resources with revenue generating activity and total costs, it is simply a tool for the allocation of limited resources in a way that serves and supports the academic mission of the University. Different programs require different levels of resources and resource allocation decisions must be made to maximize academic quality, while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Different programs require different levels of resources and resource allocation decisions must be made to maximize academic quality, while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

Spring Academic Quality Indicators Number of Tenure-Track Faculty Number of Tenure-Track Faculty Tenure-Track Faculty Credit Hour Production Tenure-Track Faculty Credit Hour Production Research and Creative Activity Production Research and Creative Activity Production Minimal Course Duplication Minimal Course Duplication Controlling Section Size Controlling Section Size Controlling Grade Inflation Controlling Grade Inflation Incoming Student Profile Incoming Student Profile Program Accreditation Program Accreditation Support for Honors Programs Support for Honors Programs Interdisciplinary Programs Interdisciplinary Programs

Spring Elements of the Budget Model Revenue Attribution Revenue Attribution State Investment in Instruction (SII) State Investment in Instruction (SII) Undergraduate Tuition Undergraduate Tuition Non-Resident Surcharge Non-Resident Surcharge Graduate Tuition & Non-Resident Surcharge Graduate Tuition & Non-Resident Surcharge Success Challenge Success Challenge Indirect Cost Recovery Indirect Cost Recovery Headcount Majors Headcount Majors General Fee General Fee

Spring Elements of the Budget Model Cost Allocation Cost Allocation Direct Budgets Direct Budgets Undergraduate Scholarships Undergraduate Scholarships Graduate Fee Waivers Graduate Fee Waivers Employee Fee Waivers Employee Fee Waivers Space Costs (Custodial, Maintenance, Utilities) Space Costs (Custodial, Maintenance, Utilities) Enrollment-related (Registrar, Fin Aid, Admissions) Enrollment-related (Registrar, Fin Aid, Admissions) Overheads (Library, Research, Administration, Overheads (Library, Research, Administration, Supported Academic Units) Supported Academic Units)

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) New Taxonomy = 26 Models New Taxonomy = 26 Models Groupings of disciplines with similar costs - Arts / Humanities (AH), Business / Education / Social Science (BES), Science / Technology / Engineering / Math / Medicine (STEMM) Groupings of disciplines with similar costs - Arts / Humanities (AH), Business / Education / Social Science (BES), Science / Technology / Engineering / Math / Medicine (STEMM) 13 Undergraduate 13 Undergraduate 9 Masters 9 Masters 2 Doctoral 2 Doctoral 2 Medical 2 Medical

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) ModelCostSIITuition AH1 $6,993$2,132$4,862 AH2 $9,108$2,776$6,336 AH3 $11,760$3,585$8,176 AH4 $17,121$5,219$11,902 AH5 $26,529$10,108$16,421 AH6 $32,868$12,524$20,344 Example Model Costs

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) Uniform Share Uniform Share 31% on Undergraduate 31% on Undergraduate 38% of cost of Graduate Costs 38% of cost of Graduate Costs Additional STEMM weighting Additional STEMM weighting The remainder of the cost would be obtained through tuition, but tuition is not differential depending on discipline cost The remainder of the cost would be obtained through tuition, but tuition is not differential depending on discipline cost For some disciplines we collect more from tuition and subsidy than the total cost while for others we do not collect enough to cover costs For some disciplines we collect more from tuition and subsidy than the total cost while for others we do not collect enough to cover costs Key Concepts

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) Doctoral Subsidy ModelCostSIITuition DOC1 $30,230$14,832$15,397 DOC2$33,265$22,249$11,016

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) Doctoral Subsidy Revenue Doctoral Subsidy Revenue is capped - $11,431,753 for Ohio University Doctoral Subsidy Revenue is capped - $11,431,753 for Ohio University Our FTE target is 791 FTE (in Doc 1 terms) Our FTE target is 791 FTE (in Doc 1 terms) As long as you maintain 85% of this target, the full revenue is received. As long as you maintain 85% of this target, the full revenue is received. We have 771 FTE or 97% of our target. We have 771 FTE or 97% of our target. Therefore, if we maintain at least 673 FTE our full revenue will be received Therefore, if we maintain at least 673 FTE our full revenue will be received If we add more FTE at the Doctoral level, we will not receive any additional revenue. If we add more FTE at the Doctoral level, we will not receive any additional revenue.

Spring Complete SII Model List

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) This is a closed system – fixed appropriation shared across all institutions. This is a closed system – fixed appropriation shared across all institutions. Growth in FTE may or may not result in additional revenue – depends on what everyone else does. Growth in FTE may or may not result in additional revenue – depends on what everyone else does. STEMM weighting is supposed to be phased out over time. STEMM weighting is supposed to be phased out over time. Doctoral subsidy is capped – more FTE simply fragments the same revenue across more units. Doctoral subsidy is capped – more FTE simply fragments the same revenue across more units. Issues to Understand

Spring State Share of Instruction (SII) $75,065,948 is earned by credit hour (FTE) production – by formula $75,065,948 is earned by credit hour (FTE) production – by formula $55,023,722 Undergraduate $55,023,722 Undergraduate $20,042,226 Graduate $20,042,226 Graduate In addition In addition $11,431,753 Doctoral $11,431,753 Doctoral $10,653,810 Medical $10,653,810 Medical Next Step: Next Step: Determine FTEs (OH Residents only) produced by each college by each model Determine FTEs (OH Residents only) produced by each college by each model

Spring SII Allocations to Colleges Based on 3-Year Eligible (OH) FTE Average

Spring SII Allocations to Colleges Based on 3-Year Eligible (OH) FTE Average

Spring SII Allocations to Colleges Based on 3-Year Eligible FTE Average Doctoral Subsidy Allocation

Spring Tuition Allocation Since tuition is flat while the costs vary by discipline, the tuition will be attributed on the basis of weights. Since tuition is flat while the costs vary by discipline, the tuition will be attributed on the basis of weights. New set of weights based on statewide average (6-year) model costs. New set of weights based on statewide average (6-year) model costs. BES1=Undergrad Base BES1=Undergrad Base BES5 = Grad Base BES5 = Grad Base

Spring Tuition Allocation Financial Aid Undergraduate student financial aid will be deducted “off-the-top” so all units share proportionally in this tuition reduction. Undergraduate student financial aid will be deducted “off-the-top” so all units share proportionally in this tuition reduction. Avoids creating a perverse incentive for units to turn away students because they have financial need. Avoids creating a perverse incentive for units to turn away students because they have financial need. Graduate fee waiving is treated differently across programs. Waivers will be “charged” to the unit (academic support as well as academic colleges) generating the stipend Graduate fee waiving is treated differently across programs. Waivers will be “charged” to the unit (academic support as well as academic colleges) generating the stipend Puts the decision to waive tuition with the unit. Puts the decision to waive tuition with the unit.

Spring Tuition Allocation Non-Resident Surcharge Non-Resident Surcharge is conceptually linked to making up for subsidy missing from out-of-state students. Non-Resident Surcharge is conceptually linked to making up for subsidy missing from out-of-state students. Since weighting for subsidy and tuition differ within the STEMM models, undergraduate non-resident surcharge income will be allocated to the units using the subsidy weights. Since weighting for subsidy and tuition differ within the STEMM models, undergraduate non-resident surcharge income will be allocated to the units using the subsidy weights. At the graduate level, there are very few non-residents since nearly all graduate students apply for residency. This means they bring in subsidy. At the graduate level, there are very few non-residents since nearly all graduate students apply for residency. This means they bring in subsidy. Almost all non-resident surcharges are waived for graduate students so graduate non-resident surcharge income will simply be lumped in with tuition. Almost all non-resident surcharges are waived for graduate students so graduate non-resident surcharge income will simply be lumped in with tuition.

Spring Tuition Allocation Revenues Financial aid removed proportionally from the instructional fee (tuition) and non-resident fee at the undergraduate level. Financial aid removed proportionally from the instructional fee (tuition) and non-resident fee at the undergraduate level. At the graduate level, instructional and non- resident fees are lumped together. At the graduate level, instructional and non- resident fees are lumped together. Note that ultimately only about 14% of graduate tuition is actually collected. Note that ultimately only about 14% of graduate tuition is actually collected.

Spring Tuition Allocation Based on 3-Year All FTE Average Note: There are some small allocations to HTC, INST and OST not shown here As Earned

Spring Tuition Allocation Based on 3-Year All FTE Average Note: There are some small allocations to HTC, INST and OST not shown here Using Weighted SCH Change = variation from As-Earned

Spring Non-Resident Surcharge Allocation Based on 3-Year InEligible (Non-OH) FTE Average Note: There are some small allocations to HTC, INST and OST not shown here Undergraduate Only – Using Subsidy Weights Weighting Effect = variation from As-Earned

Spring Success Challenge Allocation Earned by a combination of graduating At-Risk students and graduating students in four years.

Spring Indirect Cost Recovery This is the overhead charged to some types of grants. This is the overhead charged to some types of grants. Currently held centrally and used to support research startup, research incentive and research investment programs run by the VP Research. Currently held centrally and used to support research startup, research incentive and research investment programs run by the VP Research. This is somewhat variable since it depends on which grants are funded and is earned as expenditures are made on the grant. This is somewhat variable since it depends on which grants are funded and is earned as expenditures are made on the grant. These funds are currently split among the VP Research, Principle Investigators, Departments/Centers, and Colleges. These funds are currently split among the VP Research, Principle Investigators, Departments/Centers, and Colleges. Need to determine if anything should be pooled centrally to support inter-disciplinary efforts. This shows the effect of complete distribution to units.

Spring Tuition Distribution by Head Count Costs associated with recruiting, advising and retaining majors are not reflected in number of student credit hours generated by a unit. Costs associated with recruiting, advising and retaining majors are not reflected in number of student credit hours generated by a unit. Many of these systems distribute tuition revenue partially on credit hours generated and partially on the number of headcount majors. Many of these systems distribute tuition revenue partially on credit hours generated and partially on the number of headcount majors. This reflects the additional costs to units housing the major of a student and provides incentive to attract and retain majors as well as offer service courses. This reflects the additional costs to units housing the major of a student and provides incentive to attract and retain majors as well as offer service courses. Current weighting will be 85% on SCH and 15% on Heads Current weighting will be 85% on SCH and 15% on Heads

Spring Combined Revenue Allocation

Spring General Fee General Fee revenues and expenditures are being separately tracked and budgeted. General Fee revenues and expenditures are being separately tracked and budgeted. Increases in costs of supported services (raises, minimum wage, benefits, etc) as well as changes in services offered will drive annual changes in the General Fee. Increases in costs of supported services (raises, minimum wage, benefits, etc) as well as changes in services offered will drive annual changes in the General Fee. Enrollment fluctuations will also require adjustments in funding levels for these activities. Enrollment fluctuations will also require adjustments in funding levels for these activities. In addition to these direct costs, costs associated with space, waivers, etc will also be associated. In addition to these direct costs, costs associated with space, waivers, etc will also be associated.

Spring Cost Allocation - Space There is currently over $31 million needed to operate our physical facilities – Plant Operations and Maintenance (POM) There is currently over $31 million needed to operate our physical facilities – Plant Operations and Maintenance (POM) Custodial - $9.7 M Custodial - $9.7 M Maintenance – $9.3 M Maintenance – $9.3 M Utilities – $10.8 M Utilities – $10.8 M With all revenues now allocated to the academic units, these POM costs would be “charged” to these units - possibily in proportion to the percentage of space they control With all revenues now allocated to the academic units, these POM costs would be “charged” to these units - possibily in proportion to the percentage of space they control These are NOT costs associated with building and renovating space - separate Capital budget These are NOT costs associated with building and renovating space - separate Capital budget

Spring Cost Allocation - Space All space is coded by type and associated with a department All space is coded by type and associated with a department All Non-assignable square footage is removed to produce Net Assignable Square Feet (NASF) All Non-assignable square footage is removed to produce Net Assignable Square Feet (NASF) 4,930,590 total square feet 4,930,590 total square feet 3,733,395 NASF 3,733,395 NASF Additional reductions to NASF could be made for space not receiving custodial or maintenance service (hangers, garages, facility shops, HDL, Ridges, Etc). Additional reductions to NASF could be made for space not receiving custodial or maintenance service (hangers, garages, facility shops, HDL, Ridges, Etc). Just a partial list

Spring Cost Allocation - Space Part of the POM (custodial and maintenance) costs are shared with the Residence & Dining Hall (R&DH) Auxiliary and there are direct payments from R&DH for facilities personnel as part of their overhead. R&DH Utilities are separate. The impact of R&DH space on POM costs will have to be separated. Part of the POM (custodial and maintenance) costs are shared with the Residence & Dining Hall (R&DH) Auxiliary and there are direct payments from R&DH for facilities personnel as part of their overhead. R&DH Utilities are separate. The impact of R&DH space on POM costs will have to be separated. 100% of athletic grounds costs are attributed to the general fee. 100% of athletic grounds costs are attributed to the general fee. Still some debate about how to deal with units required to maintain relatively large amounts of space to support the university research goals. Still some debate about how to deal with units required to maintain relatively large amounts of space to support the university research goals. Still some debate about whether the quality of space should be considered when allocating space costs. Still some debate about whether the quality of space should be considered when allocating space costs. Should there be another allocation factor instead of or in addition to NASF? Should there be another allocation factor instead of or in addition to NASF? Outstanding Issues

Spring Costs – Employee Fee Waivers Treated as a benefit like health care as opposed to “charging” units for actual use. Treated as a benefit like health care as opposed to “charging” units for actual use. $6,536,000 annual cost $6,536,000 annual cost 3855 eligible employees 3855 eligible employees ~$1700 per employee ~$1700 per employee Some minor units are omitted from this display.

Spring Cost – Graduate Fee Waivers Graduate Fee Waivers will be matched with the source of the stipend generating the waiver: Graduate Fee Waivers will be matched with the source of the stipend generating the waiver: College controlled waivers College controlled waivers Special Summer Special Summer Non-Resident Non-Resident Research Waivers Research Waivers Of the $31 million in graduate tuition, $23 million is not collected – i.e. waived Of the $31 million in graduate tuition, $23 million is not collected – i.e. waived

Spring Cost – Graduate Fee Waivers About $10 M is allocated to colleges and therefore controlled About $10 M is allocated to colleges and therefore controlled Research Waivers vary depending on grants that hit Research Waivers vary depending on grants that hit Non-Resident varies based on international enrollments Non-Resident varies based on international enrollments Summer is nearly 100% waived Summer is nearly 100% waived This is an approximation based on waivers. Under the model, waivers could be a direct budget cost to an academic support unit or could be a direct deduction from graduate tuition attributed to an academic unit.

Spring College Direct Costs vs. Overhead Costs associated with college budgets, technology fees, space, employee waivers and graduate fee waivers can be directly associated with college activities. Costs associated with college budgets, technology fees, space, employee waivers and graduate fee waivers can be directly associated with college activities. All the rest of the costs associated with the general fund budget would also need to be funded through the revenues associated with the academic colleges. All the rest of the costs associated with the general fund budget would also need to be funded through the revenues associated with the academic colleges. This includes enrollment-related functions, the library, the VP Research and general administrative costs. This includes enrollment-related functions, the library, the VP Research and general administrative costs. Today, the tuition and subsidy revenue generated by the colleges supports the operation of those colleges, all POM costs and all these overhead costs. Today, the tuition and subsidy revenue generated by the colleges supports the operation of those colleges, all POM costs and all these overhead costs. Since all the revenue has now be associated with the colleges, these overhead costs also need to be divided up among the colleges. That division is also under debate. Since all the revenue has now be associated with the colleges, these overhead costs also need to be divided up among the colleges. That division is also under debate.

Spring Enrollment-Driven Overhead Costs 4.6M in costs for the Registrar, Admissions and Financial Aid (budget, space, fee waivers, etc) could be allocated to the colleges based on the number of undergraduate majors in that college. 4.6M in costs for the Registrar, Admissions and Financial Aid (budget, space, fee waivers, etc) could be allocated to the colleges based on the number of undergraduate majors in that college. 1.2M in costs to operate graduate programs (OGSS budget, space, waivers, etc) could be allocated to the colleges based on the number of graduate majors in that college. 1.2M in costs to operate graduate programs (OGSS budget, space, waivers, etc) could be allocated to the colleges based on the number of graduate majors in that college.

Spring Library and Research Overhead Costs Library costs are $12.4M (budget, space, waivers, etc) Library costs are $12.4M (budget, space, waivers, etc) VP Research costs are $6M (budget, space, waivers, etc) VP Research costs are $6M (budget, space, waivers, etc) Includes Eminent Scholars, Applied Ethics Institute, Innovation Center and Animal Care in addition to Research Compliance, Grant Writing and Office of Research and Sponsored programs. Includes Eminent Scholars, Applied Ethics Institute, Innovation Center and Animal Care in addition to Research Compliance, Grant Writing and Office of Research and Sponsored programs. Both could be allocated to academic units in proportion to their percentage of the total academic revenue (tuition, subsidy, IDC). Both could be allocated to academic units in proportion to their percentage of the total academic revenue (tuition, subsidy, IDC). About 25% of the VPR costs could be allocated in proportion to grant activity – tradeoff between simplicity and accuracy. Incentive for units not utilizing these services would be for them to start doing so. About 25% of the VPR costs could be allocated in proportion to grant activity – tradeoff between simplicity and accuracy. Incentive for units not utilizing these services would be for them to start doing so.

Spring Administrative Overhead Costs Administrative costs include President, Provost, VP Finance/Administration, Advancement, and IT. Administrative costs include President, Provost, VP Finance/Administration, Advancement, and IT. $46.6M cost (budget, space, waivers, etc) represents a 20% “tax rate” on $236.3M in academic unit revenues – comparable to the OSU 19% rate. $46.6M cost (budget, space, waivers, etc) represents a 20% “tax rate” on $236.3M in academic unit revenues – comparable to the OSU 19% rate. These costs could be allocated to academic units in proportion to their percentage of the total academic revenue (comprised of tuition, subsidy, IDC). These costs could be allocated to academic units in proportion to their percentage of the total academic revenue (comprised of tuition, subsidy, IDC).

Spring General Fee – Total Picture With allocations for space (if done on NASF) and waivers, we could identify general fee related expenditures equal to the amount collected. With allocations for space (if done on NASF) and waivers, we could identify general fee related expenditures equal to the amount collected. This will always be an inexact calculation. This will always be an inexact calculation. Under cultural activities we could add part of WOUB Under cultural activities we could add part of WOUB Splitting units between general and instructional fee sources is more accurate but creates two funding systems with two budget processes. There is a tradeoff between simplicity and accuracy. Splitting units between general and instructional fee sources is more accurate but creates two funding systems with two budget processes. There is a tradeoff between simplicity and accuracy. In general, there are more than enough services offered to justify the current level of general fee. In general, there are more than enough services offered to justify the current level of general fee. Connecting these major areas to this funding stream will help facilitate a strategic use the fee. Connecting these major areas to this funding stream will help facilitate a strategic use the fee.

Spring Outstanding Issues Should part of VP Research costs be allocated in proportion to grant activity – problem with Grant Accounting being mixed in with VP Finance & Admin? Should part of VP Research costs be allocated in proportion to grant activity – problem with Grant Accounting being mixed in with VP Finance & Admin? What to do with mixed service / academic areas like Wellworks, Child Development Center, Voinovich Center, WOUB. Could be shared across colleges in proportion to revenue like other overheads or allocated in some other proportion? What to do with mixed service / academic areas like Wellworks, Child Development Center, Voinovich Center, WOUB. Could be shared across colleges in proportion to revenue like other overheads or allocated in some other proportion? Should supported academic units (Honors Tutorial College and International Studies be shared across colleges in proportion to revenue like other overheads or allocated in some other proportion? Should supported academic units (Honors Tutorial College and International Studies be shared across colleges in proportion to revenue like other overheads or allocated in some other proportion? Should both need-based and merit scholarships be shared across the board or should merit scholarships be linked to programs differentially? Should both need-based and merit scholarships be shared across the board or should merit scholarships be linked to programs differentially?

Spring Units “Outside” the Model Residence and Dining Hall (R&DH), University Outreach and Regional Campuses (UORC) Parking Services and Osteopathic Medicine pay overheads into the Athens General Fund Budget. Residence and Dining Hall (R&DH), University Outreach and Regional Campuses (UORC) Parking Services and Osteopathic Medicine pay overheads into the Athens General Fund Budget. These overhead rates need to be reviewed in relationship to the Budget Model – perhaps using a new overhead cost study to determine the impact of each of these units on various parts of the Athens operation (facilities, library, administration, enrollment services, etc) These overhead rates need to be reviewed in relationship to the Budget Model – perhaps using a new overhead cost study to determine the impact of each of these units on various parts of the Athens operation (facilities, library, administration, enrollment services, etc) Should subsidy and tuition associated with LifeLong Learning continue to be allocated directly to that unit? Should subsidy and tuition associated with LifeLong Learning continue to be allocated directly to that unit? The distribution of tuition and subsidy from Resource Distribution Programs (regional graduate programs) needs to be reviewed to determine relative contributions from UORC and Academic Colleges and their roles in the programs. The distribution of tuition and subsidy from Resource Distribution Programs (regional graduate programs) needs to be reviewed to determine relative contributions from UORC and Academic Colleges and their roles in the programs.