Practical customer service in universities - is it all bunk? The outcomes of a project examining theory and practice in UKHE.
Aims of the session Present results of the LFHE project Highlight case studies Introduce some practical ways of engaging staff with some key issues
Project aims Look at underlying theory and practice Look at the particular situation in HE and what Institutions do about it Provide information and resources to help people decide how to approach customer service issues in HEIs
Universities are different…? Who are your customers? What is a service? Why are you here?
The University Students + their sponsors HESA, Funders etc Enterprise partners etc Local & regional community etc Each other
So… is it all bunk? Empirical data Three main areas of research Service logic Social exchange theory The service quality construct
Service logic Service provision not uniform In HE: The student experience Supplementary services Core services
Social exchange theory The customer experience is a co-created product “The product or service students acquire derives value from their striving to achieve it…” Customer-customer interaction is important – sense of shared responsibility
Service Quality Construct Service quality and its perceptions are tied to: –Outcome –Environment –Interaction
Filling the gaps Promises made Intentions in service design Understanding of customer expectations What the customer really expects Reality experienced Standards of service as it operates Intentions of the service design Understanding of customer expectations
Organisational culture No appreciable recognition of customer relationship. Level 1 Level 2 Pockets of awareness, informal response to customers. Level 3 Formalised customer sampling in some areas. Level 4 Aware of need to provide better service. Level 5 Strategic initiatives geared to delivery and measuring customer satisfaction across Institution
Imperial Customer Service Academy 5* Research is not enough: developing the best for everyone
Pressures for change World class reputation, but: Hovering below the mid-point of NSS Bureaucratic procedures Need for cross-departmental collaboration Want a more supportive environment Average level 2 in terms of awareness
Finding a focus Overall importance of student experience Early success in development of catering and retail outlets Senior champions Desire for long-term change Practical orientation Predated Clive’s research
Developing a model Successful internal DLM programme Yale Academy Customer Service Institute Local exemplars What we had done already
The plan Cross-College representation Mixed status teams Sponsoring Managers Internally driven External consultancy support Online forum for sustained participation
Programme Launch – surprise sampling of customer service Seven one-day events Introduction – where we are now Establishing a baseline and raising expectations Measuring opinions Handling difficulties etc Presentations and finale
Changes to plan Response to rapidly deteriorating climate Project overload Summertime slippage
Project examples Internal measures of customer satisfaction Improved use of video conferencing Signage and personalisation of department College Open Day Graduation
Review and Learning: Next Steps Keep it simpler – no mixing of groups Engage better with Sponsoring Managers Encourage participation of ‘champions’ Identify projects from outset Recruit from within a division to create closer focus Run a shorter programme
Early Indications More than half logged on in advance Sponsoring Mangers engaged in first two days All turned up an hour early on day two Enthusiastic interpretation of ‘rules’ on first day
Meet the gaps between expectation and reality Focus on changing attitudes as well as getting systems and processes right Get the basics in place Engage Senior Management Use a framework Employ someone to oversee it all Monitor constantly Offer skills development In conclusion