Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Frameworks for Assessment of Student Learning: Questions of Concept, Practice, and Detail Christine Siegel, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Psychology.
Department of Education Professional Education Unit Assessment System September 2008.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
+ School Psychology Program MISSION Program Overview Structure and Curriculum Sequence Program Highlights Clinical Faculty Cohort Assessment System Use.
Exit Portfolio of Your name Area of Licensure Completion date 2011.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Assessment of Student Teaching and Internships Sam Evans Western Kentucky University 9/26/02.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
How Are Teacher Education Institutions Using Data to Improve Programs? Lessons Learned from the SUNY Teacher Education Program Assessment FIPSE Project,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Achievement Portfolio
Navigating Murky Waters The Challenge of Assessing Preservice Teacher Dispositions Dr. Anne B. Bucalos and Dr. Christine G. Price Bellarmine University.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
Tk20 CampusTools HigherEd. What is it? An assessment, accountability and management system to help colleges of education meet requirements for accreditation.
TWS Aids for Student Teachers & Interns Overview of TWS.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Introduction to the Teacher Work Sample Portfolio Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
NCATE Vocabulary Candidates--university/college students
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Valley City State University School of Education and Graduate Studies Aggregate Assessment Data Please click on the action boxes to navigate your way through.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
Commitment to Diversity
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
NJCU College of Education
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program

Assessment Plan: Five Collection Points Provisional Program Admission Professional Core Levels Formal Program Admission Program Completion Post-Graduation Follow-up

Provisional Program Admission GPA:  3.0 or higher in general ed/3.25 last 30 hours CAAP test:  reading, writing, essay, mathematics Faculty Interview:  40 points from 3 faculty members University Competencies: English, communication, computer literacy, quantitative literacy.

Professional Core Levels Minimum GPA requirements:  3.0 in college work  B- or above in professional core courses Critical Performance Indicators (CPIs) based on INTASC Standards:  Program Disposition evaluation  Level defined performances  Portfolio evaluation

Program Dispositions NCATE defines dispositions as the “values, commitments, and professional ethics that influence behaviors toward students, families, colleagues, and communities and affect student learning, motivation, and development as well as the educator’s own professional growth.” There are nine dispositions adopted by the WSU Teacher Education Program. Candidates are evaluated at the end of each level by the level faculty and in clinical practice by the university supervisor, content supervisor, and collaborating teacher.

Program Dispositions Positive Attitude Caring/Responsive Ethical/Responsible Inclusive Flexible Collegial Reflective/Resourceful Poised Teachable

Critical Performance Indicators (CPIs) Each of the program levels have defined critical performances based upon INTASC Standards that candidates should meet upon completion of the level. These indicators look at candidates’ knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the level as a whole. While the artifacts used for identifying student performance come from individual requirements for level course work, they do not replace grades in the level courses.

Teacher Work Sample (TWS) Enables teacher candidates to demonstrate teaching performances directly related to planning, implementing, assessing student learning and evaluating teaching and learning for a standards- based instructional unit. Provides opportunity for candidates to develop, organize, implement, assess, and reflect upon instruction in their assigned subject and grade level. Focuses on student achievement and competence in knowledge and skills and provides credible evidence of a candidate’s ability to facilitate learning of all students.

Components of the Teacher Work Sample Contextual Factors Objectives/Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan Design for Instruction Instructional Decision-Making Analysis of Student Learning Reflection and Self-Evaluation

Use of the Teacher Work Sample In all levels the TWS, or its individual components, are used to evaluate candidates’ performance of level CPI’s. Required components in each level are tied to course content and design of field experiences. The teaching of at least one complete TWS is required during clinical practice.

Formal Program Admission State defined content area Praxis tests (Required for USOE licensure). Candidates in all disciplines must take Praxis II content test in both academic majors and minors prior to admission to clinical practice.

Program Completion Clinical Practice Final Evaluations based on INTASC Standards Development and teaching of at least one TWS in clinical practice classroom INTASC Portfolio designed around the INTASC Standards Program Exit Surveys

Post-Graduation Follow-up Graduate survey  Based on the INTASC Standards assessed during clinical practice.  Mailed to graduates first three years after graduation from program.