Cassandra Rutherford Master of Science Candidate Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Identifying Bridge Scour Susceptibility:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Advertisements

An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
SANITARY SEWER EXFILTRATION & INFILTRATION RISK ASSESSMENT Meredith S. Moore Penn State MGIS Program Advisor: Dr. Barry Evans GEOG 596A, Fall 2014.
Looking for Prairie Remnants: Jo Daviess County Illinois Prairie Site Evaluation A Community Based Learning Project –Applying GIS –Margaret Grommes, student.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Floodplain Delineation of Indiana Streams Allison Craddock Tom Gormley Jessica Tempest Erin Wenger.
Harris County (Fig. 3) was chosen as the area of study for this project. The three phases described in the methodology above was used for this area. Six.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Muskegon Watershed Research Partnership The vision: Collaborative,Integrated, Relevant Science for a better future
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Describe the HEC-River Analysis System (RAS) Model Utilize HEC Geo-RAS to import data into.
Josh Peschel Master of Science Candidate
Geographic Information Systems : Data Types, Sources and the ArcView Program.
Automated “integrated Simplified Inundation Mapping (iSIM)” – CG3i Software Service Johnstown, PA – May 31, 1889 CG3I.
Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of GIS in Civil Engineering Professor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Student: Brad.
David Knipe Engineering Section Manager Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping.
Hydrologic Models for Urban Floodplain Mapping and Damage Reduction in Brownsville, TX Philip Bedient Rice University CEE Department Houston, Texas March.
APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Imane MRINI GIS in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Source. Optech,Inc.
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
Automated H&H and Advanced Terrain Processing
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
Infinity-project.org The Caruth Institute for Engineering Education Engineering Education for today’s classroom. Engineering Earth.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
HEC-RAS 3.0 Input Data and Demo Presented By: Kevin Donnelly.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Floodplain Delineation of Unsteady Flow Using HEC-RAS Final Presentation Presented By: Kevin Donnelly.
Basic Hydraulics: Bridges. Definition & terminology Abutments Flow contraction.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
The Schoharie Bridge Collapse, Scour By Group 18 4 th Year Civil Engineering Date: 28 th of October 2005.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1 Triangulated Irregular Network Node Edge Face. 2 3D Structure of a TIN.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
FLOOD MAPPING Menaxhimi i rezikut te permbytjeve Objektivat Gjenerale.
Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
USGS Water Resources Discipline Charleston, WV District office Katherine Paybins GIS data and projects.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601 Module 6 Regional Analysis.
Meredith Shiflet. Outline Watershed mapping Structure Design Irrigation Water management Erosion modeling.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS,
Morphodynamics of the Madeira River in Brazil Christine Bonthius The University of Texas at Austin Department of Geography and the Environment
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
Experience ∙ Innovation · Results CALCASIEU PARISH – SABINE RIVER AND BAYOU LACASSINE BASINS STORMWATER MASTER PLAN Engineers ∙ Surveyors · Environmental.
Source: CBS 5 (KPHO Broadcasting Corporation) Peggy A. Johnson
National Hydro Data Programs
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Using GIS to Plan for and Mitigate Flooding on Tribal Lands
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Scour Analysis on the west fork of the Duchesne River
Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Cassandra Rutherford Master of Science Candidate Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Identifying Bridge Scour Susceptibility: A GIS-based Approach

Project Objective To develop a GIS-based method to evaluate the potential for scour at bridges and to identify those structures that are scour susceptible.

Presentation Overview Bridge Scour Available Data Methodology Case Study Progress Future Work Questions GIS-based Approach

Bridge scour is the Bridge scour is the erosion of streambed erosion of streambed soils and sediment soils and sediment that provide support that provide support for bridge foundations. for bridge foundations. Bridge Scour

The primary variables that effect scour: Bed materialsBed materials Channel protectionChannel protection Channel and bridge geometryChannel and bridge geometry Flow hydraulicsFlow hydraulics

Bridge Scour Of the 832 bridge failures since 1950, 60% were related to scour.Of the 832 bridge failures since 1950, 60% were related to scour. $50 million spent annually in Federal aid for scour related bridge failures and repairs.$50 million spent annually in Federal aid for scour related bridge failures and repairs. 3 bridges failures have resulted in the loss of 25 lives in the last 15 years.3 bridges failures have resulted in the loss of 25 lives in the last 15 years.

Bridge Scour Over the 49,186 Over the 49,186 bridges in Texas... bridges in Texas... 40,814 bridges –40,814 bridges – over waterways over waterways 688 bridges –688 bridges – scour critical scour critical

Bridge Scour Scour critical bridges – structural integrity potentially jeopardized due Scour critical bridges – structural integrity potentially jeopardized due to scour. Requires Level II Analysis. to scour. Requires Level II Analysis. Level II Analysis – developed in HEC 18 requires on site investigation, bridge foundation information, modeling of stream Level II Analysis – developed in HEC 18 requires on site investigation, bridge foundation information, modeling of stream

Bridge Scour Scour susceptible bridges – likelihood that bridge may be vulnerable to scour. Scour susceptible bridges – likelihood that bridge may be vulnerable to scour. Current methods require large database of analyzed bridges for comparisons, or envelope curves based on historical scour measurements. Current methods require large database of analyzed bridges for comparisons, or envelope curves based on historical scour measurements.

GIS-based Approach Due to the large number of bridges, their spatial distribution, wide variety of data required and cost of performing Level II analysis, a robust method of analysis is required. GIS is an effective means for spatially storing the database, analyzing the data and presenting the results. Due to the large number of bridges, their spatial distribution, wide variety of data required and cost of performing Level II analysis, a robust method of analysis is required. GIS is an effective means for spatially storing the database, analyzing the data and presenting the results. Prioritization of bridges susceptible to scour can be more easily accomplished using a GIS scheme than previous methods. Prioritization of bridges susceptible to scour can be more easily accomplished using a GIS scheme than previous methods.

General Methodology HEC GeoRas Data Processing Analysis Validation

Available Data USGS Harris County Surface-Water Data - daily stream flow and measurements - daily stream flow and measurements provides gage location, channel width, cross section area, velocity, gage height, discharge and drainage area. provides gage location, channel width, cross section area, velocity, gage height, discharge and drainage area.

Available Data Federal Highway Administration Federal Highway Administration National Bridge Inventory (NBI) National Bridge Inventory (NBI) Database Database - electronic database coded by DOTs - electronic database coded by DOTs provides data on bridges such as structural type, number of spans, geometry, length, width, channel protection, etc. provides data on bridges such as structural type, number of spans, geometry, length, width, channel protection, etc.

Available Data USDA – NRCS USDA – NRCS SSURGO Soil Data SSURGO Soil Data - shapefile of county along with multiple tables providing soil information such as classification, hydrologic group, sieve passing percents, soil erodibility factor, etc. - shapefile of county along with multiple tables providing soil information such as classification, hydrologic group, sieve passing percents, soil erodibility factor, etc.

HEC GeoRas General Methodology Data Processing Validation Analysis

Case Study: Harris County

Datasets Used: Texas Bridge Database (NBI) USGS DEM (1:24,000) Harris County (TNRIS) Harris County data files Texas Counties shapefile (ESRI) Reach Files Version 3 (EPA) Harris County Soils shapefile (SSURGO) Harris County Stream gages (USGS) TIN Data for Buffalo Bayou (Dodson)

Case Study: Harris County

Erodibility

Bridges with Erosive Soils

Case Study: Harris County Channel Protection Channel Protection < 6 NNot over water 9None needed 8Well vegetated 7Minor damage 6Slumping 5Eroded 4Extensive erosion 3Protection failing 2State of collapse 1Bridge closed

Scour Susceptible Bridges Case Study: Harris County

Case Study: Buffalo Bayou 2 Bridges on Buffalo Bayou to model total scour in HEC RAS Selected 2 Bridges on Buffalo Bayou to model total scour in HEC RAS

HEC GeoRas General Methodology Data Processing Analysis HEC GeoRas Validation

HEC GeoRAS Used to develop the spatial data required to generate a HEC- RAS import file with a defined 3-D stream network and 3-D cross sections

HEC GeoRAS Buffalo Bayou Triangular Irregular Network (TIN) data is required. Contours are created to allow ArcView to refresh more quickly.

HEC GeoRAS The following themes must be created: Stream Centerline Main Channel Banks Flow Path Centerline Cross-Sectional Cut Lines and Land Use

HEC GeoRas General Methodology Data Processing Analysis Validation

HEC RAS An accurate hydraulic models of river reach containing bridge must be developed before scour calculations can be performed.

HEC RAS Scour calculations in HEC RAS require: Depth at bridge Velocity Number of piers

HEC GeoRas General Methodology Data Processing Analysis HEC GeoRas Validation

HEC GeoRAS Scour calculations Scour calculations results can be results can be exported back exported back into ArcView. into ArcView.

Data Processing HEC GeoRas General Methodology Validation Analysis

Current Progress Text files correctly delimited and column headers properly determinedText files correctly delimited and column headers properly determined All non-digital data made into point shapefilesAll non-digital data made into point shapefiles Data correctly projected and combined in one projectData correctly projected and combined in one project Used method to select 6 scour susceptible bridgesUsed method to select 6 scour susceptible bridges Began initial HEC-GeoRAS and HEC RAS modelingBegan initial HEC-GeoRAS and HEC RAS modeling

Future Work Generate HEC GeoRAS themes Validate method by modeling 2 bridges and calculating the total scour using HEC RAS Determine accuracy of the method Automate GIS method

Questions?