MTIP: Michigan Technology Implementation Project: Western Michigan Technology Conference April 19, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Quarry Bay School What is CoIS? The Council of International Schools is an organisation in International Education for the.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of Education Career and Technical Education Section Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Curriculum Leadership The Central Figure is the Principal.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Presentation Ivy Tech Community College Terre Haute, IN Jackie McCracken April 21, 2007.
Part II: Strategic Planning for a Successful 1:1 Program
Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools Connecting Action and Research.
Jennifer K. Foster Associate Vice President of Adult Education and Workforce Development Illinois Community College Board 0.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
WHAT’s A STATE TO DO? TO BUILD SCHOOL/EDUCATION LEADERSHIP CAPACITY Betty Hale.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Strategic Planning for EEO & HR Offices Dinah Cohen CAP Director Derek Shields CAP Program Manager EEOC Executive Leadership Conference – May 3-5, 2011.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Frameworks Overall Facts and Presentations Hubbard High School Model Lakeview Career Readiness Certificates Grand Rapids Model.
January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
Management of teacher education and the issue of quality inclusive education Prepared by Dr. Reda Hegazy Egypt focal point for the "international Task.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Leading in Creating Community Schools Module 4. Learning Outcomes Analyse how various models of technology support can be applied in schools; Use the.
Leadership & Vision: The Administrator’s Role Susan Brooks-Young
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
NCCE 2009 Administrator/IT Summit Strategy Session: Leadership.
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
Regional Chief Instructional Leader Meetings. Today We will… List, categorize, and prioritize county professional development offerings Learn about the.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Las Cruces Public Schools
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

MTIP: Michigan Technology Implementation Project: Western Michigan Technology Conference April 19, 2002

The Future is NOW!!! Ready or Not... The World is Different Work is different... Tools are different... Communication is different... Information is different... Kids and Educators are different... And Leading Is Different!

Leaders Know Change is Cultural “Transforming the culture – changing the way we do things around here – is the main point…Leading in a culture of change means creating a culture (not just a structure) of change. It does not mean adopting innovations, one after another; it does mean producing the capacity to seek, critically assess, and selectively incorporate new ideas and practices – all the time, inside the organization as well as outside the organization.” Michael Fullan, Leading in a Culture of Change

MTIP... Provides interrelated services that are designed to assist local efforts. Coordinates state and regional technology efforts. Promotes efficiency through collaboration and partnerships.

The Four MTIP Centers: Diverse But Interdependent Roles Information Development Sustained Learning Capacity Building and Accountability Awareness and Dissemination

Center for Capacity Building and Accountability Helping to assure local districts can continue the learning after the Grant support is gone.

What Makes A Difference? January 23 – Grand Rapids Symposium Pitfalls and Pinnacles 61 educators that included –Superintendents –Principals –Curriculum Directors –Tech Coordinators –Board Members –Teachers

What We Found Out Transform Education Culture Complex Messages And Goals Efficient & Effective Use Planning and Implement Vision and Leader- ship Support for Change Working out of old paradigm Conflicting Goals – MEAP vs. Inquiry Scarce Resources Funding Model vs. Educational Model Minima.l Technology Vision Training and Prof. Develop. Insure meaningful learning Lack of knowledge for impact of tech. Inequity Issues Implement District Technology Plan Vision and Leadership for Integration Personal Use Pushing my comfort envelope TCO and TCM Keeping Pace: P.D., Upgrades, Resources Commit to new Culture

What Does It All Mean? Identified Six Strategies for Building Capacity in Local Districts: – Research – Tech. Standards for School Administrators – Administrative Training – Governance Changes – Leadership Toolkit – How Technology Affects District Policy

CCBA Projects and Tools Technology Standards for School Administrators AUP Policy Template Interactive Policy Site Leadership Toolkit Website Policy Research Paper and Research sites Administrative Training

TSSA The Target Product Technology Standards for all Pre K – 12 Administrators – Standards for Superintendents and Superintendent Cabinet Members – Standards for Principals and Assistant Principals – Standards for District Level Leaders of Academic and Special Programs

Framework For the Standards: Six standards categories Six standards categories Statements for each category giving a broad definition of the category Statements for each category giving a broad definition of the category Performance indicators that further define the statement Performance indicators that further define the statement Role specific tasks for Superintendents, District Program Directors and Principals Role specific tasks for Superintendents, District Program Directors and Principals Scenarios for Superintendent, Central Office, and Principal Scenarios for Superintendent, Central Office, and Principal

Standards for School Administrators Leadership and Vision Learning and Teaching Productivity and Professional Practice Support, Management, and Operations Assessment and Evaluation Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues

How Will the Standards be used? A self assessment for administrators Understanding the systems nature of leadership in technology – 3 types of leadership To inform education administration programs Provide insight for administrators in defining the culture shift necessary for successful integration of technology. Give industry leaders an understanding of what administrators face Provide guidance for hiring, professional development and evaluation of administrative staff WHAT ELSE……

What’s Next? Finalize any changes we want to make in Michigan Submit to MDE for consideration Use in Gates Grant activities Meet with colleges and universities Align professional development offerings and voluntary certification programs with standards

What can you do? Use the Michigan resources at Watch the MTIP website for Michigan developments at Develop ways you can use the TSSA Standards in your job and in your district