Principles of Effective Prevention Programs Karol L. Kumpfer, Ph.D. Professor Dept. of Health Promotion and Education University of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

One Science = Early Childhood Pathway for Healthy Child Development Sentinel Outcomes ALL CHILDREN ARE BORN HEALTHY measured by: rate of infant mortality.
Rusk County Joint implementation by: UW-Extension, Social Services, Family Resources of ICAA For Parents And Youth STRENGTHENING PROGRAM PROGRAM.
Planning an improved prevention response up to early childhood Ms. Giovanna Campello UNODC Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Section.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
A Weighty Proposition What is Known Regarding Childhood Obesity Learning Session #1.
Developing a Logic Model
Preventing Drug Abuse among Children and Adolescents Prevention Principles.
“Adolescent” People between the ages of WHO UNICEF UN Population Fund (Joint statement, 1998)
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Griffith Youth Forensic Service From treatment to prevention : Working with Queensland remote Indigenous communities Sue Rayment-McHugh Manager Griffith.
Donna Butler Strengthening Families Programme Manager NW. NW Alcohol Forum LTD.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Community Planning Training 4- Community Planning Training 4-1.
Steve Delaronde, MSW, MPH University of Connecticut Health Center The Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth July 16, 1999 Identifying Community Resources.
+ Program Planning Chapter 2. + Individual and/or Program Cornerstones 1. Needs assessment** Needs assessment 2. Planning Planning 3. Implementation Implementation.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 2-1.
GSU-NACDD-CDC Chronic Disease and Public Health Workforce Training Training Needs Survey and Public Health Certificate in Chronic Disease Training for.
Planning an improved prevention response in adolescence and adulthood.
Evidence-Based Programs The benefits, uses, and applicability of data driven programming and community collaboration.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
Designing Survey Instrument to Evaluate Implementation of Complex Health Interventions: Lessons Learned Eunice Chong Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels Lori Webel-Edgar.
Through Our Eyes... Dr. Judi Kosterman. Prevention History 1960’s... “BIG Problem!” 1970’s... “Not enough information!” 1980’s... “Maybe it’s skills?!”
1 From Evidence to Action Replicating and Adapting Evidence-Driven Interventions at the Local Level Shannon Thomas Ryan David Lewis-Peart.
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Planning an improved prevention response in early adolescence.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
1 The New Jersey Experience: The Stationhouse Adjustment Program Part II Presented by: Raymond Massi, Jr., Law Enforcement Coordinator, US Attorney’s Office.
Perspectives on Impact Evaluation Cairo, Egypt March 29 – April 2, 2009 Presented by: Wayne M. Harding. Ed.M., Ph.D., Director of Projects, Social Science.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Literature Review. –Protective Factors Self-awareness Family cohesion Perception of risk Age of first use –Intervention Programs Substance abuse Prevention.
Potential Alcohol Strategies March 20, 2008 Sheila Nesbitt.
Components of a national drug prevention system Ms. UNODC.
MIA: STEP Toolkit Overview. NIDA-SAMHSA Blending Initiative 2 What is an MI Assessment?  Use of client-centered MI style  MI strategies that can be.
PREVENTION RESEARCH 2001 PREVENTION RESEARCH BRANCH The Staff: Liz Robertson, Ph.D., Chief Liz Robertson, Ph.D., Chief Susan David, M.P.H., Deputy Chief.
Planning an improved prevention response in middle childhood Ms. Melva Ramirez UNODC Regional Office for Central America and the Caribbean.
COMMUNITY-BASED MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH TO PROMOTE SOCIAL JUSTICE & CHILDREN’S HEALTH November 20, 2008 Jessica Goodkind, PhD University of New Mexico Department.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Communities That Care.
Key Leaders Orientation 2- Key Leader Orientation 2-1.
Communities That Care. What is Communities That Care? (CTC) “Operating system” that focuses on risk and protective factors to provide structure for community.
PUTTING PREVENTION RESEARCH TO PRACTICE Prepared by: DMHAS Prevention, Intervention & Training Unit, 9/27/96 Karen Ohrenberger, Director Dianne Harnad,
Logic Model for Youth Substance Abuse & Use Prevention Programs in OAS Member States September 14, 2005 Ottawa, Ontario Wanda Jamieson & Tullio Caputo.
Substance Abuse Prevention Fulfilling the Promise Linda Dusenbury, Ph.D. Tanglewood Research.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Alberta Children and Youth Services A Report on Parent Link Centres Lethbridge Symposium April, 2009.
Loudoun County Public Schools 2010 Communities That Care Survey.
Child Health and School Readiness: The Significance of Health Literacy Laurie Martin, ScD, MPH Human Capital Research Collaborative Conference October.
High Quality Implementation: Meeting the Challenge Linda Dusenbury, Ph.D. Tanglewood Research.
School-based Programs: A National Perspective School-Based Behavioral Health Conference Grantville, Pennsylvania, May 3 – 5 School-based Programs:
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas The Strategic Prevention Framework.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
Street Smart Implementation Webinar September 10, 2009 Cicatelli Associates Inc. Public Health Solutions.
What works: Principles of effective approaches to delinquency prevention and intervention Wisconsin Juvenile Court Intake Association Conference September.
Colin Mangham April 21, I Looked at Two Key Summaries of Best Practice  School Health Promotion Effectiveness Framework Applied to Preventing Substance.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
Implementing Interventions Effectively Between the Dream and the Reality of Prevention Linda Dusenbury, Ph.D. Tanglewood Research.
Integrating Tobacco Prevention Strategies into Behavioral Parent Training for Adolescents with ADHD Rosalie Corona, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology.
Comprehensive School Health: (CSH) An Integrated Approach to Promoting Wellness in a Healthy School Setting.
Research on the general effectiveness of school- based behavioral interventions targeting overt, physically aggressive behavior will be synthesized using.
Preventing Drug Abuse among Children and Adolescents
The Strategic Prevention Framework
Comprehensive Youth Services
The Strengthening Families Program
Presentation transcript:

Principles of Effective Prevention Programs Karol L. Kumpfer, Ph.D. Professor Dept. of Health Promotion and Education University of Utah

Objectives Learn how to judge which programs are effective by effect size and matching risk and protective factors. Identify the 9 principles or components of successful prevention programming. Identify the 6 characteristics of successful program implementation. Use the principles to select and adapt the best model program for specific groups.

Principles of Prevention The field of alcohol and drug prevention has matured over the past 20 years. Research has identified the most effective prevention programs using literature reviews and meta-analyses. Federal agencies have lists of effective prevention programs and practices.

How to Decide on Best Prevention Program? Statistical Significance and/or Effect Sizes of Prevention Programs  Statistical Significance only tells you that the change in clients is not likely to have occurred by chance.  p.<.05 only means the change could have only occurred by chance only 5 times in a hundred  Effect Size tells you the size of the change in the youth getting the program versus those not getting the program.

SFP Positive Results in Reduced Alcohol Initiation Effect Size is Difference in Reduced Alcohol Initiation in Sixth to Eight Graders in SFP Schools vs. No- tx Control Schools

Better Programs Have High Effect Sizes An Effect Size of 1.00 means clients changed one standard deviation. A small effect size is generally d=.00 to.30 A medium effect size is d=.31 to.60 A large effect size is d=.61 and larger

Comparison of Average Program Effect Sizes (Tobler & Stratton, 1997; Tobler & Kumpfer, 2000) School-based Affective -.05 Knowledge plus Affective.05 Life or Social Skills Training.28  Average ES Youth-only Programs.10 ES Parent Skills Training.31 Family Skills Training.82 In-home Family Support 1.62  Average ES Family Interventions.96 ES

Principles of Prevention Federal Agencies Have Also Developed Lists of Prevention Principles  Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)  Kumpfer and associates (NIDA, 1997)  NIDA in “Red Book” 1997; 2003  Nation, et al., 2003; American Psychologist One Caveat: Principles do not Guarantee Program Effectiveness  Some program developers say their program works because it was designed on the basis of Principles of Prevention  Only actual outcomes can prove this.

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs 1. Comprehensive Programs  Designed to enhance protective factors and reduce modifiable risk factors for all forms of substance abuse in the primary areas of influence, such as: Individual Characteristics Families Schools Peers Community  Focus on changing the environment to create enduring effects (family, community, school).

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 2. Research-based/Theory-driven Programs  Effective programs are based on tested theoretical models of precursors of substance abuse, such as: Social Ecology Model (Kumpfer, et al., 2003) Social Development Model (Hawkins & Weis, 1987)  Prevention programs should target the precursors or causes of unwanted behaviors early before they begin (Hawkins & Catalano, 1992).

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 3. Tailored to Participants Needs  Services should match the identified needs of the potential participants  Needs assessments can help to identify needs, such as the Communities That Care Student Survey (Hawkins & Catalano, 1992, Arthur, et al., 2000). CTC school survey measures 45 risk and protector factors It can be geographically coded to show community areas at highest need of prevention programs.

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 4. Relevant Programs  Prevention programs are more effective when designed or adapted to be relevant to the target population Culturally-relevant Gender-sensitive Age-appropriate Locally relevant  Culturally-adapted, evidence-based prevention programs have been found to increase recruitment and retention by as much as 40% (Kumpfer, Alvarado, Smith, & Bellamy, 2002). What could you do to increase participation of parents in a school family skills training program?

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 5. Intensive Enough to Address Major Needs  The more risk and protective factors or processes to be addressed, the greater the dosage or intensity needed to be effective.  Combining programs increases the intensity and improves the outcome effect sizes (Kumpfer, Alvarado, Tait, & Whiteside, 2002). Is a 2 hour drug education program likely to be effective for high risk youth?

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 6. Appropriately Timed  Prior to the unwanted behavior.  Early enough to have an impact in changing developmental trajectories.  At critical transition points to a new environment, e.g., junior high or high school. Can you think of other critical transition times when youth are very vulnerable?

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 7. Sufficient Follow-up or Boosters.  Prevention effects can decay with time if no booster sessions or reminders of skills learned.  With maturation, new material is needed that is developmentally-appropriate and addresses new risk factors. Would a three month prevention program designed for 1 st to 3 rd graders likely need “booster” sessions or new content for 6 th graders?

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 8. Focus on Skills Development and Behavior Change  Active, hands-on-experience increases participant skills, even for staff training  Interactive teaching methods are more effective (Tobler, 1999). Is lecturing youth about the dangers of tobacco, alcohol or drug abuse likely to be as effective as having them consult expert sources and then debate the pros and cons of use?

Nine Principles of Effective Prevention Programs (cont.) 9. Involve Youth with Prosocial Role Models  Do not isolate high-risk youth with diagnosed problem behaviors together in groups without expert supervision (Dishion & Andrews, 1995).  Change the group norms to more healthy norms and values or  Clarify that the actual substance use rates or norms are lower than youth think (Perkins & Berkowitz, 1992). What methods can you use to accomplish this?

Implementation Fidelity Impacts Program Effectiveness Once you select the best evidence-based program, you must implement with fidelity  Fidelity means implementing all essential components (“the core elements) as originally designed, including: Structure Content Delivery (effective delivery only 21%)  Most practitioners tend to “water down” programs in the process of locally tailoring them.  Do not shorten or add new content, but you can adapt an exercise to be more relevant. If the curriculum specifies a welcome exercise where children say their name and favorite ice cream, how would you “adapt” this exercise for lactose intolerant Asian or American Indian youth?

Factors Contributing to Lack of Fidelity Lack of sufficient staff training Unclear training or implementation manuals Lack of understanding of critical elements Misinformation and laziness Lack of sufficient resources  Money  Staff  Facilities  Materials

Characteristics of Successful Program Implementation 1. Target Group Readiness and Desire for the Program  The staff, participants, and community should be “ready” to implement program  They should be aware of a substance abuse problem and ready to change  The PREVENT model can help with readiness assessments (NIDA, 1997)

Assessing Community Readiness to Start a Coordinated Prevention Approach (NIDA, 1997) Seven key factors that must be present: Problem defined by needs assessment Recognition of problem by community Existence of funding sources Vision/plan Energy to mobilize/sustain coalition Networking with stakeholders Talent/leadership

Characteristics of Successful Program Implementation (cont.) 2. Effective and Well Trained Staff  The characteristics of staff are critical to program effectiveness, such as: Warmth, Empathy, Genuineness (Truax & Carkfuff, 1967)  Staff rated more highly by clients get better results (Park & Kumpfer, 2005)  Staff training and supervision are essential for quality implementation (Dusenbury & Falco, 1995)

Characteristics of Successful Program Implementation (cont.) 3. Well Defined Plan  FORECAST (Goodman & Wandersman, 1994) 4. Sufficient Resources  Food, child care, transportation, attendance incentives,meals. 5. Interactive, Experiential Techniques 6. Evaluation Linked to Improvements

Summary Evidence-based Programs should be implemented that match youth needs. Effective programs have similar components (comprehensive, theory-based, adapted, relevant, intensive, age- appropriate, sufficient, change focused, and increase positive peer interaction) Lack of fidelity or successful implementation can compromise effectiveness.