Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Core Software “Performance Review” TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working? GLAST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
SiD PFA Status and Calorimeter Performance Ron Cassell (SLAC) SiD Design Study Meeting 11/15/08.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
GLAST LAT Project Apr 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/31 Overview of End to End Runs Eduardo do Couto e Silva April 1, 2005 ( not it is not a joke, we finally.
Status of ReconGround Software Workshop, July 15, 2003 The GLAST Event Reconstruction: What’s in it for DC-1? GLAST Ground Software Workshop Tuesday, July.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 7, 2007.
S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.
Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 17th MAY 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Jan 31, 2007.
TkrRecon Status Perugia Software Workshop May, 2003.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Bill Atwood, Core Meeting, 9-Oct GLAS T 1 Finding and Fitting A Recast of Traditional GLAST Finding: Combo A Recast of the Kalman Filter Setting.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
1 May 27, 2005 Comparison tower A data and Montecarlo OVERVIEW Comparison of MC (EM- v 4r060302p18 ) and tower A data using the “baseline” run (Run )
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, August, 2005 GLAST 1 Energy Method Selections Data Set: All Gamma (GR-HEAD1.615) Parametric Tracker Last Layer Profile 4 Methods.
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Bill Atwood - July 2002 GLAS T 1 A Kalman Filter for GLAST What is a Kalman Filter and how does it work. Overview of Implementation in GLAST Validation.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
C&A 21 Aug 06 1 A Monte Carlo Puzzle, for the SCG Toby Burnett University of Washington.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL – ANL Approach Steve Magill ANL 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal.
Tracker Software Update Adam Dobbs, MICE CM37 7 th Nov 2013.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/ ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO collaborated with Acfa-Sim-J.
Introduction Miha Zgubič, summer student Scintillating fibre tracker software Analysis of performance of momentum reconstruction 1.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Adam Zok Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship Program August 14, 2008.
X5 analysis: the problem! The muon spectrum is overwhelmed by the gamma radiation background. Tmax is not visible. Possibile solution to recover the muon.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
T. Burnett1 GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 9, 2002 SAS Software: Sources Detector geometry model Simulation Event.
Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 21 th April 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Science Analysis Software DC-2 Kickoff Workshop March 1-3, 2005 Tracy Usher 1/25 Data Challenge II Kickoff Workshop Simulation and Reconstruction Overview.
C. Milsténe1 Muon Purity and Detection Efficiency Variation With Depth in an SiD Type Detector C. Milstene- Fermilab SiD Workshop- SLAC- October-2006 In.
Adele Rimoldi, Pavia University & INFN – CERN G4usersWorkshop Nov H8 Muon Testbeam Simulation CERN - 14 November, 2002 and the Physics Validation.
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
Fiber target simulation for S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/15.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
Geant4 Tutorial, Oct28 th 2003V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Simulation of the CMS 2002 Hcal Test Beam V. Daniel Elvira Geant4 Tutorial.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL
Reconstruction of TauTau events
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
A First DC2 Analysis with New Recons
TKR to CAL for 16 Towers The usual TKR extrapolation to CAL study, for the 16 tower data. Check calibrations, look for problems, etc. Today -- “work in.
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Imaging crystals with TKR
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
CR Photon Working Group
Study of MDC tuning.
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Core Software “Performance Review” TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working? GLAST Core Software Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002 The TkrRecon Group

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Is the Tracking working? YES!

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, How well is the Tracking is working?  We know the tracking is working to a certain level: –The event display tells us we are not that far off most of the time –We can make basic distributions of TkrRecon output quantities –Output from merit doesn’t crash –More importantly, see Bill Atwood’s presentation from last week Studies of track fits with muons Studies of 100 MeV gammas Some initial PSF plots –Gut feeling is that base performance already better than PDR  Detailed studies of TkrRecon performance are in the early stages –Simulation/Digitization – See Leon’s talk –Track Finding/Fitting Working towards details of “requirements” (using Monte Carlo information) Developing tools to help understand the performance of different algorithms –Vertexing/gamma reconstruction PDR inspired reconstruction working well Working on developing new techniques –Algorithm timing

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Event Display 1 GeV downward going muon  Launch point at z = 1000  Generated into a cone –0.8 < cos(theta) < 1.

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Event Display 100 MeV downward going gamma  Launch point at z = 1000  Generated into a cone –0.8 < cos(theta) < 1.

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, McHits from Default Muons muon positron electron photon

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, McHits, Energy Deposit “long” hits “short” hits

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, McHits, Fit to Landau Distribution

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Clusters

10 McHits from All_gamma electron positron photon

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, McHits, Energy Deposit “long” hits “short” hits “long” hits

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, McHits, Fit to Landau Distribution

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Clusters

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Energy deposited from McPositionHits (100 MeV Gammas)

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, An Aside – Backsplash Clusters (100 MeV Gammas) Geant4 with default settings 100 MeV Downward going gammas Clusters from backsplash <0.5%

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Total Energy deposited in clusters (100 MeV Gammas)

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, TkrRecon – Basic Recon Plots

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, TkrRecon / Monte Carlo Comparisons 100 MeV Gammas Blue is Recon Red is MC

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, TkrRecon / Monte Carlo Comparisons 100 MeV Gammas Blue is MC Red is Recon

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, TkrRecon Algorithm Timing ~10 ms resolution Reconstruction time dominated by Track Finding (No surprise)

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, TkrRecon Algorithm Timing (100 MeV Gammas) **************************************************************************************************** *****Chrono***** INFO The Final CPU consumption ( Chrono ) Table (ordered) *****Chrono***** INFO **************************************************************************************************** TkrVertexTime INFO Time User : Tot= 0.51 [s] Ave/Min/Max= 173(+-1.3e+03)/ 0/ 1e+04 [us] #=2946 TkrClusterTime INFO Time User : Tot= 7.2 [s] Ave/Min/Max= 2.44(+- 4.3)/ 0/ 10 [ms] #=2946 TkrSimpleDigiAl... INFO Time User : Tot= 15 [s] Ave/Min/Max= 3.01( )/ 0/ 40 [ms] #=5000 TkrFitTime INFO Time User : Tot= 23 [s] Ave/Min/Max= 7.8( )/ 0/ 50 [ms] #=2946 TkrFindTime INFO Time User : Tot= 19.2[min] Ave/Min/Max= 390(+- 665)/ 0/ 1.03e+04 [ms] #=2946 TkrReconTime INFO Time User : Tot= 19.7[min] Ave/Min/Max= 401(+- 670) /0/ 1.04e+04 [ms] #=2946 TkrReconAlg:exe... INFO Time User : Tot= 19.7[min] Ave/Min/Max= 401(+- 670)/ 0/ 1.04e+04 [ms] #=2946 Tkr:execute INFO Time User : Tot= 19.7[min] Ave/Min/Max= 401(+- 670)/ 0/ 1.04e+04 [ms] #=2946 ChronoStatSvc INFO Time User : Tot= 23.3[min] #= 1 *****Chrono***** INFO ****************************************************************************************************

Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, Output from Merit (100 MeV Gammas) Layers 0-11 Events used : 1566 eff. proj. sigma : nan deg = nan arc-min 68% contained : 4.65 deg = nan*(1.51*sigma) 95% contained : 19.3 deg = nan*(2.45*sigma) Energy: meas/gen : 0.26 std : events w/ no data : 9 effective area : 9396 cm^2 Figure of merit : cm Found in tuple : 2946 Generated energy--mean : 0.1 rms : e-08 min : 0.1 max : 0.1 Elapsed time (sec): : TKR_No_Tracks>0 : 2822 Accepted for analysis : Layers Events used : 1256 eff. proj. sigma : 4.7 deg = 282 arc-min 68% contained : 8.54 deg = 1.2*(1.51*sigma) 95% contained : 24.7 deg = 2.15*(2.45*sigma) Energy: meas/gen : std : events w/ no data : 14 effective area : 7536 cm^2 Figure of merit : 1058 cm total effective area : cm^2 Combined FOM : cm