1 Course outline II n Product differentiation n Advertising competition n Compatibility competition Heterogeneous goods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course outline I Homogeneous goods Introduction Game theory
Advertisements

Slides available from:
Market Institutions: Oligopoly
Topic 7. Product differentiation (II): Market Structure
Pablo Serra Universidad de Chile Forward Contracts, Auctions and Efficiency in Electricity Markets.
1 Course outline I n Introduction n Game theory n Price setting – monopoly – oligopoly n Quantity setting – monopoly – oligopoly n Process innovation Homogeneous.
MICROECONOMICS EV Prof. Davide Vannoni. Exercise session 4 monopoly and deadweight loss 1.Exercise on monopoly and deadweight loss 2.Exercise on natural.
Econ 340 Industrial Economics Product Differentiation/ Monopolistic Competition Prof. Dr. Murat Yulek.
Cournot versus Stackelberg n Cournot duopoly (simultaneous quantity competition) n Stackelberg duopoly (sequential quantity competition) x2x2 x1x1 x1x2x1x2.
IMPERFECT COMPETITION MONOPOLY. GENERAL DESCRIPTION firm produces differentiated products  firm can set its price by itself, the imperfect competitor.
1 Industrial Organization Product Differentiation Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Summer semester Week 12.
Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic Competition: Outline What is monopolistic competition? Characteristics of monopolistic competition Equilibrium in SR and the LR Implications.
1 Course outline I n Introduction n Game theory n Price setting – monopoly – oligopoly n Quantity setting – monopoly – oligopoly n Process innovation Homogeneous.
Monopoly n One firm only in a market n Persistence of such a monopoly: – huge cost advantage – secret technology (Coca-Cola) or patent – government restrictions.
1 Course outline II n Product differentiation n Advertising competition n Compatibility competition Heterogeneous goods.
Cournot versus Stackelberg n Cournot duopoly (simultaneous quantity competition) n Stackelberg duopoly (sequential quantity competition) x2x2 x1x1 x1x2x1x2.
Course Wrap-up. What is IO? Study of how firms behave in markets Key role of strategic interaction Tools: – Neoclassical comparative static analysis e.g.
Switching costs n In the middle of the 1980s AT&T succeeded in becoming the supplier of digital switches (5ESS) to Bell Atlantic. From then on, all the.
ANNOUNCEMENTS Review class: Monday, December 13 4:15-5:15, LC6 Final Exam: Friday, December 17 10:30-12:30, LC1 80 multiple choice choice questions Chapts.
Advertising competition n Grossman & Shapiro (1984) n Two firms differ with regard to two aspects: – Information policy – Horizontal differentiation (model.
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
1 Course outline II n Product differentiation n Advertising competition n Compatibility competition Heterogeneous goods.
Differentiating products in order to overcome Bertrand paradox n With homogeneous goods, competition can be quite intense: Even in a market with only two.
This slideshow was written by Ken Chapman, but is substantially based on concepts from Modern Industrial Organization by Carlton and Perloff, 4 th edition,
Chapter 10 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly.
Differentiating products in order to overcome Bertrand paradox n With homogeneous goods, competition can be quite intense: Even in a market with only two.
Course outline I Homogeneous goods Introduction Game theory
Chapter 8 Managing in Competitive, Monopolistic, and Monopolistically Competitive Markets Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 25 price planning Section 25.1 Price Planning Issues
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., McGraw-Hill/Irwin BUILDING THE PRICE FOUNDATION 13 C HAPTER.
1 Monopoly and Antitrust Policy Chapter IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND MARKET POWER imperfectly competitive industry An industry in which single firms.
Monopolistic Competition 1.Many firms (small market share each). 2.Acting independently (no collusion). 3.Products are differentiated. a. Actual differences.
David Bryce © Adapted from Baye © 2002 Power of Rivalry: Economics of Competition and Profits MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Review of the previous lecture A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller in its market. It faces a downward-sloping demand curve for its product. A.
Competition and Market Power
CHAPTER 8 Managing in Competitive, Monopolistic, and Monopolistically Competitive Markets McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
© 2002 McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., McGraw-Hill/Irwin BUILDING THE PRICE FOUNDATION.
Wages and Employment in a Single Labour Market
Industrial Organization- Matilde Machado The Hotelling Model Hotelling Model Matilde Machado.
Imperfect Competition: A Game-Theoretic Approach
Lecture 12Slide 1 Topics to be Discussed Oligopoly Price Competition Competition Versus Collusion: The Prisoners’ Dilemma.
20 E-commerce 5 Aaron Schiff ECON Introduction Product differentiation is another strategy used extensively by firms in addition to or instead.
© 2010 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Chapter 9 Markets for Differentiated Product Market for Two Differentiated Products.
Topic 1Topic 2Topic 3Topic 4Topic
Competitors and Competition
Chapters (8) Perfect Competition (8) Monopoly (8).
An extension to Salop’s model Focused on variety differentiation: consumers differ on the most preferred variety Expands it to include quality differentiation:
L19 Supply function, Entry and market structure. Today:  Partial equilibrium model (one industry)  Producers with cost functions  Questions -Equilibrium.
Oligopoly-I.
Hospital competition when patients have different willingness to pay for quality Paper by Mario Pezzino Presentation By Boris Houenou.
The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the oligopoly model(II): competition in prices ………….1price competition: introduction.
Market Structures SSEMI4 The student will explain the organization and role of business and analyze the four types of market structures in the U.S. economy.
David Bryce © Adapted from Baye © 2002 Power of Rivalry: Economics of Competition and Profits MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics.
Chapter 7 The Nature of Industry
Models of Competition Part IIIa: Cournot Oligopoly
Imperfect Competition
Summary Notes Economics 230 Part II.
Usage Guidelines for Jeopardy PowerPoint Game
Dynamic games and First and Second Movers (The Stackelberg Model)
CHAPTER 10 Oligopoly.
Market Structures SSEMI4 The student will explain the organization and role of business and analyze the four types of market structures in the U.S.
Monopolistic Competition
მონოპოლისტური კონკურენცია
Chapter 25 price planning Section 25.1 Price Planning Issues
6. Strategic Export Policy
Lecture XXIII: Monopoly/Monopolistic Competition
Presentation transcript:

1 Course outline II n Product differentiation n Advertising competition n Compatibility competition Heterogeneous goods

2 Advertising competition I n Advertising and price competition for established products n Advertising and price competition for new products n Sequential advertising competition - entry and deterrence of entry n Executive summary

3 Advertising competition II n Grossman & Shapiro (1984) n Two firms differ with regard to two aspects: – Information policy, – Horizontal differentiation (model “Hotelling“); here n We consider four groups of consumers: – Consumers are informed about both goods, – Consumers are informed about good 1 only, – Consumers are informed about good 2 only, – Consumers are not informed about any good.

4 Brand demand with name recognition A 1 and A no demand demand for good 1 demand for good 2 both products are known only good 1 is known only good 2 is known no good is known h

5 The demand function Firm 1’s demand function: intensity of competition monopolistic part of demand price advantage demand in case of equal prices Assumption: price cap!

6 Cost of advertising is called the cost rate of advertising.

7 Exercise (fixed prices, simul- taneous vs. sequential competition) Consider two insurance companies being forced to sell their policies at a fixed price of 5. Find the equilibrium name recognitions in a simultaneous advertising competition assuming Now assume that one company is the advertising leader.

8 How does the price elasticity depend on name recognition? Special case:

9 Advertising and price competition for established products

10 The simultaneous game n Firm 1’s profit function: n Firm 1’s “reaction functions”: scope for raising prices due to incomplete information

11 Symmetric equilibrium Equilibrium:

12 Advertising and price competition for new products

13 Solving the pricing game (2 nd stage) n Firms’ reaction functions n Bertrand-Nash equilibrium n Effect of name recognition on prices:

14 Analyzing the advertising competition (1 st stage) ??>0<0=0 direct effect strategic effect (optimal prices)

15 Sequential versus simultaneous game n In the simultaneous game, optimal advertising levels are chosen according to : (the direct effect - the only effect in this case - should be zero) n In the sequential game, we found a negative strategic effect of advertising. n This yields:

16 Exercise (advertising competition) Two tax consultants compete by fixing their level of advertising expenses, A 1 and A 2. The price of 10 for one consulting hour is given by regulation. Demand and profit functions are given by Calculate and interpret the reaction functions. Find the equilibria! How will the consultants feel about a law prohibiting advertising?

17 Solution (advertising competition) graphically

18 Advertising and price competition with advertising leader

19 Entry deterrence Follower’s reduced profit function: =0, optimal prices at 3 rd stage =0, optimal advertising at 2 nd stage

20 Executive summary n Incomplete information about the products (A i <1) increases the scope for raising prices. n High advertising costs may have positive effects on firm’s profits. n The advertising leader has the opportunity to build up a strategic entry barrier (limit adverti- sing expenditure or limit name recognition).