Proposed Process for Chesapeake Bay Program Adaptive Management Using ChesapeakeStat… Enhanced Partnering, Leadership, and Management Goal Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
IT Project Management Office
Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.
Purpose of the Standards
Info-Tech Research Group1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Service Equality Team July 2005 Action for Equality Briefing.
QAD's Customer Engagement Dan Blake Consultancy Development Director, QAD QAD Explore 2012.
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
1 Jim Edward Chair, IRC April 13, 2014 Issues Resolution Committee: Recommendations to PSC on Key Issues Raised during the Public/Partner Comment Period.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17, 2013 Draft 4/1/13 for GIT 6 Review.
Simplified Strategic Planning Taking Control, Involving Employees & Linking Systems Joseph Raible Senior Consultant 1The Millennium Group International,
Developing Organizational Capabilities SE Wisconsin ASTD Annual Expo November 14, 2001 Michael Venn, Ph.D. B.K. Simerson, Ed.D. Tradewinds Consulting,
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Chesapeake Bay Executive Council Meeting May 12, 2009 Mount Vernon, Virginia Jeff Corbin, Virginia Assistant Secretary of Natural Resources.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program, EPA 1 CBP Program Update on Bay Agreement Comments, Final Draft, and 2-Year Milestone Status Citizens.
FY2012 ChesapeakeStat Development Team Enhancements – content, design, function 1.Redesign Goal Overview Pages Objective: Communicate the mission and vision.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Have you downloaded WSSDA 2014? Search for the app in iTunes or Google Play Store and join the conversation. WELCOME. 1.Tap Agenda 2.Locate this session.
A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO STRATEGIC PLANNING Mitch Everton Saturday, November 23 4:15-5:30.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Strategic Planning Process
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
Strategic Planning at the Board Level & the Board’s Role in Setting the Organizational Culture Elaine Timbes Capital Metro Deputy Chief Executive Officer/COO.
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership Management Board Meeting 9/13/12 Carin Bisland.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
Chesapeake Bay Program Independent Evaluator – GIT 6 Review & Next Steps.
Authority ELCA Churchwide Organization Planning and Reporting Framework Work plans Team, cross unit group, project and event plans Align to COOP objective/s.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
E.O Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Proposed Workplan for Completing the Alignment of the Partnership
CBP Organizational Structure
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Process for Chesapeake Bay Program Adaptive Management Using ChesapeakeStat… Enhanced Partnering, Leadership, and Management Goal Implementation Team Management Board Meeting November 10, 2009

Why an adaptive management system now? Commitments made in: – EO –Report to Congress –CBP Governance Document Operational framework for new organizational structure Wide-spread belief in value for improved ecosystem management

What are the benefits of an adaptive management system? A disciplined systematic approach to program management Efficiency Alignment Performance accountability Continual improvement

What is the vision of the full value of implementing a management system? Demonstrate management excellence and conformance with world-class standards Redirect the focus of external evaluators from management issues to issues more closely tied to restoration and implementation Leadership in systems management among large aquatic ecosystem programs

AprilMarchJune May August July Feb.MarchSept.Jan.Nov.Oct.Dec. Interim Management Board Meetings Objectives Detailed technical discussions Resolution of specific issues and challenges Chesapeake Bay Program Annual Program-Level Adaptive Management System Management Board Meeting Schedule 2010 Finalize GIT Strategy and Annual Action Plans GITs demonstrate cross-goal coordination, use of targeting Determine prioritized actions, milestones and resources to be applied GITs report on progress and barriers MB evaluates progress and makes recommendations for overcoming barriers Short-term adaptation of strategies and planned activities 2011 Mission, Vision, Values Key conclusions from the Bay Barometer Results of external evaluations Look Back – performance against milestones Look Ahead – needed changes EC Final 203 Strategy PSC TSS Management System Review Strategy and Action Plan Review Quarterly Progress Review Management System Review Begin next cycle … Draft Envtl. and Performance Goals

Adaptive Management System Schedule Rationale Cycle begins in March to closely follow release of Bay Barometer and availability of Chesapeake Registry data March 2010 start allows the process to inform final EO strategy and to further the coordination of subsequent Action Plan

Adaptive Management System Implementation Milestones By March 2010 GIT coordination and awareness Clarification of organizational responsibilities Template for March 2010 Management System Review agenda and information packet ChesapeakeStat build-out Finalize changes to goals, strategies, and measures Availability of Bay Barometer and Chesapeake Registry Data for analysis

Adaptive Management System Responsibilities EC/PSC –Expectations related to goals and milestones –Key initiatives –Partnership-level resolution of critical issues Management Board –Overall system management –Critical review of strategy and action plans –Address implementation roadblocks

Adaptive Management System Responsibilities Goal Implementation Teams –GIT 6 and TSS assemble and continually improve information and annual process –Other GITs provide goal-specific strategies and performance reports Advisory Committees –Advice on strategy, improved science Action Teams –Analysis of specific issues