1 Keck NGAO Proposal: Management Overview Presenter: P. Wizinowich SSC Meeting June 21, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flow-down of Strategic Priorities to Annual and 5-year WMKO Plan Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September 18, 2009 Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September.
Advertisements

Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Chapter 3 Project Initiation
NGAO Construction Project Cost Estimation: Initial Thoughts Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting #12 December 13, 2007.
1 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) Overview July 2013 NAVY CEVM.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
W. M. Keck Observatory Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Irvine Meeting September 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics Preliminary Design & Path Forward Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
LGS AO Operations Transition: Introduction to Meeting April 15, 2005.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
PALM-3000 Management Update A. Bouchez, J. Roberts Team Meeting #15 10/29/09.
NGAO Instrumentation Overview September 2008 Updated Sean Adkins.
Build to Cost Meeting: Goals, Agenda & New Directions Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
Functional Requirements Status and Plans Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur California Institute of Technology Keck NGAO Team Meeting.
NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea P. Wizinowich for the NGAO Team.
NGAO System Design: AO System (WBS 3.2) & Laser Facility (WBS 3.3) Design Inputs & Outputs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting #9 August 24, 2007.
Science Operations Update NGAO - Meeting 11 D. Le Mignant, E. McGrath & C. Max W. M. Keck Observatory 11/05/2007.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
Build to Cost Directions & Guidelines Peter Wizinowich SSC Meeting November 3, 2008.
NGAO Meeting #3 Introduction NGAO Meeting #3 Peter Wizinowich December 13, 2006.
NGAO Management Update Peter Wizinowich NGAO Meeting #11 November 5, 2007.
Science Operations Replan NGAO - Meeting 6 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 04/25/2007.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Science Operations Plan NGAO - Meeting 10 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 09/17/2007.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
NGAO System Design Phase System & Functional Requirements Documents NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
NGAO: Cost Comparison with First Light TMT AO Peter Wizinowich, Richard Dekany, Don Gavel with input & review by Brent Ellerbroek SSC Meeting November.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich March 19, 2009.
System Architecture WBS 3.1 Mid-Year Replan Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting #6 April 25-26, 2007 UCSC.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Introduction to ARA’s Proposal Resources Don Cole
NGAO Instrumentation WBS Replan By Sean Adkins April 25, 2007.
Major Management & Systems Engineering Ideas for Reducing Costs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Meeting #5 Introduction NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
NGAO Instrumentation Preliminary Design Phase Planning September 2008 Sean Adkins.
Functional Requirements for NGAO Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory NGAO Team Meeting #9 August 24, 2007.
Plan to develop system requirements through science cases Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
Chapter 3 Project Initiation. The stages of a project  Project concept  Project proposal request  Project proposal  Project green light  Project.
GMT Instrument Development Gary Da Costa ANU Representative GMT Science Advisory Committee.
Chapter 9. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.
W. M. Keck Observatory Subaru Users’ Meeting
Travel Website Enhancement Project Project Update First Name Last Name.
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
Project Status Report Presenter Name Presentation Date.
Chapter 11. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.
AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting P. Pile 16 September 2004 AGS RSVP Weekly Meeting, 16 Sep 2004 AGS Project Office - status of funding, comments on RSVP
W.J. Foyt LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 Project Management 1 Project Management W. J. Foyt Project Scope Timeline Cost Estimate.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
OWL Concept Design Review Report to ESO Council 8 th Dec 2005.
AURA New Initiatives Office. GSMT SWG Meeting L. Stepp, July 30, 2002 NSF Science Working Group Support Available from AURA NIO Available Personnel Current.
Keck Observatory Overview Peter Wizinowich W. M. Keck Observatory AOSC May 31, 2004.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Science Priorities and Implications of Potential Cost Savings Ideas
Project Management W. J. Foyt
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
IT Transformation: Strategic Plan & Pilot Public Education Department
Details supporting the increase
Presentation transcript:

1 Keck NGAO Proposal: Management Overview Presenter: P. Wizinowich SSC Meeting June 21, 2006

2 Presentation Sequence Development ProcessDevelopment Process NGAO ProjectNGAO Project Schedule, WBS, BudgetSchedule, WBS, Budget System Design PhaseSystem Design Phase Deliverables, Plan, Schedule, BudgetDeliverables, Plan, Schedule, Budget Management status & next stepsManagement status & next steps

3 WMKO Development Process We are here Next step

4 NGAO Project: Milestones YearMonthMilestone 06July System design phase starts 07June 1 st major funding secured 07Sept System Design Review 08Dec Preliminary Design Review 10Mar Detailed Design Review 12Mar AO & LGS facility pre-ship reviews 12Dec NGS 1 st light 13Jun LGS 1 st light 13Dec Shared-risk science begins This is only a first-cut timeline

5 NGAO Project: Top-level WBS PW

6 NGAO Project: AO Budget AO Cost Estimate = $35M  $10M Estimation approach 1: Comparison to other systemsEstimation approach 1: Comparison to other systems Gemini-S MCAO - $18M in 03 dollars.Gemini-S MCAO - $18M in 03 dollars. Add $7M for 2 additional lasers + 4% inflation  $29MAdd $7M for 2 additional lasers + 4% inflation  $29M Gemini-S GPI - $19M + $6M reserveGemini-S GPI - $19M + $6M reserve Add $15M for LGS & subtract $5M for instrument  $35MAdd $15M for LGS & subtract $5M for instrument  $35M TMT NFIRAOS - $25 for AO & $24M for LGSTMT NFIRAOS - $25 for AO & $24M for LGS Subtract $10M for simpler system  $39MSubtract $10M for simpler system  $39M Estimation approach 2: Bottoms-up cost estimateEstimation approach 2: Bottoms-up cost estimate Estimation methods agree

7 NGAO Project: Instrument Budget Cost Estimate = $20M  $4M for 1 st three instrumentsCost Estimate = $20M  $4M for 1 st three instruments InstrumentROM Cost Anchor Near-IR Imager $3M G-S NIR imager ~ $3.5M + 1 vs 4 H2-RG Visible Imager $3M LRIS-R upgrade ~ $1.5M; camera/filters $1M; SW $0.5M Deployable NIR IFU $14M TMT IRMOS ~$42M for 10 IFU + AO; ~$1.6M/IFU for 6 Near-IR IFU $7M OSIRIS ~$5.5M + new detector Visible IFU $4.5M OSIRIS without full cryo, 4x4K deep depletion CCD, slicer Thermal NIR Imager $3M Similar to NIR, smaller but more expensive detector

8 System Design: Objectives Establish design approach that meets the scientific & user requirementsEstablish design approach that meets the scientific & user requirements Establish discipline integrated engineering plan for the proposed designEstablish discipline integrated engineering plan for the proposed design Understand technical risks, trade-offs, performance estimates, cost to completionUnderstand technical risks, trade-offs, performance estimates, cost to completion Key deliverablesKey deliverables Systems Requirements DocumentSystems Requirements Document System Design ManualSystem Design Manual Systems Engineering Management PlanSystems Engineering Management Plan Systems Design ReportSystems Design Report

9 System Design: Project Schedule Plan based on delivery of 4 key documents Plan includes schedule & person-hours

10 System Design: Project Schedule System requirements need science team effort Budget includes 3 graduate students & 1 postdocBudget includes 3 graduate students & 1 postdoc

11 System Design: Project Schedule System design will utilize expertise & resources at CIT, UC & WMKO

12 System Design: Project Schedule System Engineering Management Plan

13 SD: Risk Assessment & Management Detailed risk assessment spreadsheet producedDetailed risk assessment spreadsheet produced ~40 items identified during initial point design development~40 items identified during initial point design development Severity & probability of each item indicated along with risk mitigation planSeverity & probability of each item indicated along with risk mitigation plan During system design each risk area will be further addressed as either part of the planned trade studies &/or as part of risk assessmentDuring system design each risk area will be further addressed as either part of the planned trade studies &/or as part of risk assessment Risk management process includes balancing scientific & technical performance, cost & scheduleRisk management process includes balancing scientific & technical performance, cost & schedule

14 System Design: Budget Cost Estimate = $980k Basis:Basis: hrs or 6.4 FTE eng/scientist * $120k/yr = $770k12400 hrs or 6.4 FTE eng/scientist * $120k/yr = $770k 5500 hrs for 3 grad students + postdoc = $150k5500 hrs for 3 grad students + postdoc = $150k $40k for travel + $20k for procurements$40k for travel + $20k for procurements Only 3% of total NGAO budget  system design phase budget may be lowOnly 3% of total NGAO budget  system design phase budget may be low Believe we have properly identified path forward & have a clear idea of how to proceedBelieve we have properly identified path forward & have a clear idea of how to proceed A more detailed estimate will be prepared as individuals identified & next level of detail added to planA more detailed estimate will be prepared as individuals identified & next level of detail added to plan

15 Management Status Observatory Directors plan to define the NGAO management structureObservatory Directors plan to define the NGAO management structure More detailed NGAO system design phase planning awaits management structure resolutionMore detailed NGAO system design phase planning awaits management structure resolution NGAO ready to become a real projectNGAO ready to become a real project

16 NGAO Project: Next Steps NGAO is ready to become a real project: Ready to begin system design phaseReady to begin system design phase The project needs the following key personnel:The project needs the following key personnel: Principal InvestigatorPrincipal Investigator Project Scientist + Science TeamProject Scientist + Science Team Project ManagerProject Manager Systems EngineerSystems Engineer NGAO Project Scientist & science team lead development & iteration of science requirementsNGAO Project Scientist & science team lead development & iteration of science requirements Volunteer model unsustainableVolunteer model unsustainable Need to take advantage of expertise & resources at CIT, UC & WMKO in system designNeed to take advantage of expertise & resources at CIT, UC & WMKO in system design Form NGAO Science Advisory Committee to provide high level science guidanceForm NGAO Science Advisory Committee to provide high level science guidance