1 Goals -Short term: – Finish merging the L1 trigger configuration files with the HLT. – When this is done, hopefully I will see that the signal increase.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
CMS reconstruction and identification Part II CMS reconstruction and identification Part II A. Nikitenko Tau jetsTau jets Missing E T (briefly)Missing.
B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Simulation of Z->jets in CMS Outline –Introduction –Technique –Results –Conclusion.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
1 Annual Report Zongru Wan Rutgers  Proton/antiproton collisions at Fermilab  CDF detector  Tau’s - physics, decay and reconstruction  Exercise: tau.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Pixel Upgrade Workshop Grindelwald, August 29 th 2012 PERFORMANCE AND PHYSICS RESULTS FOR PHASE1 UPGRADE Alessia Tricomi (University and INFN Catania)
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Simulation of the 4 Layer Pixel Upgrade System (Fermilab) (For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Group) Simulation of the 4 Layer Pixel Upgrade System Harry.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
7 December SLHC Calo Trigger Simulation Status Report Kevin Flood, Michail Bachtis University of Wisconsin, Madison.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
Normal text - click to edit HLT tracking in TPC Off-line week Gaute Øvrebekk.
SUSY06, UC Irvine, June 2006Filip Moortgat, ETH Zurich SUSY06 Higgs (to bb) final states (including the Hemisphere Separation Algorithm) top final states.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Tau06, 9 th Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics Pisa, Italy September 2006 Reconstruction and Identification of hadronic  -decays in ATLAS Fabien Tarrade.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Software Tools for Layout Optimization (Fermilab) Software Tools for Layout Optimization Harry Cheung (Fermilab) For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Working.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
Pixel Results from CRAFT09 U. Langenegger (PSI), G. Giurgiu (JHU) Pixel General Meeting November 10, 2009.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
CMS Upgrade Workshop - Fermilab Trigger Studies Using Stacked Pixel Layers Mark Pesaresi
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.
Tommaso Boccali SNS and INFN Pisa Vertex 2002 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 3-8 November 2002 High Level Triggers at CMS with the Tracker.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Fixing Tau HLT (Part 1.5/2) ‏ M.Bachtis. 2 L1 Seeding Fix L1: Seeding with High Et Jet paths to increase efficiency with High Et Still using corrected.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.
Electron and Photon HLT alley M. Witek K. Senderowska, A. Żurański.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Pixel Phase 1 Physics/Simulations (Fermilab) for the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Group Pixel Phase 1 Physics/Simulations Harry Cheung (Fermilab) for the.
Pixel Phase 1 Upgrade Simulation: Technical Status and Plans (Fermilab) (For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Group) Pixel Phase 1 Upgrade Simulation: Technical.
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
More technical description:
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Bernard Andrieu (LPNHE,Paris)
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
The LHC collider in Geneva
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
EGAMMA HLT Marco Pieri UCSD Meeting 12 June 2007.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

1 Goals -Short term: – Finish merging the L1 trigger configuration files with the HLT. – When this is done, hopefully I will see that the signal increase for a given fake rate. In this way, we can see that the pixel upgrade is a worthwhile project. - Longer term: – Integrate the Long Barrel Geometry and Phase II definitions. We will have tracking for level 1 taus for the first time. – Look at the HLT in the same manner as above.

2 Tau Finding Algorithm Seed with a single tower: E.g. ET(1)>5 GeV Energy measurement in a 2x2 region (pick the one with highest sum ET): e.g. ET(2x2)>10 GeV Shape requirement in eta-direction: Has to be very local (or will blow up with PU): e.g. Max(ET(3x2)-ET(2x2))< 5

3 Pixel Upgrade Opportunities for Upgrade Remove radiation damage Lower/move mass  Bpix Add 4 th layer Move layer 1 closer to IP Alter pitch  Fpix Add 3 rd disk Alter disk configuration Streamline sensor design Improved “3 out of 4” pixel seeding has implications for the HLT that are not well understood.

4 HLT Predictions  Due to the new pixel tracks, we expect  Higher efficiency  We will find more tracks pointing to the calorimeter  Lower fake rate  With the more accurate tracks, we will be able to see if the track is really pointing to our cluster or rather in the isolation region.

5 Requirements at L1 Level 1 – Cluster threshold 2 – Tauseedtower 10 – IsolationTauA – IsolationTauB – Isolation threshold tau 6

Requirements at L2 SLHChltL2TauJets – Unpacks list of taujet EtMin=15 – Iterative cone algorithm with Δr=0.2 SLHChltL2TauNarrowConeIsolationProducer – ECAL isolation, inner cone 0.15, outer cone 0.5 – ECAL clustering, cluster radius 0.08 – Tower Isolation, inner cone 0.2, outer cone 0.5 SLHChltL2TauRelaxingIsolationSelector – MinJetEt 15, isolation Still working through this calculation Jan

Requirements at L2.5 SLHChltL25TauConeIsolation - at least two pixel hits associated with the track conesize.5 - at least 5 hits in total (pixel plus strip) associated with the track - the transverse impact parameter does not exceed 300 μm - the minimum transverse momentum 1 GeV/c - the normalized chi-squared of the track fit below matching cone.2 - signal cone isolation cone minimum transverse momentum in isolation ring 1 GeV/c - maximum number of tracks in isolation ring 0 SLHChltL25TauLeadingTrackPtCutSelector - Min leading track pt > 5 SLHChltL25TauConeIsolation - at least two pixel hits associated with the track conesize.5 - at least 5 hits in total (pixel plus strip) associated with the track - the transverse impact parameter does not exceed 300 μm - the minimum transverse momentum 1 GeV/c - the normalized chi-squared of the track fit below uses a fixed cones size: signal cone 0.15, isolation cone min leading track pt 5.0 SLHChltL25TauConeIsolation - at least two pixel hits associated with the track conesize.5 - at least 5 hits in total (pixel plus strip) associated with the track - the transverse impact parameter does not exceed 300 μm - the minimum transverse momentum 1 GeV/c - the normalized chi-squared of the track fit below uses a fixed cones size: signal cone 0.15, isolation cone min leading track pt 5.0

Requirements at L3  SLHChltL3TauConeIsolation  At least 2 pixel hits associated with the track  At least five hits in total (pixel plus strip) associated with the track  The transverse impact parameter does not exceed 300μm  The pt must exceed 1 GeV/c  The normalized chi-squared of the track fit below 100  Matching cone 0.2, signal cone 0.15, isolation cone 0.5  0 tracks in isolation ring  Min pt in isolation ring 1 Gev/c  SLHChltL3TauIsolationSelector – Min pt leading track 5 GeV/c  SLHChltL1HLTSingleIsoTau30JetsMatch – Matches to a level 1 tau ΔR < 0.5