Updates to the Post-Submission Proposal Change Process in eRPM (aka “The Revised PAF”)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT OF HRSA GRANTS
Advertisements

How Your Research Administration Team Supports You From Start to Finish Michelle Melin-Rogovin, Manager of Research Administration Research Administration.
Creating Proposal and Managing Grants Maria Whalen (508)
Special Topics. Agenda The process Frequently encountered problems Late arrivals / late assistantship appointments Dates of Significance  Traineeships.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Iowa State University Office of Sponsored Programs Administration Sub-Recipient Request Form Refresher Six Questions Presented by: John Gilmour 20 Nov.
Grants and Contracts Changes, Changes, and more Changes... What would this University be without Changes? Heather L. Paulsen.
Grant Financial Management Post Award Sponsored Projects Training Program1.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Research Unit Liaison Meeting June 29, :00 – 4:30 pm Kipke Conference Center.
Award Acceptance Process for Externally Sponsored Projects as Proposed by the eRPM Governance Team 1.
Managing the Electronic Process May 4, 2011 Presented by: Steve Beach, Research Admin Coordinator College of LSA Research Office Peggy Westrick, Senior.
LSA Research Administration Office. Paper forms our Office Still signs Material Transfers Travel to Cuba Research Faculty Hiring Packets MICHR proposals.
LSA Research Administration Office Overview. Paper forms our Office Still signs All of these items can be sent to me (Steve) at 2149 LSA Material Transfers.
EResearch Proposal Management Release 1.9 System Enhancements August 2010.
J. Thaddeus Schork Administrative Specialist “Pre-Awards Grants Manager”
Mapping an Electronic Research Administration System Discussion and Review Points for UC Davis.
Subrecipient Monitoring. A formal binding legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity A portion of your sponsored project's.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
When to Route a Proposal Sponsored Projects Services Uaccess Learning: UA
Working with DRDA NSF Career Development Workshop Division of Research Development and Administration Dave Plawchan Managing Project Representative, DRDA.
NANCY ABBOTT CANR GRANTS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER [GDO] CANR Sponsored Project Proposal Process.
1 12 Easy Steps to Complete an Employment Contract Amendment Campus Human Resources Employment & Compensation Services October, 2009.
Indiana University East March 10, 2009 Teresa Miller, Manager Office of Research Administration – Grant Services.
PROPOSAL ROUTING The Info Sheet and the Pink Sheet.
Integrating Subcontracts (SUBKs) into eResearch Proposal Management (eRPM) November 1, 2012.
Grants 3.0 Faculty Review January 21, Agenda Introductions Meeting Objective Background and Project Objective Key Changes Examples: -Amendment.
Nuts and Bolts of Proposal Development Josie Causseaux May 24,
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
Workload Fulfillment New Faculty Orientation Patricia Linton Senior Associate Dean College of Arts & Sciences.
Cost Policy Training Sponsored Project Training Program April 30, 2012 Beverly Blakeney & Jennifer Gagnon April 30, 2012Sponsored Project Training Program1.
Kansas State University – Sponsored Programs Accounting Last updated March 2015.
ORSP Proposal Process STEP 3 Upload all administrative components of the application and the draft technical section to Cayuse. Route to Chair, Dean, Director.
LSA Research Administration Office. Paper forms our Office Still signs Travel to Cuba Research Faculty Hiring Packets MICHR proposals Anything research.
MRAM. June 12th,  Last time: Discussed purpose for GIM1 Listed Proposal types to which we apply Review Criteria Covered Criteria in detail  Today:
Award Transfers Office of Research Services ORS Brown Bag November 20, 2006.
Erik Bais, May 13 th 2015 PP – unassigned yet General Transfer Policy Presenter : Erik Bais –
LSA RAIN-Managing the Process Proposal Submission Guide Physics Proposal Submission Guide 1 1. Who is the sponsor NSF, DOE, ARO, DARPA, NIH, private foundations.
1 SPS Primer Ken Packman Michael Lenetsky Form 10- General Introduction.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
Capturing Changes to PAF after Proposal is Submitted to the Sponsor but PRIOR to Award Option 1 – Budget change =>20% ( or other triger) 1.PAF sent back.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
Hamlet on Submission Deadlines: To Enforce Them or not to Enforce Them Presented by Darlene Allen, MBA, CRA Director, Pre-Award Administration Morehead.
DE-MYSTIFYING THE ACCOUNT SETUP PROCESS. Fast Facts Research Accounting’s 11 accountants generate between 2,000 and 2,500 invoices a month dependent on.
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
December,  No official date for full switchover from RMS 2.38 to RMS 3.0  State of the RMS Support Contract  Expect regular updates once per.
Is this extension or experiment station PI must complete justification form and include as many details as possible about the costs in budget justification.
Award Acceptance Process Governance Team Project Update December 13, 2011.
Coeus Proposal Development Introduction to Routing.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Agreements Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
Reinventing the Award Review and Set-Up Process NCURA Annual Meeting November 2012 Marcia Smith, Associate Vice Chancellor, Research Administration, UCLA.
“Are We Ready? ” Research Administration Day 2016 Research Services Office Together we make it happen Research Administration Day June 1, 2016 “Are we.
What’s Changing in Research Administration?
Grants & Contracts Officer, III College of Arts and Sciences
Electronic Systems (eRPM)
You have a SURF awardee, now what do you do?
Proposal Routing Overview
Overview Research Services Office.
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
GMAS Preproposal Entry
Office of Grant Resources
Effort Certification and Cost Sharing
EFFORT REPORTING TRAINING
Pre-Award Updates Research Administrators’ Forum
Sponsored Programs at Penn
PROCESSING SPONSORED PROPOSALS AT THE JOHN F
Sponsored Program Closeouts
Proposal Routing in Cayuse SP
Post-Award Grant Process
Presentation transcript:

Updates to the Post-Submission Proposal Change Process in eRPM (aka “The Revised PAF”)

Moving from PAF to Award Revised PAF* Proposal changes after being submitted to a sponsor * According to DRDA Policy Award Acceptance Award document arrives on campus and varies from last proposed (no PAF changes) Award Set-up Award accepted and ready to be established PAFAward Pre-Submission & Submission Proposal routing and/or changes through initial submission

Walk Through of Revised PAF Who is proposing changes Current Process Proposed Process Benefits / Concerns with the Proposed Process Revised PAF

Current Revised PAF Definition Occurs when a material change is required to a proposal that was previously submitted to a sponsor. – “Material” is currently defined in DRDA policy as a 20% or more increase/decrease from the prior PAF budget or any change to cost sharing or indirect cost rate – Also applicable for PAFs with a change to PI or Administrative Home Department prior to award processing Revised PAF

Current Process – Revised PAF PI/Project Team DRDA may request re-review from one or more departments Departments/Schools /Colleges DRDA PAF Submitted to Sponsor PAF Submitted to Sponsor DRDA sends PAF for changes* PI/Project Team Make Changes Submission to sponsor is logged * According to DRDA Policy Revised PAF

Current Process -OR version captured on initial submission to sponsor. DRDA can make changes or route PAF back to the PI/Project Team for changes. DRDA can request departmental re-review on a case-by-case basis. Process varies depending on the changes required. Revised PAF

Identified Issues with Current Process Only the PI/Project team and DRDA are required to review and accept changes, unless specifically routed for departmental re-review(s). Process is applied inconsistently: – Various standards for when PAF is returned to PI/Project Team for changes – All units may or may not be required to re-review Does not allow replacement of original submission data (-OR) in the data warehouse. Revised PAF

Proposed Process – Revised PAF PI/Project Team Departments/Schools /Colleges DRDA PAF Submitted to Sponsor PAF Submitted to Sponsor DRDA sends PAF for changes* PI/Project Team Make Changes DRDA logs submission to sponsor or sends to Project Team to log submission Unit Reviewers Approve Changes Dean’s level approver has option to overwrite the –OR data * According to DRDA Policy Revised PAF

Proposed Process DRDA sends the PAF to the PI/Project Team for changes – All departmental approvals are removed; PI signature(s) are removed All departments listed on PAF are required to review and approve changes. – Administrative Home Dean’s level approvers retain ability to Expedite to DRDA if necessary – Admin Home Dean’s level is given option to overwrite the –OR data in the data warehouse DRDA or the Project Team logs submission – 18-Month Turn Down date is updated to reflect re- approvals – -OR data updated in data warehouse (if applicable) Revised PAF

Why Make These Changes? System functionality to match guidelines on when PAF revisions are necessary System functionality to incorporate departmental review for all changed proposals meeting the revised PAF criteria Discussions on resource commitments would be held by those responsible for the commitments In eRPM, there will be transparency and data – any delays in the process can be identified and addressed Revised PAF

Questions & Comments