Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Advertisements

Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of Texas at El Paso 1 Program Assessment Presentation May 15, 2009 Joe Guthrie Helmut Knaust.
Cyber Education Project Accreditation Committee November 2014.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
University of Alabama Electrical & Computer Engineering Electrical and Computer Engineering Capstone Design Experience at The University of Alabama: Challenges,
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Engineering Department
Overview of the Rose-Hulman Bachelor of Science in Software Engineering Don Bagert SE Faculty Retreat – New Faculty Tutorial August 23, 2005.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 14,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.1 Guidelines on: I- Department’s Mission, PEOs and SOs II- The Preparation of.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
OBE Briefing.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
CSE ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY CAC & EAC UC Irvine October 2, 2013.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle.
Program Assessment Process for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Prepared by: Abul Fazal M. Arif Member, ABET Steering Committee November 16, 2008.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
1 CQI Process for ET Program ET Programs at Penn State Hazleton Campus Ken Dudeck EET Program Coordinator Wes Grebski MET Program Coordinator.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Outcomes Assessment in Computer Science Robert Lingard Assessment Coordinator August 27,
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Industry Advisory Board May 30 th, 2014
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Assessment Dept. of Computer Engineering King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia Dept. of Computer.
Industry Advisory Board June 8 th, 2012
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004

2 ABET (CAC) Standards The program must have documented, measurable objectives. The program’s objectives must include expected outcomes for graduating students. Data relative to the objectives must be routinely collected and documented, and used in program assessments. The extent to which each program objective is being met must be periodically assessed.

3 ABET (CAC) Standards (cont’d) The results of the program’s periodic assessments must be used to help identify opportunities for program improvement. The results of the program’s assessments and the actions taken based on the results must be documented.

4 CS Program Improvement Plan - Main Components Gathering input from constituents on a regular basis Establishing meaningful student learning outcomes for each course in the program Implementing an ongoing cyclical process for systematically directly assessing student learning with respect to our established Program Objectives and Expected Student Outcomes

5 Gathering Input from Constituents Mechanisms Senior Exit Surveys given each semester Meetings every semester with the Industrial Advisory Board Alumni Surveys conducted every three years Employer Surveys conducted every three years

6 Gathering Input from Constituents (cont’d) Input Solicited Opinions regarding the program objectives and expected outcomes Feedback regarding the quality of the program Subjective assessments of student learning

7 Establishing Learning Outcomes for each Course A plan is in place to review existing learning outcomes and/or create them for all courses in the computer science program. By the end of this semester this will be completed for all required computer science courses. The remaining courses will be addressed over the next two years.

8 Process for Direct Assessment of Program Objectives and Outcomes At the beginning of the (calendar) year an assessment plan is put in place. The plan is carried out during the year. At the beginning of the next year the results are evaluated, program improvements are made if indicated, and a new plan is created.

9 Computer Science Program Objectives 1. Create an understanding of the principles of computer science and problem solving. 2. Build an awareness of computing practices in industry and emerging technologies, emphasizing a working knowledge of current software design and development techniques.

10 Computer Science Program Objectives (cont’d) 3. Provide a broad education that enables graduates to understand the impact of computing technologies in a societal context. 4. Provide a computer science education that enables our graduates to pursue rewarding professional careers, graduate studies, and lifelong learning.

11 Expected Outcomes for Graduating Students for Objective 1 Students will: a) Demonstrate a fundamental understanding of algorithms, data structures, software design, concepts of programming languages, and computer organization and architecture, and an awareness of the evolution and dynamic nature of the foundational core of computer science. b) Demonstrate the ability to analyze and solve computing problems.

12 Expected Outcomes for Graduating Students for Objective 1 (cont’d) c) Demonstrate knowledge of a variety of programming languages and a proficiency in at least one higher-level language. d) Demonstrate understanding of discrete mathematics, differential and integral calculus, and probability and statistics. e) Demonstrate the ability to collect, analyze, and interpret data

13 Expected Outcomes for Graduating Students for Objective 2 Students will: a) Demonstrate an awareness of emerging technologies and the ability to evaluate and utilize currently available software development tools. b) Demonstrate knowledge of the principles and practices for software design and development.

14 Expected Outcomes for Graduating Students for Objective 2 (cont’d) c) Demonstrate the ability to successfully apply the principles and practices for software design and development to real problems. d) Demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively, both orally and in written form, and work in a team environment.

15 Expected Outcomes for Graduating Students for Objective 3 Students will: a) Demonstrate familiarity with basic concepts, emerging technologies, and contemporary issues relating to the societal impacts of computing. b) Demonstrate an understanding of professional and ethical considerations related to computing.

16 Expected Outcomes for Graduating Students for Objective 4 Students will: a) Be competitive in the computing job market or be admitted to a good graduate program in computing. b) Demonstrate an ability to acquire new knowledge in the computing discipline and to engage in life-long learning.

17 Process for Collecting & Assessing Data Regarding Program Objectives The following activities take place each calendar year: 1. At the first Department meeting of the spring semester, Course Group Coordinators are elected (selected) for each of our “ Course Groups ”. This set of Course Group Coordinators constitutes the Assessment Committee for the year.

18 Process for Collecting & Assessing Data (cont’d) 2. Prior to the second Department meeting of the spring semester, the Assessment Committee selects one or more program objectives and a specific set of expected student outcomes to be assessed during the current year. 3. At the second Department meeting of the spring semester, the Assessment Committee presents its recommendations for assessment for to the department for approval.

19 Process for Collecting & Assessing Data Regarding (cont’d) 4. Prior to the third Department meeting of the spring semester each Course Group prepares an assessment plan for the (calendar) year based on the objectives and outcomes selected for assessment. 5. At the third Department meeting, each Course Group presents their assessment plan for Department approval.

20 Process for Collecting & Assessing Data Regarding (cont’d) 6. The Course Group ensures that the planned and approved assessment activities are accomplished and prepares a final report, prior to the last Department meeting of the year, summarizing and evaluating the results of these activities. 7. Prior to the first Department meeting of the spring semester the reports of all Course Groups are analyzed by the Assessment Committee and recommendations for program improvements are made.

21 Process for Collecting & Assessing Data (cont’d) 8. During the first meeting of the spring semester, the program improvement recommendations from the Assessment Committee are discussed, and the Department decides what actions are appropriate based on the recommendations. The process then loops back to step 1.

22 Process for Collecting & Assessing Data (cont’d) Additional activities conducted include: 1. Each semester an Exit Survey is given to students near graduation (Comp 450 students) asking their opinions about the program. 2. Each semester one or more meetings of the Industrial Advisory Board are held. 3. Every three years an Employer Survey is conducted. 4. Every three years an Alumni Survey is conducted

23 Computer Science Department Assessment Plan

24 Computer Science Department Assessment Plan (cont ’ d)

25 Computer Science Department Assessment Plan (cont ’ d)

26 Computer Science Department Assessment Plan (cont ’ d)