OS 352 2/28/08 I. Exam I results next class. II. Selection A. Employment-at-will. B. Two types of discrimination. C. Defined and methods. D. Validation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 5-1 Managing Human Resources Managing Human Resources Bohlander.
Advertisements

HR and the Law: Fairness and Safety I. Employment fairness II. Occupational Safety.
Human Resource Management TENTH EDITON © 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Legal Framework.
Traditional Recruitment Practices Positive characteristics, rather than those things insiders find dissatisfying about the org, are communicated to outsiders.
Human Resource Management Chapter 10 Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Equal Opportunity and the Law Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Selection Part 1 OS652 HRM Fisher Sept. 30, 2004.
Selection, part 2 OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 12, 2004.
Selection, part 1 OS352 HRM Fisher Feb 21, Agenda Finish material on recruiting Impact of legal environment on selection process Basic characteristics.
1 Knowledge Objectives 1.Explain what human resource management involves. 2.Identify and briefly explain the steps in employee selection and performance.
Wrongful Termination and Employment Discrimination OBE 118 Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Illegal discrimination in the firing, firing, promoting of employees.
OS 352 3/4/08 I. Exam I feedback / Strategy Review II. Selection Interviews III. Validity IV. Downsizing & Outsourcing.
Chapter Five Selection © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 5-1 Dessler, Cole, Goodman, and Sutherland In-Class Edition Management of Human Resources Second.
Equal Employment Opportunity Principles of Discrimination Law.
Selection, part 1 OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 7, Agenda SAP Case Study Impact of legal environment on selection process How do strategy and culture.
Wrongful Termination and Employment Discrimination OBE 118 Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Illegal discrimination in the firing, firing, promoting of employees.
1 Report Tile UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Principles of Assessment.
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT of HRM. MAJOR EEO LAWS u Equal Pay Act (1963) u Title VII, Civil Rights Act (1964/1991) u Pregnancy discrimination Act (1978) u ADE.
R OBERT L. M ATHIS J OHN H. J ACKSON PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama Copyright © 2005 Thomson Business & Professional.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT February 22, 2010 Human Resource Management u Activities necessary for staffing the organization and sustaining high employee.
1.
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Bottom Line Hiring Data Making Sense of the Numbers Presented by Shelley Langan Manager, Special Projects Policy Division, State Personnel Board.
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 2-1.
Module Overview Matching individuals & organizations
6-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 3 rd edition by.
Chapters 2, 3, 4 Legal Compliance/EEO
Human Resources Selection.
Assessing Job Candidates: Tools for Selection
Human Resource Management Chapter 10 Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 SELECTION 2BC3 Week 5 ________________________ Dr. Teal McAteer DeGroote School of Business McMaster University.
Foundations of Recruitment and Selection I: Reliability and Validity
Equal Employment Opportunity. Dimensions of Diversity Religious beliefs Parental Status Marital Status Work Background Geographic Location Military experience.
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part III People in the Police Organization Chapter 10 Police Human Resources Management.
SELECTION. SELECTION PROCESS BY WHICH AN ORGANIZATION CHOOSES PERSONS WHO BEST MEET THE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR THE POSITION AVAILABLE, CONSIDERING CURRENT.
Selecting Employees and Placing Them in Jobs
Selection, part 2 OS352 HRM Fisher Oct. 9, Agenda Benefits and drawbacks of different selection tools Interviews – Structured vs. unstructured.
Managing Human Resources, 12e, by Bohlander/Snell/Sherman © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 5-1 Managing Human Resources Managing Human Resources Bohlander.
1 Chapter 6 Selection and Placement. 2 Introduction Why Selection is Important?
1 Hiring Paul L. Schumann, Ph.D. © 2011 by Paul L. Schumann. All rights reserved.
Human Resource Management TENTH EDITON Legal Framework for Equal Employment Legal Framework for Equal Employment SECTION 2 Staffing the Organization Chapter.
Kristine E. Kwong, Esq. PITFALLS OF SETTING MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS.
Chapter 24 Discrimination in Employment
Selecting Employees to Fit the Job and the Organization 03/04/2013.
6-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 3 rd edition by.
Copyright © 2014 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 6 SELECTING EMPLOYEES AND PLACING THEM IN JOBS FUNDAMENTALS.
HR and Legislation Human Resource Management. Legislation Affecting HR n CRA 1964: Title VII n Other CRAs n ADEA n Older Worker Protection Act n FMLA.
Business Administration & Management Mr. Bernstein Human Resources: Selecting Personnel and Employment Discrimination, pp May 27, 2015.
Recruitment, Retention, Selection Development and Retention of Personnel Educ 567 Summer 2009 Thomas DiPaola, Ph.D.
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 23. Employment Discrimination Treating individuals differently based on differences Treating individuals differently.
2 Equal Opportunity and the Law 2 Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 2-1.
The Employment Environment Jody Blanke Distinguished Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University.
CHAPTER 6 Selecting Employees and Placing Them in Jobs
Equal Employment Opportunity Concepts Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Blind to differences Affirmative Action Discrimination Protected Class.
Internal and External Sources of Recruitment. 8–28–2 Learning Objectives After you have read this chapter, you should be able to: –Describe why selection.
Unit 3 Seminar.  Used to predict acceptable or unacceptable behavior  Helps to assess level of skills/knowledge/ characteristics applicants have  Reduce.
Chapter 41 Equal Employment Opportunity Law Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter 2 Managing Equal Opportunity and Diversity 2-2 Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
Manager: Interviewing Within the Law Manager Information.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Foundations of Recruitment and Selection I: Reliability and Validity.
1 Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. CHAPTER 11 Personnel Selection and Onboarding Andrew N. Garman, PsyD, MS Daniel P. Russell,
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
6 Selecting Employees and Placing Them in Jobs
Chapter 8 Selection. chapter 8 Selection Selection – the process by which an organization chooses from a list of applicants the person or persons who.
Acquiring and Preparing Human Resources
Chapter 6 JA and the Law.
5 6 Selecting Employees C H A P T E R Training Employees
Chapter 7: Selection.
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment
Chapter 6 Selecting Employees
Presentation transcript:

OS 352 2/28/08 I. Exam I results next class. II. Selection A. Employment-at-will. B. Two types of discrimination. C. Defined and methods. D. Validation.

The Hiring Process Recruitment Selection Socialization Fig. 5-4© 1998 by Prentice Hall

Employment-at-Will Employers can terminate employees for good, bad, or no reason at all. Exceptions: 1) Federal law protecting ees (e.g., ADA) 2) Non-statutory public policy breach of contract

Two Kinds of Discrimination Disparate (Adverse) Treatment Disparate (Adverse) Impact Direct discrimination Unequal treatment Decision rules with a racial/ sexual premise or cause Intentional discrimination Prejudiced actions Different standards for different groups Fig. 3-3 Indirect discrimination Unequal consequences or results Decision rules with a racial/ sexual consequences or results Unintentional discrimination Neutral actions Same standards, but different consequences for different groups © 1998 by Prentice Hall

Griggs v. Duke Power (1971 U.S. Supreme Court Case) Er required a high school diploma and a passing score on general aptitude tests requirements disproportionately excluded black applicants high school education and passing aptitude tests not necessary to do jobs in question er unable to demonstrate that requirements were job-related and consistent with business necessity ---> disparate impact

How to Demonstrate Impact (plaintiff) Comparison of selection ratios Utilization analysis: comparison of workforce composition to composition of those in the qualified population in the relevant labor market Segregation by job or occupation

Once a plaintiff demonstrates impact... Er must demonstrate that selection method(s) are … 1) based upon a BFOQ or 2) based upon a seniority system or 3) job-related and consistent with business necessity. Then... plaintiff (ee) must show that an alternative practice is available that has less adverse impact

Bona-Fide Occupational Qualification in the EEO Context Necessary requirement for the job that is based upon normally prohibited characteristics of age, religion, sex, or national origin. Restroom attendants Clothing models Note 1: this is a very rare and narrow exception to non-discrimination law. Note 2: race is never a BFOQ

Personnel Selection The process through which organizations make decisions about who will or will not be allowed to join the organization. Selection decisions also include transfers, terminations, promotions, demotions, and decisions about who gets training.

Selection Steps 1) Link to organization strategy and objectives. 2) Job analysis --> job description --> job specification. 3) Recruiting. 4) Choose selection tool/method. 5) Select from applicant pool. 6) Evaluate.

Common Selection Process Multiple hurdle model: eliminating some candidates at each stage of the selection process. Compensatory model: a very high score on one type of assessment can make up for a low score on another. All candidates go through all selection procedures. vs.

Techniques for Obtaining Job Applicant Information Job Applications and Resumes Application forms Resumes References Background checks Interviews Structured, unstructured Panel / team

Additional Techniques for Obtaining Job Applicant Information Employment Tests Physical ability tests Cognitive ability tests Job performance and work samples Personality inventories Honesty tests Medical Exams & drug tests Work simulations Assessment center

Considerations When Choosing a Selection Method Strategic goals of organization Utility (benefits less costs) Generalizability Legal defensibility Reliability and validity

Your turn: Evaluate the interview question … What was your maiden name? What religious holidays do you observe? What languages do you speak? Do you have any children? How old are you? Do you have any disabilities?

Demonstrating the Job-Relatedness (Validity) of Selection Methods Employer must document that the selection method(s) are related to performance in specific jobs and/or work roles. Job analysis or substitute. Validation. KSAs that can be easily learned during a brief training program should not be used as screening criteria. KSAs required in future jobs or roles can be used provided that a majority of individuals reach these jobs. already discussed today

Reliability The extent to which a measurement is free from random error. Example: A vision test that provides a person with the same results 3 days in a row is reliable. A vision test that provides vastly different results is unreliable. Note: must have reliability to have validity.

Validity The extent to which performance on a measure (such as a test score) is related to what the measure is designed to assess (such as job performance). Example: The extent to which student performance on OS 352 Exam I is related to students’ degree of learning in the course.

Validation: Evidence that selection method(s) are job-related 3 Types: 1) Criterion-related validity A measure of validity based on showing a substantial correlation between test scores and job performance scores. 2) Construct validity - The selection method measures the KSAOs required by the job and excludes KSAOs not required by the job. 3) Content validity - Consistency between the test items and the kinds of situations or problems (i.e., tasks and duties) that occur on the job.

Criterion-Related Validity

Face Validity Extent to which a selection test or device makes sense or seems fair to the applicants. Example: questions about one’s political opinions may appear invalid to applicants for a chef job.