Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis
Advertisements

Introduction When you choose a restaurant for a meal, are you concerned with: The price of the meal How long you have to wait to be seated The quality.
Performance Evaluation Using the Balanced Scorecard
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard and Strategic Profitability Analysis
Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fourth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011.
Strategic Profitability Analysis
Chapter 3 – Evaluation of Performance
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Slide Chapter 13 Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis.
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis
1 Module 22 Segment Reporting and Balanced Scorecard (omit pp to 22-11)
Chapter 22 Decentralization & Performance Evaluation.
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints Chapter 19.
Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard and Strategic Profitability Analysis
© John Wiley & Sons, 2005 Chapter 16: Strategic Performance Measurement Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 1eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring, Monitoring,
Balanced Scorecard: Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints
Supply Chain Management
Performance Evaluation and the Balanced Scorecard
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Balanced Scorecard: Quality, and Time.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Cost Accounting 11/e, Horngren/Datar/Foster Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints Chapter 19 May.
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis.
Based on Chapter 13, Cost Accounting, 12th ed. Horngren et al., Edited and Modified by C. Bailey 1.
Nonfinancial and Multiple Measures of Performance Chapter 18 Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Based on Chapter 13, Cost Accounting, 12th ed. Horngren et al., Edited and Modified by C. Bailey 1.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Slide Chapter 19 Cost Management: Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints.
Standard Costs and Balanced Scorecard
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints.
Area of Study 1: Large-Scale Organisations in Context
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality and Time —modified by CB.
Chapter 11. Decentralization in Organizations Benefits of Decentralization Top management freed to concentrate on strategy. Top management freed to concentrate.
The Balanced Scorecard: Strategic-Based Control
Performance Management The Balanced Scorecard
Cost of Quality - COQ MGMT-5060 Operations Management.
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Strategy, Balanced Scorecard.
1 PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor Emeritus of Accounting Bryant University © Copyright 2007 Thomson South-Western,
Chapter 23. Explain why and how companies decentralize.
COST MANAGEMENT Accounting & Control Hansen▪Mowen▪Guan COPYRIGHT © 2009 South-Western Publishing, a division of Cengage Learning. Cengage Learning and.
© 2012 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Balanced Scorecard: Quality and Time —modified by CB.
Chapter CHAPTER EIGHT OVERVIEW SECTION 8.1 – OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Operations Management Fundamentals OM in Business IT’s Role in OM Competitive.
Principles of Cost Accounting 15 th edition Edward J. VanDerbeck © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated,
Financial and Managerial Accounting Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fifth Edition Wild, Shaw, and Chiappetta Fifth Edition McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013.
Continuous Improvement in Management Accounting Continuous Improvement in Management Accounting C H A P T E R 24.
The Balanced Score Card
0 CHAPTER 15 The Strategic Use of Managerial Accounting Information © 2009 Cengage Learning.
Chapter 2 Management accounting: basic terms and concepts.
Chapter Two Implementing Strategy: The Value Chain, the Balanced Scorecard, and the Strategy Map.
C H A P T E R 10 Continuous Improvement in Management Accounting Continuous Improvement in Management Accounting.
The Balanced Scorecard
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of performance Area of Study 1: Large-Scale Organisations in Context.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2011 Chapter 16: Strategic Performance Measurement Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 2eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring, Monitoring,
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Two.
CHAPTER 16: STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT Cost Management, Canadian Edition © John Wiley & Sons, 2009 Chapter 16: Strategic Performance Measurement.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
Chapter 12 Performance Evaluation Using the Balanced Scorecard.
Strategic Planning and the Balanced Scorecard for Effective Seaport Management Henry Schwarzbach, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island.
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Profitability Analysis
Balanced Scorecard: Quality, Time, and the Theory of Constraints
Implementing Strategy: The Balanced Scorecard and the Value Chain
Competing on Resources Translating Strategy into Action
Chapter 16 Lean Accounting
Strategy, Balanced Scorecard and Strategic Profitability Analysis
Operations Management
1. 2 Operational Efficiency and Business process Performance Operational Efficiency and Business process Performance Just in Time Systems (J I T) Reductions.
Presentation transcript:

Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, and Strategic Profitability Analysis Chapter 13

Recognize which of two generic strategies a company is using. Learning Objective 1 Recognize which of two generic strategies a company is using.

What is Strategy? Strategy describes how an organization matches its own capabilities with the opportunities in the marketplace to accomplish its overall objectives.

What is Strategy? What is the focus of industry analysis? Competitors Potential entrants into the market Equivalent products Bargaining power of customers Bargaining power of input suppliers

Basic Strategies 1. Product differentiation 2. Cost leadership

Implementation of Strategy Management accountants design reports to help managers track progress in implementing strategy.

The Balanced Scorecard The scorecard measures an organization’s performance from four perspectives: 1. Financial 2. Customer 3. Internal business processes 4. Learning and growth

Identify what comprises Learning Objective 2 Identify what comprises reengineering.

Reengineering Reengineering is the fundamental rethinking of business processes delivery to achieve improvements in critical measures of performance such as cost, quality, service, speed, and customer satisfaction.

Reengineering Example Dallas Co. order delivery system: Customers needs identified Quantities to be shipped matched against purchase order Purchase order issued Shipping documents sent to Billing Department Production scheduled Manufacturing completed Invoice issued Finished goods to inventory Customer payment follow up

Reengineering Example The following was determined: Frequently, there is a long waiting time before production begins in the manufacturing department. Sometimes items are held in inventory until a truck is available for shipment.

Reengineering Example If the quantity shipped does not match the number of items requested by the customer, a special shipment must be scheduled. Dallas discovered that the many transfers across departments slowed down the process and created delays. A multifunctional team reengineered the order delivery process.

Reengineering Example A customer relationship manager is responsible for each customer. Dallas will enter into long-term contracts with customers specifying quantities and prices. The customer relationship manager will work with the customer and manufacturing to specify delivery schedules one month in advance.

Reengineering Example The schedule of customer orders will be sent electronically to manufacturing. Completed items will be shipped directly from the manufacturing plant to customer sites. Each shipment will automatically trigger an invoice to be sent electronically to the customer.

Present the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard. Learning Objective 3 Present the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard.

Perspectives of Performance 1. Financial 2. Customer 3. Internal business process 4. Learning and growth

Financial Perspective Objective: Increase shareholder value Measures: Increase in operating income

Financial Perspective Initiatives: Target Performance Actual Performance Manage costs and unused capacity $2,000,000 $2,100,000 Build strong customer relationships $3,000,000 $3,420,000 Build strong customer relationships 6% 6.48%

Customer Perspective Objectives: Increase market share Increase customer satisfaction Measures: Market share in communication networks segment Customer satisfaction survey

Increase customer focus Customer Perspective Initiatives: Target Performance Actual Performance Identify future needs of customer 6% 7% Identify new target customer segments 7 8 Increase customer focus of sales organization 90% give top two ratings 87% give top two ratings

Internal Business Process Perspective Objectives: Improve manufacturing quality and productivity Meet specified delivery dates Measures: Yield On-time delivery

Internal Business Process Perspective Initiatives: Target Performance Actual Performance Identify problems and improve quality 78% 79.3% Reengineer order delivery process 92% 90%

Learning and Growth Perspective Objectives: Align employee and organization goals Improve manufacturing processes Measures: Employee satisfaction survey Improvements in process controls

Learning and Growth Perspective Initiatives: Target Performance Actual Performance Employee participation and suggestion program to build teamwork 80% of employees give top two ratings 88% of employees give top two ratings Organize R&D/ manufacturing teams to modify processes 5 5

Aligning the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy Different strategies call for different scorecards. What are some of the financial perspective measures? Operating income Revenue growth Cost reduction is some areas Return on investment

Aligning the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy What are some of the customer perspective measures? Market share Customer satisfaction Customer retention percentage Time taken to fulfill customers requests

Aligning the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy What are some of the internal business perspective measures? Innovation Process: Manufacturing capabilities Number of new products or services New product development time Number of new patents

Aligning the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy Operations Process: Yield Defect rates Time taken to deliver product to customers Percentage of on-time delivery Setup time Manufacturing downtime

Aligning the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy Post-sales service: Time taken to replace or repair defective products Hours of customer training for using the product

Aligning the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy What are some of the learning and growth perspective measures? Employee education and skill level Employee satisfaction scores Employee turnover rates Information system availability Percentage of processes with advanced controls

Pitfalls When Implementing a Balanced Scorecard What pitfalls should be avoided when implementing a balanced scorecard? 1. Don’t assume the cause-and-effect linkages to be precise. 2. Don’t seek improvements across all measures all the time. 3. Don’t use only objective measures on the scorecard.

Pitfalls When Implementing a Balanced Scorecard 4. Don’t fail to consider both costs and benefits of initiatives such as spending on information technology and research and development. 5. Don’t ignore nonfinancial measures when evaluating managers and employees. 6. Don’t use too many measures.

Analyze changes in operating income to evaluate strategy. Learning Objective 4 Analyze changes in operating income to evaluate strategy.

Evaluating the Success of a Strategy Assume the following operating incomes: Year 2003 Year 2004 Revenues: (1,000,000 × $26) $26,000,000 (1,100,000 × $24) $26,400,000 Expenses: Materials 4,050,000 3,631,320 Other 16,000,000 16,000,000 Operating income $ 5,950,000 $ 6,768,680

Evaluating the Success of a Strategy How can the increase in operating income of $818,680 be evaluated? Growth Price recovery Productivity

Growth Component Assume that for 2003, Dallas produced and sold 1,000,000 units at $26 per unit. During the year 2004, Dallas produced and sold 1,100,000 units at $24 per unit. What is the revenue effect of growth?

Growth Component = – × Revenue effect of growth component (Actual units of output sold in 2004 – Actual units of output sold in 2003) × Output price in 2003 (1,100,000 – 1,000,000) × $26 = $2,600,000 F This component is favorable because it increases operating income.

Growth Component = – × Cost effect of growth component Actual units of input or capacity that would have been used in 2003 to produce year 2004 output assuming the same input-output relationship that existed in 2003 – Actual units or capacity to produce 2003 output × Input prices in 2003

Growth Component To produce 1,100,000 units in 2004 compared with the 1,000,000 units produced in 2003 (a 10% increase), Dallas would require a proportional increase in direct materials. Assume that 3,000,000 square centimeters of materials were used to produce the 1,000,000 units in 2003 at a cost of $1.35 per square centimeter.

Growth Component Assume that manufacturing conversion costs, selling and customer service costs and research and development costs were $16,000,000 and remained stable during 2004. What is the cost effect of the growth component? 3,000,000 × 110% = 3,300,000 centimeters (3,300,000 – 3,000,000) × $1.35 = $405,000 U

Operating Income and Growth What is the net increase in operating income as a result of growth? Revenue effect of growth component $2,600,000 F Cost effect of growth component 405,000 U Increase in operating income due to growth component $2,195,000 F

Price-Recovery Component Revenue effect of price-recovery component = (Output price in 2004 – Output price in 2003) × Actual units of output sold in 2004 What is the revenue effect of the price-recovery component? ($24 – $26) × 1,100,000 = $2,200,000 U

Price-Recovery Component Cost effect of price-recovery component = (Input prices in 2004 – Input prices in 2003) × Actual units of inputs or capacity that would have been used to produce year 2004 output assuming the same input-output relationship that existed in 2003 Assume that in the year 2004, direct materials costs were $1.31 per square centimeter.

Price-Recovery Component What is the cost effect of the price-recovery component? ($1.31 – $1.35) × 3,300,000 = $132,000 F What is the total effect on operating income of the price-recovery component?

Operating Income and Price-Recovery Component Revenue effect of price-recovery component $2,200,000 U Cost effect of price-recovery component 132,000 F Decrease in operating income due to price-recovery component $2,068,000 U

Productivity Component = Actual units of inputs or capacity to produce year 2004 output – Actual units of inputs or capacity that would have been used to produce year 2004 output assuming the same input-output relationship that existed in 2003 × Input prices in 2004

Productivity Component Assume that 2,772,000 actual square centimeters of direct materials were used in the year 2004. Actual price was $1.31/square centimeter.

Productivity Component What is the productivity component of cost changes? (2,772,000 – 3,300,000) × $1.31 = $691,680 F There is a $691,680 increase in operating income due to the productivity component.

Change in Operating Income Increase in operating income $818,680 Growth component $2,195,000 F Price-recovery component $2,068,000 U Productivity component $691,680 F

Distinguish between engineered and discretionary costs. Learning Objective 5 Distinguish between engineered and discretionary costs.

Engineered Costs Engineered costs result specifically from a clear cause-and-effect relationship between output and the resources needed to produce that output. They can be variable or fixed in the short run.

Discretionary Costs Discretionary costs have two important features. They arise from periodic (usually yearly) decisions regarding the maximum amount to be incurred. They have no measurable cause-and-effect relationship between output and resources used.

Relationships Between Inputs and Outputs Engineered costs differ from discretionary costs along two key dimensions: Type of process Level of uncertainty

Relationships Between Inputs and Outputs Engineered costs pertain to processes that are detailed, physically observable, and repetitive. Discretionary costs are associated with processes that are sometimes called black boxes, because they are less precise and not well understood.

Identify unused capacity Learning Objective 6 Identify unused capacity and how to manage it.

Managing Unused Capacity What actions can management take when it identifies unused capacity? Attempt to eliminate the unused capacity Attempt to use the unused capacity to grow revenue

End of Chapter 13