K. Liewer ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 ANITA Work Breakdown Structure and Schedule K. Liewer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LBT Q Eng/SW Review SFWG – Software Group General Norm Cushing.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO SRR Project Management.
Degree and Graduation Seminar Scope Management
Full Mission Simulation Test Report UPR-R(river) P(rock) University of Puerto Rico Río Piedras Campus May 14, 2010.
The Tail-Gate Information System Team: Paul and David Wickert Advisor: Dr. Mark Wickert.
K. Liewer ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 Gondola and Power Systems K. Liewer.
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
Proposal Work Breakdown Structure
Chapter 4 Defining the Project. NEED FOR DEFINING PROJECTS One Project, small Many small projects, or large one –Yes.
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
LSU 10/09/2007Project Tasks & Costs1 Defining the Project Tasks, Cost and Schedule Project Management Unit #3.
Defining the Activities. Documents  Goal Statement defines why helps manage expectations  Statement of Work what gets delivered defines scope  Software.
LSU 07/24/2004Defining Project Tasks1 Defining the Project Tasks Project Management Unit, Lecture 4.
Release Management and Rollout A very brief overview.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Introduction to Interactive Media 02. The Interactive Media Development Process.
Flight-like Flight Software Testing Methods Celina A Garcia Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology ©2009 California Institute of.
Project Management Life Cycle Katy Koenen 05/07/2013.
©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 4 Slide 1 Concerned with activities involved in ensuring that software is delivered: on.
ASPERA-3 Sep. 25, 00 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 9_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 9/25/00 Schedule statused.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Module 6 Session 6.1 Visual 1 Module 6 Preparing the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), Responsibility Matrix, and Master Summary Schedule Session 6.1 Preparing.
Project Management. The Project Management Institute
MULTIMEDIA DEVELOPMENT
Introduction to Interactive Media The Interactive Media Development Process.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T PDR Presentation – Jan. 9, 2002 R. Claus1 Integration and Test Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer.
IT Project Management, Third Edition Chapter 6 1 Chapter 3: Project Time Management.
Ch. 5: Project Planning Good Quote: Plans are only good intentions unless they immediately degenerate into hard work Lame excuses for not planning: Takes.
Software Project Management
Fundamentals of Project Management A complete flow.
Copyright 2008 Introduction to Project Management, Second Edition 2  Many people have heard the following sayings: ◦ If you fail to plan, you plan to.
Resources Performance time Project Planning Phase : Generating Tasks & Identifying Responsibilities 1.
Geog 469 GIS Workshop Project Management.
Project Life Cycle.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Software Planning Guidelines.
1 These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5/e and are provided with permission by.
Microsoft project 2003 Chapter 3 Entering Tasks. There are several approaches that we can take to fill in the Gantt Chart. Brainstorming Sequential Team.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Software Life Cycle The software life cycle is the sequence of activities that occur during software development and maintenance.
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 3. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT two UNIT threeProject UNIT four Preview Project Status Summary.
Student Made Ultraviolet Radiation Detector Presented for your approval by: THE LATE BALLOONERS StuMURD.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation – Oct 2, 2001 B. Grist1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
Engineering Economics Lecture 18 Project Management 6 January 2010.
CHAPTER 7 – Managing Project Schedules. “Plan the Work” “Work the Plan” “Endorse the Plan” + 10% of Project effort + 90% of Project effort “Align the.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
Computing Introduction Gareth Hunt EVLA System PDR 2001 December 04.
Math 5 Division (1 digit divisor) Instructor: Mrs. Tew Turner.
7 November 2006Program Management Basics Purdue FIRST Programs Slide 1 Program Management Basics Purdue FIRST Programs Chris Fultz Rolls-Royce Corporation.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Fall 2010 Software Planning Guidelines.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
STO Test Flight Strawman
Copyright All Rights Reserved by
I&T&C Organization Chart
ATom data management plan:
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Defining the Activities
MGMT 404 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
MGMT 404 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
Software Development Process
Scheduling Toolkit Observation Scheduling Boyd Waters, NRAO
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Helping Active Missions Convert to PDS4
Defining the Project Tasks, Cost and Schedule
Presentation transcript:

K. Liewer ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 ANITA Work Breakdown Structure and Schedule K. Liewer

K. Liewer - 1 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 Proposal Work Breakdown Structure Project Management UH/JPL Science Mission System Eng. UH/JPL/Bartol/Penn Instrument Development UH/Bartol/Penn Gondola Development UCI/Penn/UM Payload Integration UCI Calibration UCLA/UH Operations UCLA/UH/JPL NOTE: box size proportional to budget

K. Liewer - 2 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 WBS item description Project management –PI and project manager support Mission system engineering –EMI survey –environmental testing –system engineering –mission assurance Science –algorithm/software development –science data analysis Instrument development –antennas, front end (RF/IF), digitizers –flight computer and storage, flight software –LOS telemetry –refurbishment

K. Liewer - 3 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 WBS description (cont’d) Gondola development –engineering workforce –materials and services –power system development payload integration –engineering workforce, materials –integration and test support Calibration –antenna calibration –Antarctic calibration system –calibrate system and deploy Operations –ground data system development –data acquisition and archiving –instrument packaging and delivery –operations support

K. Liewer - 4 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 Task flow diagram

K. Liewer - 5 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 ANITA schedule from proposal

K. Liewer - 6 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 Concerns We appear to be roughly 1/2 year behind schedule –scheduled requirements review is one (short) month away –originally planned two quarters of work preparing requirements ‘03 money will probably not arrive until beginning of third quarter –may not cause a big slip; but it can’t help Schedule is just a strawman –fidelity should improve as we progress through the review cycle –work does not tend to shrink –need to find realistic ways to shorten up the schedule if we are to make the ‘06/’07 launch window

K. Liewer - 7 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 Needs Preliminary requirements ASAP List of receivables and deliverables –make sure nothing gets left undone (or done twice) –make sure everyone knows their responsibilities Estimates from the doing organizations on cost and schedule

K. Liewer - 8 ANITA-Irvine CA 11/25/02 Yet more concerns Requirement creep –“Better is the enemy of good” –We are limited in: $$$ Time –Need to settle on a reasonable design fairly quickly Before RR (6 months) Cost matches available money