CEP 901B Proseminar in Technology & Education Matt Koehler Punya Mishra February 18, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Conducting Ethical Research Slides Prepared by Alison L. O’Malley Passer Chapter 3.
Research Ethics The American Psychological Association Guidelines
Behavioral Research Chapter Three Ethical Research.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethics of Research I Lawrence R. Gordon Psychology Research Methods I.
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
1 Ethics in Psychological Research  Ethics – __________________  Research ethics – responsibility of researchers to be honest and respectful of all individuals.
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
CEP 901B Proseminar in Technology & Education Matt Koehler Punya Mishra February 04, 2003.
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
DR. BETHANY FLECK: SOTL FACULTY ASSOCIATE MICHAELA CLEMENS: HSPP COORDINATOR USING STUDENTS AS PARTICIPANTS NAVIGATING THE IRB FOR S O TL WORK CENTER FOR.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
Ethics IRB and Animal Care. Subjects (participants) can always withdraw from participation Determine Risk Minimal or not -if not then need permission.
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Ethics in research How do ethical issues inform and restrain research practices? How are humans and animals protected during research?
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
HUMAN SUBJECTS QUIZ! TRUE OR FALSE?
SoTL Research and the IRB Process Kathleen McKinney, Cross Chair in SoTL Nancy Latham, Campus IRB Executive Committee Phyllis McCluskey-Titus, SoTL Scholar.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
SOU Institutional Review Board
CHAPTER 2 Ethics in Psychological Research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
CHAPTER 7: Ethics in Psychological Research
SOU Institutional Review Board
Ethics lecture To publish research in psychology must first be approved be a board or committee at the institution you are working at. Institutional Review.
Chapter 4 Ethics.
Chapter 4 Ethics.
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Human Participants Research
SoTL Research and the IRB Process
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

CEP 901B Proseminar in Technology & Education Matt Koehler Punya Mishra February 18, 2003

Today… Combined class with 901A (ethics in research) Visit by Dr. Wallace & Discussion of readings Break Brief updates on your work so far

Announcements Monday, February 24th, 5:30, MSU Union: Susan Golden- Meadow, University of Chicago. Distinguished Speakers in Cognitive Science Lecture Series. Hearing Gestures: How our Hands Help us Think You are invited to a free bowl of another Moosewood Restaurant Daily Special:Eastern European Vegetable Stew.Serving begins at 11:45 in the LTC Soup Kitchen.First come, first served, while it lasts. (Enough for about 15 people.)People who don't like beets, turnips, and parsnips, need not apply!Patrick Dickson, Eastern European Vegetable Steward

Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1, 2003) Ethics in Cyberspace Research: Consent, Privacy and Contribution Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research in cyberspace (a report from the American Association for the Advancement of Science)

Ethics for Social Scientists / psychologists * General Standards Evaluation, assessment, or intervention Advertising and other public statements Therapy Privacy and confidentiality Teaching, training supervision, research, and publishing Forensic activities Resolving ethical issues * Thanks to Lawrence R. Gordon, University of Vermont (

Research Ethics (background) Where it comes from –Cost-benefit considerations (Utilitarianism) –Respect for human dignity (Deontology) Major principles underlying modern codes –Respect for persons - autonomy/consent –Beneficence - max benefit and min harm –Justice- benefits and burdens distributed fairly

Ethics of Human Research We can’t just do whatever we want! Protocols prepared and submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval IRB needs to give you permission to do your study

What Is the IRB? Committee responsible for reviewing all proposed research involving human participants at all schools receiving federal funds for research Members include faculty members from different departments, at least one community member, at least one nonscientist (at least 5 total members)

MSU (UCRIHS) At MSU, The Office of Research Ethics and Standards (ORES), houses among other things, the human subjects review –IRB at MSU is called UCHRIHS (University Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects) Contains forms, FAQ, Tutorials, Regulations and contant info.

What the IRB Does Its chief function: Considers costs and benefits of the research Is the research question worth the use of human participants? Because human participants do not need to participate in studies, their rights are the highest priority

Issues Voluntary participation –Informed consent need to know what might keep them for consenting need to be able to consent need to know the right to withdraw –Coercion vulnerable populations payment/compensation

Issues Deception –Is the value of the study worth it? –Alternatives? [Must be last alternative!] –Needs to be explained ASAP [Dehoaxing] Debriefing –Explain purpose of study –remove bad feelings [Desensitizing] –get information –thank participants

Informed consent Documented agreement with participants –clarifies the nature of the research and the responsibilities of each party Use language that is reasonably understandable Obtained prior to any data collection Explain significant factors that may influence the person's willingness to participate –risks, discomfort, adverse effects, or limitations on confidentiality and other aspects about which the person may inquire. Tell participants that they can withdraw from the research at any time If participants are legally incapable of giving informed consent, provide an appropriate explanation, obtain the person's consent, AND obtain permission from a legally authorized person Inform participants of how data will be used (privacy/confidentiality) Provide an opportunity to the participants to obtain information about research findings Give contact information for researcher and IRB official

Issues Experimenter conduct –PI has assumes all responsibility for fair treatment of participants (e.g. by assistants) –6 P’s of conduct Present Prompt Prepared Polite Private Professional

Submitting Protocols Exempt from review Expedited review Full review

–study of vulnerable populations –use of physically invasive techniques (e.g. drugs, exercise, x-rays) –psychological or emotional distress –behavior manipulation (includes ALL deception) –sensitive data (with ID) (e.g. drugs, sex, crime) –videotaping (potential for ID)

Expedited review –voice recordings (e.g. study of speech defects) –studies of behavior w/o manipulation or stress –study of existing documents that are not publicly available –use of noninvasive clinical assessments (such as weight, sensory acuity, EKG, but NOT x-rays)

Exempt from review –Educational practices –Anonymous survey, interview, or naturalistic observation (no identifiers) –Study of existing data, documents, or archival records that are publicly available (no ID) –Consumer surveys (ex. Quality of dining hall food)

Finally… In ALL aspects, first concern is the ethical treatment of participants, clients, consumers Do not see UCRIHS as a hoop to jump through (though they often make it look that way). The onus is on YOU as a researcher / scholar!

Teachers and Technology Visit by Raven Wallace

Reminders DKSC need to –Sum up the online activity for the yahoogroup Readings are up for next week, Three Monkeys in charge. –Visit by Yong Zhao & Ken Frank (maybe) –Topic: Technology Diffusion Please post to the Yahoogroup by the deadline (as decided by the group of the week)

Reminders II Continue thinking of research project –Continue to meet with your parole officers this week with some ideas of what you would like to conduct research on. Third summary in your annotated bibliography due TODAY –Continue to re-design your research page as per our discussions

Reminders III Preliminary, 1 paragraph summary of a research study you could do that fits your interests is due in two weeks.