PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARCHITECTURES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS
Advertisements

WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education
© 2005 Prentice Hall6-1 Stumpf and Teague Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design with UML.
Decision Making: An Introduction 1. 2 Decision Making Decision Making is a process of choosing among two or more alternative courses of action for the.
Research Methods in MIS
Seminar /workshop on cognitive attainment ppt Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Assessing APSS Students Learning.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis
Knowledge Acquisitioning. Definition The transfer and transformation of potential problem solving expertise from some knowledge source to a program.
Chapter 2 Succeeding as a Systems Analyst
Problem Solving and Decision Making A situation that exists when objectives are not being met. Problem Solving The process of taking corrective.
PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis
PPA 691 – Policy Analysis Lecture 7a-8a. Benefit-Cost Analysis.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Creative Problem Solving and Decision Making Chapter 4 Copyright © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights.
Learning Outcomes After reading this chapter, I will be able to:
Developing Ideas for Research and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
System Analysis System Analysis - Mr. Ahmad Al-Ghoul System Analysis and Design.
Chapter Three Research Design.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1 Enviromatics Decision support systems Decision support systems Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
Decision Making Dr Vasuprada Kartic NAC Batch IX PGDCPM.
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
Lecture 1 What is Modeling? What is Modeling? Creating a simplified version of reality Working with this version to understand or control some.
Applying creativity in CS high school education - criteria, teaching example and evaluation Romeike, R. (2007). Applying creativity in CS high school education.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education
Copyright © 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning All rights reserved 1 Chapter 8 Fundamentals of Decision Making.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
Business Analysis and Essential Competencies
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 4-1 Chapter 4 Participative Leadership, Delegation, and Empowerment.
Depth and Complexity ICONS
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Frames Icons. Over Time Means Issues of importance past, present and future Applying something historic to present knowledge Predicting something based.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Chapter 11 Individual and Group Decision Making Models of Decision Making Models of Decision Making Dynamics of Decision Dynamics of Decision Making Making.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama Copyright © 2005 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Foundations.
1 CHAPTER 2 Decision Making, Systems, Modeling, and Support.
Part 2: Planning PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Foundations of Decision Making.
METODE PENELITIAN AKUNTANSI. Tugas Tugas Telaah Tugas Riset.
Unpacking the Elements of Scientific Reasoning Keisha Varma, Patricia Ross, Frances Lawrenz, Gill Roehrig, Douglas Huffman, Leah McGuire, Ying-Chih Chen,
© Farhan Mir 2007 IMS Management Thoughts & Practices MBA & BBA Lecture 6 (Decision Making the Essence of Managerial Job) By: Farhan Mir.
Lecture : 5 Problem Identification And Problem solving.
Screen 1 of 20 Vulnerability Vulnerability Assessment LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose and scope of vulnerability assessment. Understand how vulnerability.
Academic Research Academic Research Dr Kishor Bhanushali M
Management Practices Lecture 27.
Individual and Group Decision Making
1 CHAPTER 2: DECISION MAKING, SYSTEMS, MODELING, AND SUPPORT Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 7th.
Chapter 6 DECISION MAKING: THE ESSENCE OF THE MANAGER’S JOB 6.1 © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Depth and Complexity ICONS
Lifelong Learning: Construction of competencies and knowledge.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
3-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Three Research Design.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Manager ethics ETHICAL DECISION MAKING MODEL Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
How to Apply it in the Classroom Elicit ideas Elaboration & Reconstruc- tion Frequent problem based activities Variety of info. & resources Collaboration.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology 1 Decision Analysis Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University.
Project Identification and Selection Dr. Mohamed Riyazh Khan DoMS.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Click to edit Master title style What is Business Analysis Body of Knowledge?
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Chapter 2 Succeeding as a Systems Analyst 2.1.
Introduction to research
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Classification of Research
Research and Methodology
Chapter 1: Introduction to Engineering Economy
Presentation transcript:

PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis Lectures 3&4 – Problem Structuring

Nature of Policy Problems Problem structuring, which is a continuously recurring phase of policy inquiry in which analysts search among competing problem formulations of different stakeholders, is no doubt the most important activity performed by policy analysts. It is so important because policy analysts seem to fail more often because they solve the wrong problem than because they get the wrong solution to the right problem.

Nature of Policy Problems Beyond problem solving. Policy analysis is a dynamic, multilevel process in which methods of problem structuring take priority over methods of problem solving (see figure).

Priority of Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis

Nature of Policy Problems Beyond problem solving. Distinctions among problem-related processes. Problem sensing versus problem structuring. Problem structuring versus problem solving. Problem resolving versus problem unsolving and problem dissolving. Characteristics of problems. Interdependence of policy problems (policy messes). Analytic versus holistic approaches. Subjectivity of policy problems. Artificiality of policy problems. Dynamics of policy problems.

Nature of Policy Problems Characteristics of problems (contd.) In short, systems of problems (messes) cannot be decomposed into independent subsets without running the risk of producing the right solution to the wrong problem. The whole is greater (qualitatively different) than the sum of its parts. A recognition of the interdependence, subjectivity, artificiality, and dynamics of policy problems alerts us to the possible unanticipated consequences that may follow from policies based on the right solution to the wrong problem.

Nature of Policy Problems Problems versus issues. If policy problems are really systems of problems, then policy issues are equally complex. Policy issues reflect not only conflict over courses of actions, but over definitions of the problem.

Nature of Policy Problems

Nature of Policy Problems Problems versus issues. Major issues. Those encountered at highest levels of government within and between federal, state, and local jurisdictions. Involve questions of agency mission. Secondary issues. Located at the level of agency programs at the federal, state, and local levels. The setting of program priorities and the definition of target groups and beneficiaries.

Nature of Policy Problems Problems versus issues. Functional issues. Located at both the program and project levels. Involve questions of budget, finance, and procurement. Minor issues. Located at the level of specific projects. Involve questions of personnel, staffing, employee benefits, vacation times, working hours, and standard operating procedures.

Nature of Policy Problems Problems versus issues. Strategic policies are policies where the consequences are relatively irreversible. Operational polices are policies where the consequences are relatively reversible.

Nature of Policy Problems Three classes of policy problems. Well-structured. Prototype: completely computerized decision problems. Moderately structured. Prototype: prisoner’s dilemma. Ill-structured. Prototype: most important problems.

Nature of Policy Problems ELEMENT STRUCTURE OF PROBLEM Well structured Moderately Structured Ill Structured Decision maker(s) One or few Many Alternatives Limited Unlimited Utilities (values) Consensus Conflict Outcomes Certainty or risk Uncertainty Unknown Probabilities Calculable Incalculable

Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis The requirements for solving ill-structured problems demand that the analyst take an active role in defining the problem.

Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis Creativity in problem structuring. The product of the analysis is sufficiently novel that most people could not or would not have arrived at the same solution; The process of analysis is sufficiently unconventional that it involves the modification or rejection of previous accepted ideas; The process of analysis requires sufficiently high motivation and persistence that analysis takes place with high intensity or over long periods of time;

Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis Creativity in problem structuring (contd.). The product of analysis is regarded as valuable by analysts, policymakers, and other stakeholders, since it provides an appropriate solution to the problem; And. The problem initially posed is so ambiguous, value, and ill defined that part of the task is to formulate the problem itself.

Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis Phases of problem structuring. Problem search. Problem definition. Problem specification. Problem sensing.

Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis

Problem Structuring in Policy Analysis Errors of the third type (EIII). How well do the substantive and formal problems correspond to the original problem situation? If most problem situations are messes, then models should reflect complexity. Types of errors. Type I – rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. Type II – accepting the null hypothesis when it is false. Type III – solving the wrong problem.

Types of Policy Models Policy models are simplified representations of selected aspects of a problem situation constructed for specific purposes. By definition, they are artificial constructs. Descriptive models. The purpose of descriptive models is to explain and/or predict the causes and consequences of policy choices. Used to monitor the outcomes of policy actions and to forecast performance.

Types of Policy Models Normative models. Explain and predict, but also to provide rules and recommendations for optimizing some utility or value. Example: compound interest.

Forms of Policy Models Verbal models. Symbolic models. Expressed in everyday language. The equivalent of substantive problems. Limitation: the reasons for recommendations and predictions may be hidden. Symbolic models. Use mathematical symbols to describe relationships among key variables believed to characterize a problem. The premises must be made explicit.

Forms of Policy Models

Forms of Policy Models Procedural models. Represent dynamic relationships among variables believed to characterize a policy problem. Example: Decision tree.

Methods of Problem Structuring Boundary analysis (used to estimate boundaries of metaproblem). Saturation sampling. Elicitation of problem representations. Boundary estimation. Classificational analysis. Uses logical division and logical classification. Criteria. Substantive relevance. Exhaustiveness. Disjointness. Consistency. Hierarchical distinctiveness.

Methods of Problem Structuring Hierarchy analysis. Possible clauses, plausible causes, and actionable causes. Uses same rules as classificational analysis. Synectics. Personal analogies. Direct analogies. Symbolic analogies. Fantasy analogies.

Methods of Problem Structuring Brainstorming. Groups should be composed of knowledgeable subjects. Idea generation and idea evaluation should be kept separate. Atmosphere should be open and permissive. Idea-evaluating should only begin after idea-generating has ceased. At the end of idea-evaluating, ideas should be prioritized and incorporated into a proposal that contains a conceptualization of the problem and its potential solutions.

Methods of Problem Structuring Multiple perspective analysis. Technical perspective. Organizational perspective. Personal perspective. Assumptional analysis. Stakeholder identification. Assumption surfacing. Assumption challenging. Assumption pooling. Assumption synthesis.

Methods of Problem Structuring Argumentation mapping. Assessing probability and plausibility of policy argument warrants.