March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski1 Disposition flow charts Laying out the onion layers; temporary and longer term storage The measured radiation environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Advertisements

MICE: Hall Infrastructure Chris Nelson CEng CM16 8 th Oct 2006.
RACKS AND CABLES Peter Kim SLAC LST Install Readiness Review May 5, 2004.
August 6, 2007Bill Wisniewski1 Collaboration post-operations planning: analysis, computing, manpower (brief). BaBar Detector Rampdown Detector Description.
Jan 28th, 2009Colin Jessop at Notre Dame An experiment to measure CP violation in B mesons Colin Jessop University of Notre Dame.
October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review 2005 IR-2 Installation Discussion H.J. Krebs October 22, 2003.
BaBar: The Detector Richard F Boyce 21 October 2003.
May 5, 2004H.J. Krebs LST Installation Readiness Review 2004 IR-2 Installation Schedule H.J. Krebs May 5, 2004.
March 23, 2009H.J. Krebs1 BaBar D&D Schedule & Budget Overview H. James Krebs March 23, 2009.
March 23, 200Bill Wisniewski1 Intro to BaBar Detector and its subsystems Identify the assets Look at reuse potential Preserve the assets Minimal maintenance.
May 4, 2004Bill Wisniewski1 Installation Review. May 4, 2004Bill Wisniewski2 Charge ( W. Althouse, G. Bowden, W. Innes(chair), J.Weisend, (D. Nelson))
October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review 2004 IR-2 Installation Schedule H.J. Krebs October 22, 2003.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
Experimental Area Meeting V. Bobillier1 Good connection to earth (in many points) of every metallic parts to be installed in the cavern is very.
Global Design Effort Detector concept Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Kurt Krempetz September 17, 2007.
1 Cryostat assembly, integration and commissioning procedures M.Olcese Version: 07 May 2008.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
3 March 2009M. Breidenbach1 SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach.
LST Storage and Testing at SLAC in the SLD Hall Available space Available Infrastructure Needed Infrastructure Time Line People Money Carsten Hast (SLAC)
Overview of Materials Disposition. 2 DOE Moratorium and Suspension Effective in 2000 Moratorium prohibits the unrestricted release for recycling of contaminated.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
October 21, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review Handling & Installation Fixtures Design and Fabrication Status H.J. Krebs October 10, 2003.
1 ILD/CMS Engineering Meeting M. Joré – ILD integration philosophy Integration philosophy of ILD Matthieu Joré – January 21st Integration of the subdetectors.
OK, now my favorite subject: RPCs in a shipping container
August 6, 2007Bill Wisniewski1 D&D Task Force: PEPII team: S.DeBarger, S.Ecklund, A.Hill, D.Kharakh, M.Zurawel BaBar team: H.J.Krebs, S.Pierson, W.Wisniewski.
1 5 December 2012 Laurent Roy Infrastructure / Electronics Upgrade -Cabling (long distance) -Rack and Crate (space, electrical distribution, cooling) -Detector.
Tariq J. Solaija, NCP Forward RPC EDR, Tariq Solaija Forward RPC EDR The Standard RPC for low  regions Tariq J. Solaija National Centre for.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
1 MICE Hall and Infrastructure - Progress since CM18 Chris Nelson MICE CM19 Oct 2007.
July 7, 2008Bill Wisniewski1 Identify the assets Look at reuse potential Preserve the assets Minimal maintenance state Settle ownership Plan & execute.
Test Tube Activities at Ohio State (8/5/03) Two (very useful) sub-group meetings after last weekly meeting –Mechanics (Bill, Lu, Mark, Jim, Charlie, Klaus)
D0 PMG 6/15/00 PMG Agenda June 15, 2000  Overview (Tuts) u Detector status u Reportable milestones u Financial status u Summary  Response to DOE review.
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002.
B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 Overview of re-use requests and related issues D. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA.
Blair Ratcliff, SLACUS R&D Meeting, Sept. 3, 2008 Blair Ratcliff SLAC Detector R&D: Overview and Opportunities Detector Overview (some old news!). Present.
B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 B Factory D&D: Strategy Overview S. Kahn Director, PPA.
CMS Upgrade Workshop, FNAL, Oct 28-30, O.Prokofiev Update ME4/2 Chambers and Tooling A construction of new ME4/2 prototype at CERN Factory tooling,
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
GlueX Collaboration May05 C. Cuevas 1 Topics: Infrastructure Update New Developments EECAD & Modeling Tools Flash ADC VXS – Crates GlueX Electronics Workshop.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
BABAR Overview & Ramp-Down Planning David B. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA August 6, 2007.
May 31, 2010Bill Wisniewski1 Mechanical Integration Issues.
October 7, 2009H.J. Krebs1 Super B WorkShop Overview of BaBar Detector Assembly/Installation Documentation Jim Krebs.
Integration Prototype1 BaBar Integration as a Prototype for SuperB Bill Wisniewski SuperB Workshop at LNF 6 April 2011.
Project Overview James Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
June 2, 2008 Bill Wisniewski1 BaBar Disassembly and Disposal Overview.
Comments on Services Elba Comments on Services & … Bill Wisniewski SLAC.
October 6, 2009Bill Wisniewski1 State of drawings Remedies? Forward Region DIRC/DCH/EMC interplay Road Trip Discussion Beam pipe & forward cone plug ‘Quick’
01 June 2011F. Raffaelli1 Super B Mechanical integration. List of reference persons and institutions for the mechanic of the sub detectors. Review of the.
Introduction BaBar Components The Problem IFR Upgrade: 2004 & 2005
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Bill Wisniewski SuperB Frascati Meeting September 30, 2010
Transport Issues for EMC Barrel
Workshop Goals for the Detector Groups
SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.
BaBar IFR Upgrade Mark Convery SLAC 7 Jun 06.
Integration and IR Hall
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
Limited Streamer Tubes
RPC and LST at High Luminosity
Francesco Forti SuperB Workshop LNF, March, 2006
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
SuperB Integration Summary of previous integration sessions.
Inner DET. Integration Inner detector envelope Radial clearances.
Limited Streamer Tube Project Summary
SuperB Integration Summary of the Integration Status
Presentation transcript:

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski1 Disposition flow charts Laying out the onion layers; temporary and longer term storage The measured radiation environment Detector components Easily retrieved components, non-US funding Components with high re-use potential and value Components with lesser value worth holding Components from outside the accelerator housing Structures from inside the accelerator housing Storage: Metals Suspension material BaBar Material Disposition Planning

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski2 BaBar Detector Cerenkov Detector (DIRC) 144 quartz bars PMTs 1.5 T Solenoid Electromagnetic Calorimeter 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals Drift Chamber 40 stereo layers Instrumented Flux Return Iron & Brass/RPCs, LSTs (muon/neutral hadrons) Silicon Vertex Tracker 5 layers, double sided strips e + (3.1 GeV) e - (9 GeV) ‘ The Core of the Problem

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski3 BaBar Detector ‘But, then there is all the rest’ Shield wall removed The Border Platforms, cables, racks, electronics, conduit, etc.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski4 Materials Disposition Flow Charts Meetings to discuss materials disposition were begun last July. Attendees included representatives from BaBar, PPA Safety, Radiation Physics, Environmental Protection, Waste Management, Property Control, Salvage. Developed flow charts in discussions that covered the likely futures for the various components of the detector.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski5 Materials Disposition Flow Charts Process development complicated by the Metals Suspension: Require two charts, one to handle materials that came from the Accelerator Housing (ie, Radiation Area), and those that came from outside the Concrete Shield Wall. The line demarcating Inside vs Outside is drawn at the outside edge of the Shield Wall. Many services pass through the Shield Wall: cables and pipes. Line of demarcation transferred to the materials (eg, double ring of tape to indicate in/out boundary on a cable). Most of the effort focused on the flow chart for materials from inside the Accelerator Housing You will see this chart used extensively in presentations tomorrow morning. A first look:

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski6

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski7 Materials Disposition Flow Charts Disassembly work inside the Accelerator Housing began with the sign-off of the Safety Plan this month. Power for the end door drive mechanisms, dependent on detector power which flowed through the Electronics Hut that was cut off in preparation for the move of the EH, was re-established from local sources. This process produced our first material removed from the accelerator housing. Disassembly of platforms and removal of the Muon Shield Wall will provide a continued test of this materials distribution flow chart in the coming weeks. We expect that the flow charts may evolve as our experience increases. A flow chart for materials from outside the Accelerator Housing (Radiation Area), though still inside the IR2 RCA (ie, Bldg 620) follows in the next transparency:

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski8 IR2 Non-RA

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski9 Storage Areas IR2 Containers: for storage of electronics components before final disposition. Both hold/non-hold: labeled for contents, bar-code affixed. IR12 Hall: storage/disassembly of high value items. CEH: temporary storage of large steel items. SLAC N Adit: temporary storage of mid sized service items. SLAC N Adit Outside Fenced Area: storage of platforms and stairways that have been in the accelerator housing. IR8 Hall: storage of smaller items (eg, crystal storage hut). Currently, not for Hold Materials. IR8 Outside Fenced Area: storage, not for Hold Materials Sector 12 Fenced Area: pen formed by shield wall blocks. Not yet constructed; may not be needed. Storage Building (PEP): long term storage of bulk steel and structures, assuming Metals Suspension Exemption fails. Not yet build of planned. Bar codes for identification, clear labeling, and database control are critical for success in keeping straight the history of materials.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski10 Storage Areas

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski11 Radiation Environment BaBar detector systems each were concerned about their radiation environment. For the SVT, a series of PIN diodes were arrayed at key points around the detector, and instantaneous and integrated doses measured. Dose max ~5 Mrad

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski12 Radiation Environment For the EMC, an array of radFETs covered the inner surface of the Barrel and Endcap to keep track of the integrated dose to the crystals. There are 56 arrayed in 8 rows in phi in the Barrel, and 60 in front of the Endcap in three rings. Worst case EC ~2krad

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski13 Radiation Environment The Radiation Physics team proposes to obtain an exemption from the Metals Suspension using simulation to predict the expected dose, and new measurements of materials after they are removed from the Accelerator Housing as verification. These measurements from the BaBar data-taking phase provide a point of reference for the Radiation Physics team’s simulations. The expectation is that there will be very little activated material encountered in the BaBar disassembly, perhaps at most components from inside the support tube.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski14 Collaborator Owned Materials In the period between the formal declaration that the data-taking phase of the experiment was over (October 2008), and the transfer of ownership to DOE, the Collaborators can retrieve at their cost items they contributed to the detector, as described in detail in David’s talk earlier today. Some of the collaborators have chosen to do this. SVT: HV system components; spare cables and power supplies; test stand components. The intention here is to be able to perform the final set of off beampipe characterization. (Italy) DCH: Gas system from gas shack; test equipment. (France) DIRC: Front-end crates and electronics; HV supplies; test bench equipment; calibration system; spares. (France) EMC: Light pulser system modules and crates. (Germany) Few spare crystals (Germany, UK). IFR: LST LV & HV cables; LST front end electronics; RPC avalanche mode electronics & DAQ crates and modules, as well as a few streamer mode front end electronics modules. Trig: several trigger boards for display purpose (UK). There is a substantial amount of ‘hold material’ in this set that would have required special handling.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski15 Components of High Re-use Potential Magnet: store coil in cryostat, ancillary equipment (dump resistor, valve box, etc) in IR12 for the long term. [SuperB reuse]. Calorimeter: best used in current structure. [SuperB reuse]. If no reuse, disassemble to crystals and store the crystals, but reuse value is diminished. If no reuse for individual crystals, scrap. It is unlikely that crystal vendors would buy the crystals, but they are interested in them as a raw material source (salt value). The aluminum structure would also have to be stored [Hold Material].

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski16 Components of High Re-use Potential DIRC [SuperB reuse] Store bar boxes in container in Research Yard. Support structure to be stored in IR12. Disassemble of no re-use. Store pieces for the long term [Hold Material]

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski17 Components of Lesser Value There are two classes here: components with lesser value that are easily stored which have some reuse value; electronics crates, power supplies, etc. Examples: LST modules. Easily stored (containers). Storage boxes will be bar-coded and labeled as to source. The wires and Cu ground planes constitute the metal. Phototubes. Store after breakdown of the SOB. Potential use in low rates experiments. Storage boxes will be bar- coded and labeled as to source. [requests from PPA, LBNL] Electronics crates (VME), power supplies (HV). Bar code and label as to source individually. Have ready re-use in the laboratory environment. BaBar specific electronics boards will be surveyed and packed for temporary storage; if no reuse identified, they will be disposed of.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski18 Components From Outside the RA These are composed of the contents of the Electronics Hut and services from the floor of IR2 outside the EH (including cable segments from outside the shield wall), as well as the remaining contents of the Gas Shack. All these items will be surveyed before leaving IR2. Bar code tags will be affixed equipment. Electronic Hut: reuse as compute farm structure. Remains in IR2. Electronics: Power supplies (HV, LV) and VME crates have unrestricted reuse. Store electronics in the short term till it is certain there is no reuse, at which point, discard (salvage). Chillers: Commercial units are easily reused on site, or may have a SuperB reuse. DIRC purification system: Mothball for potential reuse. Free Release items with no reuse (readout fibers, etc.).

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski19 Structures from Inside the RA The magnet flux return is composed of thick slabs of steel and large support girders and slabs that are classic Metals Suspension components for bulk activation. The steel is not expected to be activated. Reuse of some or all of the steel is not unlikely if SuperB proves to be viable. Components of the steel such the inner barrel sextants may not be a good match for the new detector and may need to be retained. Cut into plates, bar-coded, stenciled and labeled, these could find reuse on site as shielding material.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski20 Storage: Metals Suspension Material To understand liability if reuse expectations fail and no exemption to the Metals Suspension is obtained, it is best to consider the space required to store the components of disassembled BaBar. The magnet in its cryostat and ancillary equipment will continue to be stored in IR12. The EMC crystals are stored in a modest-sized dry crystal hut in IR12. This is expected to be the size of a 20 ft shipping container and is included in the Jim’s project cost estimate. The DIRC bars are stored in their container. This is a 20 ft container. The disassembled EMC, DIRC and flux return structures are stored in the same building as the PEPII components. The incremental area needed is developed on the next transparency.

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski21 Storage: Metals Suspension Material Incremental area: EMC: split barrel support cylinder into two parts. Store each on the floor with cylinder axis vertical. Store support plate for endcap flat with remaining barrel and endcap parts atop it. Aisle space (assume ~25%) for access brings this to: 400 sq ft. DIRC: store cylindrical structures with axis vertical: strong support tube, SOB, central support tube. Store gusset and wings flat. DIRC magnetic shield D structure stacked. Area needed: 500 sq ft. Barrel Sextants: split into two blocks each for transport. These will need to be lifted in via crane or large capacity fork lift since up to ~40T. Store sextant restacked. Store gap filler plates, corner blocks, etc, stacked 4 deep sq ft. End Door Steel: feet stacked two deep. Each door flat. Auxiliary steel stacked 4 deep. Plug parts in stands sq ft. Detector frame: belt beams stacked three deep. Stands sq ft. Total Area: ~5600 sq ft. Incremental building cost at $200/sq ft ~ $1.12M Labor for move: 6 people (engineer, safety, riggers, workers) ~ 1 month: $.09M Total incremental cost with 50% contingency: $1.8M

March 23, 2009Bill Wisniewski22 Summary Schemes have been developed for the treatment of the detector components as they are removed from BaBar and IR2 Storage areas have been set up. The radiation environment of two BaBar subsystems has been presented. An exemption from the Metals Suspension will be sought. In the worst case, where there is no significant reuse, and assuming failure to obtain a Metals Suspension exemption, space required in a minimal building has been estimated. If anticipated reuse occurs, the material left for salvage could be quite minimal.