Using Mineralization Estimates to Predict Nitrogen Fertilizer Needs N.W. CHRISTENSEN*, R.S. KAROW, D.M. BALOCH, and M.H. QURESHI Department of Crop and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Vegetable Crops Laura L. Van Eerd, Ph.D., P.Ag. Ridgetown College, University of Guelph
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Soil N Monitoring, Fall 2012 Webinar October 19, 2012 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois
Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13,
PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY SILAGE CORN IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Amber Moore, Steve Hines, Brad Brown, Mario de Haro Marti, Christi Falen, Mireille Chahine, Tianna Fife,
World Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Cereal Crops Guilherme Torres, Natasha Macnack, Bee Chim, Jeremiah Mullock, and William Raun Oklahoma State University,
University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Soil Science 2006 Regional Experiences With The Illinois Amino Sugar N Test Larry G. Bundy and Jeffery T.
Effect of Long-term Cattle Manure Application on Soil Test Phosphorus, Organic Carbon and Winter Wheat Grain Yield Natasha Macnack, Peter Omara, Lawrence.
Influence of Minjingu rock phosphate on biological nitrogen fixation and performance of Lupin (Lupinus albus) in Kabete, Kenya.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
Using Adapt-N On-farm strip trials on Long Island, NY: Above: A = 93 lb N, G = 159 lb N Below: A = 132 lb N, G = 175 lb N AG AG Incorporating Local Weather.
Wheat Protein Enhancement with N Intervention: Why the Concern? B.D. Brown and N.W. Christensen.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
Fertilizing Pastures Gene Pirelli Oregon State University.
Soil Testing Procedures for Biologically Based Systems Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, Nebraska
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Millar, N. and G. P. Robertson Nitrogen transfers and transformations in row-crop ecosystems. Pages in S. K. Hamilton, J. E. Doll, and G.
Using Manure for Row Crop Production Edwin Ritchey Extension Soil Specialist UK-REC.
Methods and Materials Soils – 25 Kansas soils were dried for 48 h at 60 o C, ground, sieved to 2 mm. After preparation, soils were analyzed for Walkley-Black.
Comparison of Regional and NuMaSS Fertilizer Rates in On-station and On-farm Trials in Northern Ghana Jesse B. Naab 1, C. Yamoah 2, R. Yost 3 and R.A.
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
Improved fertilizer effect of nitrogen - trials in winter wheat Cattle slurry Pig slurry Digested slurry N-utilization, % (fertilizer.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
N supply in stockless organic cereal production under northern temperate conditions. Undersown legumes, or whole-season green manure? Anne-Kristin Løes,
Phosphorus Retention Capacity of a Pilot Stormwater Treatment Area in the Lake Okeechobee Basin Y. Wang 1, K.R. Reddy 1, V. Nair 1, O. Villapando 2, and.
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
 Part of › Amino Acids: Building blocks of proteins › Enzymes: responsible for all biological process › Nucleic Acids › Cholorphyll  Needed for Carbohydrate.
Organic Waste N and P Dynamics Under Dryland Agroecosystems Jim Ippolito and Ken Barbarick USDA-ARS-NWISRL & Colorado State University.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Introduction Higher market prices relative to the predominant soft white class has increased grower interest in the production of hard red spring wheat.
Economics of Alternative Rotations North Central Research Association March 11, 2004.
Repeated undersowing of clover in organic cereal production. Nutrient dynamics and sustainability. Anne-Kristin Løes, Bioforsk Organic Food and Farming.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Ivona Sigurnjak, C. Vaneeckhaute, E. Michels, B. Ryckaert,
Within Field Variation in Corn Response to N Fred Below Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Can deep roots remove the N surplus? Main crops Catch crops Crop sequence Kristian Thorup-Kristensen Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Plantekongres.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency as Influenced by Crop Response Index. G.V. Johnson, W.R. Raun, R.W. Mullen, R.L. Westerman and B.B. Tucker Department of Plant.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Influence of Late-Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Grain Protein in Winter Wheat C.W. Woolfolk, W.R. Raun, G.V. Johnson E.G. Krenzer, and W.E. Thomason.
Management Practices and Nitrogen Availability for Organic Vegetables Grace (Guihua) Chen University of Maryland, Dept. of Entomology Contact:
Introduction : Phosphorus (P) is one of the critical nutrient elements after nitrogen for increasing crop growth and yield. The Phosphatic fertilizers.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
Precision Agriculture Technologies: An Opportunity for new Approaches to N management John Schmidt Department of Agronomy Kansas State University.
Nitrogen Spatial Distribution in a Sandy Soil Cropped with Tomatoes under Seepage Irrigation Shinjiro Sato Monica Ozores-Hampton.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Assessment of suitability of different extractants for estimation of available boron status in Soils ARITRA SAHA, PABITRA KUMAR MANI & GORACHAND.
Grain Sorghum Rotations
Soil Testing & Interpretation
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Predicting Yield Potential, 2007
Nitrogen (N) use efficiency of rice grown in Arkansas.
History of Predicting Yield Potential
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.406
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Relationship Between Root Biomass and Water – Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield in Bread Wheat ‘Pavon 76’ and Its 1RS Translocation Lines J.G. Waines1,
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Crop and Soil Science Department
Biomass Yield and Nutrient Accumulation by Four Small Grain Species
Presentation transcript:

Using Mineralization Estimates to Predict Nitrogen Fertilizer Needs N.W. CHRISTENSEN*, R.S. KAROW, D.M. BALOCH, and M.H. QURESHI Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University Situation Rainfed soft white winter wheat is grown in rotation with a number of crops in the Willamette Valley of western Oregon. Rainfed soft white winter wheat is grown in rotation with a number of crops in the Willamette Valley of western Oregon. Preceding crops affect wheat response to N fertilizer in an unpredictable manner. Preceding crops affect wheat response to N fertilizer in an unpredictable manner. Inorganic soil N concentrations fail to predict wheat response to spring-applied N. Inorganic soil N concentrations fail to predict wheat response to spring-applied N. Objectives Relate field estimates of crop-available N to laboratory estimates of soil N mineralization potential Relate field estimates of crop-available N to laboratory estimates of soil N mineralization potential Predict N fertilizer needs using an N budget that includes laboratory estimates of nitrogen mineralization potential Predict N fertilizer needs using an N budget that includes laboratory estimates of nitrogen mineralization potential Methods Wheat response to N fertilizer Field research:Nineteen small-plot and on-farm trials, 1994 through 1999 Field research:Nineteen small-plot and on-farm trials, 1994 through 1999 Wheat cultivars:‘Stephens’, ‘Gene’ and ‘Madsen’ Wheat cultivars:‘Stephens’, ‘Gene’ and ‘Madsen’ Soils:Argiaquic Xeric Argialbolls, Aquultic Argixerolls, Cumulic Ultic Argixerolls, and Pachic Ultic Argixerolls Soils:Argiaquic Xeric Argialbolls, Aquultic Argixerolls, Cumulic Ultic Argixerolls, and Pachic Ultic Argixerolls Preceding crops: Clover, corn, grass, and oats Preceding crops: Clover, corn, grass, and oats N rates:0 to 224 kg N ha -1 applied at Feekes 5 N rates:0 to 224 kg N ha -1 applied at Feekes 5 Design:RCB with 4 or 5 N rates in 3 or 4 blocks Design:RCB with 4 or 5 N rates in 3 or 4 blocks Measured responses:Grain yield, grain protein, and aboveground N removal regressed on N rate Measured responses:Grain yield, grain protein, and aboveground N removal regressed on N rate Laboratory analyses Plant N:Leco CNS 2000 Plant N:Leco CNS 2000 Soil sample:0 to 30 cm, collected in Jan- Feb Soil sample:0 to 30 cm, collected in Jan- Feb Soil inorganic N:NO 3 -N and NH 4 -N Soil inorganic N:NO 3 -N and NH 4 -N Mineralizable soil N:Anaerobic incubation Mineralizable soil N:Anaerobic incubation  20 g soil sample plus 50 mL H 2 0 in 250 mL bottle  Incubate air-tight bottle at 40° C for 7 d  Extract with 50 mL 2 M KCl and filter  Analyze for NH 4 -N  Subtract pre-incubation NH 4 -N Calculations Crop-available N (kg N ha -1 ) = (plant N t2 - plant N t1 ) + (soil N t2 - soil N t1 ) where:plant N = N uptake by unfertilized control where:plant N = N uptake by unfertilized control soil N= NH 4 + NO 3 to 30 cm t 1 = Feekes 5 t 2 = harvest N fertilizer prediction (kg N ha -1 ) = 300 – (N min + soil N t1 + plant N t1 ) where:300 = empirical constant where:300 = empirical constant N min = anaerobic soil test N soil N= NH 4 + NO 3 to 30 cm t 1 = Feekes 5 N rate at Maximum Economic Yield (kg N ha -1 ) = ((P N /P Y ) – b 1 )/2*b 2 where:P N = $ 0.62 kg -1 N ($ 0.28 lb -1 N) where:P N = $ 0.62 kg -1 N ($ 0.28 lb -1 N) P Y = $ 0.13 kg -1 grain ($ 3.60 bu -1 ) b 1 = linear regression coefficient b 2 = quadratic regression coefficient Results Conclusions Nitrogen available to winter wheat can be estimated by measuring mineralizable soil N in the laboratory (Fig. 1). Nitrogen available to winter wheat can be estimated by measuring mineralizable soil N in the laboratory (Fig. 1).  Preceding crops influence crop-available N  Differences exist within and among crops Nitrogen fertilizer requirements can be calculated from laboratory estimates (Fig. 2). Nitrogen fertilizer requirements can be calculated from laboratory estimates (Fig. 2).  Mean N fertilizer uptake efficiency at MEY = 0.66 Yield and protein of soft white winter wheat fertilized for MEY fall within acceptable ranges (Fig. 3). Yield and protein of soft white winter wheat fertilized for MEY fall within acceptable ranges (Fig. 3).  Mean yield = 8.25 Mg ha -1 ; range 5.62 to 10.8  Mean protein = 92 g kg -1 ; range 81 to 104 g kg -1 N min soil test ( mg N kg -1 ) Crop-available N ( kg ha -1 ) Available N = 5.71*N min R 2 = 0.78 Fig. 1.N min soil test correlation Fig. 2.N fertilizer prediction N fertilizer recommended ( kg ha -1 ) N fertilizer for MEY ( kg ha -1 ) MEY N = 1.11*Rec N – R 2 = 0.89 Fig. 3.Grain yield and protein at MEY Grain protein ( g kg -1 ) Grain yield ( Mg ha -1 ) Outlier: Wheat after clover unresponsive >56 kg N ha -1