Purdue Ag Summit – September 13, 2002 Larry Svajgr, Executive Director Indiana Crop Improvement Association Maintenance of Product Integrity.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Use of reference materials As Calibrators For metrological traceability As QC control To ensure international comparability –Only common reference point.

Advertisements

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Identification & Documentation of Shipments of Living Modified Organisms Le Protocole de Cartagena : LIdentification et.

Question’s posed to panel What steps do you take to safeguard the purity of your crop/seed production? What steps do you take to safeguard the purity of.

NDSU Agriculture NDSU Policy on Biotech Research & GM Wheat Update Duane Hauck Assistant Director – Ag & Natural Resources NDSU Extension Service.

Contamination of Commercial Grain Deliveries with Treated Seed.

Michael Schechtman Executive Secretary, AC 21. What will and will not be covered Programmatic activities within and outside government Not a comprehensive.

Food Safety Export Assurance System Requirements for Dairy Products Confidential to Fonterra Co-operative Group September 2014 Malcolm Bailey – Fonterra.

Perspectives on GEM from a Small Company. Perspectives on GEM Early issues & efforts Initial vision about the project when we sought funding and its additional.

IP Issues and Traceability in the Marketplace Dr. Gary M. Beil Minnesota Crop Improvement Association Crop Biotechnology Update Conference September 21-22,

SEED LLP AND TRADE Bernice Slutsky American Seed Trade Association.

Quality Management System

Beyond the Farm Gate: Channeling & Identity Preservation Indiana Ag Summit Indianapolis, Indiana 13. September 2002 Dirk E. Maier Extension Agricultural.

Bill Wiebold Agronomy University Extension. One reason to contract crop sales is to capture value in an identity preserved system.

Economics of Specialty Corn Production in Missouri Joe Parcell PIE -231.

Agricultural Biotechnology Marshall A. Martin Professor and Associate Head Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University March 2000.

Industry Responds with Advanced Quality and Traceability World Pork Congress April 29, 2004 Paul Clayton U.S. Meat Export Federation.

Coexistence of organic and GM crops: Should the “zero tolerance” policy on presence of GM material in organic crops be changed? Sanja Ilic, Valeria C.

TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/ Walsh County 2002.

© Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. The Safflower Co-existence Working Group USDA 87 th Agricultural Outlook Forum.

Food Safety Richard Paterini Food Safety Supervisor

ISO 9000 Overview The Purpose of this Overview l “What is ISO 9000?” l What will it require from YOU, as a (Company) Employee?

USDA Organic Certification Business Management and Education Institute (BMEI)

The Organic Option Stacy Burwick Tennessee Crop Improvement Association.

NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.

Pollen Flow in Wheat Revisited Joel Ransom Extension Agronomist – Cereal Crops.

Hurley, 2001 What to Know Before Planting GMO Terry Hurley Telephone:

QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO

GMOD: Identifying Genetically Modified Organisms in Food

Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods Pat Byrne Department of Soil & Crop Sciences Colorado State University.

NDSU Extension The Marketing of Biotechnology Products Phil McClean Department of Plant Science North Dakota State University Biology 600 Biotechnology:

Strategic Planning Process AOSCA Board of Directors San Antonio, Texas February 25, 2008.

1 Facilitating the Marketing of America’s Grain Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration John B. Pitchford Director of International Affairs.

© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Product Analysis.

Economics of Alternative Purity Standards under Conditions of Coexistence Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes University of Missouri-Columbia.

GM vs CONVENTIONAL A PRODUCTION ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE By: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Agronomy North Dakota State University.

IP GRAINS - GROWING, HANDLING, STORAGE & MARKETING George Flaskerud NDSU Extension Economist Sept. 22, 2005

Iowa Corn Cluster of Firm Location Decision Based on Cheap Corn.

Christina Laganas HW220 GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS BENEFITS AND RISKS.

What Are Some of the Issues?. No peer-reviewed food safety tests Creation of allergens or activation of toxins Pharma crops contaminate food supply Labeling.

Managing the co-existence of conventional and genetically modified maize from field to silo A French initiative Pascal COQUIN AGPM 23-25, avenue de Neuilly.

CGCI1 Marketing to the “GMO Sensitive” Lynn Clarkson Clarkson Grain Co., Inc. August Supply Chain Isolation.

Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum Post-Harvest Seed Quality Dirk E. Maier Richard Stroshine Agricultural & Biological Engineering Linda Mason Entomology.

American Seed Industry Overview AC 21 December 14, 2006.

CFIA Plant Health E-Cert Project Client To Government (C2G) 11th UN/CEFACT FORUM in Stockholm! September 2007.

Hawai’i Public Seed Initiative Seed Saving and Production Basics Growing Seed Crops Russell T. Nagata College of Tropical Agri. and Human Resources Komohana.

Current Status of Food Traceability and Labeling in USA* Alan McHughen, D.Phil., University of California Riverside, Ca USA *- and some.

Seed Regulatory Issues Purdue Ag Summit September 13, 2002 Larry Nees Seed Administrator Office of Indiana State Chemist & Seed Commissioner.

NOVEMBER 11, 2011 ROXANNE BEAVERS Organic Standards and Certification.

CROP BREEDING AND IMPROVEMENT

Feed Grain and Wheat Market Situation And Outlook 2001 Southern Region Agricultural Outlook Conference September 25,2001 Kurt M. Guidry Associate Specialist.

Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.

Marketing Claims Craig Morris, Ph.D. Deputy Administrator Livestock, Poultry, and Seed Program.

COEXISTENCE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond September 2005.

ADVANTAGES OF U.S. SOYBEAN MEAL IN DOMESTIC FEED RATIONS.

USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7

2009 PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND INITIATIVES. MISSION – AND WORK 2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2009 PLANS.

Update of API Standards for Supply Chain Management API Standard 20J – Qualification of Distributors.

Good Agricultural Practices And Good Handling Practices Audit Verification Program (GAP/GHP)

GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING (ERT 425)

Introduction to Organic Processer/Handler Certification

Stewardship Revision Quiz

Organic Certification

As You sow- So shall You reap.

LibertyLink® Soybean Stewardship & QA

Wyoming Department of Agriculture

Forage Updates 2017.

ROLE OF KEPHIS IN SAFE HANDLING, TRANSFER AND USE OF GMOS.

Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes

Material Review and Organic Certification

Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum

Presentation transcript:

Purdue Ag Summit – September 13, 2002 Larry Svajgr, Executive Director Indiana Crop Improvement Association Maintenance of Product Integrity

What I want to accomplish today... 1.Who is Indiana Crop and what do we do? 2. What is our experience with seed & grain purity? 3. What systems are in place to maintain product integrity? 4. Answer a few questions.

INDIANA CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOC. Official Indiana seed certification agency Private, nonprofit, industry-driven Unbiased, third-part service provider

WHAT DO WE DO? Seed Certification QA Seed Programs IP programs for grain & related products Custom Field Inspections Conventional Seed Testing Genetics Lab Testing Auditing

ISO Certified Science based programs Research projects Affiliation with Purdue University Member of Assoc. of Official Seed Certifying Agencies (AOSCA) “SOME OTHER STUFF ABOUT US...

Biotech traits “impact” on conventional seed corn ELISA (antibody) test detection level is 0.1% PCR (qualitative) test detection level is also 0.1% Less than 0.3% of conventional corn samples positive Most are just a trace – 0.5% or less Highest one was 1.0% Out of thousands tested over the past four years (Based on ICIA Genetics Lab testing of seed corn for all biotech “events”)

Why is hybrid seed corn purity high? “Unique quality control systems have been in place since the inception of hybrid seed corn – and they work” Maintenance of purity at the parent (seedstock) level Isolation requirements at production Production field management (detasseling; roguing) Handling & conditioning protocols Testing to validate the system (grow outs/lab)

Indiana (AOSCA) domestic certification OECD (International) certification Indiana (AOSCA) QA seed program (Trademarked systems) “Many private seed production systems are based on Indiana (AOSCA) certification” Official Seed Programs Available in the U.S.

Concepts for seed now being used for grain systems ICIA (AOSCA) Identity Preserved Program “Biotechnology & customer demand/use has created the need for the grain industry to look beyond just corn”

Seed Programs & Identity Preservation (IP) Seed Programs Maintain seed genetic purity and identity IP Programs Maintain grain & plant product genetic purity and quality

Seed StockField HistoryIsolation Field Inspection Harvesting Facility Inspection Records Sampling & Testing Audits Maintaining Crop Product Integrity in a “Quality System”

Seedstock Verify pedigree Breeders Foundation RegisteredCertified QA/Private

Field History Inseparable previous crop volunteers

Isolation Distance from contaminating pollen sources: Self pollinated Cross pollinated –Wind –Insect

Field Inspection Off types Other crops Plant counts Weed identities Nick

Harvesting Harvester inspections Trucks & wagons Bins Trailers

Facility Inspections Dump pits Conveyer belts Storage bins Elevators Trucks and barges Dump pits Conveyer belts Storage bins Elevators Trucks and barges

Record Keeping Maintenance of Identity Weights Locations

Sampling & Testing Sampling points and frequency Sampling methods Identification & verification of genes and traits

Auditing Field inspections Facility inspections Seed sampling procedures Seed testing laboratories Records

Sampling and Testing Seed On-farm storage Ingredient Processor Regional Elevator Final Food Processor Export Terminal Overseas Importer Test

IP Programs “Product Certification” “Used for the preservation of traits when high purity levels are required” Fields inspected Bins & equipment inspected Handling facilities inspected Product is sampled Product is tested Product is labeled Costs $0.05-$0.10/bushel (for 3 rd party oversight)

Grain Channeling “Process Certification” “Used when segregation of large volumes of product is required” Farmers/handlers develop quality plans Plans approved 3rd party auditing of production & handling Audit reports/corrective actions Certificates issued Certificates presented at grain delivery Costs as low as $0.01/bushel (for 3 rd party oversight)

Grain harvested from Roundup Ready corn (whether alone or stacked) is fully approved for food and feed use in the United States, Canada and Japan, and is pending approval in the European Union. Find a market for your crop that does not ship grain or processed products to Europe. Appropriate markets for channeling this grain include: feedlots or feed mills, on-farm feeding or elevators that agree to accept the grain. For more information on your market choices, go to or call Technology Provider Program – (ASTA ownership) Compliments NCGA’s “Know before you grow” program ASTA’s “Grain Handler’s Database”

Proposed USDA-GIPSA Program Process verified Audited Market driven No USDA “standards”

IP Process Verification is here.. “Driven currently by the Non-GMO issue – the negative side of the equation” It’s our “warm up act” for the future.. “Will be critical for crop output traits impacting functional human foods, livestock feed, industrial products, human and animal medicines and more – the positive side of the equation!”