The Mott transition across the actinide series and the double life of delta Plutonium. The Mott transition across the actinide series and the double life.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theory of the pairbreaking superconductor-metal transition in nanowires Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
Advertisements

ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF STRONGLY CORRELATED SYSTEMS
Interplay between spin, charge, lattice and orbital degrees of freedom Lecture notes Les Houches June 2006 George Sawatzky.
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Lecture 3. Improvements of DFT Contents: 1. LDA+U. 2. LDA+DMFT. 3. Supplements: Self-interaction corrections,
Towards a first Principles Electronic Structure Method Based on Dynamical Mean Field Theory Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials.
Correlated Electron Systems: Challenges and Future Gabriel Kotliar Rutgers University.
Collaborators: G.Kotliar, S. Savrasov, V. Oudovenko Kristjan Haule, Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Electronic Structure.
Ab-initio theory of the electronic structure of strongly correlated materials: examples from across the periodic table. G.Kotliar Physics Department Center.
Dynamical Mean Field Theory from Model Hamiltonian Studies of the Mott Transition to Electronic Structure Calculations Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department.
Collaborators: Ji-Hoon Shim, G.Kotliar Kristjan Haule, Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Uncovering the secrets of.
Elemental Plutonium: Electrons at the Edge The Mott transition across the actinide series. Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials.
Correlations Magnetism and Structure across the actinide series IWOSMA-3 Lyon June 2-3 (2006). G.Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory.
IJS The Alpha to Gamma Transition in Ce: A Theoretical View From Optical Spectroscopy K. Haule, V. Oudovenko, S. Savrasov, G. Kotliar DMFT(SUNCA method)
Extended Dynamical Mean Field. Metal-insulator transition el-el correlations not important:  band insulator: the lowest conduction band is fullthe lowest.
DMFT approach to many body effects in electronic structure. Application to the Mott transition across the actinide series [5f’s]. G.Kotliar Phyiscs Department.
Dynamical Mean-Field Studies of the Actinide Series Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Workshop on Correlated.
Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT) Approach to Strongly Correlated Materials G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers SCES04.
Elemental Plutonium: Electrons at the Edge Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Colloquium UT July 2003.
Strongly Correlated Superconductivity G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers.
Some Applications of Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT). Density Functional Theory Meets Strong Correlation. Montauk September 5-9 (2006). G.Kotliar Physics.
Towards an Electronic Structure Method for Correlated Electron Systems based on Dynamical Mean Field Theory G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for.
Understanding Heavy Fermion Systems: a DMFT perspective Understanding Heavy Fermion Systems: a DMFT perspective Gabriel Kotliar and Center for Materials.
Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Materials : a DMFT Perspective Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University.
Quantum Criticality and Fractionalized Phases. Discussion Leader :G. Kotliar Grodon Research Conference on Correlated Electrons 2004.
Strongly Correlated Superconductivity G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers.
When Band Theory Does Not Work and What One Can Do About It: Dynamical Mean Field Approach to Strongly Correlated Materials Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department.
Cellular-DMFT approach to the electronic structure of correlated solids. Application to the sp, 3d,4f and 5f electron systems. Collaborators, N.Zein K.
Correlations Magnetism and Structure across the actinide series : a Dynamical Mean Field Theory Perspective Plutonium Futures Asilomar July 9-13 (2006).
Localization Delocalization Phenomena across the Mott transition:cracking open the f shell G.Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory.
Kristjan Haule, Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory
Strongly Correlated Electron Systems a Dynamical Mean Field Perspective:Points for Discussion G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory.
Dynamical Mean Field Theory in Electronic Structure Calculations:Applications to solids with f and d electrons Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS Hubbard model  U/t  Doping d or chemical potential  Frustration (t’/t)  T temperature Mott transition as.
Electronic structure and spectral properties of actinides: f-electron challenge Alexander Shick Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech.
Collaborators: G.Kotliar, Ji-Hoon Shim, S. Savrasov Kristjan Haule, Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Electronic Structure.
Dynamical Mean Field Theory DMFT and electronic structure calculations Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University.
Challenges in Strongly Correlated Electron Systems: A Dynamical Mean Field Theory Perspective Challenges in Strongly Correlated Electron Systems: A Dynamical.
Kristjan Haule, Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory
Electronic Structure of Actinides at the Mott Boundary: A Dynamical Mean Field Theory Perspective Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials.
The Mott Transition and the Challenge of Strongly Correlated Electron Systems. G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers PIPT.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS Mean-Field : Classical vs Quantum Classical case Quantum case Phys. Rev. B 45, 6497 A. Georges, G. Kotliar (1992)
Towards Realistic Electronic Structure Calculations of Correlated Materials Exhibiting a Mott Transition. Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center.
Introduction to Strongly Correlated Electron Materials, Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT) and its extensions. Application to the Mott Transition. Gabriel.
Introduction to Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT) and its Applications to the Electronic Structure of Correlated Materials Zacatecas Mexico PASSI School.
Dynamical Mean Field Theory and Electronic Structure Calculations Gabriel Kotliar Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University.
Theoretical Treatments of Correlation Effects Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Workshop on Chemical.
Introduction to Strongly Correlated Electron Materials and to Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT). Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials.
Correlation Effects in Itinerant Magnets, Application of LDA+DMFT(Dynamical Mean Field Theory) and its static limit the LDA+U method. Gabriel Kotliar Physics.
Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Materials : a DMFT Perspective Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University.
Understanding f-electron materials using Dynamical Mean Field Theory Understanding f-electron materials using Dynamical Mean Field Theory Gabriel Kotliar.
Spectral Density Functional: a first principles approach to the electronic structure of correlated solids Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS Studies of Antiferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in Heavy Fermion Systems. G. Kotliar Rutgers University. Collaborators:
IJS Strongly correlated materials from Dynamical Mean Field Perspective. Thanks to: G.Kotliar, S. Savrasov, V. Oudovenko DMFT(SUNCA method) two-band Hubbard.
Electronic Structure of Strongly Correlated Materials:a Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT) approach Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials.
Gabriel Kotliar and Center for Materials Theory $upport : NSF -DMR DOE-Basic Energy Sciences Collaborators: K. Haule and J. Shim Ref: Nature 446, 513,
First Principles Investigations of Plutonium Americium and their Mixtures using Dynamical Mean Field Theory Washington February 5-8 (2007). Gabriel.Kotliar.
Electronic Structure of Elemental Plutonium: A Dynamical Mean Field Perspective (DMFT) Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory.
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY RUTGERS Outline, Collaborators, References Introduction to extensions of DMFT for applications to electronic structure.
Strongly Correlated Electron Systems a Dynamical Mean Field Perspective G. Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers 5 th International.
Dynamical Mean Field Theory of the Mott Transition Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University Jerusalem Winter.
Optical Conductivity of Cuprates Superconductors: a Dynamical RVB perspective Work with K. Haule (Rutgers) K. Haule, G. Kotliar, Europhys Lett. 77,
Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory Rutgers University.
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 Gabriel Kotliar
Dynamical Mean Field Theory Approach to the Electronic Structure Problem of Solids Gabriel Kotliar Physics Department and Center for Materials Theory.
New Jersey Institute of Technology Computational Design of Strongly Correlated Materials Sergej Savrasov Supported by NSF ITR (NJIT), (Rutgers)
University of California DavisKashiwa, July 27, 2007 From LDA+U to LDA+DMFT S. Y. Savrasov, Department of Physics, University of California, Davis Collaborators:
Understanding and predicting properties of f electron materials using DMFT Collaborators: K. Haule (Rutgers ) S. Savrasov (UC Davis) Useful discussions.
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Lecture 1. Theoretical Background Contents: 1. Historical Overview. 2. Basic Equations for Interacting Electrons.
Electron-Phonon Coupling in graphene Claudio Attaccalite Trieste 10/01/2009.
Review on quantum criticality in metals and beyond
Presentation transcript:

The Mott transition across the actinide series and the double life of delta Plutonium. The Mott transition across the actinide series and the double life of delta Plutonium. Gabriel Kotliar and Center for Materials Theory $upport : NSF -DMR DOE-Basic Energy Sciences Collaborators: K. Haule and J. Shim Ref: Nature 446, 513, (2007) Colloquium : City College NY April 11 (2007) 1

OUTLINE The challenge of strongly correlated electron systems. Late actinides: experimental overview Introduction to Dynamical Mean Field Theory (DMFT). Theory of delta Pu Theory of Am and Cm Conclusions

Band Theory: electrons as waves. Landau Fermi Liquid Theory. Electrons in a Solid:the Standard Model Quantitative Tools. Density Functional Theory Kohn Sham (1964) Rigid bands, optical transitions, thermodynamics, transport……… Static Mean Field Theory. 2 Kohn Sham Eigenvalues and Eigensates: Excellent starting point for perturbation theory in the screened interactions (Hedin 1965)

Spectral Function Photoemission and correlations Probability of removing an electron and transfering energy  =Ei-Ef, and momentum k f(  ) A(  ) M 2 e Angle integrated spectral function 8 a)Weak Correlation b)Strong Correlation

Strong Correlation Problem:where the standard model fails Fermi Liquid Theory works but parameters can’t be computed in perturbation theory. Fermi Liquid Theory does NOT work. Need new concepts to replace of rigid bands ! Partially filled d and f shells. Competition between kinetic and Coulomb interactions. Breakdown of the wave picture. Need to incorporate a real space perspective (Mott). Non perturbative problem. 4

Strongly correlated systems Strongly correlated systems Copper Oxides. High Temperature Superconductivity. Cobaltates Anomalous thermoelectricity. Manganites. Colossal magnetoresistance. Heavy Fermions. Huge quasiparticle masses. 2d Electron gases. Metal to insulator transitions. Lanthanides, Transition Metal Oxides, Multiferroics……………….. 5

Superconductivity among 5f elements s/cAFFM Localisation Delocalization 1.4K 0.4 K 0.9K0.8K52K25K52K

Localization Delocalization in Actinides after G. Lander, Science (2003). Mott Transition    Pu 

Basic Questions How does the electron go from being localized to itinerant. How do the physical properties evolve. How to bridge between the microscopic information (atomic positions) and experimental measurements. New concepts, new techniques

Phases of Pu (A. Lawson LANL)

Approach the Mott point from the right Am under pressure Experimental Equation of State (after Heathman et.al, PRL 2000) Mott Transition? “Soft” “Hard”

Small amounts of Ga stabilize the  phase (A. Lawson LANL)

Anomalous Resistivity Maximum metallic resistivity

Specific heat and susceptibility. Pu is non magnetic

Standard model fails for the late actinides Predicts all the phases of Pu and Am to be magnetic, with a large moment. (about 5  B) Imposing paramagnetism, DFT fails to describe the volume of delta Pu by 25 % Many modfications have been attempted, to explain why Pu is non magnetic. Mixed level model (Wills et. al. ) Pu has (5f)4 conf. LDA+U amf (Shick, Anisimov) Pu has (5f)5 Cannot account for anomalous elastic properties, transport and thermodynamics

DMFT A. Georges and G. Kotliar PRB 45, 6479 (1992). Happy marriage of atomic and band physics. Extremize functional of A(  ) DMFT A. Georges and G. Kotliar PRB 45, 6479 (1992). Happy marriage of atomic and band physics. Extremize functional of A(  ) Reviews: A. Georges G. Kotliar W. Krauth and M. Rozenberg RMP68, 13, 1996 Gabriel Kotliar and Dieter Vollhardt Physics Today 57,(2004). G. Kotliar S. Savrasov K. Haule V. Oudovenko O. Parcollet and C. Marianetti (RMP 2006). Extremize a functional of the local spectra. Local self energy.

Dynamical Mean Field Theory Weiss field is a function. Multiple scales in strongly correlated materials. Exact large coordination (Metzner and Vollhardt 89), kinetic vs interaction energy Immediate extension to real materials DFT+DMFT Functionals of density and spectra. Review Kotliar et. al. RMP (2006) 12

T/W Phase diagram of a Hubbard model with partial frustration at integer filling. [Rozenberg et. al. PRL 1995] Evolution of the Local Spectra as a function of U,and T. Mott transition driven by transfer of spectral weight Zhang Rozenberg Kotliar PRL (1993)...

Volume Collapse Transitions: relaxing the lattice positions. Savrasov et. al. 19

Phonon freq (THz) vs q in delta Pu X. Dai et. al. Science vol 300, 953, 2003

Inelastic X Ray. Phonon energy 10 mev, photon energy 10 Kev. E = E i - E f Q = k i - k f

DMFT Phonons in fcc  -Pu C 11 (GPa) C 44 (GPa) C 12 (GPa) C'(GPa) Theory Experiment ( Dai, Savrasov, Kotliar,Ledbetter, Migliori, Abrahams, Science, 9 May 2003) (experiments from Wong et.al, Science, 22 August 2003) 21

The “DMFT- valence” in the late actinides. Time scale of the fluctuations. Ef* 22

W 110 =2/3 and banching ratio Moore and van der Laan, Ultramicroscopy 2007.

2/3 in the late actinides [DMFT results: K. Haule and J. Shim ] See the expt. work of K. Moore G. Van der Laan G. Haire M. Wall and A. Schartz Am H2

alpa->delta Photoemission Gouder Havela Lande PRB(2001)r

Photoemission Spectra[ Shim. Haule,GK Nature (2007)] alpa->delta volume collapse transition F0=4,F2=6.1 F0=4.5,F2=

Photoemission and Mixed valence in Pu

Conclusions Unique properties of Pu and Am under pressure result from a proximity of a localization delocalization transition. Rare form of mixed valence. DMFT provides a good start. Qualitative insights, some quantitative predictions into delta Pu. Other Pu phases. Meaningful interplay of theory and experiment. Key in condensed matter physics.

Conclusions Pu is a unique strongly correlated element. It is one among many strongly correlated electron system, materials for which neither the standard model of solids, works well. They require, new concepts, new computational methods, new algorithms, DMFT provides all of the above, and is being used in many other problems. Many applications to othe problems exist, others are in progress, research opportunity in correlated materials.

Approach the Mott point from the right Am under pressure Density functional based electronic structure calculations:   Non magnetic LDA/GGA predicts volume 50% off.   Magnetic GGA corrects most of error in volume but gives m ~6  B (Soderlind et.al., PRB 2000).   Experimentally, Am has non magnetic f 6 ground state with J=0 ( 7 F 0 ) Experimental Equation of State (after Heathman et.al, PRL 2000) Mott Transition? “Soft” “Hard”

Am equation of state. LDA+DMFT.New acceleration technique for solving DMFT equations S. Savrasov K. Haule G. Kotliar cond-mat (2005)

Mott transition in open (right) and closed (left) shell systems. Superconductivity ? Localized (5f) 6 in L.S coupling or jj coupling ? S S U U  T Log[2J+1] Uc  ~1/(Uc-U) J=0 ??? Tc

Photoemission spectra using Hubbard I solver and Sunca. [Savrasov Haule and Kotliar cond-mat PRL (2006)] Hubbard bands width is determined by multiplet splittings.

Resistivity of Am under pressure. J. C. Griveau et.al. PRL 94, (2005).

Photomission Spectra of Am under pressure. Sunca. Onset of mixed valence. Savrasov Haule Kotliar (2005) PRL (2006)

Conclusion Am Americium undergoes Mott transition under pressure. [AmIII-AmIV] boundary. Unusual superconductivity and resistivities. Theoretical clue mixed valent due to admixture of (5f) upon application of pressure. Realizes Mott transition from the insulating side, towards a close shell configuration..

. Mott transition in the open shell case. Heathman et. al. Science 309,110 (2006) Approach the Mott transition from the right.

LS coupling L=0 S=7  jj coupling J=7/2   =2S+L Expt monent. is closer to L S coupling Curium is magnetic Hurray et.al. Physica. B (1980) 217

K.Haule and J. Shim Trends in Actinides alpa->delta volume collapse transition Curium has large magnetic moment and orders antif Pu does is non magnetic. F0=4,F2=6.1 F0=4.5,F2=7.15 F0=4.5,F2=8.11 Gouder Havela Lander

Conclusion DMFT conceptual framework to think about electrons in solids. Finite T Mott transition in 3d. Single site DMFT worked well! Ab-initio many body electronic structure of solids. Building theoretical spectroscopies. Frontier, cuprates, lower T, two dimensionality is a plaquette in a medium enough? Inhomogenous structure in correlated materials New renormalizaton group methods built around DMFT ? 28

Conclusion A Few References …… A.Georges, G. K., W. Krauth and M. J. Rozenberg, Reviews of. Modern Physics 68, 13 (1996). G. K, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, C.A. Marianetti, RMP 78, , (2006). G. K and D. Vollhardt Physics Today, Vol 57, 53 (2004). 29

Conclusions Constant interplay between theory and experiment has lead to new advances. General anomalies of correlated electrons and anomalous system specific studies, need for a flexible approach. (DMFT). New understanding of Pu. Methodology applicable to a large number of other problems, involving correlated electrions, thermoelectrics, batteries, optical devices, memories, high temperature superconductors, ……..

Conclusions DMFT produces non magnetic state, around a fluctuating (5f)^5 configuraton with correct volume the qualitative features of the photoemission spectra, and a double minima structure in the E vs V curve. Correlated view of the alpha and delta phases of Pu. Interplay of correlations and electron phonon interactions (delta-epsilon). Calculations can be refined in many ways, electronic structure calculations for correlated electrons research program, MINDLAB, ….

What do we want from materials theory? New concepts, qualitative ideas Understanding, explanation of existent experiments, and predictions of new ones. Quantitative capabilities with predictive power. Notoriously difficult to achieve in strongly correlated materials.

Some new insights into the funny properties of Pu Physical anomalies, are the result of the unique position of Pu in the periodic table, where the f electrons are near a localization delocalization transition. We learned how to think about this unusual situation using spectral functions. Delta and Alpha Pu are both strongly correlated, the DMFT mean field free energy has a double well structure, for the same value of U. One where the f electron is a bit more localized (delta) than in the other (alpha). Negative thermal expansion, multitude of phases.

Quantitative calculations Photoemission spectra,equilibrium volume, and vibration spectra of delta. Good agreement with experiments given the approximations made.Many systematic improvements are needed. Work is at the early stages, only a few quantities in one phase have been considered. Other phases? Metastability ? Effects of impurities? What else, do electrons at the edge of a localization localization do ? [ See epsilon Pu spectra ]

Collaborators, Acknowledgements References Los Alamos Science,26, (2000) S. Savrasov and G. Kotliar Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, , (2000). S.Savrasov G. Kotliar and E. Abrahams, Nature 410, 793 (2001).Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, , (2000)Nature 410, 793 (2001). X. Dai,S. Savrasov, G. Kotliar,A. Migliori, H. Ledbetter, E. Abrahams Science, Vol300, 954 (2003). Collaborators: S. Savrasov ( Rutgers-NJIT) X. Dai ( Rutgers), E. Abrahams (Rutgers), A. Migliori (LANL),H Ledbeter(LANL). Acknowledgements: G Lander (ITU) J Thompson(LANL) Funding: NSF, DOE, LANL.

Cluster DMFTlimitations of single site DMFT Cluster DMFT: removes limitations of single site DMFT No k dependence of the self energy. No d-wave superconductivity. No Peierls dimerization. No (R)valence bonds. Reviews: Reviews: Georges et.al. RMP(1996). Th. Maier et. al. RMP (2005); Kotliar et..al. RMP (2006). 23

U/t=4. Two Site Cellular DMFTin the 1D Hubbard model Two Site Cellular DMFT ( G.. Kotliar et.al. PRL (2001)) in the 1D Hubbard model M.Capone M.Civelli V. Kancharla C.Castellani and GK PRB 69, (2004)T. D Stanescu and GK PRB (2006)24

Kohn Sham Eigenvalues and Eigensates: Excellent starting point for perturbation theory in the screened interactions (Hedin 1965) Self Energy VanShilfgaarde (2005) VanShilfgaarde (2005) 3

Smith Kmeko Phase diagram. Minimum in melting curve and divergence of the compressibility at the Mott endpoint

The enhancement of the specific heat, further evidence for an open shell configuration, presence of electronic entropy. J. Lashley et.al. PRB(2005)

Double well structure and  Pu Qualitative explanation of negative thermal expansion[ Lawson, A. C., Roberts J. A., Martinez, B., and Richardson, J. W., Jr. Phil. Mag. B, 82, 1837,(2002). G. Kotliar J.Low Temp. Phys vol.126, (2002)] Natural consequence of the conclusions on the model Hamiltonian level. We had two solutions at the same U, one metallic and one insulating. Relaxing the volume expands the insulator and contract the metal. F(T,V)=Fphonons+ Finvar

“ Invar model “ for Pu-Ga. Lawson et. Mag. Vol. 86, Nos. 17 – 18, 11 – 21 June 2006, 2713 – 2733 (2006) Data fits if the excited state has zero stiffness.

Dynamical Mean Field Theory. Cavity Construction. A. Georges and G. Kotliar PRB 45, 6479 (1992). A(  ) 10

A. Georges, G. Kotliar (1992) A(  ) 11

Expt. Wong et. al.

Elastic Deformations In most cubic materials the shear does not depend strongly on crystal orientation,fcc Al, c 44 /c’=1.2, in Pu C44/C’ ~ 7 largest shear anisotropy of any element. Uniform compression:  p=-B  V/V Volume conserving deformations : F/A=c 44  x/L F/A=c’  x/L

Localization Delocalization in Actinides after G. Lander, Science (2003). Mott Transition   Modern understanding of this phenomena using functional approach toDMFT. K Haule S.Savrasov J Shim  Pu  18

= n7/2 – 4/3 n5/2 nf = n7/2 + n5/2

Spectral Function and Photoemission Probability of removing an electron and transfering energy  =Ei-Ef, and momentum k f(  ) A(  ) M 2 e Angle integrated spectral function 8

Kohn Sham Eigenvalues and Eigensates: Excellent starting point for perturbation theory in the screened interactions (Hedin 1965) Self Energy Succesful description of the total energy and the excitation spectra of a large number of simple metals semiconductors and insulators. Succesful description of the total energy and the excitation spectra of a large number of simple metals semiconductors and insulators. Succesfully predicts semiconducting gaps, phonon frequencies, resistivities, of countless materials. 3 a)Weak Correlation b)Strong Correlation

W 110 =2/3 and banching ratio See the expt. work of K. Moore G. Van der Laan G. Haire M. Wall and A. Schartz Am H2