Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey Planning & Illumination with NORSAR-3D
Advertisements

Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.
Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency signals: Applications in migration velocity updating and tomography Xiao-Bi Xie University of California at Santa.
Local Reverse Time Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Function Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Local Reverse Time Migration with VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah May 1, 2008 PhD Defense 99 pages.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley University of Utah.
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Salt Flank Delineation by Interferometric Imaging of Transmitted P-to-S Waves Xiang Xiao Advisor: Gerard T. Schuster Committee: Michael Zhdanov Bob Smith.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Key Result Seismic CAT Scan vs Trenching.
Acquisiton of Passive Seismic Data at Tooele Army Depot, Utah David Sheley, Travis Crosby, Jianming Sheng.
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Borehole Seismic Introduction
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Reverse-Time Migration For 3D SEG/EAGE Salt Model
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
1 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. VSP modeling, velocity analysis, and imaging in complex structures Yue Du With Mark Willis, Robert Stewart May.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
Automatic Wave Equation Migration Velocity Analysis Peng Shen, William. W. Symes HGRG, Total E&P CAAM, Rice University This work supervised by Dr. Henri.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Prestack Migration Intuitive Least Squares Migration Green’s Theorem.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Pre-Stack Depth Migration of Dual-Azimuth Surveys Incorporating Azimuthal P-Wave Anisotropy Phil WhitfieldWesternGeco Fiona Dewey Wintershall Noordzee.
Migration Velocity Analysis 01. Outline  Motivation Estimate a more accurate velocity model for migration Tomographic migration velocity analysis 02.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Velocity Estimation of Friendswood’s Weathering Zone using Fermat’s Interferometric Principle By Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat University of Utah.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Waveform tomography and non-linearity  L  38 m N s = 101 N r = 101  10 m 30 m 21 m10.5 m.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Sisgbee2b / Data Release
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
Inverse Crimes d=Lm m=L-1 d Red Sea Synthetics
Least Squares Migration
Presentation transcript:

Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley

Outline MotivationMotivation Transmission Migration TheoryTransmission Migration Theory ResultsResults –Synthetic –Gulf of Mexico VSP ConclusionsConclusions

Problem: Limited Illumination SEDIMENT Receiver Well SEDIMENT P PP SALT

Solution: PS Transmission Migration SEDIMENT PS Receiver Well SEDIMENT P SALT

Outline MotivationMotivation Transmission Migration TheoryTransmission Migration Theory ResultsResults –Synthetic –Gulf of Mexico VSP ConclusionsConclusions

Conventional PP Migration m(r) = S(z g,  sr +  rg )   sr  rg s r g

m(r) = S(z g,  sr +  rg )   sr s r g Transmission PS Migration  rg P-wave S-wave

m(r) = S(z g,  sr +  rg )   sr s r g Transmission PS Migration  rg

Outline MotivationMotivation Transmission Migration TheoryTransmission Migration Theory ResultsResults –Synthetic –Gulf of Mexico VSP ConclusionsConclusions

Depth (m) Offset (m) ds = 1 m dg = 1 m Vertical Boundary RVSP Model V = 5500 m/s P V = 5000 m/s P V = 3333 m/s S V = 3666 m/s S Source = 1500 Hz

Synthetic RVSP Data 0 One-way Traveltime (ms) Offset (m) 1000

Synthetic RVSP Data 0 One-way Traveltime (ms) Offset (m) 1000 Direct P PS Direct S SP PS PP SP

Depth (m) Offset (m) PP Reflection Migration P PP

PP Reflection Kirchhoff Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

PP Kirchhoff Migration: 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Reduced-TimeConventional Depth (m) Offset (m)

PP Reflection Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

PP Wavepath Migration: 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Reduced-TimeConventional Depth (m) Offset (m)

Depth (m) Offset (m) PS Transmission Migration PS P

PS Transmission Kirchhoff Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

PS Kirchhoff Migration: 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Reduced-TimeConventional Depth (m) Offset (m)

PS Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

PS Wavepath Migration: 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Reduced-TimeConventional Depth (m) Offset (m)

Depth (m) Offset (m) SP Transmission Migration S SP

SP Transmission Kirchhoff Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Kirchhoff Migration: 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Reduced-TimeConventional Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Wavepath Migration: 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Reduced-TimeConventional Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Kirchhoff Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Kirchhoff Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity Single Gather Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Kirchhoff Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) % Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) Single Gather

True Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) SP Transmission Kirchhoff Migration 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) KM Single Gather True Velocity

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Ray Tracing True Velocity

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Fresnel Zone True Velocity

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Wavepath Image True Velocity

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity 90% Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m)

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) % Velocity Depth (m) Offset (m) KM Single Gather

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Ray Tracing 90% Velocity

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Fresnel Zone 90% Velocity

SP Transmission Wavepath Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) Depth (m) Offset (m) Wavepath Image 90% Velocity

Outline MotivationMotivation Transmission Migration TheoryTransmission Migration Theory ResultsResults –Synthetic –Gulf of Mexico VSP ConclusionsConclusions

Acquisition Geometry Depth (kft) Offset (kft) SALT Depth (kft) Offset (kft) SALT

P-Wave Velocity Depth (kft) Offset (kft) Velocity (kft/s) 5 15 Depth (kft)

S-Wave Velocity Depth (kft) Offset (kft) Velocity (kft/s) 5 15 Depth (kft)

Offset 500 ft Z-Component Depth (ft) One-way Traveltime (s) SALT Direct P Reflected P

500 ft Offset: PP Reflections Depth (ft) One-way Traveltime (s) SALT

500 ft Depth (ft) ft Synthetic SALTSALT PP Reflection Migration Receivers Receivers

Offset 500 ft X-Component Depth (ft) One-way Traveltime (s) SALT Reflected PS Direct P

500 ft Offset: PS Reflections Depth (ft) One-way Traveltime (s) SALT

500 ft Depth (ft) ft Synthetic 8000 PS Reflection Migration Receivers Receivers SALTSALT

Offset 500 ft X-Component Depth (ft) One-way Traveltime (s) SALT Direct P Transmitted PS

500 ft Offset: PS Transmissions Depth (ft) One-way Traveltime (s) SALT

500 ft Depth (ft) ft Synthetic 8000 PS Transmission Migration Receivers Receivers SALTSALT

Outline MotivationMotivation Transmission Migration TheoryTransmission Migration Theory ResultsResults –Synthetic –Gulf of Mexico VSP ConclusionsConclusions

Conclusions Reduced-time is shown to reduce migration errors in PP reflection images.Reduced-time is shown to reduce migration errors in PP reflection images. The top and bottom of the salt tablet were successfully imaged using the three VSP gathers.The top and bottom of the salt tablet were successfully imaged using the three VSP gathers. PS transmission migration sucessfully imaged a tranmitting boundary above the receiver array.PS transmission migration sucessfully imaged a tranmitting boundary above the receiver array.

Implications Can vertical salt boundaries be imaged using PS transmissions.Can vertical salt boundaries be imaged using PS transmissions. VSP transmission migraion an alternative to single well imaging ?VSP transmission migraion an alternative to single well imaging ? Greater illumination using combined PP reflection and PS transmissionsGreater illumination using combined PP reflection and PS transmissions = Cheaper VSP. = Cheaper VSP.