Jennifer Locke Web-based Legal Research Guides in Academic Law Libraries
Overview Background Information Suggestions for creating guides Comparison of existing guides Implications of Web-based guides
Background Information Booklists and reading guides Pathfinders Web-based guides
Uses of research guides Research guides… Help patrons access information and make them aware of the library’s resources and how they can be used - Candace Dahl
Legal Research Guides Legal research guides give the researcher a “sense of the whole picture, of all the things that must be considered in a particular area of law.” - Bob Berring
Suggestions… Format Content –Readability –Usability –Currentness –Scope –Miscellaneous
Format Simple color schemes Sufficient blank space Easily understood design Gallagher’s Legislative History GuideGallagher’s Legislative History Guide
Content - Readability Descriptive annotations Free of jargon Scannability Section headings & internal links
Content - Usability Annotations Instructions Intuitive structure Vanderbilt – Environmental Law GuideVanderbilt – Environmental Law Guide Duke – Environmental Law Guide
Content - Currentness Minimum of broken links Updated annually Disclosure of date of last revision
Content - Scope Introductory paragraph Limited & defined scope GW – Patent Law Guide
Content – Misc. Features “Ask a Librarian” feature Links open in a new window Copyright statement Easily accessible
Comparisons General Comparison –Number of guides produced –Name of guides –Location of guide in Web site Specific Comparison –Legislative History
Numbers Number of Research Guides Number of Libraries % 01818% % 11 to % 21 to % More than %
Terminology Guide Name#% Guides that have “Research Guide” in its name 3746% Guides that have “Resources” in its name79% Guides that have “Library Guide” in its name 911% Guides that have “Pathfinder” in its name68% “Research Guide”3139% “Legal Research Guide”79%
Home Page Hyperlink Number of Clicks from Home Page #% 15063% 22937% 311%
Specific Comparisons Federal Legislative History 15 Schools 3 Sets of Criteria –Format –Content & Scope –Currentness & Other Features
Increasing Awareness At the library level –CatalogCatalog National level –LawScoutLawScout Consortium level –NELLCONELLCO
Implications Guide creation –EmoryEmory –GeorgetownGeorgetown Research guide as intermediary between print and electronic resources
The Future? Interactive tutorials –GeorgetownGeorgetown –LexisNexisLexisNexis
Summary Define & limit the scope Include descriptive and evaluative annotations Write for the Web Use a simple and uncomplicated design Use global and local navigation tools Keep the name of the guide simple Review and update each guide annually Prominently disclose the date of last revision Link from Home page Include an “ask a librarian” feature
Conclusion & Questions