Threshold of measures of active regions and solar activities Yang Liu – Stanford University

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Solar Polar Field Reversal Observed By SOHO/MDI Yang Liu, J. Todd Hoeksema, X-P Zhao – Stanford University

Advertisements

The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.

Injection of magnetic helicity and chirality change in sunspot penumbral filaments Jiangtao Su National Astronomical Observatories of China Helicity Thinkshop.

RHESSI Investigations of the Neupert Effect in Solar Flares Brian R. Dennis AAS/SPD Meeting 6 June 2002.

Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Helicity in Quiet Sun Regions and their role in Solar Dynamics Kostas Tziotziou IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens,

1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.

H.N. Wang 1 ， H. He 1, X. Huang 1, Z. L. Du 1 L. Y. Zhang 1 and Y. M. Cui 2 L. Y. Zhang 1 and Y. M. Cui 2 1 National Astronomical Observatories 2 National.

Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.

Magnetic Helicity and Energetics in Solar Active Regions: Can we calculate them – why do we need them? Manolis K. Georgoulis JHU/APL Whistler, CA, 08/01/07.

Abstract Individual AR example: 8910 The only selection criterion imposed in this study is that the AR must be within 30 degrees of disk center to minimize.

Free Magnetic Energy and Flare Productivity of Active Regions Jing et al. ApJ, 2010, April 20 v713 issue, in press.

Changyi Tan et al. NJIT, April 2008 Evolution of Evershed and Shear Flows Associated with the X3.4 Flare of 2006 December 13 Evolution of Evershed and.

September 2006 CISM All Hand Meeting Properties of Solar Active Regions and Solar Eruptive Events Yang Liu -- Stanford University

The Halo CMEs’ Speeds and Energy of Their Related Active Regions Yang Liu¹, and CDAW Source Identification Team² ¹Stanford University ² Including: E. Cliver,

August 2006 IAU Assembly Halo CMEs and Configuration of Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University

Valentina Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT Multi-fractality of Solar Magnetic Fields: New Progress with HMI Abstract. The SDO/HMI instrument.

MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.

1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University

September 2007LWS 2007 Halo CMEs and Configuration of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University

1 Synoptic Maps of Magnetic Field from MDI Magnetograms: polar field interpolation. Y. Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, X. P. Zhao, R. M. Larson – Stanford University.

1Yang Liu1997 May 12 Event The 1997 May 12 Event Yang Liu – Stanford University

Magnetogram Evolution Near Polarity Inversion Lines Brian Welsch and Yan Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA , USA.

POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.

Helicity on the Sun: What is it good for anyway? Slide 1 of

The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.

Flare Flux vs. Magnetic Flux …extending previous studies to new regimes.

Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University

Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov Helicity on the Sun. If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.

Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.

Distinguishing Eruptive from Non-Eruptive Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis JHU/APL Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD Durham, NH, 06/27/06.

Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.

Distinguishing Eruptive from Non-Eruptive Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis JHU/APL Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD Durham, NH, 06/27/06.

MDI Level 1.8 Magnetograms Yang Liu Stanford University 6/23/ SHINE 2008.

Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:

Can the coronal field’s susceptibility to emergence-induced eruption be estimated? SSPVSE Discussion Group B, Wed., 19 Oct B. Welsch, Space Sciences.

Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.

Magnetic Field and Heating of the Corona Valentyna Abramenko and Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory.

1 Test rescale methods Y. Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, X. P. Zhao, R. M. Larson – Stanford University

Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University

The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.

1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.

H.N. Wang Key Laboratory of Solar Activity National Astronomical Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences SDO data for solar activity forecasts.

Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.

SOLAR FLARES AND ERUPTIONS Lyndsay Fletcher University of Glasgow.

1 Introduction: Onset of solar flares and coronal mass ejections Yokoyama, T. Dept. Earth & Planetary Science, University of Tokyo Isobe, H. Univ. Tokyo.

SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.

Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.

Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.

1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.

Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.

ITT: SEP forecasting Mike Marsh. Solar radiation storms Solar energetic particles (SEPs)

The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.

On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.

Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.

What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)

Ch Solar Activity. Sunspots Gases inside the sun move up and down due to convection and the sun’s magnetic fields. Regions of the photosphere are.

Solar Activity Level Estimation and Solar Activity Prediction Xin Huang Huaning Wang Liyun Zhang

October-November CMEs Yang Liu – Stanford University

Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.

Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions

A Relation between Solar Flare Manifestations and the GLE Onset

A New Methodology to Predict the Axial ICME Magnetic Field at 1 AU

MDI Level 1.8 Magnetograms

Observations of December 2006 events

Quantification of solar wind parameters from measurments by SOHO and DSCOVR spacecrafts during series of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the.

Quantifying Reconnection*

-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,

Solar Eruption Onset: Where Does the Action Begin?

Reconnection of Loops and Open Field Lines

Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study

Presentation transcript:

Threshold of measures of active regions and solar activities Yang Liu – Stanford University

Results for the entire solar cycle 23 / SoHO MDI LaBonte et al. (2006) X-flaring ARs |(dH m / dt)| > 6 x Mx 2 s -1 X-flaring ARs appear to to have a lower threshold in their peak helicity rates Durham, 06/27/06 08/13 This slit is from M. Georgoulis’ presentation made in 2006 SPD.

Sufficient statistics needed Eruptive active regions:  |H m | > Mx 2  (E free /E tot ) > 0.10 Non-eruptive active regions:  |H m | < Mx 2  (E free /E tot ) < 0.05 |H m | (x Mx 2 ) Relative magnetic free energy Durham, 06/27/06 12/13 This slit is from M. Georgoulis’ presentation made in 2006 SPD.

Flare productivity vs magnetic gradient Flare productivity vs length of neutral line Flare productivity vs number of singular points From Cui et al (2006) Flare productivity index is defined as: p(x)=s(x)/t(x), where s is the number of active regions with a measure greater than x, while t is total number.