April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 1 Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.

Advertisements

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.

March 21-22, 2006 HAPL meeting, ORNL 1 Status of Chamber and Blanket Effort A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: M. Sawan B. Robson G. Sviatoslavsky.

Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.

May 27, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., IFE Chamber Walls: Requirements, Design Options, and Synergy with MFE Plasma Facing Components 1 IFE Chamber Walls:

Assessment of Chamber Concepts for IFE Power Plants: The ARIES-IFE study Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team IFSA2001 September 9-14, 2001 Kyoto, Japan.

April 6-7, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber 1 Modeling of Inertial Fusion Chamber A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi, Z. Dragojlovic,

Thermal Control Techniques for Improved DT Layering of Indirect Drive IFE Targets John E. Pulsifer and Mark S. Tillack University of California, San Diego.

In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

IFSA, Kyoto, Japan, September Dry Chamber Wall Thermo-Mechanical Behavior and Lifetime under IFE Cyclic Energy Deposition A. R. Raffray 1, D. Haynes.

May 31-June 1, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Assessment of Dry Chamber Walls as Preliminary Step in Defining Key Processes for Chamber Clearing Code 1 Assessment.

March 8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Assessment of Carbon and Tungsten Dry Chamber Walls under IFE Energy Depositions Assessment of Carbon and Tungsten.

February 3-4, nd US/Japan Target Workshop, GA, San Diego, CA 1 Heating and Thermal Response of Direct- Drive Target During Injection Presented by.

June 18, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities, IAEA Meeting, San Diego 1 ARIES-IFE Chamber Engineering Activities A. R.

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,

Design Windows for IFE Chambers and Target Injection Farrokh Najmabadi for the ARIES Team US/Japan Workshop on Target Fabrication December 3-4, 2001 General.

May 28-29, 2008/ARR 1 Thermal Effect of Off-Normal Energy Deposition on Bare Ferritic Steel First Wall A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.

April 10, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE 1 Dynamic Chamber Armor Behavior in IFE and MFE A. R. Raffray 1, G.

June7-8, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Completion of Assessment of Dry Chamber Wall Option Without Protective Gas, and Initial Planning Activity for Assessment.

November 8-9, Considerations for Small Chambers A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from M. Sawan (UW), I. Sviatoslavsky (UW) and X. Wang (UCSD)

July 1, 2002/ARR 1 Scoping Study of FLiBe Evaporation and Condensation A. R. Raffray and M. Zaghloul University of California, San Diego ARIES-IFE Meeting.

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.

October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.

1 THERMAL LOADING OF A DIRECT DRIVE TARGET IN RAREFIED GAS B. R. Christensen, A. R. Raffray, and M. S. Tillack Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department.

Scoping Study of He-cooled Porous Media for ARIES-CS Divertor Presented by John Pulsifer Major contributor: René Raffray University of California, San.

Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.

ARIES-IFE: An Integrated Assessment of Chamber Concepts for IFE Power Plants Mark Tillack for the ARIES Team 19th IEEE/NPSS SOFE January 22-25, 2002 Atlantic.

Thermal Control Techniques for Improved DT Layering of Indirect Drive IFE Targets M.S. Tillack and J.E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego D.T.

1 of 16 M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, J. Pulsifer, F. Najmabadi, L. C. Carlson, K. L. Sequoia, R. A. Burdt, M. Aralis Laser-matter interactions and IFE research.

January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.

Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Advanced Chamber Concept with Magnetic Intervention: - Ion Dump Issues - Status of Blanket Study A. René Raffray UCSD.

Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.

Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:

Aug. 8-9, 2006 HAPL meeting, GA 1 Open Discussion on Advanced Armor Concepts Moderated by A. René Raffray UCSD HAPL Meeting GA, La Jolla, CA August 8-9,

August 30, 2001 A. R. Raffray, IFE Dry Chamber Wall Designs 1 IFE Dry Chamber Wall Designs A. R. Raffray and F. Najmabadi University of California, San.

April 9-10, 2003 HAPL Program Meeting, SNL, Albuquerque, N.M. 1 Lowering Target Initial Temperature to Enhance Target Survival Presented by A.R. Raffray.

HAPL WORKSHOP Chamber Gas Density Requirements for Ion Stopping Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.

ARR/April 8, Magnetic Intervention Dump Concepts A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from: A. E. Robson, D. Rose and J. Sethian HAPL Meeting.

ISIS Target studies Could a used ISIS target provide fusion relevant irradiated tungsten material properties? Tristan Davenne 20 th May nd Radiate.

Ion Beam Analysis of Gold Flecks in a Foam Lattice F E Gauntlett, A S Clough Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.

Z Machine Materials Studies November 14, 2001 Tina J. Tanaka, Greg Rochau, Tim Renk, Craig Olson (SNL), Tim Knowles (ESLI), Per Peterson (UCB), and Robert.

/15RRP HAPL Dec 6, Robert R. Peterson Los Alamos National Laboratory and University of Wisconsin Calculations of the Response of Inertial Fusion.

J. Hasegawa, S. Hirai, H. Kita, Y. Oguri, M. Ogawa RLNR, TIT

July 11, 2003 HAPL e-meeting. 1 Armor Design & Modeling Progress A. René Raffray UCSD HAPL e-meeting July 11, 2003 (1)Provide Parameters for Chamber “System”

Fast Electron Temperature Scaling and Conversion Efficiency Measurements using a Bremsstrahlung Spectrometer Brad Westover US-Japan Workshop San Diego,

Materials Studies on Z (x-rays) and RHEPP (ions) C.L. Olson, T.J.Tanaka, T.J. Renk, G.A.Rochau, M.A. Ulrickson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque,

Update on Roughening Work Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin e-meeting – July 2003.

1 US PFC Meeting, UCLA, August 3-6, 2010 DIONISOS: Upgrading to the high temperature regime G.M. Wright, K. Woller, R. Sullivan, H. Barnard, P. Stahle,

R. Doerner, ITPA SOL/DIV meeting, Avila, Jan. 7-10, Be deposition on ITER first mirrors: layer morphology and influence on mirror reflectivity G.

Status of HAPL Tasks 1 & 3 for University of Wisconsin Gregory Moses Milad Fatenejad Fusion Technology Institute High Average Power Laser Meeting September.

1 Deuterium retention and release in tungsten co- deposited layers G. De Temmerman a,b, and R.P. Doerner a a Center for Energy Research, University of.

Modeling of Surface Roughening M. Andersen, S. Sharafat, N. Ghoniem HAPL Surface-Thermomechanics in W and Sic Armor UCLA Workshop May 16 th 2006.

Temperature Response and Ion Deposition in the 1 mm Tungsten Armor Layer for the 10.5 m HAPL Target Chamber T.A. Heltemes, D.R. Boris and M. Fatenejad,

Effect of Re Alloying in W on Surface Morphology Changes After He + Bombardment at High Temperatures R.F. Radel, G.L. Kulcinski, J. F. Santarius, G. A.

Target threat spectra Gregory Moses and John Santarius with Thad Heltemes, Milad Fatenejad, Matt Terry and Jiankui Yuan Fusion Technology Institute University.

Effect of Mirror Defect and Damage On Beam Quality T.K. Mau and Mark Tillack University of California, San Diego ARIES Project Meeting March 8-9, 2001.

M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills and M. D. Hageman G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Correlations for Divertor Thermal-Hydraulic.

Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Atlanta, Georgia, February 5, 2004 This work was performed.

Modeling of Z-Ablation I. E. Golovkin, R. R. Peterson, D. A. Haynes University of Wisconsin-Madison G. Rochau Sandia National Laboratories Presented at.

350 MJ Target Thermal Response and Ion Implantation in 1 mm thick silicon carbide armor for 10.5 m HAPL Chamber T.A. Heltemes and G.A. Moses Fusion Technology.

Chopper Beam Dump Thermal Problem 10/27/20101PX Linac FE Technical Discussions.

Exposures of Candidate First Wall Materials

BUCKY Simulations of Z and RHEPP Experiments

Modelling of Frost Formation and Growth on Microstuctured Surface

A. R. Raffray, J. Pulsifer, M. S. Tillack, X. Wang

University of California, San Diego

University of California, San Diego

Aerosol Production in Lead-protected and Flibe-protected Chambers

A. Vertkov et al., SC “Red Star”, Moscow, Russia

First Wall Response to the 400MJ NRL Target

Presentation transcript:

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 1 Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility A. R. Raffray, J. Pulsifer, M. S. Tillack, X. Wang University of California, San Diego With input from T. Knowles (ESLI) and T. Renk (SNL) HAPL Review GA, San Diego April 4-5, 2002

A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 2 Energy Deposition as a Function of Penetration Depth in Carbon Flat Wall Under RHEPP Ion Spectra Ion Beam data obtained from T. Renk in terms of time, voltage and current density for each ion x10 4 J/m 2 -Energy Split: -16% H + -26% C % C + Energy deposition computed as a function of penetration depth for given ion spectra based on SRIM stopping power data

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 3 How Does the RHEPP Energy Deposition Compares with the 154 MJ DD Target Spectra Case for R=6.5 m? Energy Deposition fromRHEPP dominated by C ions Energy deposition from DD target spectra dominated by deuterium and tritium ions C and H ions have different penetration depths and energy deposition profiles RHEPP reproduces the debris ion energy deposition level and penetration depth within a factor of 2

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 4 Volumetric Heat Generation as a Function of Space and Time in Carbon Flat Wall Under RHEPP Ion Spectra

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 5 Temperature History for Carbon Flat Wall Under RHEPP Ion Spectra Updated sublimation model for C from Philipps’ recommendation IFE reactor-like CFC thermal conductivity as a f(T) (~235 W/m-K for T >1800 °C) - Max. Temp. 4370°C -Corresponding sublimated thickness calculated as ~  m per shot for 5.1x10 4 J/m 2 ) Measurement from T. Renk on POCO Graphite ~20  m after 75 shots, ~0.27  m per shot for 5.5x10 4 J/m 2 Not clear what grade of POCO graphite was used but k would be much lower

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 6 Maximum C Temperature and Sublimation Loss per Shot as a Function of Energy Density and k carbon for Same RHEPP Ion Energy Level Sublimation model from Philipps’ data derived for T<4000K As expected, thermal conductivity plays a key role and it is possible to sublimate ~1  m per shot at energy density of 4 x10 4 J/m 2 if k < 100 W/m-K POCO graphite seems to have low k and would be a poor material to validate CFC grade armor It is very important to conduct experiments on well characterized material and with good diagnostics (surface T and mass loss)

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 7 Carbon Fiber: Geometry Model Fiber characteristics Fiber length 2500  m Fiber diameter 6.5  m Fiber k ~ W/m-K 1.5% fiber volume fraction 98.5% void fraction Fiber separation, y 47  m y eff 215  m

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 8 Carbon Fiber: Energy Deposition Model Penetration depth set as a function of location in fiber based on angle of incidence and including shadowing effect from upstream fibers Energy deposition calculated as a function of penetration depth and including angle effect which effectively increase the area seeing the ion flux

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 9 Results for Carbon Fiber Under RHEPP Ion Spectrum AngleMax. Temp.(°C)Avg. Fract. Subl. Loss LeftRightFiber TipOverall. 0° * ° ° ° * Fractional sublimation loss of 1 is equivalent to ~0.032  m per shot Sublimation loss for fiber based on temperature distribution at tip Major difference with flat plate is very low density of fiber (0.015) In agreement with post-experimental examination of fiber showing no visible ablation or loss of material Temperature Contour at Time Corresponding to T max for 10° Case

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility 10 Concluding Remarks from Fiber Analysis Difficult to model flat POCO graphite case in the absence of fully characterized property data and temperature surface temperature measurement -Need to use actual material or material closely-ressembling (in properties) reactor grade armor -Need to fully characterized material properties - Need to conduct experiments with adequate diagnostics Based on the fiber model (and consistent with experimental observation), much less material is ablated from the fiber -Incidence angle effect on local sublimation -More importantly, fiber density effect on total sublimation