Stat 301 – Day 20 Fisher’s Exact Test. Announcements HW 4 (45 pts)  Classify variables (categorical vs. quantitative)  Round vs. truncating to produce.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Testing the Difference Between Means (Large Independent Samples)
Advertisements

Lecture 3 Outline: Thurs, Sept 11 Chapters Probability model for 2-group randomized experiment Randomization test p-value Probability model for.
Hypothesis Testing: Intervals and Tests
Chi-Squared Hypothesis Testing Using One-Way and Two-Way Frequency Tables of Categorical Variables.
CHAPTER 23: Two Categorical Variables The Chi-Square Test ESSENTIAL STATISTICS Second Edition David S. Moore, William I. Notz, and Michael A. Fligner Lecture.
Comparing Two Population Means The Two-Sample T-Test and T-Interval.
Stat 301 – Day 17 Tests of Significance. Last Time – Sampling cont. Different types of sampling and nonsampling errors  Can only judge sampling bias.
Stat 217 – Day 24 Analysis of Variance Have yesterday’s handout handy.
Stat 301 – Day 19 One sample z-test (4.3). Last Week - Sampling How to select random samples so that we feel comfortable generalizing from our sample.
Stat 512 – Lecture 14 Analysis of Variance (Ch. 12)
Stat 301 – Day 15 Comparing Groups. Statistical Inference Making statements about the “world” based on observing a sample of data, with an indication.
Stat 512 – Lecture 18 Multiple Regression (Ch. 11)
Stat 301- Day 32 More on two-sample t- procedures.
Stat 512 – Lecture 12 Two sample comparisons (Ch. 7) Experiments revisited.
Confidence Interval for Relative Risk
Test statistic: Group Comparison Jobayer Hossain Larry Holmes, Jr Research Statistics, Lecture 5 October 30,2008.
Stat 217 – Day 27 Chi-square tests (Topic 25). The Plan Exam 2 returned at end of class today  Mean.80 (36/45)  Solutions with commentary online  Discuss.
Stat 217 – Week 10. Outline Exam 2 Lab 7 Questions on Chi-square, ANOVA, Regression  HW 7  Lab 8 Notes for Thursday’s lab Notes for final exam Notes.
Stat 512 – Lecture 13 Chi-Square Analysis (Ch. 8).
Stat 301 – Day 21 Large sample methods. Announcements HW 4  Updated solutions Especially Simpson’s Paradox  Should always show your work and explain.
Stat 301 – Day 9 Fisher’s Exact Test Quantitative Variables.
Stat 217 – Day 25 Regression. Last Time - ANOVA When?  Comparing 2 or means (one categorical and one quantitative variable) Research question  Null.
Stat 301 – Day 22 Relative Risk. Announcements HW 5  Learn by Doing Lab 2-3  Evening Office hours  Friday: 10-11, 12-1.
Stat 512 – Day 8 Tests of Significance (Ch. 6). Last Time Use random sampling to eliminate sampling errors Use caution to reduce nonsampling errors Use.
Chapter 26: Comparing Counts. To analyze categorical data, we construct two-way tables and examine the counts of percents of the explanatory and response.
Section 4.4 Creating Randomization Distributions.
Stat 217 – Day 15 Statistical Inference (Topics 17 and 18)
Stat 217 – Day 20 Comparing Two Proportions The judge asked the statistician if she promised to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Stat 418 – Day 2 Binomial Inference (Ch. 1). Syllabus How is JMP downloading going? Optional subscription.
5-3 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Unknown
Review for Exam 2 Some important themes from Chapters 6-9 Chap. 6. Significance Tests Chap. 7: Comparing Two Groups Chap. 8: Contingency Tables (Categorical.
Presentation 12 Chi-Square test.
1. Statistics: Learning from Samples about Populations Inference 1: Confidence Intervals What does the 95% CI really mean? Inference 2: Hypothesis Tests.
Chapter 10 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
How Can We Test whether Categorical Variables are Independent?
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 12 Analyzing the Association Between Quantitative Variables: Regression Analysis Section.
Chapter 9 Comparing More than Two Means. Review of Simulation-Based Tests  One proportion:  We created a null distribution by flipping a coin, rolling.
More About Significance Tests
LECTURE 21 THURS, 23 April STA 291 Spring
1 G Lect 6b G Lecture 6b Generalizing from tests of quantitative variables to tests of categorical variables Testing a hypothesis about a.
Chi-square test or c2 test
Chapter 11 Inference for Tables: Chi-Square Procedures 11.1 Target Goal:I can compute expected counts, conditional distributions, and contributions to.
CHAPTER 11 SECTION 2 Inference for Relationships.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING BETWEEN TWO OR MORE CATEGORICAL VARIABLES The Chi-Square Distribution and Test for Independence.
Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data Lock 5 Exam 2 Review STAT 101 Dr. Kari Lock Morgan 11/13/12 Review of Chapters 5-9.
Methodology Solving problems with known distributions 1.
Single-Factor Studies KNNL – Chapter 16. Single-Factor Models Independent Variable can be qualitative or quantitative If Quantitative, we typically assume.
1 Chapter 11: Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables Section 11.1: What is Independence and What is Association?
AP STATISTICS LESSON (DAY 1) INFERENCE FOR TWO – WAY TABLES.
{ Statistics Review One Semester in 50 minutes. Setting up a null- hypothesis and finding the p-value.
Section 12.2: Tests for Homogeneity and Independence in a Two-Way Table.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.1 Categorical Response: Comparing Two Proportions.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables Section 11.2 Testing Categorical.
Paired Samples Lecture 39 Section 11.3 Tue, Nov 15, 2005.
Chapter 13- Inference For Tables: Chi-square Procedures Section Test for goodness of fit Section Inference for Two-Way tables Presented By:
Synthesis and Review 2/20/12 Hypothesis Tests: the big picture Randomization distributions Connecting intervals and tests Review of major topics Open Q+A.
Analysis of Variance ANOVA - method used to test the equality of three or more population means Null Hypothesis - H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 = μ 3 = μ k Alternative.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 1 FINAL EXAMINATION STUDY MATERIAL III A ADDITIONAL READING MATERIAL – INTRO STATS 3 RD EDITION.
The Chi-Square Distribution  Chi-square tests for ….. goodness of fit, and independence 1.
Goodness-of-Fit and Contingency Tables Chapter 11.
Chi Square Test of Homogeneity. Are the different types of M&M’s distributed the same across the different colors? PlainPeanutPeanut Butter Crispy Brown7447.
Exact probability test (Fisher’s Test) Oh Hun Kwon.
Assessing Statistical Significance ROSS 2016 Lane-Getaz.
Chi Square Test Dr. Asif Rehman.
Presentation 12 Chi-Square test.
Two-sided p-values (1.4) and Theory-based approaches (1.5)
Stat 217 – Day 28 Review Stat 217.
Stat 217 – Day 23 Lab 5.
Exact Test Fisher’s Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Stat 301 – Day 20 Fisher’s Exact Test

Announcements HW 4 (45 pts)  Classify variables (categorical vs. quantitative)  Round vs. truncating to produce counts  Defining the parameter  Simulation vs. theory-based One vs. two-sided hypotheses Two-sided p-values Interpretation of p-value, random chance = sampling  Some times one sample but will to consider the two sub-samples independent (male, female) Project 2 proposal

Extra credit possibility? Taysseer Sharaf   4:10-5pm  Teaching demonstration (paired t-test)

Last Time – Comparing treatments Random chance = random assignment Null hypothesis: Equal treatment probabilities  No association between explanatory and response variables Simulation: Assume the successes/failures were going to be successes/failures no matter which group they were assigned to, see how often “shuffling” creates a difference in the groups at least as extreme as observed

PP 2.6 (p. 151) sacrificeno reminder total Gifts ok Not ok cards, 70 blue and 110 green Deal out 120 and 60 Count the number of blue cards in sacrifice group How often 57 or more blue cards in sacrifice group? How often 13 or fewer in no reminder?

Quiz 9

Investigation 2.7 (p. 152) (a) EV: yawn seed or no RV: whether or not yawned (b) Parameter: difference in probability of yawning (yawn seed – no yawn seed) H 0 : the two probabilities are the same H a : the probability of yawning is larger if given a yawn seed

Hypergeometric Distribution X counts the number of successes in a sample of n objects selected from a population of N objects consisting of M successes E(X) = n(M/N) Two-way table applet, R  Fisher’s Exact Test

Let X represent the number of yawners in the yawn seed group p-value = P(X> 10) with M = 14, n = 34, N = 50 (p) Success = “not yawning” p-value = P(X < 24) Yawning study M N n M N n

(q) Let X represent the number that didn’t yawn in the no yawn seed group p-value = P(X > 12) with M = 36, n = 16, N = 50

To Do PP 2.7A and 2.7B(a)(b) (p. 157) Investigation 2.8 through part (d) Have one group member submit project 2 proposal