Two Approaches to Multiphysics Modeling Sun, Yongqi FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulazione di Biomolecole: metodi e applicazioni giorgio colombo
Advertisements

Multiscale Dynamics of Bio-Systems: Molecules to Continuum February 2005.
BIOSYST-MeBioS. Model-based approach Purpose Improve understanding Optimization Control Macroscale approach (Ho et al., 2006) Geometry: intact fruit Gas.
Probability evolution for complex multi-linear non-local interactions Irene M. Gamba Department of Mathematics and ICES The University of Texas at Austin.
Adaptive multi-scale model for simulating cardiac conduction Presenter: Jianyu Li, Kechao Xiao.
Aug 9-10, 2011 Nuclear Energy University Programs Materials: NEAMS Perspective James Peltz, Program Manager, NEAMS Crosscutting Methods and Tools.
By Paul Delgado. Motivation Flow-Deformation Equations Discretization Operator Splitting Multiphysics Coupling Fixed State Splitting Other Splitting Conclusions.
Upscaling and effective properties in saturated zone transport Wolfgang Kinzelbach IHW, ETH Zürich.
Dongxiao Zhang Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering The University of Oklahoma “Probability and Materials: from Nano- to Macro-Scale”
Generalization of Heterogeneous Multiscale Models: Coupling discrete microscale and continuous macroscale representations of physical laws in porous media.
An Introduction to Multiscale Modeling Scientific Computing and Numerical Analysis Seminar CAAM 699.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
 Product design optimization Process optimization Reduced experimentation Physical system Process model Product model Product Market need Multiscale Modeling.
Incorporating Solvent Effects Into Molecular Dynamics: Potentials of Mean Force (PMF) and Stochastic Dynamics Eva ZurekSection 6.8 of M.M.
Transport phenomena in chemical processes part II Michał Araszkiewicz PhD.
PHYS 410: Computational Physics Term 2 – 2008/09.
Peyman Mostaghimi, Martin Blunt, Branko Bijeljic 11 th January 2010, Pore-scale project meeting Direct Numerical Simulation of Transport Phenomena on Pore-space.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Multi-Scale Finite-Volume (MSFV) method for elliptic problems Subsurface flow simulation Mark van Kraaij, CASA Seminar Wednesday 13 April 2005.
Latest Advances in “Hybrid” Codes & their Application to Global Magnetospheric Simulations A New Approach to Simulations of Complex Systems H. Karimabadi.
James Sprittles ECS 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E. Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
Weakly nonlocal fluid mechanics Peter Ván Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Chemical Physics –One component fluid mechanics.
Numerical methods for PDEs PDEs are mathematical models for –Physical Phenomena Heat transfer Wave motion.
Instructor: André Bakker
A Hybrid Particle-Mesh Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multiphase Flows Jie LIU, Seiichi KOSHIZUKA Yoshiaki OKA The University of Tokyo,
Equation-Free (EF) Uncertainty Quantification (UQ): Techniques and Applications Ioannis Kevrekidis and Yu Zou Princeton University September 2005.
The Onsager Principle and Hydrodynamic Boundary Conditions Ping Sheng Department of Physics and William Mong Institute of Nano Science and Technology The.
MA354 Mathematical Modeling T H 2:45 pm– 4:00 pm Dr. Audi Byrne.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Mathematical Equations of CFD
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION LIJIAN TAN NICHOLAS ZABARAS Date: 24 July 2007 Sibley School.
Yoon kichul Department of Mechanical Engineering Seoul National University Multi-scale Heat Conduction.
Laboratoire Environnement, Géomécanique & Ouvrages Comparison of Theory and Experiment for Solute Transport in Bimodal Heterogeneous Porous Medium Fabrice.
Review of Urban Modeling Program at LLNL CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
Stirling-type pulse-tube refrigerator for 4 K M. Ali Etaati CASA-Day April 24 th 2008.
Upscaling of Transport Processes in Porous Media with Biofilms in Non-Equilibrium Conditions L. Orgogozo 1, F. Golfier 1, M.A. Buès 1, B. Wood 2, M. Quintard.
Dissipative Particle Dynamics. Molecular Dynamics, why slow? MD solves Newton’s equations of motion for atoms/molecules: Why MD is slow?
Basic Boltzmann Gas Concepts. Kinetic Theory Complete set of position (x) and momentum (p) coordinates for all individual particles gives exact dynamical.
1 Investigative Tools--Theory, Modeling, and Simulation Rational You ITRI-IEK-NEMS 2001/08/06 Source: IWGN (1999/09)
Round Tables and Discussions Experiment + Theory + Numerical Simulations How to stay connected to reality?
The Old Well 10/25/2003 AMS Sectional Conference 1 Continuum Fluid Simulations Using Microscopically Polymer Computed Constitutive Laws Sorin Mitran
MA354 An Introduction to Math Models (more or less corresponding to 1.0 in your book)
The Old Well 3/15/2003 AMS 2003 Spring Southeastern Sectional Meeting 1 An adaptive method for coupled continuum-molecular simulation of crack propagation.
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
Role of Theory Model and understand catalytic processes at the electronic/atomistic level. This involves proposing atomic structures, suggesting reaction.
Review Session BS123A/MB223 UC-Irvine Ray Luo, MBB, BS.
Lecture 3. Full statistical description of the system of N particles is given by the many particle distribution function: in the phase space of 6N dimensions.
AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 3
The Old Well 10/25/2003 AMS Sectional Conference 1 Continuum Fluid Simulations Using Microscopically Polymer Computed Constitutive Laws Sorin Mitran
MA354 Math Modeling Introduction. Outline A. Three Course Objectives 1. Model literacy: understanding a typical model description 2. Model Analysis 3.
Modeling. How Do we Address Aerosol-Cloud Interactions? The Scale Problem Process Models ~ 10s km Mesoscale Models Cloud resolving Models Regional Models.
Network Systems Lab. Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology No.1 Ch. 1 Introduction EE692 Parallel and Distribution Computation | Prof. Song.
Computational Fluid Dynamics - Fall 2007 The syllabus CFD references (Text books and papers) Course Tools Course Web Site:
1 LES of Turbulent Flows: Lecture 7 (ME EN ) Prof. Rob Stoll Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Spring 2011.
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES Materials Process Design and Control.
Mean Field Methods for Computer and Communication Systems Jean-Yves Le Boudec EPFL Network Science Workshop Hong Kong July
One Team: Relevant... Ready... Responsive... Reliable Basic Research Program Particle-Scale Distribution of Soil Moisture in Porous Media 24 January 2007.
GEM Student Tutorial: GGCM Modeling (MHD Backbone)
Gas Transport Phenomena in Nanoporous Material
Data Structures for Efficient and Integrated Simulation of Multi-Physics Processes in Complex Geometries A.Smirnov MulPhys LLC github/mulphys
Intro to Global Modeling and Prediction Session
Fluctuating Hydrodynamics of Reactive Liquid Mixtures
Jos Derksen & Radompon Sungkorn Chemical & Materials Engineering
Large Time Scale Molecular Paths Using Least Action.
Hydrology Modeling in Alaska: Modeling Overview
What are Multiscale Methods?
Presentation transcript:

Two Approaches to Multiphysics Modeling Sun, Yongqi FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg

Content Introduction Introduction Patch Simulation Patch Simulation Mesoscale Simulation Mesoscale Simulation

Introduction 1.1 Objects Multiple simultaneous physical phenomena Multiple simultaneous physical phenomena Multiple physical models - PDEs Multiple physical models - PDEs

Introduction 1.2 Application Examples Space weather: plasma kinetics + magneto hydrodynamics Space weather: plasma kinetics + magneto hydrodynamics Fluid-structure interaction: Fluid-structure interaction: fluid dynamics + structural mechanics fluid dynamics + structural mechanics Materials fracture: molecular dynamics + solid mechanics Materials fracture: molecular dynamics + solid mechanics Distributed network performance: Distributed network performance: discrete event dynamics + stochastic fluid models discrete event dynamics + stochastic fluid models Nanodevice electronics: Nanodevice electronics: quantum kinetic theory + quantum hydrodynamics quantum kinetic theory + quantum hydrodynamics

Introduction 1.3 Scales – Time and Space Macro: continuum reaction and transport (PDEs) Macro: continuum reaction and transport (PDEs) e. g. mass-action chemical kinetics, e. g. mass-action chemical kinetics, hydrodynamics (Navier-Stokes Eq.) hydrodynamics (Navier-Stokes Eq.) Micro: physically motivated discrete models Micro: physically motivated discrete models e. g. molecular dynamics e. g. molecular dynamics Boltzmann kinetic theory Boltzmann kinetic theory crack propagation crack propagation

Introduction 1.4 Approaches Patch dynamics Patch dynamics – when only microscopic model is available – when only microscopic model is available – to predict macroscopic space-time scales behaviour – to predict macroscopic space-time scales behaviour Mesoscale model Mesoscale model – bridge of macro- and microscale methods – bridge of macro- and microscale methods – hybrid models for specific kinds of problems – hybrid models for specific kinds of problems

Patch Simulation 2.1 Idea Predict system-level behaviour (macroscale) from locally averaged properties (microscale) Predict system-level behaviour (macroscale) from locally averaged properties (microscale) Macroscopic equations are unavailable (highly non-linear, singular) or equations for the higher moments on microscale are unavailable Macroscopic equations are unavailable (highly non-linear, singular) or equations for the higher moments on microscale are unavailable

Patch Simulation 2.2 Application Examples Molecular dynamics Molecular dynamics Lattice-Boltzmann particles methods Lattice-Boltzmann particles methods Reaction-diffusion equations Reaction-diffusion equations Epidemiology Epidemiology

Patch Simulation 2.3 Algorithms – Finite difference methods Microscopic initial conditions agree with the macroscale averages at the grid points : lifting Microscopic initial conditions agree with the macroscale averages at the grid points : lifting Interpolate the macroscale averages : m acroscopic solution and microscopic boundary conditions Interpolate the macroscale averages : m acroscopic solution and microscopic boundary conditions Solution in each patch by microscopic model Solution in each patch by microscopic model Integration of the microscopic model: changes in macroscale averages and time derivatives : restriction Integration of the microscopic model: changes in macroscale averages and time derivatives : restriction Advance macroscopic variables in time Advance macroscopic variables in time

Patch Simulation One-dimentional problem One-dimentional problem

Patch Simulation Space-time plot for the patches Space-time plot for the patches

Patch Simulation 2.4 Overview Microscale structure: solution varies rapidly Microscale structure: solution varies rapidly Macroscale structure: smooth locally averaged Macroscale structure: smooth locally averaged Patch boundary conditions: communicate between patches, obtained from macroscale reconstructed solution Patch boundary conditions: communicate between patches, obtained from macroscale reconstructed solution Buffer region: microscale solution’s statistical properties Buffer region: microscale solution’s statistical properties Macroscale reconstructed solution: local interpolation of macroscopic field variables Macroscale reconstructed solution: local interpolation of macroscopic field variables

Patch Simulation 2.5 Accuracy Assumption Macroscale is separated from microscale: Macroscale is separated from microscale: i. e. △ x << △ X, △ t << △ T i. e. △ x << △ X, △ t << △ T Macroscale variables are sufficient to determine the system’s dynamics and define the microscopic i. c. Macroscale variables are sufficient to determine the system’s dynamics and define the microscopic i. c. Microscale model is well defined Microscale model is well defined Macroscale model is statistically stable to small perturbations in the microscale Macroscale model is statistically stable to small perturbations in the microscale The reference grid accurately resolves the macroscale solution The reference grid accurately resolves the macroscale solution

Patch Simulation 2.6 Crucial Steps Lifting the microscale i. c. from macroscopic (balance between microscopic forces): defect-correction algorithm (maximum entropy approach) Lifting the microscale i. c. from macroscopic (balance between microscopic forces): defect-correction algorithm (maximum entropy approach) Bridging the spatial gaps (microscale b. c. must agree with macroscale): polynomial interpolation, global conservation Bridging the spatial gaps (microscale b. c. must agree with macroscale): polynomial interpolation, global conservation Bridging the temporal gaps (average time derivatives and the time derivatives of the spatial moments): microscale integration(e. g. Runge-Kutta) Bridging the temporal gaps (average time derivatives and the time derivatives of the spatial moments): microscale integration(e. g. Runge-Kutta)

Mesoscale Simulation 3.1 Problems with Macro- and Microscale Simulation Microscopic methods are computationally expensive Microscopic methods are computationally expensive e. g. Molecular Dynamics: 100 nanometers, several tens of nanoseconds e. g. Molecular Dynamics: 100 nanometers, several tens of nanoseconds Macroscopic models usually fail with microscale Macroscopic models usually fail with microscale e. g. continuum hypothesis break down for approximately 10 molecules e. g. continuum hypothesis break down for approximately 10 molecules The coupling of two methods has problems The coupling of two methods has problems e. g. noise at the interface, conservation of mass or momentum e. g. noise at the interface, conservation of mass or momentum

Mesoscale Simulation 3.2 Example of mesoscale method – Dissipative Particle Dynamics model Dissipative Particle Dynamics model Area: complex liquids and dense suspensions Area: complex liquids and dense suspensions Content: Model of polymer chains in dilute solutions: different forces on polymer- and solvent particles Content: Model of polymer chains in dilute solutions: different forces on polymer- and solvent particles Different time scale: time-staggered integrating scheme with two different time steps – smaller for polymer particles and larger for solvent particles Different time scale: time-staggered integrating scheme with two different time steps – smaller for polymer particles and larger for solvent particles

References J. M. Hyman, “Patch Dynamics For Multiscale Problems,” Computing in Science & Engineering, May/June J. M. Hyman, “Patch Dynamics For Multiscale Problems,” Computing in Science & Engineering, May/June V. Symeonidis et al., “A Seamless Approach To Multiscale Complex Fluid Simulation,” Computing in Science & Engineering, May/June V. Symeonidis et al., “A Seamless Approach To Multiscale Complex Fluid Simulation,” Computing in Science & Engineering, May/June 2005.

Thanks for your attention!