Second ICAP Workshop Aerosol Modeling using the GISS modelE Sophia Zhang, Dorothy Koch, Susanna Bauer, Reha Cakmur, Ron Miller, Jan Perlwitz Nadine Bell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global, Regional, and Urban Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Mark Z. Jacobson Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering Stanford University.
Advertisements

The other Harvard 3-D model: CACTUS Chemistry, Aerosols, Climate: Tropospheric Unified Simulation Objective: to improve understanding of the interaction.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Global Warming and Climate Sensitivity Professor Dennis L. Hartmann Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington.
Direct radiative forcing and BC on snow in the Arctic region Bjørn H. Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Ragnhild B. Skeie, … Outline: - BC on snow in the Arctic region.
Xuan Wang and Colette L. Heald 7th International GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting, May 5, 2015 This work is funded by U.S. EPA Simulating Brown Carbon and its.
The Atmosphere: Oxidizing Medium In Global Biogeochemical Cycles EARTH SURFACE Emission Reduced gas Oxidized gas/ aerosol Oxidation Uptake Reduction.
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
Investigating the Sources of Organic Carbon Aerosol in the Atmosphere Colette L. Heald NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellow University of.
Eric M. Leibensperger, Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University Climate response to changing.
What are aerosols ? Aerosol is a collection of particles suspended in the air, they range in size from 0.01 microns to several tens of microns.
Gregory R. Carmichael Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA Climatic Effects & Air Quality: Aerosol/Chemistry.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
This Week—Tropospheric Chemistry READING: Chapter 11 of text Tropospheric Chemistry Data Set Analysis.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
MET 12 Global Climate Change – Lecture 8
The Role of Aerosols in Climate Change Eleanor J. Highwood Department of Meteorology, With thanks to all the IPCC scientists, Keith Shine (Reading) and.
Effects of size resolved aerosol microphysics on photochemistry and heterogeneous chemistry Gan Luo and Fangqun Yu ASRC, SUNY-Albany
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Konrad Cunningham, Joel Arberman, Nadine Bell, Susan Harder, Drew Schindell, Gavin Schmidt The Effects of Climate and Emission Changes on Surface Sulfate.
Using Earth System Models to provide policy-relevant information (Couples therapy for the uneasy marriage between science and policy)‏ Gavin Schmidt NASA.
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
(Impacts are Felt on Scales from Local to Global) Aerosols Link Climate, Air Quality, and Health: Dirtier Air and a Dimmer Sun Emissions Impacts == 
Impact of Short-Lived Pollutants on Arctic Climate (SPAC) Background and Progress Since January 2007 GISS Meeting SPAC Workshop, November 5 – 7, 2007 Oslo,
Improving Black Carbon (BC) Aging in GEOS-Chem Based on Aerosol Microphysics: Constraints from HIPPO Observations Cenlin He Advisers: Qinbin Li, Kuo-Nan.
INTERACTIONS OF AIR POLLUTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE Daniel J. Jacob How do air pollutants contribute to climate change? How will climate change affect air.
Aerosol effect on cloud cover and cloud height Kaufman, Koren, Remer, Rosenfeld & Martins.
Natural and Anthropogenic Drivers of Arctic Climate Change Gavin Schmidt NASA GISS and Columbia University Jim Hansen, Drew Shindell, David Rind, Ron Miller.
Numerical Simulations of the Effect of Black Carbon Aerosol on Regional Climate in Southeast Asia and Vietnam Danang, March 2009 Ho Thi Minh Ha, Phan Van.
Future Climate Projections. Lewis Richardson ( ) In the 1920s, he proposed solving the weather prediction equations using numerical methods. Worked.
US Aerosols : Observation from Space, Climate Interactions Daniel J. Jacob and funding from NASA, EPRI, EPA with Easan E. Drury (now at NREL), Loretta.
1 MET 112 Global Climate Change MET 112 Global Climate Change - Lecture 11 Radiative Forcing Eugene Cordero San Jose State University Outline  GHG/Aerosols.
Human fingerprints on our changing climate Neil Leary Changing Planet Study Group June 28 – July 1, 2011 Cooling the Liberal Arts Curriculum A NASA-GCCE.
The GEOS-CHEM Simulation of Trace Gases over China Li ZHANG and Hong LIAO Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences April 24, 2008.
Dust Modeling at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Ron Miller, Susanne Bauer, Reha Cakmur, Jan Perlwitz, Peng Xian.
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Sciences Indirect aerosol effects in EC earth Trude Storelvmo and Ulrike Lohmann, ETH-Zurich.
UNECE-CLRTAP and EMEP Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling 26th session, Brussels, May 2001 Integrating the environmental effects of Particulate.
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000 Gunnar Myhre 1,2 Terje K. Berntsen 3,1 James M. Haywood 4 Jostein K.
Why is the photochemistry in Arctic spring so unique? Jingqiu Mao.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Regional analysis of multi- year aerosol indirect effects Dr. Thomas Jones University of Alabama in Huntsville January 13, th Annual AMS Conference,
Aerosols and climate - a crash course Marianne T. Lund CICERO Nove Mesto 17/9-15.
Potential alteration of ice clouds by aircraft soot Joyce E. Penner and Xiaohong Liu Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University of.
REGIONAL/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Greenhouse gases Halocarbons Ozone Aerosols Acids Nutrients Toxics SOURCE CONTINENT REGIONAL ISSUES:
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
04/12/011 The contribution of Earth degassing to the atmospheric sulfur budget By Hans-F. Graf, Baerbel Langmann, Johann Feichter From Chemical Geology.
Radiative forcing due to BC on snow and the direct aerosol effect of BC in the Arctic Gunnar Myhre CICERO – Center for International Climate and Environmental.
Tom Breider, Loretta Mickley, Daniel Jacob, Cui Ge, Jun Wang, Melissa Payer, Betty Croft, David Ridley, Sangeeta Sharma, Kostas Eleftheriadis, Joe McConnell,
Review: Constraining global isoprene emissions with GOME formaldehyde column measurements Shim et al. Luz Teresa Padró Wei-Chun Hsieh Zhijun Zhao.
GEOS-CHEM Activities at NIA Hongyu Liu National Institute of Aerospace (NIA) at NASA LaRC June 2, 2003.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Estimation of the contribution of mineral dust to the total aerosol depth: Particular focus on Atlantic Ocean G. Myhre, A. Grini, T.K. Berntsen, T.F. Berglen,
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
Aerosol 1 st indirect forcing in the coupled CAM-IMPACT model: effects from primary-emitted particulate sulfate and boundary layer nucleation Minghuai.
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone
TOWARDS AN AEROSOL CLIMATOLOGY
Impact of the vertical resolution on Climate Simulation using CESM
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000   Gunnar Myhre, Terje K. Berntsen, James M. Haywood, Jostein K. Sundet,
Influences of Wet Scavenging on Aerosol Concentrations and Deposition in the ECHAM5-HAM Global Climate Model Betty Croft1 Ulrike.
Climate response to changing United States aerosol sources
Lin Zhang, Daniel J. Jacob, Jennifer A
Amplified Eurasian springtime warming from snow darkening
SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF OZONE PRECURSORS FROM GOME
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Global Climate Response to Anthropogenic Aerosol Indirect Effects
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

Second ICAP Workshop Aerosol Modeling using the GISS modelE Sophia Zhang, Dorothy Koch, Susanna Bauer, Reha Cakmur, Ron Miller, Jan Perlwitz Nadine Bell NASA/GISS, New York

GISS Aerosol Transport Model The new GISS model version “modelE” (Schmidt et al., submitted to J. Clim.). Improved radiative treatment, including relative- humidity dependence of optical properties for sulfate, sea salt, and OC. Implementation of dissolved species budget (DSB) with stratiform cloud (Koch et al., JGR 2003, Koch et al., in prep). Closer coupling between species and the BL. Resolution: 4 o lat x 5 o long, 20 vertical layers with 10 in the troposphere. The model top is 0.1 mb.

Emissions Emission (Tg/yr) References: Industrial SO IIASA, Dentener, in prep Biomass SO 2 2.3Sprio et al., 1992 Volcanic SO GEIA (Andres and Kasgnoc, 1998) scaled by 1.5 Halmer et al., 2002; Graf et al., 1997 DMS21.2Kettle et al., 1999; Nightingale et al., 2000 Biomass Burning BC+POM Cooke and Wilson, 1996 Fossil fuel and biofuel BC+POM Bond et al., 2004 Aircraft BC0.01Baughcum et al.,1993 Dust (4 bins)1500Cakmur et al, in prep Sea Salt (2 bins)1734.4Monahan et al., 1986

Comparison with observations Remote sitesEMEP IMPROVE Implementation of DSB results in lower loadings for soluble species, especially for sulfate due to reduced aqueous-phase-produced amount. Heterogeneous processes may correct the deficient sulfate amounts.

The direct radiative forcing for anthropogenic sulfate is reduced to only W/m 2 because of a lower anthropogenic sulfate loading in this model. Direct Radiative Forcing

Ocean The Tropospheric Sulfur Cycle

SO 2 is irreversibly absorbed on the dust surface and then oxidized by ozone and forms stable sulfate on the dust surface. HET assumes 1.e -4 uptaking rate for SO 2 on dust. Heterogeneous Reaction on Dust SO4 concentrations CTR (  g/m 3 ) HET (  g/m 3 ) HET- CTR (  g/m 3 ) Sulfate surface concentrations

Comparison with observations. - CONTROL - HETERO. CHEM - CONTROL

Impact on Dust Heterogeneous reaction can change the dust loading and lifetime. In addition, sulfate, when coated on dust, can change the optical properties of dust. CTR (mg/m 2 ) HET-CTR (mg/m 2 )

BC Emissions by regions Region*Tg yr −1 % burden(Tg) % Globe Biomass S of 40 o N Biomass N of 40 o N Far East Europe North America Russia Aircraft Rest of World * Region names are not exactly correspond to their geographic labels.

Contributions to BC optical depth based on regional source experiments.

Climate effects of BC BC absorbs solar radiation and is thought to warm the climate through aerosol direct effect, and other enhancing mechanisms (semi-direct effect and snow albedo effect). The climate effect of BC is highly uncertain due the uncertainties in aerosol loading, vertical distribution, and how cloud changes due to BC.

Results of BC in each model Layer Layer Fa (w/m 2 ) Efficacy Change of Cloud Cover (%) lowmidhigh The efficacy is 0.82 for BCI and 0.60 for BCB.

Change of Low Cloud Cover When BC is put in the layer 1, the reduction of low cloud cover over land is smaller than that over ocean on average. When BC is put in the layer 4, the reduction of low cloud cover occurs mostly overland and the coastal region near source, while most of the increase of low cloud cover occurs over ocean. BC in Layer 4 (847mb)BC in Layer 1(959mb)

Correlation of anomalies of ISCCP low cloud amount and TOMS AI ( ). The TOMS AI points used for calculating anomalies are those with reflectivity ≤ 15%. The correlation for low cloud amount is slightly positive for dust and biomass burning region. Relationship between the modeled ISCCP low cloud amount and AI needs to be studied. TOMS AI vs. Low Cloud Amount TOMS AI vs. Total Cloud Amount

Optimizing Dust Emissions An optimal global value of dust emission and the aerosol load are calculated by minimizing the difference between the model and multiple observational data sets. (Cakmur et al., in prep) No single data set is sufficient to constrain the emission. The optimal value represents the influence of all data sets. The optimal dust emission ranges from 1150 to 2850 Tg/yr using different a priori sources. The result is sensitive to the a priori source, datasets, and location used

Other on-going aerosol projects at GISS Fully interactive tropospheric gas-phase coupling between sulfur and chemistry has been implemented in the GISS modelE (Bell et al., submitted to JGR). On annual and global scales, the differences of sulfate burden between the coupled and off-line simulations are small but larger deviations do occur on regional and seasonal scales. The chemistry-aerosol coupling leads increases in surface sulfate over source regions in the NH summer, with compensating decreases downwind and in the upper troposphere due to depleted SO 2.