Other Opportunities for SLAC in the Linear Collider Era SLAC Scenarios Study Kickoff Feb. 24, 2003 Lance Dixon
What will SLAC look like in 5-20 years? “Always looking to the future, we pick up bad habits of anticipation” -Philip Larkin The “part B” committee Lance Dixon John Seeman (co-chairs) Pat Burchat (Stanford) Eric Colby JoAnne Hewett Bob Jacobsen (Berkeley) Steve Kahn (Columbia -> SLAC) Homer Neal (Yale) Bruce Schumm (UCSC) Su Dong Tom Himel Persis Drell (ex-officio)
Some potential opportunities On-site accelerator-based particle physics Super B factory Gamma-gamma collider: Higgs “shop” Mega-to-Giga Z factory Advanced Accelerator R&D Other Particle astrophysics & off-site/nonaccel. options Particle astrophysics post GLAST EXO Other neutrino options LHC upgrades Other
Educating ourselves We need input from you! Now is the time for creative ideas of all sorts Particularly important to brainstorm ideas for accelerator-based particle physics Maximize “bang-to-buck” ratio We will hold “days” devoted to major themes, 2-3 talks from experts, plenty of discussion time What is the physics? What are the technical requirements? What are the possible roles for SLAC? Web broadcast of talks Schedule “days” in March & April if possible
“B day” The flavor physics landscape in the LC era Bob Cahn Physics & detector issues at a super B factory Dave Hitlin Machine options John Seeman Mike Sullivan Possible dates: March 20 or April 2
“Neutrino day” The neutrino mass/mixing landscape in the LC era Boris Kayser Long-baseline oscillation opportunities Gary Feldman Other underground science ??? Possible date: April 18
Other events Orion workshop (last week): facility for advanced accelerator designs (laser, plasma, lab astrophysics) Super B factory workshop (May 8-10)
Next phases of study May-June: Identify some representative opportunities Estimate resource requirements Roundtable with users & staff to discuss what has been learned, identify areas needing more study Report to SLAC SPC, solicit their input Part C of study (July-Sept.): Understand how options will fit together with each other, and (most importantly) with SLAC’s role in the linear collider (part A)
Conclusions SLAC’s character will change over the next 5-20 years. What do we want it to look like? We need your input Now (brainstorming) Later (which scenarios should be considered in most depth?)