Muon Capture on the Deuteron Motivation for a new Experiment B e r n h a r d L a u s s U C B e r k e l e y for the MuCAP Collaboration Petersburg Nuclear.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Eta production Resonances, meson couplings Humberto Garcilazo, IPN Mexico Dan-Olof Riska, Helsinki … exotic hadronic matter?
Advertisements

Spectroscopy at the Particle Threshold H. Lenske 1.
Energy Consumption Fossil Fuel Contribution to Global Energy Demand Year.
A.Vorobyov on behalf of MuCap collaboration Determination of the nucleon’s pseudoscalar form factor in the MuCap experiment HSQCD 2014 Gatchina
Neutrino-nucleus  : Measurements vs. calculations Petr Vogel, Caltech Oak Ridge, Aug , 2003 Outline: a) review of known weak processes b) successes.
Muon Capture on the Proton Final results from the MuCap experiment Muon Capture on the Proton Final results from the MuCap experiment gPgP Peter Winter.
Neutrino-induced meson production model for neutrino oscillation experiments Satoshi Nakamura Nuclear Theory Group.
Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei Tina Leitner, Ulrich Mosel LAUNCH09 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Su Shi Chun. From experiments, we found that nuclei are more tightly bounded  number of protons or neutrons is 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126 (Magic numbers).
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
1 Peter Kammel for the MuSun Collaboration Muon Capture on the Deuteron The MuSun Experiment BV39, Feb 21, 08.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
The Size and Shape of the Deuteron The deuteron is not a spherical nucleus. In the standard proton-neutron picture of this simplest nucleus, its shape.
1 B.Ricci* What have we learnt about the Sun from the measurement of 8B neutrino flux? Experimental results SSM predictions SSM uncertainties on  (8B)
Precision Muon Physics Group muon capture on proton  - + p   + n  to 1 % muon capture on proton  - + p   + n  to 1 % Nucleon form factors, chiral.
Precision Measurement of Muon Capture on the Proton “  Cap experiment”  - + p   + n Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI), Gatchina,Russia Paul.
11 Primakoff Experiments with EIC A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC For the PrimEx Collaboration Outline  Physics motivation:  The.
Muon Capture as a Probe of the Nucleon’s Axial Structure – the  Cap Experiment Peter Kammel University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1 Muon Capture by 3 He and The Weak Stucture of the Nucleon Doron Gazit Institute for Nuclear Theory arXiv:
MuCap: From first results to final precision on determining g P Brendan Kiburg 2008 APS April Meeting April 12 th, 2008.
Study of the  -decay of 12 B Proposal to INTC 25th February 2002 SpokespersonH.O.U. Fynbo ContactpersonU.C. Bergmann.
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Charm hadrons in nuclear medium S. Yasui (KEK) K. Sudoh (Nishogakusha Univ.) “Hadron in nucleus” 31 Nov. – 2 Dec arXiv:1308:0098 [hep-ph]
Coupled-Channel Computation of Direct Neutron Capture and (d,p) reactions on Non- Spherical Nuclei Goran Arbanas (ORNL) Ian J. Thompson (LLNL) with Filomena.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Constraint on new physics by measuring the HVV Couplings at e+e- LC In collaboration with.
Precision Muon Capture on the Proton and Very Light Nuclei 1 Peter Kammel Department of Physics and Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics,
Neutrino Reactions on the Deuteron in Core-Collapse Supernovae Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University Collaborators: S. Nasu, T. Sato (Osaka U.), K. Sumiyoshi.
Neutrino reactions on two-nucleon system and core-collapse supernova
Muon PSI Peter Winter University of Washington gPgP L 1A / d R.
Peter Kammel First Results from the New Muon Lifetime Experiments at PSI GFGF gPgP L 1A MuCap “MuSun” project MuLan.
Chiral condensate in nuclear matter beyond linear density using chiral Ward identity S.Goda (Kyoto Univ.) D.Jido ( YITP ) 12th International Workshop on.
Neutral pion photoproduction and neutron radii Dan Watts, Claire Tarbert University of Edinburgh Crystal Ball and A2 collaboration at MAMI Eurotag Meeting.
-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS and FUTURE PROJECTS Cristina VOLPE Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France.
Determining Strangeness Quark Spin in Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering at J-PARC T.-A. Shibata (Tokyo Tech) in collaboration with N. Saito (Kyoto Univ) and.
Parity-violating NN interaction from different approaches Chang Ho Hyun with B. Desplanques Universite Joseph Fourier S. Ando Manchester C.-P. Liu Wisconsin-Madison.
Dott. Antonio Botrugno Ph.D. course UNIVERSITY OF LECCE (ITALY) DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS.
New Nuclear and Weak Physics in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Christel Smith Arizona State University Arizona State University Erice, Italy September 17, 2010.
What Can be Learned from Identifying Leading Hadrons of Jets in STAR? Kolja Kauder for the STAR Collaboration.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
Spin Polarization in d  → n p Chang Ho Hyun Daegu University Work with S. Ando (Daegu) Y.-H. Song (South Carolina) K. Kubodera (South Carolina) HNP2011,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Effective interactions for reaction calculations Jutta Escher, F.S. Dietrich, D. Gogny, G.P.A. Nobre, I.J. Thompson.
R. Machleidt, University of Idaho Recent advances in the theory of nuclear forces and its relevance for the microscopic approach to dense matter.
Three-body force effect on the properties of asymmetric nuclear matter Wei Zuo Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou, China.
Model independent extraction of neutron structure functions from deuterium data. Svyatoslav Tkachenko University of South Carolina.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Weak decay of  in nuclear medium FCPPL-2015, USTC, April 8-12, 2015 Institute of High Energy Physics Qiang Zhao Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS.
The radiative neutron capture on 3 He ( 3 He+n→ 4 He+  ) in effective field theory Young-Ho Song Seoul National University in collaboration with T.-S.
Muon Capture on the Deuteron – MuSun Experiment  + d  n + n +  + d  n + n + model-independent connection via EFT.
Collaborators: Bugra Borasoy – Bonn Univ. Thomas Schaefer – North Carolina State U. University of Kentucky CCS Seminar, March 2005 Neutron Matter on the.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Solar Neutrinos By Wendi Wampler. What are Neutrinos? Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles.
Magnetic moment of neutrino and deuteron reaction T. Sato (Osaka U.) Motivation Neutrino disintegration of deuteron by electromagnetic interaction Summary.
Cristina VOLPE BETA-BEAMS The beta-beam concept The baseline scenario The physics potential Conclusions LOW ENERGY BETA-BEAMS A N D The idea Motivation.
1 Peter Kammel Muon Capture and Basic Solar Neutrino Reactions The New MuSun Experiment Muon Capture and Basic Solar.
High-Precision Measurement of Muon Capture on the Proton
MuD project: m + d  n + n + n
Muon Capture on the Deuteron The MuSun Experiment
First results from the MuLan and MuCap experiments
High Precision Measurement of Muon Capture on the Proton
The Weak Structure of the Nucleon from Muon Capture on 3He
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
Signature of L(1405) in K-dpSn reaction
Elastic alpha scattering experiments
Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France
Some Nuclear Physics with Solar Neutrinos
Presentation transcript:

Muon Capture on the Deuteron Motivation for a new Experiment B e r n h a r d L a u s s U C B e r k e l e y for the MuCAP Collaboration Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Paul Scherrer Institut University of California - Berkeley and LBNL University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign Universite Catholique de Louvain Boston University University of Kentucky - Lexington Universität München APS April Denver The muD-Project - experiment under consideration - encourage strongly community input

APS April Denver The Basic Process to be investigated is muon capture on the deuterium doublet state  + d  n + n + d nnnn --  W  hyperfine states: (1/2)  d  (3/2)  d  doublet capture rate:  d 1/2 ~ 400s -1 quartet capture rate:  d 3/2 ~ 10s -1 F=1/2 dd dd F=3/2  n n  DD QQ

APS April Denver Why a new experiment on  d-capture ? » First precise Measurement of charge current reaction in a 2 Nucleon system » Test of 2-body currents (Axial) Meson Exchange Currents » Resolve unclear experimental situation » Determine L 1,A -> relevant for Neutrino experiments & Solar Model

APS April Denver The Present Experimental Situation is unsatisfying n-measurement  =4% gas, T=40K lifetime measurement liquid D2, T=18K n-measurement H2-D2(5%) gas mixture, T=293K but only if pure 1/2 population assumed / statistical mix -> x3 n-measurement liquid H2-D2(0.32%) mixture T=18K lifetime measurement  = 5%; ultraclean D2 gas 409±40 470±29 Problems: n-method: depends on n-efficiency and energy threshold -> needs theory for extraction of . lifetime method: needs high statistics & target purity.

APS April Denver SNPA 2-body nuclear system is well known  test of our description of nuclear response to weak probes at intermediate energies; two nucleon interaction.  test of MECs (  exchange / significant  isobar current) MECs are sensitive to short range effects enhanced for high energetic neutrons  a nn - final state interaction  g p dependence (similar to  p- capture) Test of the Standard Nuclear Physics Approach and of Meson Exchange Currents SNPA Tatara et al PRC42(1990) MECs 10% of total rate New Calculation Ando et al. PLB 533 (2002) EFT* (HBCPT+EFT) reduces MECs effect |1B| 2 = 370 s -1 |1+2B| 2 = 386 s -1

APS April Denver The Present Experimental Situation is controvers n-measurement  =4% gas, T=40K lifetime measurement liquid D2, T=18K n-measurement H2-D2(5%) gas mixture, T=293K but only if pure 1/2 population assumed / statistical mix -> x3 n-measurement liquid H2-D2(0.32%) mixture T=18K lifetime measurement  = 5%; ultraclean D2 gas 409±40 470±29 Problems: n-method: depends on n-efficiency and energy threshold -> needs theory for extraction of . lifetime method: needs high statistics & target purity.Theory Theory cannot account for rates at 470 s -1 ! ! !

Test of calculational approach via Effective Field Theory APS April Denver  EFT(  EFT* - uses a low-energy expansion scheme with a set cut-off parameter for regularization - provides independent framework with model-independent results when all low-energy coefficients in the effective Lagrangian are known a NLO calculation contains one not so well determined parameter denoted L 1,A or d R  d can be used to determine precisely the low-energy parameter within a 2-body system ( Ando-Park-Kubodera-Myhrer PLB533(2002)25 / Kammel-nucl-ex/ ) ^

Astrophysical Interest because of the close connection between muon capture and neutrino scattering calculation APS April Denver EFT: Class of axial current reactions related by one single low-energy parameter L 1,A ( Butler-Chen-Kong PRC63 (2001) ) - pp-fusion - tritium  -decay -  d &  d scattering & breakup reactions -> SNO L 1,A can be determined from: _ _ 3-body current ? assumes standard 8B shape no solar model uncertainties included (f B,  12,  m 21 2 constraint) suggested  d capture ? ± 1.5 fm 3 Chen-Kammel  would be the most precise determination from 2-body system

APS April Denver The leading two-body current parametrized by L 1,A is the dominant uncertainty of every low-energy weak interaction deuteron breakup process including SNO’s CC and NC reactions ! ( Chen-Heeger-Robertson PRC ) We emphasize the importance of fixing the axial counter term through a direct experimental measurement ! ( Butler-Chen-Kong/PRC ) Knowledge of L 1,A is important for a precision determination of neutrino parameters constrain  13 ! L 1,A necessary to determine absolute rates in SNO !

APS April Denver Due to the complexity of muonic processes in deuterium it is very important for a precision measurement to determine the most favourable experimental conditions.

 CF n hf population monitoring  3 He capture background ! recycling dddd Muons are subject to a Complex Chain of Processes in Deuterium APS April Denver F=1/2 dd dd F=3/2  n n  DD QQ  hf

APS April Denver Well known Variation of the Muonic Deuterium Hyperfine Populations with Temperature and Density  = 0.01 LHD T = 300K  = 0.1 LHD T = 300K — 1/2 states— 3/2 states— sum 1/2+3/2 — dd-fusion neutron

— 1/2 states— 3/2 states— sum 1/2+3/2 — dd-fusion neutron APS April Denver Well known Variation of the Muonic Deuterium Hyperfine Populations with Temperature and Density  = 0.01 LHD T = 80K  = 0.1 LHD T = 80K liquid N2 - cooling possible !!!

APS April Denver Comparison Hydrogen / Deuterium Experiments in D 2 easier - isotopic purity requirements less stringent in D 2 harder - muonic molecular processes - additional neutron measurement - control of hyperfine states - cooled TPC detector with higher density (smaller chamber) MuCAP  Experience with precision Lifetime Measurement in Hydrogen

APS April Denver Setup Stage 1 - Lifetime Measurement ( MuCAP ) e-detectors  mu-detectors  cooled TPC D2 gas system XXXX measure at 300 K to  3% precision with present setup

Investigation of Energy Dependence - Dalitz Plot APS April Denver final state interaction nn-scattering length little contribution to  because of small overlap of wavefunctions of the deuteron and the 2 neutrons  EFT  EFT ?  + d  n + n + n n  EFT*

APS April Denver Setup Stage 2 -Neutron TOF deuterium gas cooled with liquid N2 with enough physics motivation

APS April Denver Thanks for your attention !

APS April Denver

F=1/2 dd dd F=3/2  n n  DD QQ

APS April Denver F=1/2 dd dd F=3/2  n n  DD QQ  hf dddd  CF n hf population monitoring  3 He capture background ! recycling

APS April Denver F=1/2 dd dd F=3/2  n n  DD QQ  hf

APS April Denver dddd

 CF n hf population monitoring  3 He capture background ! recycling

APS April Denver dddd  CF n hf population monitoring  3 He capture background ! recycling