AIDS Clinical Conference March 27, 2007 14th CROI: Update Ann Collier, MD Robert Harrington, MD David H. Spach, MD DHS/PP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emerging patterns of drug resistance and viral tropism in cART-naïve and failing patients infected with HIV-1 subtype C Thumbi Ndung’u, BVM, PhD Associate.
Advertisements

HIV Lifecycle and Mechanisms of Antiretroviral Therapy
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
DHS/HIV/PP HIV/AIDS 2007 Update David H. Spach, MD Clinical Director Northwest AIDS Education and Training Center Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
1 Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Future ART options for HIV-infected children exposed to maternal HAART Lee Kleynhans Experts Roundtable June 2008.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Global HIV Resistance: The Implications of Transmission
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Failure Therapy VIRAL RESITANCE ADHERENCE!!!!!!!!!!! DRUG INTERACTION.
Changes in Lipids in Randomised, Open-Label Comparative Trial of Abacavir or Tenofovir DF as Replacement for a Thymidine Analogue in Persons with Lipoatrophy.
HIV-1 Resistance - Implications For Clinicians Joseph J. Eron Jr., MD Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina.
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
1 Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D. Division of Antiviral Products Food and Drug Administration April 24, 2007 FDA Antiviral Advisory.
Primary HIV-1 Infection Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Summary of Evidence Martin Markowitz M.D. Clinical Director and Staff Investigator Aaron.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Simplification from Protease Inhibitors to Once or Twice Daily Raltegravir: the ODIS trial Eugenia Vispo, Pablo Barreiro, Francisco Blanco, Sonia Rodríguez-Novoa*,
Update on HIV Therapy Elly T Katabira, FRCP Department of Medicine Makerere University Medical School Scaling up Treatment Programs: Issues, Challenges.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.
Prevention and Care Dr S Charalambous WHO guidelines.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Utilization of Genotype and Phenotype Resistance Tests in Patient Management Richard Haubrich, MD Professor of Medicine University of California San Diego.
Potential Utility of Tipranavir in Current Clinical Practice Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Director of AIDS Research Brigham and Woman’s Hospital Division of.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
HIV-1 Resistance - Implications For Clinicians Joseph J. Eron Jr., MD Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina.
Management of NRTI Resistance
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of EFV vs MVC  MERIT Study.  Design N = 361 N = 360  Objective –Non inferiority of MVC vs EFV: % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL and < 50 c/mL (co-primary.
Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Long-Term Changes in Lipids and Glucose/Insulin among HIV-Infected Antiretroviral Naïve Persons Randomized to PI vs. NNRTI vs. PI+NNRTI-based strategies:
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Novel Classes of Antiretrovirals: Update on CCR5 Antagonists and Integrase Inhibitors This program is supported by an educational grant from.
HIV co-receptor tropism in treatment-naïve patients: impact on CD4 decline and subsequent response to HAART Laura Waters, Sundhiya Mandalia, Adrian Wildfire,
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
Copyright © 2016, 2013, 2010 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 94 Antiviral Agents II: Drugs for HIV Infection and.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Novel Antiretroviral Studies and Strategies
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
XVI International AIDS Conference
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of EFV vs MVC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NRTI combinations
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

AIDS Clinical Conference March 27, th CROI: Update Ann Collier, MD Robert Harrington, MD David H. Spach, MD DHS/PP

Notable Abstracts: Brief Summaries Circumcision: - Randomized trial of circumcision 4996 men in Uganda: HIV incidence at 24 months 0.66/100 Vs 1.33/ Circumcision was protective regardless of GUD:0.63/100 (C+/GUD-), 1.06/100 (C-/GUD-), 1.82/100 (C+/GUD+), 6.32/100 (C-/GUD+). (#155aLB and 155bLB) Microbicides: - Phase III, blinded, PC study of cellulose sulfate (CS) gel to prevent HIV infection. - Conducted in 3 African and 2 Indian sites: study was halted after enrollment of 1333 patients. 35 sero-conversions occurred (#106LB) 14th CROI

Hepatitis B Vaccine: - R, DB, PC trial of CPG-7909 (immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotide that activates B cells via TLR9) and DD Engerix-B - Given to 38 HIV+ subjects (50% previous NR). - Dosed at 0,1,2 months: - Response: 17/18 Vs 10/18 (36 months), 6/8 Vs 3/12 (60 months) (#134) Entecavir and HIV Activity: - Demonstrated entecavir inhibited HIV pseudoviruses with IC50 of 0.1 to 1.0 nM (below plasma concentrations) - 3 HIV+ patients on entecavir alone had decline of HIVRNA of 1 to 3 logs. One patient developed 184V mutation in 61% and 96% of clones at 4 and 6 months into entecavir therapy. Strains with 184V mutation were resistant to entecavir. (#136LB) Notable Abstracts: Brief Summaries 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

Comparison of 1 st Line Regimens (A5142) Multicenter, open-label, randomized study To compare 2 common U.S. 1 st line regimens and a NRTI- sparing regimen EFV + 2 NRTIs vs LPV/r BID + 2 NRTIs vs LPV/r BID + EFV NRTIs: 3TC + either ZDV or d4T XR or TDF ZDV 42%, d4T XR 24%, TDF 34% 753 ARV-Naïve pts, CD4 191, RNA 100K From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al. 14th CROI

EFV had better viral suppression than LPV/r LPV/r + EFV was not different from either of the other regimens P EFV vs LPV/r0.006 EFV vs LPV/r + EFV0.5 LPV vs LPV/r + EFV0.13 Comparison of 1 st Line Regimens (A5142) 14th CROI From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al.

Metabolic Effects of 1 st Line Regimens Compare: - Body composition and lipids - DEXA scans (0, 48, 96 wk) - Fasting Lipids Pt. characteristics similar on 3 arms From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al. 14th CROI

A5142: Effects of 1 st Line Regimens on Extremity Fat Trunk Fat increased 12-16% and was not different across the arms 14th CROI From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al.

A5142: Effects of 1 st Line Regimens on Extremity Fat 14th CROI From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al. Weeks on Study % Lipoatrophy (>20% Loss) Lipoatrophy (>20% loss Extremity Fat) Weeks on Study % Lipoatrophy (>20% Loss) Lipoatrophy (NRTI arms only)

Risk Factors for Lipoatrophy - EFV 2.7x higher risk than LPV/r - d4T 1.9x higher than ZDV - TDF less likely than ZDV Greater increases in cholesterol, TG with LPV/r + EFV A5142: Effects of 1 st Line Regimens on Extremity Fat 14th CROI From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al.

FeatureBetter Worse Viral SuppressionEFV > LPV/r + EFV > LPV/r LipoatrophyLPV/r + EFV << LPV/r < EFV LipidsEFV < LPV/r << LPV/r + EFV Lipoatrophy and lipids worse with d4T Illustrates tradeoffs in regimen choices when options are available UW ACTU A5142: Effects of 1 st Line Regimens on Extremity Fat 14th CROI From: 14th CROI. Haubrich et al.

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

From: Pozniak A, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 144-LB. TMC-278 versus Efavirenz in ARV-Naive STUDY C204 DHS/PP Efavirenz (600 mg qd) + ZDV-3TC or TDF-FTC Eligibility (N = 368) - HIV-infected - ARV-naïve - HIV RNA > 5,000 copies/ml - Randomized, double-blind - No major NNRTI mutations TMC-278 (25 mg qd) + ZDV-3TC or TDF-FTC TMC-278 (75 mg qd) + ZDV-3TC or TDF-FTC TMC-278 (150 mg qd) + ZDV-3TC or TDF-FTC 14th CROI

From: Pozniak A, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 144-LB. TMC-278 versus Efavirenz in ARV-Naive STUDY C Week Results (ITT:NC = F) DHS/PP Central Nervous System AEs 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

Resistance Transmission of DR HIV, Susan Little (#60) Prevalence: - TDR in newly infected 11-15%; - In newly diagnosed, ARV naïve 7-11% Persistence: 14 subjects with TDR identified within 66 d of infection and followed for mean of 110 wks: - Time from all DR --> DR/WT (mostly DR): 103 wks - Time from all DR --> DR/WT (mostly WT): 142 wks - At end of study TDR virus present in 13/14 patients 14th CROI

Resistance Transmission of DR HIV, Susan Little (#60) Natural History (AIEDRP 003, 93-07, N=1555) - Baseline VL set point: WT:TDR (p=NS), WT:PI/r 5.0:4.5 (p=NS), WT:NRTI/r 5.0:4.2 (p=.001), WT:NNRTI/r 5.0:5.3 (p=.003) - At 1000 days VL set point: WT:TDR (p=NS), WT: 4.5, PI/r 4.5, NRTI/r 3.8, NNRTI/r 4.8 Response to Rx (AIEDRP 002, 95-06, N=793) - N=84 with TDR - Overall: no difference in response to Rx TDR vs WT - No delay in time to ND: NNRTI/r vs WT - Delayed response in patients with PI/r or 215 mutation but these patients received fewer active drugs 14th CROI

Resistance Clinical Implications of Low Frequency HIV Variants, Jeff Johnson (#61) Developed RT-PCR, point-mutation assay to detect common mutations with sensitivity of 99% for L90M, M41L, K70R, K103N, Y181C, M184V, T215Y, T215F Screened recently diagnosed drug naïve patients: - 30/205 (15%) classified as WT had mutations - 21/302 (7%) with 1 Mu had R to another class of drug Screened GSK study of naïve patients treated with EFV/3TC + ABC or ZDV - 95 patients failed at 48 weeks, 221 did not - Unmasked 9 patients with mutations at baseline - 7 of these 9 were among the 95 failures at wk 48 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

HIV: Integrase Inhibitor DNA HIV Nucleus Host Cell Integrase Integrase Inhibitor Strand Transfer HIV RNA RT

DHS/PP OBT + Placebo Eligibility - HIV-infected - Treatment Experienced - HIV RNA > 1,000 copies/ml - Randomized, double-blind - Resistance to 3 classes of ARV drugs OBT + Raltegravir 400 mg bid From: Cooper DA, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 105a-LB. Steigbigel R, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 105b-LB. Raltegravir in ARV-Experienced Patients BENCHMRK-1 & 2 Studies BENCHMRK 1: N = 350 (Europe, Asia, Peru) BENCHMRK 2: N = 349 (North & South America) 1x 2x 14th CROI

From: Cooper DA, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 105a-LB. Steigbigel R, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 105b-LB. Raltegravir in ARV-Experienced Patients BENCHMRK-1 & 2 Study BENCHMRK 1: 16 Week Result DHS/PP P = 0.04P = P < BENCHMRK 2: 16 Week Result P = 0.04P = * CD4 counts higher in LPV-RTV arms P < th CROI

DHS/PP Raltegravir in ARV-Experienced Patients BENCHMRK-1 & 2: Combined Data Week 16: HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml From: Cooper DA, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 105a-LB. Steigbigel R, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 105b-LB. 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

Elvitegravir (GS-9137) Background HIV integrase inhibitor Blocks strand transfer Dihydroquinolone IC nM Cyp P450 3A4 metabolism ½ life 9 hrs with RTV Previous 10 day mono- therapy study Zolopa A, et al. CROI BL BID 400 BID 800 BID 50/RTV QD Placebo 800 QD Day Log 10 Change HIV-1 RNA Dosing 14th CROI

Elvitegravir Phase 2 Study Ongoing, randomized, partially-blinded study 3 doses + RTV vs Optimized Bckgr with NRTIs ± T experienced pts. with > 1 PI mutation Median GSS zero 20 mg dose stopped 2 o poor activity Then allowed PIs (15% took after wk 16) No difference in side effects 14th CROI Zolopa A, et al. CROI 2007.

Sustained response with GSS >1 Elvitegravir active, Phase III planned 50 mg (N=71) 100 mg (N=73) Optim Bck (N=63) Δ RNA (wk 24) RNA > -2 log69%76%51% % RNA <5038%40%30% Δ CD4/mm Zolopa A, et al. CROI Elvitegravir Phase 2 Study 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

AIDS Pathogenesis Humans infected with HIV have high plasma viral loads, gradual CD4 depletion and develop AIDS Sooty Mangabeys (SM) and African Green Monkeys (AGM) infected with SIV have high plasma viral loads, no CD4 depletion and no disease 14th CROI

AIDS Pathogenesis Slow repopulation of CD4+ T-cells in SM occurs after depletion with an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody – suggesting SM do not have an intrinsically high rate of CD4 production. ( #316, Engram) SIV infection of AGM leads to massive depletion of GALT CD4+ T- cells and persistent high plasma VL but no increase in mucosal translocation as measured by LPS (#315, Pandea) SIV infected SM experience high plasma VL, rapid depletion of GI and lung CD4+ T-cells but only a temporary increase in plasma LPS and immune activation (2/5 animals) (#69, Gordon) Increased plasma LPS is associated with progressive HIV disease. HAART only partially reduces plasma LPS. LPS in SM is very low. (#65, Brenchley) 14th CROI

AIDS Pathogenesis CD4-TcmCD4-Tem SIV Infection of Sooty Mangabeys SIV infection of a natural host Viral replication and disease: Non-human primates versus Humans; Louis Picker, (Plenary #8) 14th CROI

AIDS Pathogenesis CD4-Tcm CD4-Tcm* CD4-Tem Activation-apoptosis HIV-CD4 death Viral replication and disease: Non-human primates versus Humans; Louis Picker, (Plenary #8) Immune activation LPS? HIV-1 Infection of Humans AIDS is a disease of Immune Activation leading to Depletion of CD4-Tcm cells 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

TH9507 for Fat Redistribution Synthetic 1-44 Growth Hormone (GH) Releasing Factor analogue GH secretion is in pts. with fat redistribution and GH has trunkal fat Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 6 months study of 2mg/d SC 412 pts. with abdominal fat accumulation on ART Men: Waist >95, WHR>0.94 Women: Waist >94, WHR>0.88 Fasting glucose <150 Falutz J, et al. 14th CROI

No change in glucose or insulin No change in RNA or CD4 cells More edema, myalgias, rash with TH9502 Hypersensitivity in 2% (no SAEs) TH9502 decreases VAT and improves lipids TH9502 N=211 Placebo N=137 VAT-15%+5% SAT<1%+3% Trunk fat-1 kg0.4 kg Limb fat0 kg+0.2 kg TG-50 mg/dL+8 mg/dL TH9507 for Fat Redistribution 14th CROI Falutz J, et al.

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

CD4 Cell R5-Tropic HIV Inhibitors of HIV Cell Binding and Entry CCR5 CXCR4 CD4 DHS/PP CCR5 Inhibitor Maraviroc

DHS/PP OBT + Placebo Eligibility - HIV-infected: R5-tropic - Treatment Experienced - HIV RNA > 5,000 copies/ml - Randomized, double-blind - Resistance to (and/or) > 6 months of 3 classes of ARV drugs OBT + Maraviroc qd (150 or 300*) OBT + Maraviroc bid (150 or 300*) From: Lalezari J, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 104b-LB. Nelson M, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 104a-LB. Maraviroc in ARV-Experienced Patients MOTIVATE-1& 2 Study Motivate 1: N = 601 (Canada, US) Motivate 2: N = 475 (Europe, Australia, US) * Maraviroc 300 mg dose reduced to 150 mg in patients receiving RTV (except with Tipranavir) 1x 2x 14th CROI

From: Lalezari J, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 104b-LB. Nelson M, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 104a-LB. Maraviroc in ARV-Experienced Patients MOTIVATE-1 & 2 Studies Motivate 1: Results: 24 Weeks DHS/PP Motivate 2: Results: 24 Weeks 14th CROI

CD4 Cell R5-Tropic HIV CCR5 CXCR4 CD4 DHS/PP X4-Tropic HIV HIV Cell Binding Potential Shift from R5-Tropic HIV to X4-Tropic HIV

DHS/PP HIV Co-Receptor Tropism Assay  Assay Measures HIV Tropism - R5 Tropic - X4 Tropic - Dual Tropic - Mixed Tropic  Utilizes Entire Envelope Gene - Generates pseudoviruses  Viral Load - Above 1,000 copies/ml  Detection of Minor Species - Reliably detected at 5-10% R5-Tropic X4-Tropic R5X4 (Dual)-Tropic Mixed Tropic From: Whitcomb JM, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemo 2007;51: HIV-1 Strains

HIV Tropism at Time of Virologic Failure MOTIVATE-1 & 2 Studies DHS/PP From: Lalezari J, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 104b-LB. Nelson M, et al. 14th CROI Abstract 104a-LB. OBT + Placebo OBT + Maraviroc qdOBT + Maraviroc bid R5 at Baseline & at Failure R5 at Baseline; Dual, Mixed or X4 at Failure Non-R5 at Baseline or No Tropisms Data at Failure 14th CROI

Discussion DHS/PP 14th CROI

Immune Reconstitution Syndrome Plenary session by Martyn French (#111) Timing: Early: 3 months, non-viable pathogens. Incidence: Unmasking 16-28%, paradoxical 4-50% (cryptococcus), 8-43% (tuberculosis) Pathogenesis: 1) increase TH-1 IFN producing CD4 and CD8 cells, 2) increase IL-17 producing T-cells (recruit PMNs), 3) decrease regulatory IL-10 T-cells Risks for IRS: low CD4, recognized disseminated OI and early start of HAART. (Abstract # 859 (Elliot) MTB IRS: OR for IRS if CD4 < 50 = 5.47, if HAART started < 28 days = 21.29) 14th CROI

Immune Reconstitution Syndrome Plenary session by Martyn French (#111) Risk for IRS: Early HAART start: Lawn, AIDS, 2007: MTB IRS: OR if HAART start 0-30 days: th CROI

IRS OI or Ag HAART Low CD4 Increased if started early Increased with dissem infection, high Ag load Low CD4 assoc with high Ag load & immune dysregulation Immune Reconstitution Syndrome 14th CROI

END DHS/PP 14th CROI