LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Commissioning of the LIGO Detector life out in the wild wild (north)west Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory Tenmondai, Mitaka July.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
Advertisements

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
1 LIGO-G v3 Transmission Monitoring Telescope and Suspension – TMS Eric Gustafson aLIGO NSF Review LIGO Livingston Observatory April 25-27, 2011.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
LIGO-G W Proposed LHO Commissioning Activities in May 02 Fred Raab 29 Apr 02.
LIGO-G W Performance of the LIGO I PSL at the LIGO Hanford Observatory Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory Laser Zentrum Hannover November 15,2000.
LIGO Hanford Observatory FY2001 Budget Request Fred Raab October 3, 2000.
1 Environmental Disturbances: S4 and Pre-S5 Robert Schofield, U of O Doug Cook, Fred Raab, Richard McCarthy, LHO I.Seismic up-conversion II.Some peak identification.
LIGO-G W LIGO II Pre-stabilized Laser System Design Requirements and Conceptual Design David Ottaway, Todd Rutherford, Rick Savage, Peter Veitch,
LIGO-G W Tidal Compensation Update Fred Raab, Hugh Radkins, Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
Performance of the LIGO Pre-stabilized Laser System Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity Rome 2000.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish March 13, 2000.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G D Commissioning PAC11, 2001 Daniel Sigg, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Commissioning Report LSC Meeting, Hanover August 19, 2003 Peter Fritschel, MIT.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
LIGO-G W Commissioning and Performance of the LIGO Interferometers Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Commissioning of the LIGO Detector Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory University of Tokyo July 12, 2002.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
G D LSC Changes in Preparation of High Power Operations Commissioning Meeting, May 5, 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg, Matt Evans.
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
G D Commissioning Progress and Plans Hanford Observatory LSC Meeting, March 21, 2005 Stefan Ballmer.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO Commissioning Status
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D LIGO Commissioning Update LSC Meeting, Nov. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
LIGO Livingston Observatory Commissioning Status and Proposed Commissioning Activities Prior to S1 Mark Coles May 13, 2002.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
LIGO-G Z Report on E3/E4 Lock Losses K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Report on E3/E4 Lock Losses David Chin, Dick Gustafson Keith.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
LIGO-G W Status of the LHO PSLs Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting August 13-16, 2001.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
LIGO Commissioning June 10, 2002
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Commissioning of the LIGO Detector life out in the wild wild (north)west Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory Tenmondai, Mitaka July 3, 2002

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Observatories

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Hanford Observatory 4 km 2 km

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Livingston Observatory 4 km

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Hanford Observatory Commissioning Players Resident at LHO »Dick Gustafson – UM »Michael Landry – postdoc »Fred Raab – Head LHO »Rick Savage »Paul Schwinberg »Daniel Sigg Visiting »Stan Whitcomb – CIT »Robert Schofield – UO »Nergis Mavalvala – MIT »Peter Fritschel – MIT »Rana Adhikari – MIT (student) »Bill Kells – CIT »Luca Matone - CIT Grad Students »Bill Butler – Rochester »Masahiro Ito – UO »Rana Rakhola – UO Operators »Betsy Bland »Corey Gray »Mark Guenther »Nathan Hindman »Mark Lubinski »Gerardo Moreno »Hugh Radkins »Cheryl Vorvick

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LHO Support Staff Support Staff »Dave Barker – CDS »Greg Mendell – LDAS (theory) »Richard McCarthy – Electronics »Josh Myers – Electronics »Doug Cook – Optics »Kyle Ryan – Vacuum »John Worden – Vacuum »Bartie Rivera –Vacuum prep. »Christine Patton – Sys. Admin. »Otto Matherny – Business »Jill Berry - Administrative

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LHO Daily Schedule Operators on site seven days per week. »Two shifts per day –7:00 AM to 5:00 PM –4:00 PM to 2:00 AM »Two operators per shift Increased seismic noise due to construction of new building »Typically 6:30 AM to 3:30 PM Electronics troubleshooting, cabling, system maintenance, etc. typically in the mornings. Begin operation of interferometers at about 2:00 PM daily. High winds (> 25 mph) typically make full lock difficult, if not impossible.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Control and Data System (D. Barker at LHO) 12,770 “slow” EPICS channels per interferometer (LHO 4k ifo. with digital suspension controllers) 425 “fast” channels per ifo. (256 Hz, 2 kHz, 16 kHz) kHz channels per ifo. 16 CDS computers (IOCs) per ifo. 3 MB/sec per ifo. written to frames 15 TB of full-frame storage capacity at LHO --> Previous 390 hrs. or days of data available on disk Past 25 days of second- trend data available on disk All past minute-trend data available on disk

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Epics Control System -All control via computer -Digital length and alignment control -Dynamic control of input matrix in acquisition mode (ala M. Evans)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 4k Digital Suspension Control Screen Lots of digital filter stages »Whitening and dewhitening »Resonant gain stages »Notches »Combs »Etc. Improved optical lever performance

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Automation of Interferometer Configuration Changes Common mode transition script (D. Sigg) # Turn MICH and PRC boost on excawrite -b -r "H2:LSC-MICH_SW1R" -l "SET" "H2:LSC-MICH_SW1" ezcawrite -b -r "H2:LSC-PRC_SW1R" -l "SET" "H2:LSC-PRC_SW1" sleep 2 # # Turn servo gains to final values ezcawrite "H2:LSC-DARM_ERR_K" -1.2 ezcawrite "H2:LSC-CARM_ERR_K" -1.0 ezcawrite "H2:LSC-MICH_ERR_K" ezcawrite "H2:LSC-PRC_ERR_K" sleep 1 # # Set CM initial state ezcawrite -b -r "H2:LSC-CM_SELECT_RD" -l "XOR" "H2:LSC-CM_SELECT" ezcawrite H2:LSC-CM_OVERRIDE 0 ezcawrite H2:LSC-ComMode_CommGainIn 1 ezcawrite H2:LSC-ComMode_AOGainIn 11 ezcawrite H2:LSC-ComMode_ALGainIn 3 ezcawrite H2:IOO-MC_ERR_EXC_ENABLE 0 ezcawrite H2:IOO-MC3_LSC_IN 1 ezcawrite H2:LSC-ComMode_OpenLoop 1 # Automated initial alignment (M. Evans)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M “One-click” Generation of Calibrated Spectra (M. Landry) –uses most recent actuation calibrations –makes swept sine measurement of transfer function from TM drive toAS_Q –pole-zero fit using Root –measures AS_Q spectrum and applies calibration DTT software package by D. Sigg

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LHO 2k Interferometer Status 5 Watts laser power delivered to modecleaner. Analog suspension controllers. Only WFS 1 active »Now used for differential control of ITM alignment. »Improved optical lever damping for ETMs Common-mode servo configuration changed (now similar to TAMA) Tidal prediction applied to reference cavity temperature. Fine actuators (PZTs on ETM stacks) used for tidal compensation. First part if intensity stabilization loop is active. Automated calibration working. Several-hour locked stretches, often 6-10 hours.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Sensitivity Improvement Hanford 2k Ifo.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LHO 4k Interferometer Status 1 Watt laser power delivered to modecleaner Digital suspension controllers »Lots of digital filter stages »Dynamic diagonalization of drive of optics Only WF1 active Old common-mode servo configuration Tidal prediction to reference cavity temperature Fine actuators on ETM stacks for balance of tidal correction. Inner loop of intensity stabilization active. Lots of code changes. Shakedown of digital suspension code now (almost) complete. Now locking for up to 8 hours. Radiation pressure induced alignment variations?

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Sensitivity Improvement Hanford 4K Ifo.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LLO 4k Interferometer Status 2 Watt laser power delivered to modecleaner. Analog suspension controllers. Old common-mode servo configuration. Closed-loop control of reference cavity temperature to compensate for CM tides. Fine actuators for residual tidal correction. FSS beam sampled after PMC. Inner loop of intensity servo active. Unable to lock during logging – most weekdays. Adversely affected by traffic on highway. Lock broken by trains twice nightly. Large microseism. Locking for multi-hour stretches when ambient noise allows.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Sensitivity Improvement Livingston 4k Ifo.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Interferometer noise modeling (R. Adhikari) EO shutter at AS port attenuates light by factor of 50 New optical lever whitening filters should reduce ADC noise by factor of 400 Below 15 Hz, freq. noise resulting from MC radiation pressure fluctuations dominates

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2k Sensitivity Improvement: Reconfiguration of CM servo Original configuration of frequency stabilization topology From Nergis M.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Reconfiguration of Common-mode Servo (D. Sigg) Eliminate CARM drive to ETMs MC servo feedback to laser frequency actuator only From Nergis M.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Improved Displacement Spectrum

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Relative Intensity Noise Stabilization Previous servo had insufficient drive range, resulting in intermittent power glitches (with Y. Aso, 5/02) Free-running slow power variations ~1-2% Current shunt actuator design range > +,- 2.5% 4k laser current shunt xfer. fctn. D.C level = 1.7 V  3.7%/V

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M New Intensity Stabilization Servo New two-loop servo and new low-noise photodetectors Inner loop with PD just after pre-modecleaner Outer loop with PD just after modecleaner (outside vacuum) RIN goal: 1e-8/rtHz Only inner loop installed, June, ,- 10 V drive range LHO 4k Outside-the-loop RIN Spectra Free-running Stabilized  P/P = 5e-8 Hz -1/2

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LHO 4k RIN Spectra Gain ~ 30 dB at 1 Hz RIN not yet measured downstream of MC with this servo.

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Grounding and EMI Frequency stabilization servo error point »Green – laser power supply in rack »Red – laser power supply moved to top of PSL enclosure 60 Hz and harmonics

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Parasitic Interferometer LHO 2k Measurement made with RM aligned and other optics misaligned 1 Hz period indicates small optic motion 6 fringes >> 3 microns peak Tried to identify which optic moving by changing damping gains – no change observed Investigaion abandoned because edge is below seismic wall

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Source of Parasitic Interferometer Identified? Post MMT2 slippage investigation »“uncovered an unsettling scenario. From the plots, SM1 has been without it's photodiode sensor readbacks (and damping) since ~12/18/01.” J. Myers July1, 2002 elog entry electronics module failed 12/18/01 Non-stationary noise from parasitic ifo. Measured downstream of modecleaner

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Delay of S1 Run Friday, June 28, k mode-matching telescope small optic pitch monitor channel LHO x-end vertical seismometer channel 30 minutes slip? starts optic drops peak to peak vertical velocity in the spike is 80 microns/sec

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Slack MMT2 Suspension Wire Suspension wire

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Repair of MMT2 Suspension l Vacuum system opened this morning l “A preliminary inspection of mirror MMT2 shows two broken magnet assemblies. The wire break is along the free section of wire, not in the clamp. The optic is on its way to the optics lab for a post-mortem and repairs. Chamber door is going back on and we hope to be pumping soon.” Fred Raab7/2/02 l “There is a very TENTATIVE plan to reschedule the S1 science run to start Thursday August 1, ending on or before the LSC meeting that begins August 19. This is an optimistic schedule that assumes the Hanford 2K repair can be done quickly.” Keith Riles 7/1/02

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M After the S1 Run Still lots to be done! Many pending hardware and software installation tasks P. Fritschel 6/02

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Run Plan Science 1 run – Upper Limits »June 29 to July 15 (Delayed) »2.5 weeks comparable to E7 »Target sensitivity: 200x design Science 2 run – Upper Limits »Nov. 22 to Jan. 6, 2003 »8 weeks »Target sensitivity: 20x design Science 3 run – Search Run »July 1, 2003 to Jan. 1, 2004 »26 weeks »Target sensitivity: 5x design “During 2003 and 2004, we will plan to run in this search mode for at least 50% of the calendar time, followed by the planned one year integrated LIGO science run at design sensitivity. This science run will be completed prior to proposed major interferometer replacements.” LIGO Lab Planning Memo.