Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 2. New products were released in CALDB 3.2.1 on Dec. 15, 2006 to properly handle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray Imaging Spectrometers (XIS) of Astro-E2 Hironori Matsumoto (Kyoto University) and the XIS team 1. Overview Astro-E2 is the fifth Japanese X-ray Astronomy.
Advertisements

Imaging Analysis Aneta Siemiginowska Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal April ACIS Calibration: Recent Updates, Planned Updates, & Future Issues 2.E0102: Joint.
SDS Presentation Jonathan McDowell CXC 1 Chandra Users Committee Meeting, 25 January 2005 Science Data Systems (SDS) CUC Presentation Jan 2005.
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain correction files for epochs 30, 31 and 32 were released in CALDB (Sept 2007), (Dec. 2007) and
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain corrections for epochs 28 and 29 (Nov – April 2007) were released in CALDB 3.4 on May 16, Gain corrections.
Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 08 – March 09 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 06 April 2008.
CUC Oct 2005 Science Data Systems Jonathan McDowell.
Chandra X-ray Center Chandra X-ray Observatory Overview Roger Brissenden Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory CIAO Workshop 23 April 2001.
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain correction files for epochs 33 and 34 were released in CALDB (June 2008) and (Sep. 2008). HETG 1. An.
Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 1. New tgain files were released for epochs 23 and 24 (May 2005 – Nov 2005)
XMM-Newton/ Chandra Cross Calibration with Clusters of Galaxies CXC Calibration Workshop October L. David, J. Nevalainen, M. Bonamente, D. Jerius,
Chandra Calibration Status  Gain correction files for epochs 35 (Aug. – Oct. 2008) and 36 (Nov Jan.2009) were released in CALDB versions
CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 06 – September 06 Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Roger Brissenden 17 October 2006.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay EPIC Calibration Meeting Saclay 24/09/03 Epoch dependant MOS QE and RMF and Cross-calibration with the PN.
CUC meeting Apr 2009 CXC-SDS Science Data Systems CIAO, Pipelines and Catalog Jonathan McDowell.
Some Chandra Basics. Chandra X-Ray Observatory.
XMM-Newton 1SCI-SA Populating the CCF Immediate needs are driven by the requirement to test the SAS over the summer before public release. (A release called.
Chandra Calibration Status Summary 1.The gratings and mirrors are very well calibrated at this time and there are no time-dependent effects as far as we.
Chandra Calibration Status  Recent releases  Current Calibration projects  Cross-Calibration between Chandra and other X-ray telescopes  Revisions.
Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 1. A full set of calibration products for S0, S4 and S5 at T=-120 C, including.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC SOT, FOT, ACIS & MSFC PS October 19, Update on a Proposed Bakeout CXC SOT & FOT, ACIS Instrument Team and CXC SOT.
Testing the EPIC hard band calibration S. Molendi (IASF/CNR)
CXC Chandra X-ray Observatory Operations. CXC Overview 1. Mission and Observatory Description 2. Chandra Operations 3. Chandra X-ray Center Architecture.
Chandra Calibration Status  Highlights of the IACHEC Meeting  Updates to the LETG/HRC-S calibration  Continuous Clocking (CC) mode calibration.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal Nov ACIS Calibration: Planned Updates & Future Issues 2.ACIS Operations: Controlling the.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 CTI.. update for EPIC pn EPIC pn: Update on the CTI, the absolute energy scale and the energy.
Chandra Calibration Status CUC Meeting Oct. 13, 2011.
Chandra Calibration Status  Highlights from the Chandra Calibration Review  New results on the HRMA effective area  Updates to the ACIS contamination.
Chandra X-ray Center Martin Elvis Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Welcome to the 4 th Chandra – CIAO Workshop 20 – 22 May 2002.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky February A Comparison of Spectral Fit Results of E0102 from the Chandra and XMM CCDs Paul Plucinsky.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal October Comparison of RGS Model for 1E to the HETG data 2.BI CCD CTI Correction.
CXC CUC September SDS Page 1 CUC Sep 2007 Science Data Systems – Jonathan McDowell.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 29 June 2004.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal Update on ACIS Calibration 1) Update to the ACIS contamination model 2) Temperature-dependent.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Correcting spatial inhomogeneities of the absolute energy scale K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Correcting spatial inhomogeneities.
The first year result of MAXI/SSC Masashi Kimura, Hiroshi Tsunemi, Hiroki Kitayama (Osaka Univ.) Hiroshi Tomida, Masaru Matsuoka (JAXA) Arata Daikyuji.
Not Your Advisor's CIAO... - an update on Chandra's CIAO analysis system Jonathan McDowell Doug Burke, Antonella Fruscione, Aneta Sieimiginowska and the.
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
CXC CUC April SDS Page 1 Science Data Systems – Jonathan McDowell CUC April 2007 SCIENCE DATA SYSTEMS.
CUC Oct 2012 CXC-SDS CIAO (and scripts) Update Jonathan McDowell CXC Science Data Systems.
XIS Calibration on the Ground Status Report K. Hayashida (Osaka University) and the XIS-team.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Sept 10-14, 2012 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
End to End Simulations. p.2 What’s this ? This is the MUSE datacube of NGC 1068 we just received from ESO Can you remind me how many students we have.
CUC Oct 2014 CXC Jonathan McDowell. I will report on CIAO (user software) and the standard processing pipeline software, which come into being thanks.
Strehl Ratio estimation. SR from H band images High Strehl PSF ->fitting with Zernike modes We suppose: No relevant loss of energy due to high modes (Z>36)
SDS – Jonathan McDowell Chandra Users' Committee, Apr 2006 Chandra Source Catalog Repro 3 CIAO status Testing Data analysis issues.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Main-Cluster XIS0XIS1XIS3 Weighted mean Chandra Figure 2 : XIS spectra of the main-cluster XIS keV Main-Cluster Sub-Cluster Search for Bulk Motion.
3/16/04mwb, sek, MIT/CSR MIT XIS Status 16 March 2004 Overview: TCE board rebuild status Back-illuminated CCD performance & status (Slightly) improved.
SDS Staffing:  Welcome Nina Bonaventura on the Helpdesk team  All CIAO tickets now handled by SDS (Liz, Nick, Nina)‏ Focus this year has been (and will.
CUC Apr 2010 CXC-SDS CIAO Jonathan McDowell. CUC Apr 2010 CXC-SDS CIAO Update – Jonathan McDowell Community support CIAO 4.2 released late 2009; CIAO.
Difference Image Analysis at OAC Groningen, 1st Dec 2004 AW-OAC team.
Page 11/28/2016 CSE 40373/60373: Multimedia Systems Quantization  F(u, v) represents a DCT coefficient, Q(u, v) is a “quantization matrix” entry, and.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Aug 26-30, 2013 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
STIS Status TIPS, September 17, 2009 Charles Proffitt for the STIS team.
XIS2 Calibration Status at Osaka U. 2004/03/16 Overview and current status of calibration in the soft X-ray region Energy-Pulse Height relation Energy-Resolution.
The onboard calibration for the spaced-row charge injection of the Suzaku XIS Hideki Uchiyama, Yoshiaki Hyodo, Hiroya Yamaguchi, Hideyuki Mori, Takeshi.
New SPIRE features in HIPE 9.1 NHSC; Nov 28, 2012 PACS Page 1 What’s New in HIPE 9.1 ( SPIRE FTS) Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (on behalf of the SPIRE ICC)
Improved ACS Geometrical Distortion Correction Richard Hook TIPS Meeting, STScI, 18th December 2003.
Instrumental limits to our knowledge in X-ray Astronomy Matteo Guainazzi (ASTRO-H ESA Science Operations Centre) Calibration (as any truly scientific endeavors)
Swift-XRT Team Meeting – Clemson, October 23 rd, 2011 ( Page 1 ) Andy Beardmore and the Leicester Swift-XRT calibration team CCD22 Simulator Mk II.
The 2011 Chandra Alignment Shift
CURRENT WORK Reading ‘Radiative Processes in Supernova Remnants’ by S. Reynolds (a chapter in an upcoming handbook on supernova remnants) and ‘X-Ray Studies.
EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting
CURRENT WORK Reading ‘Radiative Processes in Supernova Remnants’ by S. Reynolds (a chapter in an upcoming handbook on supernova remnants) and ‘X-Ray Studies.
Energy Response of the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) on Suzaku
Chandra Calibration Status
Echidna: current status and expected performance
CTI and time dependent gain corrections for ACIS
Presentation transcript:

Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 2. New products were released in CALDB on Dec. 15, 2006 to properly handle the analysis of graded mode data which cannot be cti-corrected. By default, graded mode FI data is now analyzed with the last version of cti-uncorrected products and graded mode BI data is analyzed with the most up-to-date calibration products (i.e., until cti-corrected products are available for the BI chips). 1. The Repro III suite of calibration products was released in CALDB on Nov. 11, These calibration products provide a better treatment of the cti-corrected time-dependent response of the FI chips and the cti-uncorrected time-dependent response of the BI chips. All 10 chips are now calibrated in 32x32 pixel regions.

Chandra Calibration Status HRC 1. A gain corrections map for the HRC-I was released in CALDB Standard processing now automatically computes the PHA to PI conversion for HRC-I data. This can also be done off-line with the CIAO tool hrc_process_events. This product allows users to generate spatially invariant hardness ratio images. 2. An updated HRC-S de-gap corrections table was released in CALDB that includes empirical corrections derived from LETG/HRC-S observations of emission line sources. 3. An HRC-I rmf was released in CALDB The rmf can help with the interpretation of hardness ratio images and deciding what PI binning to use when generating hardness ratio images.

Chandra Calibration Status LETG 1. An updated HRC-S QE file was released in CALDB that is consistent with the new HRMA effective area file. HRMA 1. An updated HRMA effective area file was released in CALDB The new effective area was derived from SAOSAC simulations with a 22A layer of hydrocarbon on the mirrors. This corrects the residuals near the Ir-M edge. HETG 1. Updated HEG and MEG efficiencies were released in CALDB that are consistent with the new HRMA effective area file.

Chandra Calibration Status Present Status Goals met prior to last CUC meeting 1. ACIS effective area: Between rows 100 and 900 on ACIS-S and within 6' of the aim point on ACIS-I the present uncertainties are 5%. Beyond these regions the uncertainties are 10%. 2. HRC effective area – present uncertainties are 7% Goals met since last CUC meeting 1. HETG/ACIS-S 1 st order effective area – present uncertainties are 8% Effective Area

Chandra Calibration Status Goals Not Met 1. LETG/HRC-S first order – present uncertainties are 15% - the goal is 10% 2. LETG/HRC-S higher orders – present uncertainties are 20% - the goal is 15% 3. HETG/ACIS-S higher orders – present uncertainties are 20% - the goal is 15% Effective Area

Chandra Calibration Status Goals met since last CUC meeting Energy Resolution (FWHM) Absolute Energies Goals met prior to last CUC meeting 1. LETG/HRC-S - present uncertainties are 0.010A 2. HETG/ACIS-S – present uncertainties are 1. ACIS – rms deviations in the gains are 0.3% Goals met prior to last CUC meeting 1. HETG/ACIS-S present uncertainties are 3%

Chandra Calibration Status Astrometry Goals met prior to last meeting 1. HRC/ACIS absolute positions – uncertainties are 0.6 arcsec 2. ACIS relative astrometry – uncertainties are 0.1 arcsec Goals not met 1. HRC-I relative astrometry – uncertainties are 0.3 arcsec – goal is 0.1 arcsec Goals met since last meeting 1. ACIS - present uncertainties are 20eV Goals not met 1. LETG/HRC-S present uncertainties are 20% - goal is 10% Timing – relative and absolute timing goals have been met

Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Plans ACIS 1. CTI-corrected calibration products for the BI chips at T= -120C 2. CTI- corrected calibration products for all 10 chips at T=-110C 3. ACIS QE adjustment near the Si-K edge 4. Improve CC mode calibration HRC 1. Update the HRC-S degap correction coefficients table to include emiprical corrections from both line and continuum sources observed by the LETG/HRC-S 2. Update the HRC-I degap correction coefficients table using the AO7 raster scan of Capella 3. Develop time-dependent gain correction tables for the HRC-I and HRC-S

Chandra Calibration Status HRMA 1. Public release of Linux version of SAOsac 2. Release the ECFs derived from elliptical rather than circular apertures 3. Post a memo on the unpiled-up ACIS PSF based on the analysis of stacked faint sources 4. Finish analysis of the ACIS-S piled-up observations and post a report. LETG 1. Update the HRC-S QE file – the new product will include a better treatment of the QE near the O-K edge. 2. Incorporate the spatial non-linearities in the LETG/HRC-S dispersion relation in the LRFs. 3. Search for any time-dependence in the non-linearities of the LETG/HRC-S dispersion relation

Chandra Calibration Status HETG 1. Improve HETG higher order efficiencies 2. Examine effects of pile-up in grating spectra 3. A more extensive analysis of gratings data taken in CC mode