Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Northern Australia floodplain and coastal wetlands Max Finlayson National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Darwin,
Advertisements

Moffatt Thomas Lower Boise River Wetlands Restoration Project Sponsor:Pioneer Irrigation District Presenter: Scott L. Campbell Legal Counsel for Pioneer.
Maines Sustainability Solutions Initiative (SSI) Focuses on research of the coupled dynamics of social- ecological systems (SES) and the translation of.
Status of Instream Flow Science in the Southeastern US Mary M. Davis, Ph.D., Technical Advisor Southern Instream Flow Network.
Robert Goldstein Senior Technical Executive, Water & Ecosystems WSWC–WGA Energy–Water Nexus Workshop Denver, April 2, 2013 Water Prism: Decision Support.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Availability, Water Use, and the Great Lakes Compact Jim Nicholas, Director USGS Water Science.
Linking watershed characteristics and land use to lake water quality using GIS presented by Brian Block ESR Limnology instructed by Dr. Mark Sytsma.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
Careers in Forestry Forestry as a Career? Forestry as a Career! It starts with a four-year university degree. There are also two-year degree programs.
Issues Urban pollution Agricultural water use Linking the rivers of India Conservation.
Muskegon Watershed Research Partnership The vision: Collaborative,Integrated, Relevant Science for a better future
Development of Aquatic Ecosystem Models Lizhu Wang, Shaw Lacy, Paul Seebach, Mike Wiley Institute for Fisheries Research MDNR and U of M.
Applications of GIS to River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment.
Integrated Modeling of the Muskegon River Ecosystem: A New Approach to Integrated Risk Assessment for Great Lakes Watersheds Michael Wiley 1, Bryan Pijanowski.
"Developing statistically-valid and -defensible frameworks to assess status and trends of ecosystem condition at national scales" "Developing statistically-valid.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Urban Planning Applications of GIS GIS can be applied to many types of problem. Among these are representatives of both raster and vector data base structures,
GIS Evaluation of the Ganges River Shaw Lacy. Presentation Overview 1. Who are we? 2. Who am I working for? 3. What is the problem? 4. What is the methodology?
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
The Great Lakes Aquatic Gap Analysis Project Overview Jana Stewart U.S. Geological Survey.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Steering Committee Meeting December 19-20, 2013 UPDATES.
Geospatial Organization and Access to Springs Survey Data in Kaibab National Forest Jeri Ledbetter, MGIS Candidate Douglas Miller, Graduate Advisor July.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
MANTADIA- ZAHAMENA. Deforestation across elevation  Between 1974 and 1994: around 90% of forest
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.
ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M E N T A L D E.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Lake Superior Decision Support Systems: GIS Databases and Decision Support Systems for Land use Planning George Host Lucinda Johnson Carl Richards Natural.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
1 1 Quantifying the benefits of different types of protection for freshwater biodiversity Eren Turak,Simon Ferrier, Michael Drielsma, Glenn Manion, Tom.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup West Palm Beach November 2006.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-19, Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
Who We Are What I Do Great Lakes Commission. Great Lakes Basin.
Coordinating Monitoring in the Great Lakes Basin Ric Lawson Project Manager Great Lakes Commission National Water Quality Monitoring Council meeting Ann.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.
Corporate Ecosystem Valuation (CEV) Road Test Case Study: Lafarge May 3, 2011.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Integrated Landscape Monitoring Great Basin Pilot Carol Schuler Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science.
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Dick Cameron Senior Conservation Planner The Nature Conservancy, California Program 1.
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
Riparian Wetland Restoration Site Selection Using GIS Dave Cour SSC 570 December 2, 2003.
Aquatic GAP program in Kansas Keith Gido, Walter Dodds, Chris Guy, Jessica Kemp, and Bob Oakes Kansas State University The Gap Analysis Program
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Controls on Catchment-Scale Patterns of Phosphorous in Soil, Streambed Sediment, and Stream Water Marcel van der Perk, et al… Journal of Environmental.
The Future of NHDPlus 2009 NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, NHD Stewardship Conference Denver, CO April 14-17, 2009 Tommy Dewald.
Do not reproduce any photos that are in this presentation.
Predicting relative risk of invasion in river networks under different scenarios of climate change and dam operations in the western U.S. N. LeRoy Poff,
SFS Sacramento May 23, 2016 Special Session Introduction: Traits-Based Vulnerability Assessment and Monitoring Under Climate Change Britta Bierwagen (EPA/ORD),
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
“10k 2006” - IP Linked Climate Catchment Models
Sustainable use of ecosystem services in Europe’s regions
Presentation transcript:

Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Why are we here? To learn about research and conservation activities in the Gangan Basin To explore possibilities of collaborative research focusing on River Ecosystem Management

Crop Developed Forest Shrubland Grassland Barren Land cover within 5km of the river Percent Ganga Watershed St. Lawrence Watershed Land cover within 5km of the river Percent Crop Developed Forest Shrubland Grassland Barren

Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin 1.Ecosystem Management Approach : Collaborative, Interdisciplinary, Cross-institutional 2.Classification frameworks for regional Ecological Inventory, Modeling & Assessment The ecological complexity of large river systems and the many, inter-related impacts of our own societies on this ecology, make practical management and restoration activities in large rivers

Ecosystem Management Approach: Cross-institutional, interdisciplinary research Collaborative, Stake-holder sensitive Planning and Management {Bi-lateral treaties and management activities (Canada-U.S.)} Inter-University science supported by state agencies and private foundations Inter-State collaborations with Federal support: Fisheries Agencies MI,WI,IL, USGS Great Lakes Aquatic Geographic Analysis Program (AGAP) Strong involvement of local Citizens, NGO’s, and other stakeholders Laurentian (Great Lakes) and Gangan Basin Researchers? Some examples:

2. Ecological Classification frameworks for regional Ecological Inventory, Modeling and Assessment Michigan Rivers Inventory VSEC units MAP 280 main stem river segments and tributary units [mri-vsec v1.0]

What is Ecological Classification? Hydrologic character Biological character Chemical character Identifying the “fundamental units of nature” (Tansley 1935) Geomorphic character Integrated multi-factor [Ecological] Character of a River Segment

Structural Ecosystem Units The relatively homogeneous river segments we encounter having distinctive biology, temperature, chemistry, etc.; Valley Segment Ecological Unit = Biogeocoenose = Ecosystem type these are local structural expressions of functional watershed units structural and functional units of river ecosystems Functional Ecosystem Units Watersheds { = Landscape (Regional) ecosystems? }

Raisin River mainstem units

Au Sable River mainstem units

Lake Michigan Tributary Systems Basin-wide hydrologic assessment of classification units useful for regional fisheries resource And water quality planning Example applications: regional inventory

Example application: River Otter (Kotanchik 1997) MDNR Trapping record PCB threshold Hg threshold

Otter and contaminant data aligned on MRI-VSEC segments Otters present high trapping success PCB contaminated Hg contaminated both

Logistic modeling of Otter distribution Logistic Regression Results Prediction success: 83% Primary predictors: - Extreme hydrologies - PCB contamination - Urban development - Ag development + conifer forests Using moderls to plan restoration

Landcover alterations pose a major threat to aquatic ecosystems in the Great Lakes Basin Modeling timelines for 3-State EPA-STAR project. GIS maps based on original GLO surveys, Current Air photo, and Neural Net (LTM) projections for the future.

Our goal is to use MREMS to evaluate the risks and benefits of alternate land and water management strategies in a spatially explicit way. A 2002 conference with regional Stakeholders developed specific management scenarios for evaluation. Issues of concern identified by stakeholders in Muskegon River Partnership meetings include: (1) Negative effects of development and urbanization; (2) Increasing bank erosion and sedimentation (3) Impacts of power and recreational impoundments Integrated, GIS-linked Computer modeling provides one tool for regional river-based planning and management: Muskegon River example

MREMS VSEC Modeling framework Valley Segment Ecological Classification Unit (Seelbach et al. 1997) All modeling input & output is referenced to the VSEC channel units map and can be displayed in GIS format

An illustration, from the current Muskegon River study, of our method for linking valley scale ecological classification (VSEC) units to landscape sensitive models. A.. Sample sites are used to represent the entire VSEC unit they occur in, based on the mapping objective of ecological homogeneity. B.VSEC unit ID # is used to geo-reference and query the associated catchment, buffers, site databases etc. C. Query results are used as inputs for regional models of relevant processes as illustrated here for soluble phosphate load. All segments are processed simultaneously in a matrix modeling environment. Once modeling is completed predicted results are mapped back into the GIS using the VSEC spatial framework. Coupled to changing input data sources on landcover distributions, this process can generate both forecasts and hind-casts of ecological status.

past present future River classification based assessment and modeling techniques retain high spatial resolution across large regional assessments, and are being used by The Nature Conservancy to map the entire Great Lakes Basin for conservation planning; by the USGS Aquatic GAP Program for the Great Lakes Basin; also in a new Three-State Regional Assessment Project; and in Muskegon River Basin Initiative. Soluble P per day at high flow (g/d)

The same modeling approaches can be used to organize and interpret biological resource inventories and to identify future risks to river biodiversity

Why are we here? To learn about research and management activities in the Gangan Basin To explore possibilities of collaborative research on River ecosystem management

Generalized Methodology Inventory and Data compilation Landscape analysis leading to regional modeling Ecological Classification Modeling of reference condition Status Assessment Risk Assessment

An illustration, from the current Muskegon River study, of our method for linking valley scale ecological classification (VSEC) units to landscape sensitive models. A.. Sample sites are used to represent the entire VSEC unit they occur in, based on the mapping objective of ecological homogeneity. B.VSEC unit ID # is used to geo-reference and query the associated catchment, buffers, site databases etc. C. Query results are used as inputs for regional models of relevant processes as illustrated here for soluble phosphate load. All segments are processed simultaneously in a matrix modeling environment. Once modeling is completed predicted results are mapped back into the GIS using the VSEC spatial framework. Coupled to changing input data sources on landcover distributions, this process can generate both forecasts and hind-casts of ecological status.