Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
ILC – The International Linear Collider Project Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, November ILC Valencia SIMULATION OF BEAMCAL WITH B FIELDS SIMULATION.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
L. Suszycki, Tel Aviv, Sept, 2005 LumiCal background studies Contents: Guinea Pig results Vermasseren results Remarks on energy reconstruction Conclusions.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Beam Crossing Angle for  Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University International Linear Collider January 2005 MDI Workshop SLAC.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
IP crossing-angle and LC technology recommendation Philip Bambade LAL, Orsay 5 th ITRP meeting, Caltech, USA Session on detector & physics issues June.
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Krakow2006.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Cambridge ILC software tools meeting.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
About L* i.e. the distance between the end of the last quadrupole “QD0” and the IP Until now, L* has been different for SiD and ILD, -> due to detector.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
LDC Meeting Vienna 17. November 2005 Karsten Büßer LDC Machine Detector Interface Update.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Valencia meeting November, Contents Conditions of simulation Treatment of TPC exact hits VTX hits and tolerance TPC hits and tolerance Summary.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
Dominik Dannheim (CERN), André Sailer (HU Berlin / CERN) Beam-induced backgrounds in the CLIC detector models ALCPG Workshop March 2011 Eugene,
16 February 2009CLIC Physics & Detectors Konrad Elsener 1... some issues regarding the forward region... (“picking up” from Lucie Linssen, 29 Sept 2008)
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
Fast and Precise Luminosity Measurement at the ILC Ch.Grah LCWS 2006 Bangalore.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
Background studies for the ILD vertex detector Rita De Masi IPHC-Strasbourg.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Doses and bunch by bunch fluctuations in BeamCal at the ILC Eliza Teodorescu FCAL Collaboration Meeting June 29-30, 2009, DESY-Zeuthen, Germany.
Interaction Region of gamma gamma colliders
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Maria Person Gulda , Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik,
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Introduction Goal: Can we reconstruct the energy depositions of the proton in the brain if we are able to reconstruct the photons produced during this.
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
GLD IR optimization and background study
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Presentation transcript:

Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Tools Simulations have been done using GUINEA-PIG as generator for the pairs Ideal TESLA beam parameters Full GEANT3 based TESLA detector simulation BRAHMS Cut-offs in GEANT3 have been lowered to 10keV for EM particles A hit is every charged particle which deposes energy in a SI device every 3d hit in the TPC The following crossing angles have been studied: head-on collisions 2*10 mrad crossing angle 2*1 mrad crossing angle

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Head-On Geometries 1) TESLA TDR design: L*=3.0 m, head-on 2) New TESLA design: L*=4.05 m, head-on

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop *10 mrad Geometries 4) 2*10 mrad x-angle, outgoing hole: r=2.4 cm 3) 2*10 mrad x-angle, outgoing hole: r=1.2 cm

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop *1 mrad Geometries 5) 2*1 mrad x-angle, outgoing hole: r=1.2 cm 6) 2*1 mrad x-angle, outgoing hole: r=2.0 cm

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Vertex Detector: Head-on

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Vertex Detector: 2*10 mrad

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Hot Spots Azimuthal hit distributions in the Vertex Detector Distributions for x-angle geometries show a peak of hits in the horizontal plane Peak is just visible in Layers 2 and 3 (maybe also in 4). Peak is much more pronounced with the increased exit hole Small exit hole !

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Hot Spots Origin FTD 1-3 Backscattering Charged LE Particles Backscattered particles are collimated by the exit hole and aim directly to the VTX LE charged particles produced in the hot region are focused additionally by the solenoidal field Collimated photons

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Vertex Detector: 2*1 mrad Backscattering out of the exit hole is significant!

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop TPC Increasing the exit holes decreases backscattering into TPC volume

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop TPC Backgrounds FTD 1-3 Backscattering TPC backgrounds are dominated by backscattered photons converting to e+e- pairs in the gas Photons from the frontside of the BeamCal are scattered back (more or less) isotropically Larger exit hole reduces isotropical backscattering (→TPC) but increases collimated backscattering (→VTX) Photons

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop d Hits in the TPC Increase in TPC hits with larger L* is a geometrical effect L*=3.0 m, head-on collisions Opening angle of the mask

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop d Hits in the TPC Increase in TPC hits with larger L* is a geometrical effect L*=4.05 m, head-on collisions Opening angle of the mask

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Forward Tracking Disks

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop SI Intermediate Tracker SIT1: r=16 cm, l=76 cm SIT2: r=30 cm, l=132 cm

K. BüßerMDI at the ILC Workshop Conclusion Background numbers depend on geometrical details Opening the exit holes increases backscattering into the vertex detector decreases backscattering into the outer trackers (e.g. TPC) Head-on geometries or small crossing angles seem to produce less backgrounds from backscattered pairs Optimisation of interaction region is an iterative task