1 Satellite observation systems and reference systems (ae4-e01) Orbit Mechanics 2 E. Schrama.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Satellite geodesy, Fall C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Distributed Force. All of the forces we have used up until now have been forces applied at a single point. Most forces are not applied at a.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
GN/MAE155B1 Orbital Mechanics Overview 2 MAE 155B G. Nacouzi.
Space Engineering I – Part I
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado ASEN 5070 OD Accuracy Assessment OD Overlap Example Effects of eliminating parameters.
The Beginning of Modern Astronomy
Use of Kalman filters in time and frequency analysis John Davis 1st May 2011.
On the alternative approaches to ITRF formulation. A theoretical comparison. Department of Geodesy and Surveying Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Athanasios.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Sect. 3.12: The Three Body Problem So far: We’ve done the 2 Body Problem. –Central forces only. –Eqtns of motion are integrable. Can write as integrals.
Orbit Determination Software at ESOC Flight Dynamics
Linear dynamic systems
Excess phase computation S. Casotto, A. Nardo, P. Zoccarato, M. Bardella CISAS, University of Padova.
Department of Physics and Applied Physics , S2010, Lecture 23 Physics I LECTURE 23 5/10/10.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
Orbit Determination (Seeber, 3.3), sat05_42.ppt,
Course AE4-T40 Lecture 5: Control Apllication
Dynamics II 17-nov-2006 E. Schrama
Physics 151: Principles of Physics: Mechanics & Heat (Honors) Prof. Stan Zygmunt Neils
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Gravitational Potential energy Mr. Burns
Overview and Mathematics Bjoern Griesbach
Principles of Least Squares
Adaptive Signal Processing
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
Spring Topic Outline for Physics 1 Spring 2011.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
1 Samara State Aerospace University (SSAU) Modern methods of analysis of the dynamics and motion control of space tether systems Practical lessons Yuryi.
Newtonian Gravitation and Orbits
Kinetics of Particles:
Secular motion of artificial lunar satellites H. Varvoglis, S. Tzirti and K. Tsiganis Unit of Mechanics and Dynamics Department of Physics University of.
航天动力学与控制 Lecture 年 2 月 4 General Rigid Body Motion –The concept of Rigid Body A rigid body can be defined as a system of particles whose relative.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Newton’s 1 st Law of Mechanics A particle will continue is a straight line at constant speed unless acted upon by a net push or pull (i.e. force). The.
Essential Idea:  The Newtonian idea of gravitational force acting between two spherical bodies and the laws of mechanics create a model that can be.
CSDA Conference, Limassol, 2005 University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa” Iasi Department of Mathematics and Informatics Gabriel Dimitriu University.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Chapter 12 Universal Law of Gravity
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 18: Minimum Variance Estimator.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
1 Chapter 5: Harmonic Analysis in Frequency and Time Domains Contributors: A. Medina, N. R. Watson, P. Ribeiro, and C. Hatziadoniu Organized by Task Force.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 11: Batch.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 12 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Application of Perturbation Theory in Classical Mechanics
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design Statistical Orbit Determination A brief overview 1.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070 Statistical Orbit determination I Fall 2012 Professor George H. Born Professor Jeffrey S. Parker Lecture 9: Least.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 29: Observability and Introduction.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Kalman Filter with Process Noise Gauss- Markov.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
Celestial Mechanics I Introduction Kepler’s Laws.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
Celestial Mechanics VI The N-body Problem: Equations of motion and general integrals The Virial Theorem Planetary motion: The perturbing function Numerical.
Chapter 7 Rotational Motion and The Law of Gravity.
Celestial Mechanics IV Central orbits Force from shape, shape from force General relativity correction.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Universal Gravitation
Quantum One.
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

1 Satellite observation systems and reference systems (ae4-e01) Orbit Mechanics 2 E. Schrama

2 Contents Perturbed Kepler orbits –Linear C20 perturbations and classification of orbits –Orbit determination, solve the equation of motions –Effects of other acceleration models Numerical implementation –Example 1: Bullet physics –Example 2: Kepler and higher order physics –Orbit determination Parameter estimation –Parameters in function model –Parameter estimation procedure –Variational equations –Organisation parameter estimation

3 Perturbed Kepler Orbits Please remember that the Kepler problem assumes a central force field with U=GM/r In reality the gravity potential U is more difficult than that and spherical harmonics are involved. Moreover there are other conservative and non-conservative forces that determine the motion of a spacecraft

4 Linear perturbations by C 20 Ref: Seeber p 84 C 20 not normalised, n: mean motion

5 Classification of orbits Sun synchronous orbits:  runs as fast as the Earth’s rotation around the Sun. This is possible by tuning the a, e and I. Golden inclination: Perigee is frozen in time Repeating: Ground tracks reoccupy the same geographic locations after a certain time (a cycle) Polar orbits: the orbit plane is fixed in inertial space despite the presence of gravitational flattening.

6 Orbit determination Kepler’s theory happens to be a very good approximation to describe the motion of small particles in a gravity field as a result of the presence of a large body like the Earth or the Sun. In reality there are higher order multipoles in the gravity field and other accelerations play a role. The more complete equations of motion are therefore:

7 This is Y200

8 Y300

9 Y210 and Y211

10 Y320

11 Y330

12 Solution equations of motion Analytic –Lagrange planetary equations –Gravity Potential in Kepler elements –Isolate first order solution –Approximate higher order perturbations Numeric –Conversion to system of first order ODE –Integration of system of equations

13 What other accelerations? Tidal forces cause by Sun and Moon Gravity effect of air, water in motion etc Radiation pressure as a result of sun light and light reflected from Earth (Albedo) Heat radiating away from the spacecraft Atmospheric drag Relativistic mechanics

14 Effect of perturbing accelerations The table below lists various acceleration terms that act on the orbit of a GPS satellite, gravitational flattening is by far the largest contributor. Ref: Seeber table 3.4

15 Hard to model perturbations The remaining perturbations always result in oscillating functions. There are cos/sin series from which the amplitudes and phases are defined Numerical integration is the way to go, all orbit determination s/w uses this method. Required is an initial state vector and an acceleration model for the satellite. To classify satellite orbits a first-order analytical solution can be used.

16 Numerical implementation Keplerian physics is easy to understand, essentially follows from a central force field with a point-mass potential The real world is more difficult, essentially because there are higher order terms in the potential and because there are other accelerations Orbit dynamics can be described in the form of ordinary differential equations. You should formulate the problem as a system of first-order ODEs There are efficient numerical tools to solve ODEs, in particular single-step and multi-step integrators

17 Demonstration numerical solution ordinary diff. eq. Example gun bullet physics function f = bullet( t,state ) % implements bullet dynamics xp = state(1); yp = state(2); xv = state(3); yv = state(4); g = 9.81; dia = 0.44*2.54; length = 1.5*2.54; dens = 8000; area = pi*(dia/2).^2; mass = dens*area*length; cd = 1; h = yp; f = exp(-h/6000*log(2)); rho = 1.2 *f ; v = sqrt(xv*xv+yv*yv); ad = 0.5*rho*(area/mass)*v*v*cd; nx = xv/v; ny = yv/v; xa = -nx*ad; ya = -ny*ad - g; f = [state(3) state(4) xa ya]'; In reality

18 Demonstration Numerical Implementation (2) function f = satdyn( t,state ) % implements Kepler dynamics xp = state(1); yp = state(2); xv = state(3); yv = state(4); mu = 4e14; r = sqrt(xp.^2+yp.^2); factor = mu/r/r/r; xa = -factor*xp; ya = -factor*yp; f = [state(3) state(4) xa ya]'; Example Kepler orbit physics: In reality

19 Orbit prediction (1) During orbit perdiction one needs to integrate the equations of motion. Suitable numerical techniques are used to treat differential equations of the following type: There are numerical procedures like the Runge-Kutta single step integrator and Adams-Moulton-Bashforth multi step integrator that allow the state vector y 0 to be propagated from y 0 till y n. In this case a state vector at index j coincides with the time index t 0 +(j-1)*h where h is the integrator step size.

20 Example in MATLAB span = [ ]; state = [ 1e e3]; option = odeset('RelTol',1e-10); [t,y] = ODE45('satdyn',span,state,option); plot(y(:,1),y(:,2))

21 Orbit prediction (2) The orbit prediction problem is entirely driven by the choice of the initial state vector y 0, the definition of F(y,t) and g(t). The basic question is of course, where does this information come from? F(y,t) and g(t) fully depend on the realism of your mathematical model and its ability to describe reality However, knowledge of the initial state vector should follow from 1) earlier computations or 2) launch insertion parameters The conclusion is that it is desirable to estimate initial state parameters from observations to the satellite.

22 Parameter estimation Terminology: –Here, a problem refers to an interesting case to study. Problems in satellite geodesy: –Type of problem does it contain orbit parameters? does it contain gravity field parameters? does it contain any other geophysical parameters? –How do you organize parameter estimation? it is a batch or a sequential least squares problem? can you solve it from one observation set or are more sets involved? Is preprocessing of observations involved or is it in the problem?

23 Function model (1) The function model aims to relate observations and parameters to another The unknowns are gathered in vector The observations are in vector Usually we begin to approximate reality by a priori estimates and

24 Function model (2) XeXe YeYe ZeZe B S RiRi RjRj  R ij

25 Function model (3): Examples The over-determined GPS navigation solution for one receiver VLBI observations of phase delay Two GPS receivers: double difference processing SLR network: station, orbit parameters, earth rotation parameters DORIS with orbit and gravity field improvement Spaceborne GPS receiver on a LEO

26 Implementation From our function model we conclude that: –it is by definition a non linear problem –it depends on a priori information –it almost always depends on orbit dynamics –orbit predictions are used to correct the raw observations and to set-up the design matrix –the orbit prediction model is not necessarily accurate the first time you apply it

27 Least squares

28 Minimize cost function The way the A matrix is computed completely depends on the type of observations and parameters in your problem. We will distinguish between problems that contain orbit parameters and problems that do not. Our first task will always be to model an orbit in the best possible way given the existing situation This task is called orbit prediction

29 Example” Initial state vector estimation in POD Task: determine the size, orientation and position of the arrow, it determines whether you hit the bull’s eye

30 Variational equations Example  : initial state vector component, terms in force model etc

31 Set-up parameter estimation program In reality orbit parameters are estimated from observations like range, Doppler or camera to the satellite or inbetween satellites Orbit prediction method –Numerically stable schemes are used –Choice initial state vector –Definition satellite acceleration model Variational method –Define parameters that need to be adjusted using least squares –Iterative improvement of these parameters –Use is made of the variational equations

32 Parameters in POD Station coordinates Station related parameters (clock, biases) Initial state vector elements of satellite orbits Parameters in acceleration models satellite Other satellite related parameters (clock, biases, etc) Signal delay related parameters Earth rotation related parameters Gravity field related parameters

33 Organization parameter estimation For large scale batch problems: –separation of arc -- and common parameters –combination of normal matrices and right hand sides –choice of optimal weight factors for combination –example: development of earth models like EGM96 Sequential problems –apart from the adjustment procedure there is a state vector transition mechanism –During transition state vector and variance matrix are advanced to the next time step (normally with a Kalman filter) –Example: JPL’s GPS data processing method