SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The third longest suspension span in the world opened on July 1st
Advertisements

Click to edit Master title style »Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level Fifth level Construction Update 11/13/2012 Larry.
Some things cant wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project Fairfax County TAC Update – August 16, 2011 New Travel Choices Ahead.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
AVONDALE ROAD ITS 2006 COUNTYWIDE GRANT. AVONDALE ROAD ITS OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Location Location Avondale Road between Novelty Hill Road and NE 132 nd St.
How Politics Even Affect Good Pricing Projects Eric N. Schreffler, ESTC TRB Int’l Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, Florida November 21, 2003.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
NATMEC JUNE 5, 2012 DALLAS, TEXAS Improving MPO Decisions With Better Data: Examples in Dallas-Fort Worth Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation.
11 Travel Behavior Panel Surveys: Measuring the Impacts of Road Pricing in Seattle and Atlanta Travel Survey Methods Committee Meeting January 25, 2012.
The USDOT Urban Partners & FHWA August 20, 2007 Webcast with Division Offices Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal.
Versatile Applications of EMME/2 and ENIF: Seattle Experience Madhavi Sanakkayala Heather Purdy & Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff, Seattle.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
June 2005 Intelligent Transportation Systems 101 June 21, 2005.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
Moving the Most People for the Least Cost Preserving the American Dream Conference Friday, September 24, 2010.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management NTOC Webinar Presented by Jessie Yung, P.E. Office of Transportation Management April.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
Congestion Causes and Solutions. Traffic Congestion Characteristics Slower speeds Longer trip time Increased queues More vehicles.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Looking Forward to a High Performance.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
Some things can’t wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project New Travel Choices Ahead.
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit Administration Session 11: ITS Research in the U.S. and Abroad 2007 ITSA Annual.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Congestion Pricing and Urban Partnerships Presentation 11 US Department of Transportation Part 4: Urban Partnership Agreements.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Transportation Management, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and Other Adaptations to Maturity in the Highway Sector David Levinson.
Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
Pricing Traffic: Pacing Growth Robert T. Dunphy Senior Resident Fellow Urban Land Institute.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Sreenath Gangula, P.E., PTOE Washington State Department of Transportation 2015 Corridor Capacity Report WSDOT ways to communicating – multimodal state.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 37) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
1 520 Tolling Implementation Committee Cascadia Center for Regional Development Beyond Oil Conference Thursday, September 4, 2008 Richard Ford, Commissioner.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
Solving the SR-520 Problem © 2005 Chaisy, Hurvitz, Jiang, Jun, ShinnersSlide 1 (of 31) Solving the SR-520 Problem prepared for UTRAN prepared by INSTEP.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Presentation transcript:

SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project Engineer Urban Corridors Office

The Lake Washington Urban Partnership LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Lake Washington Urban Partnership This partnership is a unique opportunity— It is tied to the urgent need to replace the SR 520 Lake Washington floating bridge and approaches It is an ideal corridor to test congestion pricing, transit and technology working in concert. The legislature is ready to set the state’s tolling policy framework. The Lake Washington Urban Partnership will clearly demonstrate to Puget Sound residents how the 4 Ts can work together to finance new facilities, and make existing and new infrastructure as productive as possible for our communities. LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Lake Washington Urban Partnership Designed to reduce congestion through the “Four T’s”: · Transit · Technology · Telecommuting · Tolling Awarded $154.5 million to assist WSDOT, PSRC and King County in applying these innovative approaches to reduce congestion in the 520 corridor. Other regions that have been selected for Urban Partnership Agreements include: Miami San Francisco Minneapolis Los Angeles Chicago Funded by: LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP

Telecommuting and TDM in the 520 corridor The Urban Partnership will build on existing commute trip reduction programs and encourage: telecommuting and flexible schedules educational campaigns employer subsidies car/vanpooling Current commute trip reduction programs in the 520 corridor LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP

Adding transit to the 520 corridor The 520 corridor today: - 24 bus routes bus trips a day - 13,400 riders daily LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP The Urban Partnership Agreement allocates $41 million to be used to: purchase 45 additional buses for the 520 corridor; make improvements to the South Kirkland and downtown Redmond Park and Rides; enhance passenger facilities (new shelters and improved lighting); and install Real Time Information signs.

Electronic tolling in Washington Drivers would be encouraged to set up prepaid Good to Go! accounts, using the same system used on both the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and the SR 167 HOT Lanes Pilot Project. Those without Good To Go! accounts would be billed based on their license plate, with a surcharge added to the toll rate. Washington drivers have easily embraced electronic tolling and signed up in record numbers – more than 90,000 accounts and 200,000 transponders in the first six months – the most successful launch in the country. Electronic tolling at the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Simulation of electronic tolling on SR 167 HOT lanes. Tacoma Narrows Bridge SR 167 HOT lanes The 520 corridor Current and future tolling options in the Puget Sound region. LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP

Electronic tolling on SR 520 A single tolling point would be constructed on the existing SR 520 bridge All tolls on the 520 corridor would be collected electronically – no toll booths. Toll rates would vary by time of day – drivers would pay less during off-peak travel times. Simulation of electronic tolling on SR 520 Floating Bridge LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP

Will expand WSDOT’s intelligent transportation system, that now includes: 135 ramp meters, real-time traveler information, 475 traffic cameras, 179 electronic message boards, 7 traffic management centers, 55 incident response trucks, 884 timed traffic signals, 200 miles of HOV lanes and 20 miles of HOT lanes. Technology Improvements Overhead gantry envisioned by WSDOT M42 Birmingham, England LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP

Technology Improvements New travel times signs will be added to the corridor that will assist drivers in making trip decisions. LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Technology Improvements Active Traffic Management techniques will be implemented on SR520 and I-90 Variable Speed limit signs over each lane with message signs alert drivers of backups ahead Lane Control signs alert drivers to steer away from trouble spots and clear the way for emergency vehicles. LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Implementation Schedule LAKE WASHINGTON URBAN PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Questions? The existing SR 520 Bridge.