1 Michael Scharfenstein 1 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June 3 2009 Mike Scharfenstein ES&H.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Rue du Rhône CH-1204 Geneva - T: F: Safety of Electronic Equipment Safeguards to reduce.
Finally! – A Process that Looks at Environmental Risk Early J. S. Irving Environmental Compliance Idaho National Laboratory.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
Credited Controls at C-AD Photo of the Week E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department Take 5 for Safety.
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center September group.slac.stanford.edu/esh/isms/tools.htm ISMS/EMS for Individuals.
FAC 4/20/06 D. Schultz 1 The SAD and ARR for Commissioning The Status of the SAD Being written as a part of the SLAC Linac SAD The Status of the ARR Design.
Richard Hislop FAC April 20-21, 2006 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY Richard Hislop LCLS Construction Safety Coordinator.
Michael Scharfenstein FAC October LCLS Environment, Safety & Health Michael Scharfenstein ES&H Coordinator.
Safety Oversight for SLAC Accelerator Department Operations
Michael Scharfenstein FAC April 7, 2005 LCLS ES&H Process and Documentation.
SLAC ES&H Overview Craig Ferguson March Operating Model ES&H Mission Critical Issues Challenges Path forward Topics October 2008.
Mike Scharfenstein FAC Review - November 11, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Environment Safety & Health Status.
Michael Scharfenstein FAC April 16, 2007 LCLS CONSTRUCTION SAFETY Michael Scharfenstein.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Mike Scharfenstein CF Breakout - 12 November 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 ES&H Status of Construction and Technical.
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
Health and Safety Department ESH&Q Division. Health and Safety Department John Kelly, Acting Department Head Key Areas of Responsibility – Electrical.
Risk Management at a Glance. Terms Hazard Hazard Risk Risk Probability Probability Severity Severity Estimating Estimating Exposure Exposure Risk Assessment.
M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 8 June 2009
International Health and Safety at Work
ALPHA Project Safety Assessment Document Vladimir Anferov.
LCLS NEH Operational and User Safety Programs
Michael P. Andrews NuMI Shutdown & Facility Coordinator LBNE Project ESH Manager AD ESH Special Projects Coordinator.
Risk Analysis for Engineering Design J. M. McCarthy Fall 2003 Definitions Hazard Analysis Hazard Analysis Report Example for Mini Baja Nationally Recognized.
Safety & Project Management by NABEEH JUM’AH. Eye on Safety  Proactive  Reactive.
1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Integrated Safety Management Systems Review August 8-9, 2006 B erkeley Lab Safety Committee Presentation Paul Blodgett.
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
‘OHS - A Survival Kit’ State Library of Victoria Buildings & Facilities Division (OHS) Occupational Health & Safety ‘A Survival Kit’ February 2002 Presenter:
LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan and Safety Overview Joe Kenny Camera Safety Manager LSST Safety Council Review 18 August 2015.
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
Risk Assessment Hazard Identification SAFETY LEARNING LAB Col Alex Kay and Lt Col Eric Shappee.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Safety Induction to the Lift & Escalator Industry
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Edward T. Lessard ESHQ.
Two of the most important pieces of the health and safety legislation affecting educational establishments across the UK are the Health and Safety at.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Management of Change ► The health, safety, security, environmental, technical and other impacts of temporary and permanent changes are formally assessed,
Energy, Environment and National Security Directorate (EENS) Best Management Practices in the Experimental Safety Review Program Robert Doty Experimental.
September 19-20, 2007 E. Lessard EBIS Safety EBIS Project Safety Ed Lessard September 19-20, 2007 DOE Annual Review.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
Why Do We Need The ASO? E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department (C-AD) Brookhaven National Laboratory DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop to
California State Lands Commission Mineral Resources Management Division Long Beach Unit Safety & Environmental Audit Proposal June 23, 2011 Mineral Resources.
January 4, 2007 RHIC II Project Internal Cost Review Ed Lessard ESH D R A F T Project Overview.
Take 5 for Safety E. Lessard January 13, Readiness for High Consequence Risks: Accelerator Operations  Implementing procedures tie responsible.
Independent Oversight Status Report on Workplace Exposure Monitoring ISM Workshop 2007.
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
Task Manager Construction Coordinator Training -- EMS-- Fermilab 95% of Asbestos found is either Amosite or Chryosotile95% of Asbestos found is either.
GENERAL RISK ASSESSMENT  Managing H&S at Work Regulations 1992  Every employer shall make a suitable and sufficient assessment of risk to the H&S of.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Goals: ◦ Minimize the environmental impacts of construction projects and tasks undertaken at the Lab; ◦ Remain in compliance with environmental rules;
Overview of FESHCom Subcommittees Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
1 Interfaces, Engineering and Standards. 2 Interfaces LoKI Interface document description for deliverables Elements: PBS number, Deliverable description,
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Laboratory Safety 1 Navigating the University: Laboratory Safety James Gibson, PhD, MPH Executive Director, Office of Environmental Health & Safety Descanso.
Planning for Succession
Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) Training for Safety and Health Staff
HAZWOPER Operations Level.
Reducing Risk with Competency and Compliance
ECMA-287 Safety of Electronic Equipment Safeguards to reduce harmful exposure to energy sources Ecma TC12 Rue du Rhône CH-1204 Geneva - T: +41.
M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 14 May 2009
Ian Evans SSRL Safety Office
Integrated Safety and Environmental Management
Environment, Safety and Health
Richard Hislop Construction Safety Coordinator
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Safety Program for LCLS Experiments
PROJECT SAFETY Richard Hislop.
Presentation transcript:

1 Michael Scharfenstein 1 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Mike Scharfenstein ES&H Coordinator Environment, Safety and Health

2 Michael Scharfenstein 2 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Process DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management Hazard Analysis Report DOE O 420.2A / Accelerator Safety Safety Assessment Document Accelerator Safety Envelope DOE O / Safety Management System Integrated Safety Management National Environmental Policy Act Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Process

3 Michael Scharfenstein 3 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June ISEMS Process cont’d The Environmental Assessment developed for the LCLS resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact encompassed the physical space occupied by LUSI and its operations The LUSI Hazard Analysis Report states its instruments are being designed so that they will not pose hazards to people or the environment The most significant potential hazard associated with LUSI instruments is that related to ionizing radiation The LUSI instruments are designed to 10CFR 835 defines radiation protection regulations for the protection of individuals from ionizing radiation LUSI instruments will be designed and built w/i the scope of LCLS SAD The instruments will comply with the approved Accelerator Safety Envelope

4 Michael Scharfenstein 4 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June ISEMS Process cont’d SLAC Integrated Safety and Environmental Management SLAC ES&H Manual Safety Oversight Committee Review Process LCLS ES&H management practices LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents Physics Requirements Documents, Engineering Specification Documents, Preliminary & Final Design Reviews, etc LCLS Work Authorization Preliminary Design Review SOC Reviews Final Design Review Project Management sign-off

5 Michael Scharfenstein 5 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Hazards Analysis Process Process to document the hazard assessment of the instrument design Reviewed and Approved by the DOE Stanford Site Office DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management Peer Review Hazards Analysis Report R. Hislop SME, Author & Reviewer APS F. O’Neil SME, Author of GLAST HAR Living document subject to an annual review

6 Michael Scharfenstein 6 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Hazard Assessment Process The hazard assessment process is a principal factor in the understanding and management of technical risk. Hazard severity is an assessment of the worst potential consequence, defined by degree of injury or property damage, which could occur Probability is the likelihood that an identified hazard will result in a mishap, based on an assessment of such factors as location, exposure in terms of cycles or hours of operation, and affected population. These levels are derived from MIL- STD-882D, Standard Practices for System Safety. Defense Standards are also used by other non-Defense government organizations, technical organizations, and industry

7 Michael Scharfenstein 7 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Hazard Consequence Rating

8 Michael Scharfenstein 8 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June LUSI CXI Configuration Hazards Analysis Radiation Fire Protection Electrical Seismic Chemical Thermal/Cryogenic Mechanical Aerosolized Nanoparticles Environmental Insults Air Emissions Waste Material Disposal Magnetic Oxygen Deficiency Vacuum / Pressure Laser Design Hazards Pinch points Sharp corners Diagnostics 1 micron Sample Environment 0.1 micron KB & Sample Environment, 1 micron KB Reference Laser Optics & Diagnostics

9 Michael Scharfenstein 9 Environment, Safety and Health CXI Final Instrument Design Review, June Conclusion Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Following SLAC ISEMS Process SLAC ES&H Manual Safety Oversight Committee Following LCLS ES&H management practices LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents Work Authorization Hazard Analysis Report Approved by DOE