Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003

Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating Foundation/Wall Rating Window/Door Rating Porch Rating Exterior Paint Rating3.719 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.881 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Blue Hills Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating Lawn/Shrub Rating Nuisance Vehicle Rating Litter Rating Open Storage Rating Accessory Structure Rating Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Blue Hills Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public Sidewalk Rating Curb Rating Street Light Rating Catch Basin Rating Street Rating Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

BLUE HILLS AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied % Single Family, Not Owner Occupied % Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status622.1% Not Single Family Housing613 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

Vineyard NPI Area Report March, 2003

Vineyard Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating Foundation/Wall Rating Window/Door Rating Porch Rating Exterior Paint Rating4.250 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.330 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Vineyard Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating Lawn/Shrub Rating Nuisance Vehicle Rating Litter Rating Open Storage Rating Accessory Structure Rating Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Vineyard Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public Sidewalk Rating Curb Rating Street Light Rating Catch Basin Rating Street Rating Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

VINEYARD AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied % Single Family, Not Owner Occupied % Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status281.7% Not Single Family Housing299 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

Blue Valley NPI Area Report March, 2003

Blue Valley Components of Change in Structure Ratings (2000 to 2002) Average RatingsParcels with Residential Structures Difference 1.Roof Rating Foundation/Wall Rating Window/Door Rating Porch Rating Exterior Paint Rating Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family Difference Difference Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Blue Valley Components of Change in Grounds Ratings (November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure Diff Diff 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating Lawn/Shrub Rating Nuisance Vehicle Rating Litter Rating Open Storage Rating Accessory Structure Rating Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family Difference Difference Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

Blue Valley Components of Change in Infrastructure Ratings (November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure Diff Diff 1.Public Sidewalk Rating Curb Rating Street Light Rating Catch Basin Rating Street Rating Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5) Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family Difference Difference Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

BLUE VALLEY AREA - Single Family Housing (November, 2002) Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied % Single Family, Not Owner Occupied % Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status592.2% Not Single Family Housing693 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002