衛資所 生物資訊組 陳俊宇 April 07, 03. graph nodeedge Chromosomegenepositional correlations Pathwayenzymefunctional correlations Gene expression genecoexpressed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPARCLE = SPArse ReCovery of Linear combinations of Expression Presented by: Daniel Labenski Seminar in Algorithmic Challenges in Analyzing Big Data in.
Advertisements

University at BuffaloThe State University of New York Interactive Exploration of Coherent Patterns in Time-series Gene Expression Data Daxin Jiang Jian.
Threshold selection in gene co- expression networks using spectral graph theory techniques Andy D Perkins*,Michael A Langston BMC Bioinformatics 1.
Networks are useful for describing systems of interacting objects, where the nodes represent the objects and the edges represent the interactions between.
Gene Co-expression Network Analysis BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University.
Modularity in Biological networks.  Hypothesis: Biological function are carried by discrete functional modules.  Hartwell, L.-H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler,
CSE 222 Systems Programming Graph Theory Basics Dr. Jim Holten.
Graph, Search Algorithms Ka-Lok Ng Department of Bioinformatics Asia University.
Classical tree view of cell cycle data (Spellman, et al MolBiolCell 9, 3273)
Microarray analysis 2 Golan Yona. 2) Analysis of co-expression Search for similarly expressed genes experiment1 experiment2 experiment3 ……….. Gene i:
ANALYSIS OF GENETIC NETWORKS USING ATTRIBUTED GRAPH MATCHING.
Introduction to molecular networks Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Nov 6 th, 2014.
Systems Biology, April 25 th 2007Thomas Skøt Jensen Technical University of Denmark Networks and Network Topology Thomas Skøt Jensen Center for Biological.
國立陽明大學生資學程 陳虹瑋. Genetic Algorithm Background Fitness function ……. population selection Cross over mutation Fitness values Random cross over.
Protein Classification A comparison of function inference techniques.
DEMO CSE fall. What is GeneMANIA GeneMANIA finds other genes that are related to a set of input genes, using a very large set of functional.
Systematic Analysis of Interactome: A New Trend in Bioinformatics KOCSEA Technical Symposium 2010 Young-Rae Cho, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of.
Exploiting indirect neighbors and topological weight to predict protein function from protein– protein interactions Hon Nian Chua, Wing-Kin Sung and Limsoon.
Cytoscape A powerful bioinformatic tool Mathieu Michaud
MATISSE - Modular Analysis for Topology of Interactions and Similarity SEts Igor Ulitsky and Ron Shamir Identification.
Overview  Introduction  Biological network data  Text mining  Gene Ontology  Expression data basics  Expression, text mining, and GO  Modules and.
Network Analysis and Application Yao Fu
Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering Patrik D’haeseleer,Shoudan Liang and Roland Somogyi.
Reconstructing Gene Networks Presented by Andrew Darling Based on article  “Research Towards Reconstruction of Gene Networks from Expression Data by Supervised.
Gene Regulatory Network Inference. Progress in Disease Treatment  Personalized medicine is becoming more prevalent for several kinds of cancer treatment.
Networks and Interactions Boo Virk v1.0.
Microarrays to Functional Genomics: Generation of Transcriptional Networks from Microarray experiments Joshua Stender December 3, 2002 Department of Biochemistry.
Anindya Bhattacharya and Rajat K. De Bioinformatics, 2008.
A Clustering Algorithm based on Graph Connectivity Balakrishna Thiagarajan Computer Science and Engineering State University of New York at Buffalo.
HUMAN-MOUSE CONSERVED COEXPRESSION NETWORKS PREDICT CANDIDATE DISEASE GENES Ala U., Piro R., Grassi E., Damasco C., Silengo L., Brunner H., Provero P.
Abstract Background: In this work, a candidate gene prioritization method is described, and based on protein-protein interaction network (PPIN) analysis.
Part 1: Biological Networks 1.Protein-protein interaction networks 2.Regulatory networks 3.Expression networks 4.Metabolic networks 5.… more biological.
Introduction to Bioinformatics Biological Networks Department of Computing Imperial College London March 18, 2010 Lecture hour 18 Nataša Pržulj
1 Having genome data allows collection of other ‘omic’ datasets Systems biology takes a different perspective on the entire dataset, often from a Network.
Tutorial session 3 Network analysis Exploring PPI networks using Cytoscape EMBO Practical Course Session 8 Nadezhda Doncheva and Piet Molenaar.
Anis Karimpour-Fard ‡, Ryan T. Gill †,
Metabolic Network Inference from Multiple Types of Genomic Data Yoshihiro Yamanishi Centre de Bio-informatique, Ecole des Mines de Paris.
CSCE555 Bioinformatics Lecture 18 Network Biology: Comparison of Networks Across Species Meeting: MW 4:00PM-5:15PM SWGN2A21 Instructor: Dr. Jianjun Hu.
Understanding Network Concepts in Modules Dong J, Horvath S (2007) BMC Systems Biology 2007, 1:24.
A rapid algorithm for generating minimal pathway distances: Pathway distance correlates with genome distance but not enzyme function Stuart Rison 1*, Evangelos.
1 CIS 4930/6930 – Recent Advances in Bioinformatics Spring 2014 Network problems Tamer Kahveci.
Introduction to biological molecular networks
341- INTRODUCTION TO BIOINFORMATICS Overview of the Course Material 1.
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of fungi Group Nicotiana Daan van Vliet, Dou Hu, Joost de Jong, Krista Kokki.
Integrated Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of a Systematically Perturbed Metabolic Network Science, Vol 292, Issue 5518, , 4 May 2001.
How many interactions are there? ~6,200 genes ~6,200 proteins x 2-10 interactions/protein ~12, ,000 interactions Yeast.
Discovering functional interaction patterns in Protein-Protein Interactions Networks   Authors: Mehmet E Turnalp Tolga Can Presented By: Sandeep Kumar.
Biological Networks. Can a biologist fix a radio? Lazebnik, Cancer Cell, 2002.
Predicting Protein Function Annotation using Protein- Protein Interaction Networks By Tamar Eldad Advisor: Dr. Yanay Ofran Computational Biology.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Computer Science and Engineering PhD in Computer Science Monday, November 07, :00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Swearingen Conference Room 3A75 Network Based.
Network construction and exploration using CORNET and Cytoscape - Excercises SPICY WORKSHOP Wageningen, March 8 th 2012 Stefanie De Bodt.
1 Having genome data allows collection of other ‘omic’ datasets Systems biology takes a different perspective on the entire dataset, often from a Network.
1 Lesson 12 Networks / Systems Biology. 2 Systems biology  Not only understanding components! 1.System structures: the network of gene interactions and.
Network Analysis Goal: to turn a list of genes/proteins/metabolites into a network to capture insights about the biological system 1.Types of high-throughput.
Network applications Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Dec 9 th, 2014.
Comparative Network Analysis BMI/CS 776 Spring 2013 Colin Dewey
Mining Coherent Dense Subgraphs across Multiple Biological Networks Vahid Mirjalili CSE 891.
Inferring Regulatory Networks from Gene Expression Data BMI/CS 776 Mark Craven April 2002.
Tutorial 12 Biological networks.
Large Scale Data Integration
Building and Analyzing Genome-Wide Gene Disruption Networks
GPX: Interactive Exploration of Time-series Microarray Data
SEG5010 Presentation Zhou Lanjun.
Anastasia Baryshnikova  Cell Systems 
ADAGE model example. ADAGE model example. For one sample in the expression compendium (one column in the figure with red or green colors, representing.
Bioinformatics, Vol.17 Suppl.1 (ISMB 2001) Weekly Lab. Seminar
Characteristics of tissue‐specific co‐expression networks (CNs)‏
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2017)
Global and focused views of human interaction map.
Presentation transcript:

衛資所 生物資訊組 陳俊宇 April 07, 03

graph nodeedge Chromosomegenepositional correlations Pathwayenzymefunctional correlations Gene expression genecoexpressed Protein interaction proteinprotein-protein interaction Protein structure protein3D structural similarity

What questions they want to answer? C i : correlated gene cluster (correlated cluster) h i : hyperedge To extract a set of correlated genes with respect to multiple biological features. Provide biological information to classify genes.

Method Clustering of hyperedges!! Input datasets: graph G = {G 1, …, G n } hyperedges H = {h 1, …, h m } Distance between hyperedges:

E.coli correlated gene clusters E.coli genome dataset (G 1 : 4,396 nodes and 4,396 edges) E.coli pathway dataset (G 2 : 761 nodes and 1,223 edges) E.coli structure similarity dataset (G 3 : 538 nodes and 3,823 edges) 917 hyperedges threshold parameters p 1 = 2, p 2 = 3, p 3 = 0

Screening the two-hybrid protein-protein interaction dataset. (yeast protein interaction) Compared this dataset with the following datasets: –S.cerevisiae coexpression dataset –S.cerevisiae pathway dataset –E.coli genome dataset If an interaction or a relation is also observed in biological attributes other than protein-protein interactions, we judge the interaction is relevant.

S.cerevisiae two-hybrid vs. E.coli genome

Discussions graphs being compared really can provide biological information to classify genes. It’s not clear whether the inclusion of the yeast genome dataset can improve the confidence of screening the two-hybrid dataset. Deriving sub-networks that indicate how genes are connected in a correlated gene cluster. edge -> weight (normalization of edge weights among graphs for comparison!)