Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 28, 2004 3rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Marks Registration In Jordan Presented by: Samer AL-Tarawneh Director Industrial Property Directorate Ministry of Industry & Trade Amman-Jordan.
Advertisements

INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION Global Protection and Enforcement of Trademarks.
Trademark and Unfair Comp.
Copyrights for Creatives April 16, 2014 Brocach Irish Pub.
Texas Real Estate Contracts 4 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning.
IP Protection in Thailand
Trade-marks Act Registrability: s. 12. Registrable & Entitlement to Register Distinguish Distinguish Is the mark registrable? Is the mark registrable?
Paradise Point Resort & Spa San Diego, CA October 19-21, 2011 Patenting Protein Therapeutics: In the Shadow of Uncertainty 4th Protein Discovery and Therapeutics.
Laws applicable to Trade Mark Common law Legislation - Trade Marks Act 1976 and Trade Marks Regulations Trade Descriptions Act 1972 P.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 19, 2008 False Designation, False Advertising.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 9, 2004 Dilution (cont’d)
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 21, 2004 Use in Commerce.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 14, 2009 Introduction.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 25, 2009 Trademark – Priority.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 12, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 14, 2004 Trade Dress - Part 2.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School August 31, 2004 Introduction.
Intellectual Property
Establishing Protection Intro to IP – Prof. Merges
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 2, 2008 Dilution.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 5, 2004 Registration.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 4, 2008 Trademark – Priority, Registration.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2008 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 16, 2008 What is a Trademark?
Trademarks: Administrative Issues Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 5, 2008 Types of Confusion, Trademark Use.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 25, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 9, 2008 Domain Names.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 4, 2007 Trademark – Priority, Registration.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 1, 2009 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 4, 2004 Dilution.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 11, 2004 False Advertising.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 21, 2004 Likelihood of Confusion 2.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 7, 2004 Bars to Registration.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 14, 2004 Abandonment.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 30, 2004 Intent to Use.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 6, 2008 Intent to Use.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 7, 2004 Distinctiveness.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 14, 2007 Patent - Utility.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 9, 2004 Trade Dress - Part 1.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 23, 2009 Trademark - Intro, Subject Matter.
Trademark Priority + TM Office Procedures/Incontestability Intro to IP – Prof Merges [Originally scheduled for 3.13 and ]
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
12-1 Small Business Management, 11th edition Longenecker, Moore, and Petty © 2000 South-Western College Publishing Chapter 12 Customer Loyalty and Product.
Chapter 7 Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy
Brand Protection In China Eligio Pimentel
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Trademarks I Introduction to Trademarks Class Notes: March 26, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent Richard Warner.
Intellectual Property & Export Controls Presented by Madelynne Farber, Sandia Vincent Branton, Pacific Northwest Murray Baxter, Savannah River May 26,
Trademark Opposition & Cancellation Process U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) US Oppositions and Cancellations 2006.
Chapter 7 Intellectual Property and Piracy
Trademark May Pay the USPTO’s ATTORNEY FEES??? Ex parte appeal to D. Ct. for De Novo Review –must name the Director of the PTO as a defendant; and.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
Trademarks II Establishment of Trademark Rights Class 20 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
Trademark Law1  Oct. 9, 2006  Week 6 Finish Chapter 4 – Registration Start Chapter 5 - Loss of Trademark Rights  Read Pgs , , ;
Trademark Law1  Sept. 25, 2006  Week 5 Finish Chapter 3 Start Chapter 4 (Registration of Trademarks  Reading: Pgs , suppl. pgs
Trademark Law1  Week 8 Chapter 6 – Infringement (cont.)
Spirits Branding in 2016 and Beyond
Trademarks III Infringement of Trademarks
Practice Group Luncheon
International Trademark Association U.S. Roundtable Program
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CYBER PIRACY
Trademarks Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman
Chapter 7 Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy
File Sharing Networks: Sony, Napster, Grokster, Bit Torrent
The Ragged Edge of the Lanham Act
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN FINLAND
Presentation transcript:

Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 28, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses

Third Party Liability –Contributory Liability –Vicarious Liability

Hard Rock Café v. CSI

e-Bay Example

Third Party Liability –Contributory Liability (i) assist in infringing activity (ii) knew or had reason to know of infr. activity –Vicarious Liability (i) authority or ability to control other’s behavior (ii) direct financial benefit from infringement

Incontestability Lanham Act §15: –Except on a ground for which application to cancel may be filed … under paragraphs (3) and (5) of section 14 … –and except to the extent … to which the use of a mark … infringes a valid right acquired … by use of a mark … continuing from a date prior to the date of registration …, –the right of a registrant to use such registered mark in commerce for the goods … on … which such registered mark has been in continuous use for five consecutive years subsequent to the date of such registration … shall be incontestable … –no incontestable right shall be acquired in a mark which is the generic name for the goods or services

Incontestability Lanham Act §14: –A petition to cancel a registration of a mark … may … be filed … (1) Within five years from the date of registration... (3) At any time if the registered mark becomes the generic name for the goods … or is functional, or has been abandoned, or its registration was obtained fraudulently or contrary to the provisions of … subsection (a), (b), or (c) or section 2 … or if the registered mark is being used … so as to misrepresent the source of the goods … (5) At any time in the case of a certification mark...

Bars to Registration Lanham Act §2: –(a) Immoral, scandalous, deceptive; disparages –(b) Flag, coat of arms, insignia of U.S., state, etc. –(c) Name, portrait, signature of living individual –(d) Likely to cause confusion with other mark –(e) Consists of mark that is: (1) merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive (2) primarily geographically descriptive (3) primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive (4) primarily a surname (5) functional

Incontestability Lanham Act §33: –(a) Any registration … shall be prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark... –(b) To the extent that the right to use the registered mark has become incontestable under section 15, the registration shall be conclusive evidence of the validity of the registered mark …. Such conclusive evidence … shall be subject to the following defenses: (1) [Obtained by fraud] (2) [Abandoned] (3) [Used to misrepresent source] (4) [Fair use defense] (5) [Prior use defense] (6) [Prior registration defense] (7) [Used to violate antitrust laws] (8) [Other equitable principles]

Administrative Details Next Assignment –VII.A –VII.B through Lemley Handout