Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
Advertisements

Micromegas studies using cosmic rays Franck Sabatié May 7th 2009 Saclay cosmic ray bench Data acquisition system and analysis tools MIP detection Position.
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
CMS Calorimetry in the Very Forward Direction E. Norbeck, P. Debbins, and Y. Onel University of Iowa For the 23 rd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
Main detector types Multi Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) How does it work? 1. Photon hits a pixel producing electron hole.
Far forward angle physics at the LHC E. Norbeck and Y. Onel University of Iowa For the 24th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics South Padre Island
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
The Physics Potential of the PHENIX VTX and FVTX Detectors Eric J. Mannel WWND 13-Apr-2012.
E. Norbeck U. IowaFast Gas Detector APR 05 Tampa1 Small Fast Gas Detector for High-Energy Electrons E. Norbeck, J.E. Olson, and Y. Onel University of Iowa.
1 Tianchi Zhao University of Washington Concept of an Active Absorber Calorimeter A Summary of LCRD 2006 Proposal A Calorimeter Based on Scintillator and.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Andy White U.Texas at Arlington (for J.Yu, C.Han, J.Li, D.Jenkins, J.Smith, K.Parmer, A.Nozawa, V.Kaushik) 10/18/04 IEEE/NSS Digital Hadron Calorimetry.
Tanja Horn, CUA PHYS 575/675 Modern Detectors Phys 575/675, Spring 2012 Tools of High Energy and Nuclear Physics Detection of Individual Elementary Particles.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
Proposal for Generic R&D on EIC Detectors Yasar Onel University of Iowa.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CLIC Workshop 2013 January 28 – February 1, 2013 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting March 10 – 12, 2010 University of Texas at Arlington.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
The DHCAL Data Analysis José Repond CALICE Meeting, Prague, September 10 – 12, 2007.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
CALICE 03/14/05Ed Norbeck U. of Iowa1 PPACs in a Calorimeter Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa.
Calibration of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter with Muons Burak Bilki d, John Butler b, Tim Cundiff a, Gary Drake a, William Haberichter a, Eric Hazen b,
Development of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Shahnoor Habib For HEP Group, UT Arlington Oct. 12, 2002 TSAPS Fall ’02, UT Brownsville Simulation.
QuarkNet and Cosmic Ray Muon Flux Experiments Florida Academy of Sciences Spring Conference 2009 Alfred Menendez and Michael Abercrombie with Dr. Marcus.
ILC Calorimetry Test Beam Status Lei Xia ANL HEP.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Ion signals with R134a and R134 in a parallel plate proportional counter Y. Onel, E. Norbeck, J. E. Olson University of Iowa For HCAL meeting at Fermilab.
A Hadron Calorimeter with Resistive Plate Chambers José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALOR 2006, Chicago, June 5 – 9, 2006.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
PPAC in ZDC for Trigger and Luminosity Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa Luminosity Workshop November 5, 2004.
Imaging Hadron Calorimeters for Future Lepton Colliders José Repond Argonne National Laboratory 13 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Vienna University.
Iowa Test Plans for ESTB B. Bilki, Y. Onel University Of Iowa.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
Small, fast, low-pressure gas detector E. Norbeck, J. E. Olson, and Y. Onel University of Iowa For DNP04 at Chicago October 2004.
1/28 VISITS TO COMPASS / NA58 Seminar for guides 9 March 2005 Susanne Koblitz Gerhard Mallot.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
Simulation studies of total absorption calorimeter Development of heavy crystals for scintillation and cherenkov readout Dual readout in the 4 th concept.
Analysis of DHCAL Data José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Meeting, September 16 – 18, 2009 Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, France.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa Thesis Defense 8 April 2005.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLYSTYRENE SCINTILLATOR TECHNOLOGY AND PARTICLE DETECTORS ON THEIR BASES VLADIMIR RYKALIN IHEP, PROTVINO INSTR-14, NOVOSIBIRSK, 24.
PPAC Parallel Plate Avalanche Counter Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa For meeting at SLAC June 2, 2004.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
“Performance test of a lead glass
Dual Readout Clustering and Jet Finding
Semi-Digital Hadronic CALorimeter
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
Hall C KPP Demonstration March 10, 2017.
GEM-based Digital Hadron Calorimetry for SiD
Experimental Particle Physics
GEM-based Digital Hadron Calorimetry for SiD
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Tests of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Experimental Particle Physics
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, Montana 1-7 February 2009

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa2 First a brief report on the performance of an actual directional detector.

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa3 The QuarkNet group from Bettendorf HS have constructed and tested a directional particle detector that makes use of light produced by the Čerenkov effect. Much of the work was done by high school students Mitch Miller and Nathan Premo at the U of Iowa in 2008.

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa4 A charged particle moving at almost the speed of light through a transparent material makes light that goes off at a angle with respect to its direction. This angle is given by cos (θ) = 1/n where n is the index of refraction of the material. For n = 1.414, θ = 45º Particle θ Čerenkov light

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa5 Muon angle (relative to vertical) allowed by QuarkNet scintillator paddles is ± 24º HV Signal Lucite cylinder 3” OD 4” long PMT1 PMT2

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa6 Each point shows the size of the signal in PMT1 and PMT2. Blue points are with the same system turned upside down. With no exception the PMT looking up has the larger signal.

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa7 Here the 4 inch long lucite cylinder is replaced with a 2” long cylinder. The looking down PMT has the larger signal 3% of the time.

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa8 In these detectors the PMTs did not show the usual dark current pulses. Why? Is a bare PMT a directional Čerenkov detector?

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa9 A PMT by itself is a directional Čerenkov detector Up Facing the incoming muons Side

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa10 The down system is the same as the up but turned upside down.

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa11 What part of the PMT sees muons? Face only All counts Tail only No counts

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa12 Conclusions Directional Čerenkov detectors are simple and effective. A high-energy test beam may be available at your local high school. (There are over 300 high schools in the QuarkNet program)

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa13 Ed Norbeck, Burak Bilki, Yasar Onel and José Repond What is a digital calorimeter and why would anyone want one ? May get improved energy resolution by not measuring the energy!

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa14 Sampling Calorimeter Heavy metal absorberDetectors For good energy resolution need large sampling fraction

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa15 Common “thick” detectors Čerenkov Scintillator Semiconductor Each has its own set of problems. All have low density, makes calorimeter longer

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa16 Some excellent gas detectors RPC (Resistive Plate Chamber) GEM (Gas Electron Multiplier) MICROMEGAS (MICRO-Mesh-Gaseous Structure) All are “thin”, at most a few mm of gas. Sampling ratios of 10 -5

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa17 Amplitude Number of counts Threshold Noise Signal Signal from MIP in a thin detector If single MIP, energy lost in absorber known.

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa18 To measure energy in a jet each particle must go into separate pixel. Requires excellent position resolution Many pixels Cubic meter detector 40 planes each with 10, cm 2 pixels 400,000 single-bit channels Does not require A to D conversions!

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa19 Problems! What if a MIP is recorded in two pixels? May be below threshold in one plane May collide and make several new MIPs

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa20 Extrapolate tracks back to find number of MIPs near junction Need elaborate computer programs “Particle flow algorithms”

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa21 With analog calorimeter calibration is a major problem. With digital calorimeter drift in sensitivity can cause Missed point in a track or spurious point (noise) Both of these easily dealt with by Particle Flow Algorithm

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa22 A few events… μ Calibration Runs 120 GeV protons with 1 m Fe beam block no μ momentum selection One of many perfect μ event μ event with double hits in x μ at an angle or multiple scattering μ event with δ ray or π punch through

A few events…e + Run GeV secondary beam Čerenkov signal required 8 GeV e + event 8 GeV e + event with satellites8 GeV e + event

A few events… π + Run 1 – 16 GeV secondary beam Veto on Čerenkov signal 8 GeV π + event (typical) 8 GeV π + event (early shower)

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa25 A few events…Multiple particles 120 GeV protons without beam block 2- π event (upstream shower?) 3- π event (upstream shower?)

25th WW 02/7/09Ed Norbeck University of Iowa26 This technique allows detailed tracking for penetrating particles. (It is difficult to implement ten nuclear reaction lengths of silicon.) Digital calorimetry is a rapidly developing field. Cosmic ray studies used lead plates and emulsion 50 years ago. Spark chambers used camera readout. Concluding comments