1 Hydrogen Safety System Summary MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HVAC523 Heat Sources.
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION. Seminar on IMPROVEMENT OF THERMAL EFFICIENCY BY RECOVERY OF HEAT FROM IC ENGINE EXHAUST.
1 AFSWG Mtg 15 Aug 2003 Elwyn Baynham RAL Safety Overview Work done by RAL Group Contributors Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP
Basic Refrigeration Cycle
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Hydrogen R&D System Operational Procedures and Test Plan M Courthold.
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
MICE OsC – 22 nd June 2010 Liquid-hydrogen system and absorber M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Ishimoto W Lau I Mullacrane P Warburton.
MICE hydrogen review Commissioning, testing and operations.
1 MICE Hydrogen System Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL MICE / RAL Safety RAL, 30 October 2003.
Status of the AFC at RAL Tom Bradshaw John Cobb Wing Lau Matt Hills Elwyn Baynham Mike Courthold Victoria Bayliss MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011.
Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.
1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,
1 MICE at RAL MICE Collaboration RAL, 2 November 2003 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering.
MICE Hazard Overview and Analysis Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov.
MICE Safety Review Process and Schedule Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Columbia Meeting June 2003.
CM26 – 26 th March 2010 Step IV: Liquid Hydrogen Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
Absorber/vacuum windows and absorber assembly 1.Window Requirements 2.MICE experimental constraints 3.Welded vs. non-welded windows 4.Installation 5.Testing.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
A presentation at the MICE Video Conference on Wednesday the 5 th of May 2004 Response to the Safety review comments by Wing Lau -- Oxford.
March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
Matthew Hills Hydrogen System – Piping and Instrumentation Diagram.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
1 Technical Arguments in Favor of using the Cryomech PT-415 Cooler for Cooling the LH 2 Experiment Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…
Hydrogen system status Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
Mucool cryo-design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department 8/12/02.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN, 29 March-2 April 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division,
MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.
Mechanical Safety Systems and DSEAR Compliance
MICE hydrogen review System modifications. Relief circuit repair During leak testing of R&D tests, the insulating vacuum would not go lower than
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.
The MICE Hydrogen System Summary Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tony Jones, Mike Courthold and Matthew Hills Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
MICE Hydrogen Safety Functions IEC61508 Compliance & Emergency Procedures MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
Status overview of the cooling 31 August 2015 Bart Verlaat, Raphael Dumps 1.
1 Preparation of the hydrogen test system Yury Ivanyushenkov for Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones CCLRC Technology.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Results from Helium Commissioning M Hills.
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Collaboration Meeting RAL October 2004.
CMS FPIX Cooling System Studies Joe Howell, Fermilab for the FPIX Upgrade Mechanical Working Group CMS Upgrade Workshop April 27,
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 The Hydrogen Delivery System – An Introduction M Hills.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Progress on Hydrogen R&D System
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
MICE LH2 Absorber Safety Mary Anne Cummings Edgar Black (IIT) Abingdon, UK Oct. 30, 2003.
Hydrogen Control System MJD Courthold TW Bradshaw Y Ivanyushenkov D Baynham.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation.
Progress on Hydrogen R&D System Yury Ivanyushenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold Matthew Hills, Tony Jones MICE Collaboration.
1 MICE Hydrogen system Working group mtg – 01/09/14.
Replacing hydride bed with bottle Advantages No risk of diminished bed capacity Following jobs no longer necessary – Move pressure gauge – Replace cracked.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
Sensors and Detectors - 1
Absorber progress MICE-ISIS review of the liquid hydrogen system will be held in early January; guidance from Nominated Engineers on the imported absorber.
MICE Meeting at RAL, Oct-23, 2005
Status of Hydrogen System Development
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
Presentation transcript:

1 Hydrogen Safety System Summary MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department RAL

2 Status of hydrogen absorber and system safety Hydrogen system: - changes in the system according to the Safety Review Panel recommendations; - ongoing work on safety issues; Hydrogen absorber/system operation: - instrumentation and control. Hydrogen R&D Scope

3 Safety = Safe Design + Safe Operation Design: Internal safety review- passed ( many useful comments, response is ready) Preliminary HAZOP- done Instrumentation- to be implemented Operation: Operation analysis- started Safety system analysis- started R&D stage- to be done Operation manual - to be written Final safety review – to be passed Status of hydrogen absorber and system safety

4 Changes in MICE hydrogen system AFC Safety Review Panel recommendations are implemented: Buffer vessel is removed from venting path. Vent manifold is added. The manifold is filled with nitrogen. Venting lines are separated. Other changes: Buffer vessel is added in between absorber vessel and hydride bed: - together with liquid hydrogen vessel and hydrogen condensation pot forms a quasi-closed system; - improves time response of safety devices in case of catastrophic failure. Ventilation system is removed. Most of the equipment is now sits under hydrogen extraction hood.

5 Pressure gauge Non-return valve PP VP Vacuum pump Bursting disk Pressure relief valve Valve Pressure regulator Pre-cooling Out In Metal Hydride storage unit (20m 3 capacity) Purge valve 0.5 bar 0.9 bar H 2 Detector P P VP1 VP2 Purge valve Chiller/He ater Unit 1 bar P P 0.5 bar 0.9 bar Helium supply Hydrogen supply High level vent Buffer vessel Vent outside flame arrester Extract hood H 2 Detector P P Nitrogen supply P P P P 1 m 3 Hydrogen zone 2 Vent manifold P1 PV1 PV7 PV8 PV2 PV3 PV4 HV1 Fill valve Tbed HV2 HV3 P3 P P2 PV6 High level vent Non return valve 0.1 bar MICE hydrogen system Liquid level gauge Internal Window LH 2 absorber Safety windows Vacuum Vacuum vessel

6 Safety issues: Ongoing work Pressure rise rate calculations Valves Hydrogen sensors Control

7 Operation issues: Ongoing work Operation from cryocoolers Instrumentation and control

8 Instrumentation to be implemented into absorber design: Hydrogen level sensor/s: - their functions (what do we need them for)? - continuous/ discrete? - how many and where? Temperature sensors: - their functions ? - how many and where? Hydrogen absorber instrumentation

9 Point level sensors Continuous level sensor Hydrogen level sensors

10 The capacitance-based liquid level sensor, used in conjunction with the Model 185 and 186, is manufactured of stainless steel tubing. Upon request, special assembly techniques can be applied for sensors required for liquid oxygen or hydrogen measurement _ including minimization of oils during construction and no use of epoxies. Sensors can be supplied in single-section overall lengths of up to 30 feet. Multi-section lengths in excess of 50 feet are available upon request. Three standard sensor mounting configurations are available. The typical configuration includes a hermetically sealed BNC connector with an adjustable 3/8" male NPT nylon feed-through. For higher pressure or vacuum applications, a welded stainless steel 3/8" male NPT fitting or conflat flange fitting is available. Twelve feet of connecting coaxial cable and in-line oscillator/transmitter are included with the sensor. With additional cable the sensor can be remotely mounted over 500 feet from the instrument without effecting performance. Sensor options include: 1. Rugged service construction 1/2" or 3/4" OD 2. Miniature sensors of 3/16" and 1/4" OD 3. Radius bends up to 90° 4. Capacitance or RTD point sensing elements Custom sensors are available from AMI to meet your individual Cryogenic liquid level sensors from AMI

11 Continuous level sensor Connector required (Swagelok VCR Metal gasket face seal fittings ?) Level sensor implementation Can a sensor be manufactured to this shape ?

12 Table 1 The specification of the MH tank for RAL Hydrogen Storage Capacity 20 Nm 3 Tank number/system 1 Tank Description: Heat Transfer Medium Water MH Weight 155kg Tank Structure Shell & Tube type Dimensions φ216.3×L1600 ( mm ) ( not include attachments ) Tank Total Weight 220 Kg Operating Condition: Charging Gas Component Hydrogen of 99.99% purity Charging Gas Pressure 1.2 barA Hydrogen Charging Rate 70NL/min (up to 90% of Storage Capacity) Discharging Gas Pressure 1.2 barA Hydrogen Discharging Rate 70NL/min (up to 90% of Storage Capacity) Utility Requirements: Cooling Medium Water Below -10 ℃ ( At 20L/min ) Heating Medium Above 20 ℃ ( At 20L/min ) Design Code ( AD Merkblaetter ) Certification ( Declaration of Conformity to Pressure Equipment Directive 97/23/EC Certified by a Notified Body ) REFERENCE What is known about metal hydride tank

13 Fig.1 Schematics and dimensions of the MH tank What is known about metal hydride tank (2)

14 Fig.2 P-C-T curves of metal hydride for RAL What is known about metal hydride tank (3)

15 Annotation by JSW: Attached please find the temporary specification of a 20Nm3 metal hydride (MH) tank, its sketch and the pressure-composition-temperature diagram of the candidate MH alloy. It would be better to explain the temperatures and pressures on charging and discharging hydrogen, referring to the PCT diagram. As you can see in the diagram (Fig. 2), it is possible for the alloy to absorb hydrogen gas almost to its maximum capacity at 0 degC if the pressure of hydrogen gas is maintained at 0.12 MPa. However, we are not yet sure of the influence of pressure loss inside the tank under such a negative pressure region. So, at the moment the charging temperature is specified to be below -10 degC with 0.12 MPa of charging pressure (See Table 1.). Then, you can see in the diagram (Fig. 2) that the MH alloy can discharge almost all the hydrogen at +20 degC if the pressure is maintained at 0.17 MPa. To be on the safer side, the discharging temperature is specified to be "above" +20 degC (See Table 1.). This means that the maximum internal pressure of the MH tank is likely to be reached during the hydrogen gas holding period if the water is stopped and the surrounding temperature increases. However, even at +30 degC, the expected internal pressure is not so high, approximately 1 MPa. As a matter of fact, there will be an unknown factor, i.e., how accurately we could control the materials properties when we newly manufacture an MH alloy. Due to slight variations in the chemical composition and other manufacturing parameters, the equilibrium temperature could vary by up to 5 degC for the same pressure. This could cause further changes in the charging/discharging temperatures and consequently the internal pressure. Since the relative plateau positions do not change, please assume that a difference of more than 30 degC is needed between the charging and discharging temperatures for the given charging and discharging pressures. What is known about metal hydride tank (4)

16 Hydrogen R&D Conceptual question: a small-scale rig vs. a full-scale prototype ? Decision: go for a full-scale system which later will be used in MICE. R&D goals: Establish the working parameters of a hydride bed in the regimes of storage, absorption and desorption of hydrogen. Absorption and desorption rates and their dependence on various parameters such as pressure, temperature etc. Purity of hydrogen and effects of impurities. Hydride bed heating/cooling power requirements. What set of instrumentation is required for the operation of the system? Safety aspects including what is the necessary set of safety relief valves, sensors and interlocks.

17 Tchill

18 Next steps Finish pressure rise rates calculations Select safety devices Control system diagram Instrumentation defined and implemented into design Hydrogen R&D: - find suitable place for hydrogen test area (MICE hall ?) ; - timetable depends on funding but would like to setup test rig in 2005.