Preview Assessment/Evaluation Primer Small-Group Discussions Whole-Class Discussions Mid-Semester Review Oral Exam Practice English 714 Ed Nagelhout 20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Advertisements

The Framework for Junior Cycle Presentation to Staff St Mark’s Community School, Tallaght.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
TASK FORCE CALL TO ARMS Henninger High School 2012.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council 1 Team members: Stephen Barton*, Jennifer Batten, Dillon Carr*, Laurie Chesley, Katie Daniels*,
Designing a course Eugenia Etkina Graduate School of Education Department of Learning and Teaching Rutgers University September 2006.
Principled Teaching for Deep Progress - Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials An NCETM research study module.
Andrea Bewick, Julie Hall & Lisa Yanover Flex Day, 2010.
General Education as a Learning-Outcome-Based Program: Course Review and Revision Workshop Tuesday, September 21 Fitting the pieces together and making.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Multi-Section Assessment of One Course: English 407A Ed Nagelhout Julie Staggers Department of English.
General Education Writing Across the Curriculum Retreat Session III: Mission and Objectives for Gen Ed / WAC Program October 6, 2006.
English 714 Ed Nagelhout 13 October 2010 Research and Writing Q & A w/Priscilla Finley Mid-Semester Evaluation Peer Review – Teaching Philosophy Peer Review.
Preview Issues to Consider (as I see them) Small-Group Discussion I Small-Group Discussion II Small-Group Discussion III Whole-Class Discussion Research.
The Academic Assessment Process
Preview Assessment/Evaluation Primer II Small-Group Discussions Whole-Class Discussions For Next Week English 714 Ed Nagelhout 27 October 2010.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Preview Technology Points Small-Group Discussions Whole-Class Discussions Oral Exam Practice English 714 Ed Nagelhout 03 November 2010.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Preview for Writing #1 General Expectations Defining Assignments Genre Features Evaluation Criteria Review Samples Planning Activities Interwoven Throughout.
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
WRITING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES March 24, 2010.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Triple C Competency-based Curriculum: Implications for Family Medicine Residency Programs.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
SLO A SSESSMENT S TUDY W ORKSHOP D EVON A TCHISON, SLO C OORDINATOR August 20, :30-10:30 a.m. Room 523.
Friday July 22, 10:00 am - 4:00 pm Agenda 1.Thoughts/questions 2.Discussion of reading, “CLT Today,” pp Looking at content courses and task-based.
Jeremy Hall Nicholas Jones Wouter Poortinga An Exploration of Assessment Practices at Cardiff University’s Schools of Engineering, Psychology and the Centre.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Presented by Debbie Godsen DePalma.  What is the plan for NYS and the CCS?  What are the CCS?  FAQ  What are the benefits?  What are the models of.
Student Services Assessment Workshop College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill & Cheryl Tucker Nov 28 th & 30 th, 2011.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Curriculum Mapping November Types of Curriculum Recommended – Standards as defined by experts in their field. Written – State standards, local goals.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
On SLOA (SLO Assessment). (after Munch) Will Lecture die? No…
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Preview Review of Issues for Pedagogy and the Profession Small-Group Discussions Whole-Class Discussions Tips for Oral Exams Oral Exam Practice English.
Student Services Learning Outcomes and Assessment Jim Haynes, De Anza College Sept. 17, 2010.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
N O The Standard Course Level Approach to Assessment of General Education DCC General Education Characteristics Writing Skills Oral Communications Analytical.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Exam and Portfolio 1.Negotiate Week 14 Exam 2.Exam Planning 3.Review Writing #3 4.Writing #3 Considerations 5.Writing #3 Criteria 6.Writing #3 Planning.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
Secondary Mathematics Professional Development October 9, 2014.
English Department Glendale Community College English Assessment Program Documents are available online on the Assessment Program webAssessment Program.
Elaine Baker, Baker Communications, Inc. Laura Hope, Chaffey College Kelley Karandjeff, RP Group Center for Student Success Contextualized Teaching &
Human Society and its Environment K-6 (HSIE) Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
IKU ROUNDTABLE MEETING FINAL DECLARATION May 28, 2011.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
Program Evaluation 13. Dental Public Health & Research: Contemporary Practice for the Dental Hygienist, 3/e Christine Nielsen Nathe Copyright ©2011 by.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
© 2013 TILA 1 Organizing telecollaboration projects TILA Teacher Training Teacher as researcher.
Design and Development 101 School of Education June 6, 2012.
RES 320 expert Expect Success/res320expertdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Lesson One Title: Course Outline Term 1 Mr. Farley Chavez Augustine.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Preview Assessment/Evaluation Primer Small-Group Discussions Whole-Class Discussions Mid-Semester Review Oral Exam Practice English 714 Ed Nagelhout 20 October 2010

Assessment/Evaluation Primer Not the same thing Can and should work hand-in-hand Absolutely, positively necessary (required) for effective development at all levels of post-secondary education Assessment and Evaluation

Assessment Process-based Improvement- Oriented Dynamic & Ongoing Evaluation Product-based Rank-Oriented End of Cycle Assessment and Evaluation Assessment/Evaluation Primer

Objectives Broad goals that describe what students and/or programs are supposed to achieve May be based upon needs of learners, academic unit or community, and/or society as a whole Normally not observed or measured Supported and defined by specific outcomes Evaluation-oriented Objectives and Outcomes Assessment/Evaluation Primer

Outcomes Statements of educational goals Concentrate traditionally on “knowing what” and “knowing how” Focus on observable and assessable actions Articulate expectations for teaching and learning Assessment-oriented Objectives and Outcomes Assessment/Evaluation Primer

Measures Quantitative Qualitative Benchmarks & Standards Success-Based Tools Process-Based Product-Based Reflection-Based Pre- and Post- Measures and Tools Assessment/Evaluation Primer

Consistency Reliability Replication Primarily Vertical Contextual Coherence Validity Synchronicity Horizontal & Vertical Parts-to-Wholes Consistency and Coherence Assessment/Evaluation Primer

Individual Course Program And More... (next week) Spaces for Action Assessment/Evaluation Primer

Small Group Discussion How did the authors situate their discussions contextually and/or historically?

Small Group Discussion How did the authors define assessment and/or evaluation? What are the implied binaries in this definition?

Small Group Discussion According to the articles, how might assessment and/or evaluation enhance teaching and/or learning?

Whole Class Discussions Describe how the articles address assessment and/or evaluation at the following levels: Individual Course Program Department University

Mid-Semester Review What we do well: 4.Organized 5.Interesting Readings 6.Support 1.Engagement 2.Open Discussions 3.Thoughtfulness

What we can improve: 1.Respect others’ opinions and who has the floor 2.Build on classmates’ ideas 3.Stay on task (in class and during the week) Mid-Semester Review

Oral Exam Practice

For Next Week Read Policy Documents on Assessment / Evaluation Continue Research for Topic #5 (due October 28) Continue Revising Writing #1 (due October 29) Draft Writing #2 First Draft (due November 10)