Why do we have storms in atmosphere?. Mid-atmosphere (500 hPa) DJF temperature map What are the features of the mean state on which storms grow?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The mathematics of weather and climate Dr Emily Shuckburgh.
Advertisements

F.Nimmo EART164 Spring 11 EART164: PLANETARY ATMOSPHERES Francis Nimmo.
The Quasi-Geostrophic Omega Equation (without friction and diabatic terms) We will now develop the Trenberth (1978)* modification to the QG Omega equation.
Chapter 6 Section 6.4 Goals: Look at vertical distribution of geostrophic wind. Identify thermal advection, and backing and veering winds. Look at an example.
Euro-Atlantic winter atmospheric response to the Tropical Atlantic Variability T. Losada (1), B. Rodríguez-Fonseca (1), J. García- Serrano (1) C.R. Mechoso.
Baroclinic Instability
Lackmann, Chapter 1: Basics of atmospheric motion.
Chapter 15 Global Circulation: Big Picture: Idealized View Ferrel cell Polar cell.
General Circulation and Kinetic Energy
Vorticity.
ATM S 542 Synoptic Meteorology Overview Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington, Seattle, USA Vertical structure of the.
LGM Eddy Diagnostics and Energetics from CCSM. Winter Composite of VT at 850.
Shear Instability Viewed as Interaction between Counter-propagating Waves John Methven, University of Reading Eyal Heifetz, Tel Aviv University Brian Hoskins,
Causes of Reduced North Atlantic Storm Activity in A Global Climate Model Simulation of the Last Glacial Maximum Aaron Donohoe, David Battisti, Camille.
MET 61 1 MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology MET 61 Introduction to Meteorology - Lecture 12 Midlatitude Cyclones Dr. Eugene Cordero San Jose State University.
A comparison of North Atlantic storms in HiGEM, HadGEM and ERA-40 Jennifer Catto – University of Reading Supervisors: Len Shaffrey Warwick Norton Acknowledgement:
General Circulation and Climate Zones Martin Visbeck DEES, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Linearly Stable Localized Atmospheric Features Inserted Into Nonlinear Cyclogenesis Richard Grotjahn, Daniel Hodyss, and Sheri Immel Atmospheric Science.
Generalized Surface Circulation
AOSS 321, Winter 2009 Earth Systems Dynamics Lecture 12 2/17/2009
Atms 4320 / 7320 – Lab 7 The Thermal Wind: Forecasting Problems and the Analysis of Fronts.
The General Circulation of the Atmosphere Tapio Schneider.
General Circulation of the Atmosphere René Garreaud
1.4 thermal wind balance ug plug (2) into (1) ug ug=0 y
AOSS 401, Fall 2006 Lecture 8 September 24, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
AOSS 401, Fall 2006 Lecture 19 October 26, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
General Circulation of the Atmosphere Lisa Goddard 19 September 2006.
MPO 674 Lecture 9 2/10/15. Hypotheses 1.Singular Vector structures are dependent on the barotropic instability condition in the initial vortex.
Basic dynamics  The equations of motion and continuity Scaling Hydrostatic relation Boussinesq approximation  Geostrophic balance in ocean’s interior.
1 Introduction to Isentropic Coordinates: a new view of mean meridional & eddy circulations Cristiana Stan School and Conference on “the General Circulation.
AOSS 401, Fall 2007 Lecture 27 November 28, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
PRECIPITATION PROCESSES AT FRONTS. POSSIBLE CONDITIONS PRESENT AT FRONT 1.Air ahead of the front is stable to all forms of instability Forcing mechanism.
ENSO impact to atmospheric circulation system for summer Motoaki Takekawa Tokyo Climate Center, Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) 1.
Rossby Wave Two-layer model with rigid lid η=0, p s ≠0 The pressures for the upper and lower layers are The perturbations are 
ADVENTURE IN SYNOPTIC DYNAMICS HISTORY
Thickness and Thermal Wind /aos101/wk12.html /aos101/wk12.html.
EVAT 554 OCEAN-ATMOSPHERE DYNAMICS FILTERING OF EQUATIONS FOR OCEAN LECTURE 10 (Reference: Peixoto & Oort, Chapter 3,8)
AOSS 401, Fall 2006 Lecture 9 September 26, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
Sound speed in air: C S ∝ [T] 1/2 T[K] C S [m/s] Conv. Div. tendency of pressure & density >0
The Linear and Non-linear Evolution Mechanism of Mesoscale Vortex Disturbances in Winter Over Western Japan Sea Yasumitsu MAEJIMA and Keita IGA (Ocean.
Basic dynamics ●The equations of motion and continuity Scaling
Applications of ‘IPV’ thinking for time-dependent dynamical processes (p. 202, Bluestein, 1993) The purpose of this discussion is to utilize ‘IPV’ thinking.
Synoptic Scale Balance Equations Using scale analysis (to identify the dominant ‘forces at work’) and manipulating the equations of motion we can arrive.
Level of No Motion (LNM)
Acceleration of high winds in idealised simulations of extratropical cyclones. Tim P. Slater Prof. David M. Schultz Prof. Geraint Vaughan 3 Jan 2012 UTC.
Jets Dynamics Weather Systems – Fall 2015 Outline: a.Why, when and where? b.What is a jet streak? c.Ageostrophic flow associated with jet streaks.
AOSS 401, Fall 2007 Lecture 21 October 31, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
Class 8. Oceans Figure: Ocean Depth (mean = 3.7 km)
Lecture 11 Picking up pieces from previous lectures + – result of surface force balance – scales of motion – mesoscale systems: sea breeze, land breeze.
AOSS 401, Fall 2006 Lecture 18 October 24, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
 p and  surfaces are parallel =>  =  (p) Given a barotropic and hydrostatic conditions, is geostrophic current. For a barotropic flow, we have and.
Matthew J. Hoffman CEAFM/Burgers Symposium May 8, 2009 Johns Hopkins University Courtesy NOAA/AVHRR Courtesy NASA Earth Observatory.
Chapter 9 Synoptic scale instability and cyclogenesis.
Atmospheric Dynamics Suzanne Gray (University of Reading) With thanks to Alan Gadian and Geraint Vaughan. Basic dynamical concepts.
AOSS 401, Fall 2006 Lecture 7 September 21, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
An altered atmospheric circulation regime during Last Glacial Maximum Camille Li, Aaron Donohoe David Battisti University of Washington.
For a barotropic flow, we have is geostrophic current.
The “Perfect Storms” of 1991:
Synoptic Scale Balance Equations
Instability Baroclinic instability (needs vertical shear,
For a barotropic flow, we have is geostrophic current.
Unit 6 – Part I: Geostrophy
O. Melnichenko1, N. Maximenko1, and H. Sasaki2
Gwendal Rivière12 Collaboration: Philippe Arbogast, Alain Joly
Midlatitude Weather Systems ATMS 301
Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB)
Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB)
Atlantic Jet: Stability of jet core
Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB)
Presentation transcript:

Why do we have storms in atmosphere?

Mid-atmosphere (500 hPa) DJF temperature map What are the features of the mean state on which storms grow?

Zonal thermal winds, and zonal mean cross sections

The DJF Atlantic Jet 10 m/s 20 m/s 30 m/s 0 m/s 40 m/s Sector zonal mean cross section Thermal wind map (250 hPa – 850 hPa)

Are atmospheric jets stable? Will perturbations to the jet immediately decay? Does the jet support instabilities? Analogy: Ball on top of a hill Answer #1: Perturbations to the jet seem to grow in magnitude; The jet is unstable. Answer #2: The jets are the time mean of the atmospheric flow; Something most kill the instability and return the flow to the time mean.

Velocity Shear The velocity shear between the two layers leads to an instability

Consider two different mean states with different velocity shears 5 m/s - 5 m/s - 10 m/s 10 m/s The systems have the same linear momentum But the system with more shear has more kinetic energy x y

Can the perturbations extract energy from the flow? Key concept: If the perturbations can decrease the velocity shear in the flow, the flow will have less energy This energy will go to the perturbations Therefore, in order for the perturbations to grow in shear flow, they must transport momentum against the shear of the flow

Lets put this in mathematical terms dU dy > 0 x y MEAN STATE Which perturbation stream function will grow? A B C

Which way do perturbations transport momentum When v’ is positive, u’ is zero When u’ is negative, u’ is zero u’v’ = 0 When v’ is positive, u’ is negative When v’ is negative, u’ is positive u’v’ < 0 u’v’ > 0 When v’ is positive, u’ is positive When v’ is negative, u’ is negative No momentum transport Negative momentum transport In the y direction Positive momentum transport In the y direction

Barotropic Conversion Mean State Shear Perturbation Stream Function Energy flow from mean state to the perturbation if : u’v’ dU dy < 0 And the initial perturbation will grow

Simple analogy: If we perturb a ball, lying on top topography from its resting position, will it continue to move away or will it return to the original position StableNeutrally stable

Ideal Flow and most unstable mode

Barotropic Normal Modes Linearize about a basic state with zonally invariant zonal velocity The equation becomes In the spatial domain, we require that the solution at each grid point grows linearly We assume a sinusoidal structure in x and discrete structure in y

Is this the form of instability which is most pronounced in the atmosphere 10 m/s 20 m/s 30 m/s 0 m/s 40 m/s Sector zonal mean cross section Thermal wind map (250 hPa – 850 hPa) There is much more vertical sheer than horizontal sheer in the jet This is a different form of instability because it is in hydrostatic and geostophic balance

Mid-atmosphere (500 hPa) DJF temperature map Can we extract energy from this?

How do Storms Grow? Perturbations (Storms) extract energy from the mean state via two different mechanisms Meridional Temperature Gradient (Baroclinic) Velocity Shear (Barotropic) High Energy Low Energy High Energy Low Energy Wind Vectors Isotherms Hot Cold Not too hot Not too cold

Atmospheric available potential energy- energy decrease by flattening isotherms Temperature Potential Temperature Equator Pole Height cold hot More Energy Less Energy

Simple model of baroclinic instability x y z Top layer Bottom layer MEAN STATE 2 layer model Uniform meridional temperature gradient No zonal variations warm cold FASTEST GROWING PERTURBATION Contours = perturbation stream function Colors = tendency in stream function Peturbations slant against the vertical shear This causes the energy to be converted to the eddies

The maximum growth of perturbations is:.31 f N -1 Eady Growth Rate Using values for the mid-latitude atmosphere, the perturbations will double in magnitude every 2 days, ocean = 20 days The horizontal spatial scale of the perturbations is 4000 km in the atmosphere, 400 km in the ocean Results of the simple model dU dz

Tilt of baroclinic modes

What happens to eddies as they are advected by the mean flow T=0, u’v’ dU =0 dY u’v’ dU >0 dY T=1

Layered eddy advection Upper Level mean flow Lower Level mean flow T= 0 days T= 2 daysT= 4 days v’t’ < 0 u’v’ = 0 v’t’ = 0 u’v’ > 0 dT dy dU dy dT dy dU dy

Atmospheric Energy Reservoirs Mean State Potential Energy Equator to Pole Temperature Gradient Mean State Kinetic Energy Large Scale Circulation Transient Eddy Potential Energy Transient thermal anomalies Transient Eddy Kinetic Energy Transient Circulations 10X > -v’t’ dT dy w’α’ N 2 u’v’ dU dy Baroclinic Growth Barotropic Decay

Lifecycles in simple models Chang and Orlanski, 1993

Baroclinic Instability explains the Locations of storm tracks Storm activity High pass height variance at 250 hPa 75 m m 2 Baroclinicity Eady Growth Rate.6 /day Hoskins, Valdes, 1989

Different Ways of defining a storm-track High Pass Eulerian variances High pass filter a field and take the variance z’ 2 (250 hPa) v’ 2 (300 hPa) slp’ 2 v’t’ (850 hPa) u’v’ (250 hPa) Chang, 2002

Alternative approach, Lagrangian tracking Dotted red lines = tracks Colored boxes = size

Defining a storm track, continued Track features (Lagrangian) and keep track of where they pass and how strong their central value is Sea level pressure features- track density.

The picture in 1888 Hinman, 1888

What seeds storms? Cyclogenesis density at 850 hPa. Courtesy of Sandra Penny

Seasonality of storminess Pacific Storminess V’ 2 (300 hPa) Atlantic Storminess V’ 2 (300 hPa) Pacific Baroclinicity U(500 hPa) – U(925 hPa) Atlantic storm activity follows the baroclinicity, but Pacific does not Chang, 2002

Mid-winter suppression of the Pacific storm track Courtesy Camille Li

Ideas on Midwinter Suppression DJF SON Weaker seeding in winter? From Sandra, again

Last Glacial Maximum Storm Tracks V’T’ throughout the troposphere (colors) and upper level jet (contours) during the winter LGM has less storm activity LGM - MODERN MODERN LGM

LGM baroclinicity LGM Modern LGM - MODERN LGM has more baroclinicity

Do faster growing storms mean bigger storms? Composite Storm size (m) Composite storm growth Rate (per day) LGM MODERN

Do faster growing storms mean bigger storms? LGM MODERN Probability distribution function of initial size, growth rate, and growth period for LGM and Modern

Predicted and observed storm size distribution for LGM and modern LGM MODERN Predicted from initial size and growth PDF Observed in model Bottom line, storm size not proportional to growth rate/instability in mean state

Baroclinic instability in the ocean