FIRST RESULTS from the CLEO-c DETECTOR The CLEO-c Physics Program The CLEO-c Detector The CLEO-c Run Plan Preliminary Results on the  (3770) Preliminary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of non BB Decays of Y(4S) to Y(1S)     and Y(2S)     Silvano Tosi Università & INFN Genova.
Advertisements

Bo XinRare D Semileptonic Decays 14/23/2006 Studies of Rare Semileptonic D Meson Decays  Introduction  Analysis Technique  Testing the procedure  Results.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Oct.,  Overview of the CLEO experiment  D and D S leptonic decays to  and  : Measurements of absolute branching fractions Measurements of absolute.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
CLEO-c and R measurements THE CLEO COLLABORATION Albany CalTech Carnegie Mellon Cornell Florida Harvard Illinois Kansas Minnesota Oklahoma Ohio State Pittsburgh.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Toru Iijima & Koji Ikado (Talk presented by T.I.) Nagoya University May 15, 2006 “Flavour in the LHC CERN The First Evidence of B   from Belle.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
Charm results from CLEOIII, CLEO-c Steven Dytman Univ. of Pittsburgh OUTLINE: 1.Introduction to CLEO 2.D 3-body decays 3.Semileptonic D decay K-K- --
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
1 Charm Decays at Threshold Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration CKM 2005 Workshop on the Unitarity.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, (2006) B Reconstruction.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,
Prelude for practice talk:  I have outdated numbers for the D Hadronic BR analysis  I have the papers and a week so will fix soon.  Tables grabbed from.
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Bo XinD  K/π e + and Vcs and Vcd at CLEO-c 12/20/2008 Study of and measurement of V cs and V cd at CLEO-c Study of D  K/πe + and measurement of V cs.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Measurement of B (  (nS)   +   ) at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration 1 st Meeting of the APS.
1 CLEO-c Measurements of Purely Leptonic Decays of Charmed Mesons & other Wonders Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Moriond QCD, Mar., 2007, S.Uehara 1 New Results on Two-Photon Physics from Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
 (3770) and D physics at BESII Ma HaiLong [For BES Collaboration] CCAST & IHEP 中国物理学会 2006 年秋季会议(北京)
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
 c Physics at the Energy Threshold John Yelton U. of Florida CLEO experiment A review of what we know, and what we do not know, about the  c, with an.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Semileptonic D Decays from CLEO and BELLE Yongsheng Gao Southern Methodist University (CLEO Collaboration) ICHEP04, Beijing, Aug. 16 ─ 23, 2004.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
1 Recent results on  (3770) production & decays from BES/BEPC Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R.
Recent results on D meson decays from BES 陈江川 (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing China 高能物理学会第七届全国会员代表大会暨学术年会 广西 桂林 2006.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Extract the partial rates We can make fits to the partial decay rates to extract (1) normalization f + (0)|V cx | (2) Form factor shape parameters r 1.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
1 First Results from CLEO-c Thomas Coan CLEO-c Physics Program D +  +  Decays Absolute Br(D  hadrons) e + e -   (DD) Southern Methodist University.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
Steven Blusk, Syracuse UniversityRecontres de Moriond, March Measurements of Hadronic, Semileptonic and Leptonic Decays of D Mesons at E cm =3.77.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
Measurement of the total hadronic cross-section at e+e- machines I. Logashenko Boston University (Boston, USA) Budker Institure of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk,
Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.
Semileptonic and Leptonic D0, D+, and Ds+ Decays at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO Collaboration XLIVth Rencontres de Moriond, QCD.
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
Presentation transcript:

FIRST RESULTS from the CLEO-c DETECTOR The CLEO-c Physics Program The CLEO-c Detector The CLEO-c Run Plan Preliminary Results on the  (3770) Preliminary Results on D decays at threshold Conclusions John Yelton University of Florida Gainesville, FL

The CLEO-c Physics Program The CLEO collaboration: Carleton, Carnegie Mellon, Cornell, Florida, George Mason, Illinois, Kansas, Northwestern, Minnesota, Pittsburgh, Puerto Rico, Purdue, Rochester, RPI, SMU, Syracuse, Vanderbilt and Wayne State. Charm Measurements : Precise charm absolute branching ratio measurements Hadronic decays: measure strong phases Leptonic decays: decay constants f D and f D s Semi-leptonic decays: form factors V cs, V cd QCD Studies Precise measurements of quarkonia spectroscopy Searches for glue-rich exotic states Studies Beyond the Standard Model D-mixing, CP violation, rare D decays

“ZD” – Inner Drift Chamber 6 stereo layers:  r=5.3 cm – 10.5 cm  o stereo angle  |cos  < , 10 mm cells 1% X 0,.8mm Al inner tube 60:40 Helium-Propane 20  m Au-W sense wires 110  m Au-Al field wires Outer Al-mylar skin

CLEO-c Run Plan Main change for CESR to become CESR-c is the installation of 12 wigglers (6 completed, 6 more being installed). __________________________________________________ Spring and Fall 2004, we hope for 3 fb -1 at and around the  (3770). This corresponds to ~18,000,000 decays, and maybe 3,600,000 tagged D decays (310 x MARKIII, 170xBES) ____________________________________________________ Fall 2005, E=4140 MeV, we hope for 3 fb -1 giving 1,500,000 D s D s events, 300,000 tagged D s decays (480 x MARK III, 130 x BES) ___________________________________________________ Fall 2006 we may run at E=3100 MeV, 1 fb -1, giving 1,000,000,000 J/  decays (170 x MARKIII, 20 x BES II) Run plan subject to change, in particular it is dependent on the physics results from the early running.

CLEO-c Run Plan E beam (GeV) 6 CESR Wigglers installed Summer 2003 Winter 2003 took data on the  (3770),  (2S), and continuum h ~20 pb -1 continuum a ~3 pb -1  (2s) ~55 pb -1  (3770) Cross-Section Log Scale 6 Wiggler Running L ~ 5x10 31 cm -2 s -1 On target! Design Luminosity, 12 Wigglers, ~3x10 32 cm -2 s -1

Physics at the  (3770) The  (3770) is known to decay into mesons. The total cross section at E=3.77 GeV has been measured to be 26.2+/-1.0 nb (preliminary), this includes a large, and not well understood continuum component, the radiative tail of the  (2S),,and maybe some other processes as yet unexplored. Decays of the  (2S), and thus the nature of the  (2S) events at E=3770 are being investigated (see next talk). The continuum below the  (2S) is also being studied. To know how many D’s we will reconstruct, we need to know at E=3.77 GeV.

Measurement of The value of cross section is required to make predictions of the sensitivity of charm threshold e + e - experiments such as CLEO-c and BESII. Mark III (PRL (1988) with 9.4 pb -1 measured the observed cross section at GeV to be Recently BES II (Moriond '04) using 17 pb -1 measured In the BES measurement the cross section was determined using a single tag method, where the charm branching fraction to the final state under study is taken from the PDG. Here, we use a double tag method to find a value of independent of any branching fraction measurement.

General Analysis Techniques Good K-  separation by dE/dx up to 600 MeV/c For p > 600 MeV/c, RICH combined with dE/dx. K 0 s are found from two tracks with a displaced vertex.  0 ’s found from 2 gammas in the CsI To find D’s from the  (3770), we first calculate the E(D) and compare with the beam energy. If E(D)=E beam then we calculate the beam constrained mass

Measurement of at 3770 e+e+ ee K+K+  ++ K-K- Single tagged D Double tagged D e+e+ ee K+K+  ( independent on B and  in the approximation )

D 0  K  - in DD Monte Carlo M bc (GeV )  E(GeV) MC D 0 →K - π +  = 6.4 MeV MC D 0 →K - π +  = 1.6 MeV

D 0 single tag -Data M bc (GeV)  E(GeV) Luminosity = 55.81pb -1 Data D 0 →K - π +  =1.7 MeV S =9460 Require –40 MeV <  E < 30 MeV Data D 0 →K - π +  =8.2 MeV

Double Tag Monte Carlo M 1 (GeV) We search for events where the AND We use a scatter plot of two beam constrained masses to measure the double tag efficiency. MC Double tag  2 =34.8% M 2 (GeV) We find the double tag efficiency is the square of single tag efficiency with an uncertainty of 3% for

D 0 Double Tags – Data DATA Double tag Signal =102±11  (ee →D 0 D 0 )=(3.93  0.42(stat)  0.23(syst)) nb M 1 (GeV) M 2 (GeV)

D + Single Tags -Data M bc (GeV )  E(GeV) Search for delE cut :  E (-31MeV,25MeV) Data D - →K - π + π + S=13950 ±132 Data D - →K - π + π +

D + Double Tags - Data  (e + e - →D + D - )=(2.58  0.15(stat)  0.16(syst))nb Double tags Signal=338 ±19 Use the Decays M 1 (GeV) M 2 (GeV)

Summary for  (DD) Our result, which is independent of charm branching ratios, is in agreement with the BES. The BES experiment used a single tag method which depends on the PDG values for the branching fractions. The largest systematic uncertainty arises from the luminosity measurement All CLEO-c numbers are preliminary!  (D + D - )(nb) (stat.err)(sys.err)  (D 0 D 0 )(nb) (stat.err)(sys.err)  (DD) (nb) (stat.err)(sys.err)  (D + D - )/  (D 0 D 0 ) CLEO-c 2.58  0.15   0.42   0.44  BES 2.52  0.07   0.09   0.11  MARK III 2.1   

D-Tagging An initial D state can be tagged by the “other-side” D Several good tagging decay modes  Many large branching fractions  High reconstruction efficiency Net tagging efficiency ~20% Expectations from full dataset: 3,600,000 D’s Tagging can be used to find absolute branching fractions of not only hadronic decays, but semi-leptonic and even purely leptonic decays.

Measurement of In the decay of a scalar meson, M, into a lepton plus neutrino, the width is given by: We know the D + lifetime, thus a measurement of this branching fraction can give a model-free measurement of f D, This is of vital check of LQCD, and can be used to extrapolate to f B, which can enhance our understanding of B decays.

4 More D + Modes K s  + ~ 1800 events K s  +  +  0 ~ 4300 events K s  +  0 ~ 2800 events K s  +  -  + ~ 3700 events

Reconstruct one of the two D’s in a hadronic decay channel. Make use of the neutrino MM 2 observable to separate signal and background: Muon candidate consistent with minimum ionizing particle, deposited energy < 0.4 GeV in the CsI. (Too low a momentum for the muon detector). Overview of the technique

MM 2 Distribution Signal region K0p-K0p- Candidates/0.01 GeV 2 MC DATA Preliminary! ~55 pb -1 Signal Region Data Preliminary Signal Region K0K0

Backgrounds D  Background: D +   +  0 : Used max. shower energy cut. D +  K 0  + : No reconstructed K 0. D +   0  + : negligibly small, higher MM 2. D +   + : negligibly small, higher MM 2. D 0 D 0 Background: D 0 D 0 can look like D + D - : ex: D 0  K -  +, D 0   +  - Continuum Background Estimated backgrounds from MC #Tagsp+p0p+p0 K0 p+K0 p+ D0D0D0D0 Cont      0.17

Signal 9 events within 2  (-0.056<MM 2 <0.056 GeV 2 ) 0.67  0.24 estimated background events. SIGNIFICANT SIGNAL! Reconstruction efficiency ~70% B = Signal / (Tags x Efficiency) PRELIMINARY! Statistically Limited! Soon we will have 60 x the dataset! Systematic errors on B estimated to be: a)  detection efficiency (5%) b) background, taken as 100% uncertainty (7.4%) c) D + sample size (1%)

Inclusive Electron Spectrum from D Semi-Leptonic Decays Electron identification, optimized by studying radiative Bhabha events, a combination of E/p in the CsI calorimeter, dE/dx and RICH information. Object: To make improved measurements of the shape of the lepton spectra in This, leads to measurements of the semi-leptonic branching fractions.

D Meson Samples  (3770) DD D 0 D 0 tagged D + D - D + tagged X e -  Charge conjugate mode K -      K- K-  Only use one mode for each state now, more will be added later

Statistical Uncertainty ~0.5% PDG: BR = (6.75  0.29)% Statistical Uncertainty ~ 0.6% PDG: BR = (17.2  1.9)% DATA Electron Momentum (GeV/c) from D  Electron Momentum (GeV/c) from D  Number Of event /(50MeV/c ) DATA The Corrected Electron Spectra Systematic Uncertainties not Fully Evaluated The dataset should increase by a factor of 60! PRELIMINARY!

Exclusive Semi-Leptonic Decays of D’s Measurements of the absolute branching fractions for semi-leptonic decays in the D system provide: a) A stringent test of theoretical form factor models b) Input calibration of LQCD c) Direct Measurements of V cs and V cd d) Input of semi-leptonic form factor models in the B system, and thus V ub Method a) Reconstruct as many D’s as possible (62K D 0 and 30K D + Tags) b) Identify the remaining tracks in the event and define the parameter U=E miss -|P miss | and look for a peak at zero.

Excess of around 100 events in data ALL PRELIMINARY! MC (prelim) Data (prelim)

Excess of around 1.1K events ALL PRELIMINARY! MC (prelim) Data (prelim)

ALL PRELIMINARY! Other D 0 Semileptonic Modes Excess ~ 80 events Excess ~120 events. Excess ~ 25 events First Observation of this Mode! Data (prelim) Data (prelim) Data (prelim) Signals are inclusive of non-resonant contributions

D + Semileptonic Modes (1) Excess of around 400 events Excess of around 300 events The nonresonant contribution is included in the yield Excess of around 50 events ALL PRELIMINARY! Data (prelim) Data (prelim) Data (prelim)

D + semileptonic modes (2) Excess of around 35 signal events The nonresonant contribution is included in the yield A Hint of a Signal ALL PRELIMINARY! Data (prelim) Data (prelim)

The CLEO-c Reach for Semi-Leptonics The 55/pb data sample collected in fall-2003/winter-2004 by the CLEO-c detector already allows measurements of BRs for most or all of the modes considered today with statistical uncertainties comparable or smaller than those in PDG CLEO-c is expected to collect 60 times more (~3/fb) data on  (3770) as well as ~3/fb of data at E cm ~ 4140 MeV for studies of D s mesons in the coming 2 years. The CLEO-c data will dramatically improve knowledge of the BRs of charm mesons:

Summary and Conclusions The CLEO-c Detector is working well, and has accumulated ~55fb -1 at the  (3770), together with data at the  (2S) and continuum below the  (2S) With this dataset, we have new preliminary results for the cross section at the  (3770) of  (D + D - ) = 2.58  0.15  0.16 nb and  (D 0 D 0 ) = 3.93  0.42  0.23 nb We have new preliminary results for the branching fraction of the purely leptonic mode of We hope to collect 60 times more data on the  (3770) and then same amount of data at E cm ~ 4140 MeV. These data samples will play an extremely important role in particle physics, making the definitive measurements of charm hadronic, semi-leptonic and leptonic decays. These will validate and calibrate data for LQCD, and increase the physics potential of B-factories and other experiments. CLEO-c running resumes in September.