Gravity in the Fernley & Hazen Flat Areas Geol 492/692 Spring 2005 Melissa Edwards, Harmony Farnsworth, and Rich Redd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Problem 1 The corrections can be larger than the anomaly Stat.Time T Dist. (m) Elev. (m) Reading (dial units) Base reading at time T Drift corr’d anom.
Advertisements

Gravity Janice Kukuk Rob Ghigieri Ross Whitmore
The general equation for gravity anomaly is: where:  is the gravitational constant  is the density contrast r is the distance to the observation point.
Instruments used in gravity prospecting
Geol 319: Important Dates Monday, Oct 1 st – problem set #3 due (today, by end of the day) Wednesday, Oct 3 rd – last magnetics lecture Wednesday afternoon.
Gravity of the Earth Gravitational acceleration a distance r from a sphere of density ρ is This result is independent of radial density variations.
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS How using a “PATROL WORKSHEET” for a predefined Patrol Area will improve your report accuracy. Prepared by the First Northern Navigation.
LaCoste-Romberg.
Applied Geophysics What is it
Nyack - Geophysical Characterization Problem - determine subsurface parameters, relevant to fluid flow and basin evolution, from non-invasive observations.
Gravity Theory Measurement practices –Relative –Closed loops Corrections –Drift –Free Air –Bouguer –Terrain Interpretation –Modeling.
Geology 492/692 Field Project Hoping to put Fernley and Hazen on the Fault Map ReMi Data.
Airborne Gravity Processing 101 Sandra Preaux
GPS Survey Equipment GPS Trimble R6 or R8 Legs+Bipod Controller* Base Station or VRS Competencies #1-5.
GRAVITY. EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD 978 Gals 983 Gals 1 Gal = 1 cm/sec² ELLIPSOID North-South change ~1 mGals/km ~1.5 mGals/mile ~1  Gals/m ~.3  Gals/ft.
GRAVITY SURVEY (ii) -Gravity Data Correction-
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
Model of the theoretical gravity Normal gravity Elevation effect The effect of material beneath the station - the plate effect Topographic or terrain effect.
GPH 692 South Lake Tahoe Field Exercise 2012 GPS Work.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
Practical issues (This lecture is based largely on: The shape of the gravity anomaly depends not on the absolute.
Magnetic Fields in Wires. Strength of Magnetic Field Strength of the magnetic field produced by a current carrying wire is directly proportional to the.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
GG 450 Lecture 3 1/22/08 Gravity Corrections Potential Geoid.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h. wilson Department of Geology.
Exploration and Environmental Geophysics
Gravity 4 Gravity Modeling.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Gravity surveys Annie, Sue, Betsy. Regional location Bango Road canal bank V-line canal bank Reno Highway Carson Highway.
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h. wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h. wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
GRAVITY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION SCHURZ, NV BY: DREW JONES AND MARLON RAMOS GPH 492/692, SPRING 2013.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
An E-W gravity profile across the La Bajada fault Zone in the Rio Grande Rift, North Central New Mexico Rajesh Goteti University of Rochester SAGE 2007.
Field Geophysics – Lecture 3
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
Potential Fields Methods Potential Fields A potential field is  a field in which the magnitude and direction (vector) of the measurement depends on the.
Exploration Geophysics Indoors Rob Sternberg Dept. of Earth and Environment Franklin & Marshall College Teaching Structural Geology, Geophysics, and Tectonics.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
SIO 226: Introduction to Marine Geophysics Gravity
Gravity Summary In first approximation we can chose for the shape of the Earth an ellipsoid of rotation defined essentially by the degree n=2 m=0 of the.
Variation of G with latitude
Field Geophysics – Lecture 2 1)Brief introduction to earthquakes in ECSZ 2)Introduction to gravity – measurement and interpretation Reading: Chapter.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Lecture 4 January 24, 2008 Geoid, Global gravity, isostacy, potential, field methods.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h. wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Last Time: Gravity Measurements may be surface-based (i.e., taken with instruments placed on the ground surface) or space-based ; absolute or relative.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 22 Mar 2016 Lab 6 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Gravity Start by discussing lab 3 assignment & your assignment for two weeks from.
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 21 Mar 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Wed 23 Mar: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Gravity Reduction For terrestrial.
GRAVITY.
Gravity Data Reduction
Gravity 3.
Gravity II: Gravity anomaly due to a simple-shape buried body
Gravity Methods (II) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Difference between GPS ellipsoid and sea level heights (N)
GRAVITY in Yosemite Valley
Gravity Interpretation
Two major types of gravimeters
Gravity of the Reno Basin
Gravity Theory Measurement practices Corrections Interpretation
Outline Construction of gravity and magnetic models Reference models
Presentation transcript:

Gravity in the Fernley & Hazen Flat Areas Geol 492/692 Spring 2005 Melissa Edwards, Harmony Farnsworth, and Rich Redd

Locations—Fernley

Locations—Hazen

Methods—Gravimeter Used a LaCoste & Romberg Model G Gravimeter to measure gravity at each location –Before each trip to the field a base station measurement was taken at UNR outside of SEM (Base 1) –At both the Fernley and Hazen sites a base station was established and a gravity measurement was taken the morning, afternoon, and the evening of each trip (Base 2 & Base 3) –The base station gravity measurements were all within 0.5 mGals of each other, indicating the gravimeter was working correctly A calibration correction for the reading for the gravimeter was made using one of the following formulas (depending on what the gravity reading was): –For 3100 reading: ((Gravimeter reading-3100)* ) –For 3200 reading: ((Gravimeter reading-3200)*1.0226)

Methods—Trimble Used a Trimble XT GPS to measure elevation and lat/long at every location –Instrument was placed 10 ft or less away from the spot where a gravity reading was taken, but at the same elevation level –Instrument was allowed to collect GPS points for 10 minutes or 120 points, which ever came first Data –Downloaded using GPS Pathfinder Office 3.0 –Used the Reno airport as the reference for corrections to all the GPS data collected from the Trimble since it had data for all the days we recorded. –Horizontal error at least 6 cm. –68% confident elevation is within 2 meters Amounts to a 0.3 to 0.6 mGal error in the Bouguer calculations

Methods—Terrain Corrections Estimations were made of the elevation difference b/w the place where the gravity reading was taken and the surrounding topography –For zone B (6.56’-54.6’), 4 directions –For zone C (54.6’-175’), 6 directions With these values a chart was used to find the dgr values for each direction & all of these values were added to obtain the total terrain correction value Zone B 4 sectors 6.56’-54.6’ +/- zd gr Zone C 6 sectors 54.6’-175’ +/- zd gr

Methods—Bouguer Correction Bouguer anomaly value calculations were made using the gravity readings from the gravimeter, the terrain corrections, the elevation/lat/long data downloaded from the Trimble, and the following formulas: –Free Air Correction = * elevation –Bouguer Correction = *density (used 2.67) * elevation –Theoretical Gravity = * (1 + ( * sin 2 (latitude)) – ( * sin 2 (2 * latitude)) –Bouguer Anomaly = (Observed Gravity + Free Air Correction – Bouguer Correction) – Theoretical Gravity

Methods & Results—Fernley Line 1 Gravimeter points were spaced 100 meters apart Points S1-S19 were surveyed (plus Base 1 & Base 2)

Methods & Results—Fernley Line 2 Gravimeter points spaced 100 meters apart Points S201-S221 were surveyed (plus Base 1 & Base 2) Poor satellite coverage for S204 & S205 with the Trimble

Methods & Results—Hazen Gravimeter points were spaced 100 meters apart –S128 was spaced 150 meters form S127 –S131 was spaced 330 meters from S130 Points S100-S131 were surveyed Poor satellite coverage for S121 & S122 with the Trimble

Modeling—Bouguer Slab Depths  Where Δg= The computed Ganom value from grav2d  Δρ= -.35  The value is a constant Bouguer Slab Equation (Telford et. Al.1990)

Fernley 1 Blue lines indicate regional stresses. Red lines indicate shearing within the flower structure

Fernley Line 1

Fernley 2

Hazen

The End... Questions?