A Search for the SM Higgs Boson by Burt DeWilde Kalamazoo College Against all odds
The Standard Model (again) Particles grouped into generations by mass Higgs field with non- zero VEV causes EWSB -> mass Higgs boson is the particle associated with this field
The Tevatron
The D0 Detector
Run I vs. Run II Increase in center-of- mass energy->1.96TeV Increase in number of bunches, decrease in spacing of bunches Much higher luminosity (Hopefully) enough for Higgs boson detection
Higgs Production Modes
Higgs Decay Modes bb channel dominant up to M=135GeV Z boson decays into two muons less frequent, but also cleaner channel
Neural Network Structure
NN Variables: Signal, Background, and Data
Training Method Comparison
Signal Significance vs. Training Method
Optimal # of Epochs for # of Hidden Neurons
Signal Significance vs. Optimal # of Neurons/Epochs
Signal Significance vs. NN Weighting Scheme
Invariant Mass Distributions for Potential Higgs Masses
Signal Significance vs. Invariant Mass Base Cut
NN Results for Higgs M=105GeV
NN Results for Higgs M=115GeV
NN Results for Higgs M=125GeV
NN Results for Higgs M=135GeV
NN Results for Higgs M=145GeV
NN Results for Higgs M=155GeV
Importance of the Results NN achieves better signal/background discrimination than cuts on Mjj alone NN analysis gives better signal significance than conventional analysis Integrated luminosity required for Higgs detection reduced 40-70% Not too shabby
Acknowledgements Andy Haas, for meaning, direction, and data The Nevis crew, for troubleshooting and much-needed moral support The National Science Foundation, for research experience and money